Pandas: apply list of functions on columns, one function per column

Pandas: apply list of functions on columns, one function per column - python-3.x

Setting: for a dataframe with 10 columns I have a list of 10 functions which I wish to apply in a function1(column1), function2(column2), ..., function10(column10) fashion. I have looked into pandas.DataFrame.apply and pandas.DataFrame.transform but they seem to broadcast and apply each function on all possible columns.

IIUC, with zip and a for loop:
Example
def function1(x):
return x + 1
def function2(x):
return x * 2
def function3(x):
return x**2
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2, 3], 'B': [1, 2, 3], 'C': [1, 2, 3]})
functions = [function1, function2, function3]
print(df)
# A B C
# 0 1 1 1
# 1 2 2 2
# 2 3 3 3
for col, func in zip(df, functions):
df[col] = df[col].apply(func)
print(df)
# A B C
# 0 2 2 1
# 1 3 4 4
# 2 4 6 9

You could do something like:
# list containing functions
fun_list = []
# assume df is your dataframe
for i, fun in enumerate(fun_list):
df.iloc[:,i] = fun(df.iloc[:,i])

You can probably try to map your N functions to each row by using a lambda containing a Series with your operations, check the following code:
import pandas as pd
matrix = [(22, 34, 23), (33, 31, 11), (44, 16, 21), (55, 32, 22), (66, 33, 27),
(77, 35, 11)]
df = pd.DataFrame(matrix, columns=list('xyz'), index=list('abcdef'))
Will produce:
x y z
a 22 34 23
b 33 31 11
c 44 16 21
d 55 32 22
e 66 33 27
f 77 35 11
and then:
res_df = df.apply(lambda row: pd.Series([row[0] + 1, row[1] + 2, row[2] + 3]), axis=1)
will give you:
0 1 2
a 23 36 26
b 34 33 14
c 45 18 24
d 56 34 25
e 67 35 30
f 78 37 14

You can simply apply to specific column
df['x'] = df['X'].apply(lambda x: x*2)

Similar to #Chris Adams's answer but makes a copy of the dataframe using dictionary comprehension and zip.
def function1(x):
return x + 1
def function2(x):
return x * 2
def function3(x):
return x**2
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2, 3], 'B': [1, 2, 3], 'C': [1, 2, 3]})
functions = [function1, function2, function3]
print(df)
# A B C
# 0 1 1 1
# 1 2 2 2
# 2 3 3 3
df_2 = pd.DataFrame({col: func(df[col]) for col, func in zip(df, functions)})
print(df_2)
# A B C
# 0 2 2 1
# 1 3 4 4
# 2 4 6 9

Related

Pandas DataFrame: Same operation on multiple sets of columns

I want to do the same operation on multiple sets of columns of a DataFrame.
Since "for-loops" are frowned upon I'm searching for a decent alternative.
An example:
df = pd.DataFrame({
'a': [1, 11, 111],
'b': [222, 22, 2],
'a_x': [10, 80, 30],
'b_x': [20, 20, 60],
})
This is a simple for-loop approach. It's short and well readable.
cols = ['a', 'b']
for col in cols:
df[f'{col}_res'] = df[[col, f'{col}_x']].min(axis=1)
a b a_x b_x a_res b_res
0 1 222 10 20 1 20
1 11 22 80 20 11 20
2 111 2 30 60 30 2
This is an alternative (w/o for-loop), but I feel that the additional complexity is not really for the better.
cols = ['a', 'b']
def res_df(df, col, name):
res = pd.Series(
df[[col, f'{col}_x']].min(axis=1), index=df.index, name=name)
return res
res = [res_df(df, col, f'{col}_res') for col in cols]
df = pd.concat([df, pd.concat(res, axis=1)], axis=1)
Does anyone have a better/more pythonic solution?
Thanks!
UPDATE 1
Inspired by the proposal from mozway I find the following solution quite appealing.
Imho it's short, readable and generic, since the particular operation can be swapped into a function and the list comprehension applies the function to the given sets of columns.
def operation(s1, s2):
# fill in any operation on pandas series'
# e.g. res = s1 * s2 / (s1 + s2)
res = np.minimum(s1, s2)
return res
df = df.join(
[operation(df[f'{col}'], df[f'{col}_x']).rename(f'{col}_res') for col in cols]
)

You can use numpy.minimum after setting the arrays to identical column names:
cols = ['a', 'b']
cols2 = [f'{x}_x' for x in cols]
df = df.join(np.minimum(df[cols],
df[cols2].set_axis(cols, axis=1))
.add_suffix('_res'))
output:
a b a_x b_x a_res b_res
0 1 222 10 20 1 20
1 11 22 80 20 11 20
2 111 2 30 60 30 2
or, using rename as suggested in the other answer:
cols = ['a', 'b']
cols2 = {f'{x}_x': x for x in cols}
df = df.join(np.minimum(df[cols],
df[list(cols2)].rename(columns=cols2))
.add_suffix('_res'))

One idea is rename columns names by dictionary, select columns by list cols and then group by columns names with aggregate min, sum, max or use custom function:
cols = ['a', 'b']
suffix = '_x'
d = {f'{x}{suffix}':x for x in cols}
print (d)
{'a_x': 'a', 'b_x': 'b'}
print (df.rename(columns=d)[cols])
a a b b
0 1 10 222 20
1 11 80 22 20
2 111 30 2 60
df1 = df.rename(columns=d)[cols].groupby(axis=1,level=0).min().add_suffix('_res')
print (df1)
a_res b_res
0 1 20
1 11 20
2 30 2
Last add to original DataFrame:
df = df.join(df1)
print (df)
a b a_x b_x a_res b_res
0 1 222 10 20 1 20
1 11 22 80 20 11 20
2 111 2 30 60 30 2

Create a new dataframe from list of strings from each row of dataframe [duplicate]

I have the following DataFrame where one of the columns is an object (list type cell):
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
Output:
A B
0 1 [1, 2]
1 2 [1, 2]
My expected output is:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
3 2 1
4 2 2
What should I do to achieve this?
Related question
Pandas column of lists, create a row for each list element
Good question and answer but only handle one column with list(In my answer the self-def function will work for multiple columns, also the accepted answer is use the most time consuming apply , which is not recommended, check more info When should I (not) want to use pandas apply() in my code?)

I know object dtype columns makes the data hard to convert with pandas functions. When I receive data like this, the first thing that came to mind was to "flatten" or unnest the columns.
I am using pandas and Python functions for this type of question. If you are worried about the speed of the above solutions, check out user3483203's answer, since it's using numpy and most of the time numpy is faster. I recommend Cython or numba if speed matters.
Method 0 [pandas >= 0.25]
Starting from pandas 0.25, if you only need to explode one column, you can use the pandas.DataFrame.explode function:
df.explode('B')
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
0 2 1
1 2 2
Given a dataframe with an empty list or a NaN in the column. An empty list will not cause an issue, but a NaN will need to be filled with a list
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2, 3, 4],'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2], [], np.nan]})
df.B = df.B.fillna({i: [] for i in df.index}) # replace NaN with []
df.explode('B')
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
2 3 NaN
3 4 NaN
Method 1
apply + pd.Series (easy to understand but in terms of performance not recommended . )
df.set_index('A').B.apply(pd.Series).stack().reset_index(level=0).rename(columns={0:'B'})
Out[463]:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
0 2 1
1 2 2
Method 2
Using repeat with DataFrame constructor , re-create your dataframe (good at performance, not good at multiple columns )
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':df.A.repeat(df.B.str.len()),'B':np.concatenate(df.B.values)})
df
Out[465]:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
Method 2.1
for example besides A we have A.1 .....A.n. If we still use the method(Method 2) above it is hard for us to re-create the columns one by one .
Solution : join or merge with the index after 'unnest' the single columns
s=pd.DataFrame({'B':np.concatenate(df.B.values)},index=df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len()))
s.join(df.drop('B',1),how='left')
Out[477]:
B A
0 1 1
0 2 1
1 1 2
1 2 2
If you need the column order exactly the same as before, add reindex at the end.
s.join(df.drop('B',1),how='left').reindex(columns=df.columns)
Method 3
recreate the list
pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in df.values for z in y],columns=df.columns)
Out[488]:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
If more than two columns, use
s=pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in zip(df.index,df.B) for z in y])
s.merge(df,left_on=0,right_index=True)
Out[491]:
0 1 A B
0 0 1 1 [1, 2]
1 0 2 1 [1, 2]
2 1 1 2 [1, 2]
3 1 2 2 [1, 2]
Method 4
using reindex or loc
df.reindex(df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len())).assign(B=np.concatenate(df.B.values))
Out[554]:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
#df.loc[df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len())].assign(B=np.concatenate(df.B.values))
Method 5
when the list only contains unique values:
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[3,4]]})
from collections import ChainMap
d = dict(ChainMap(*map(dict.fromkeys, df['B'], df['A'])))
pd.DataFrame(list(d.items()),columns=df.columns[::-1])
Out[574]:
B A
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 3 2
3 4 2
Method 6
using numpy for high performance:
newvalues=np.dstack((np.repeat(df.A.values,list(map(len,df.B.values))),np.concatenate(df.B.values)))
pd.DataFrame(data=newvalues[0],columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Method 7
using base function itertools cycle and chain: Pure python solution just for fun
from itertools import cycle,chain
l=df.values.tolist()
l1=[list(zip([x[0]], cycle(x[1])) if len([x[0]]) > len(x[1]) else list(zip(cycle([x[0]]), x[1]))) for x in l]
pd.DataFrame(list(chain.from_iterable(l1)),columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Generalizing to multiple columns
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[3,4]],'C':[[1,2],[3,4]]})
df
Out[592]:
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4]
Self-def function:
def unnesting(df, explode):
idx = df.index.repeat(df[explode[0]].str.len())
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame({x: np.concatenate(df[x].values)}) for x in explode], axis=1)
df1.index = idx
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
unnesting(df,['B','C'])
Out[609]:
B C A
0 1 1 1
0 2 2 1
1 3 3 2
1 4 4 2
Column-wise Unnesting
All above method is talking about the vertical unnesting and explode , If you do need expend the list horizontal, Check with pd.DataFrame constructor
df.join(pd.DataFrame(df.B.tolist(),index=df.index).add_prefix('B_'))
Out[33]:
A B C B_0 B_1
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2] 1 2
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4] 3 4
Updated function
def unnesting(df, explode, axis):
if axis==1:
idx = df.index.repeat(df[explode[0]].str.len())
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame({x: np.concatenate(df[x].values)}) for x in explode], axis=1)
df1.index = idx
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
else :
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame(df[x].tolist(), index=df.index).add_prefix(x) for x in explode], axis=1)
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
Test Output
unnesting(df, ['B','C'], axis=0)
Out[36]:
B0 B1 C0 C1 A
0 1 2 1 2 1
1 3 4 3 4 2
Update 2021-02-17 with original explode function
def unnesting(df, explode, axis):
if axis==1:
df1 = pd.concat([df[x].explode() for x in explode], axis=1)
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
else :
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame(df[x].tolist(), index=df.index).add_prefix(x) for x in explode], axis=1)
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')

Option 1
If all of the sublists in the other column are the same length, numpy can be an efficient option here:
vals = np.array(df.B.values.tolist())
a = np.repeat(df.A, vals.shape[1])
pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, vals.ravel())), columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Option 2
If the sublists have different length, you need an additional step:
vals = df.B.values.tolist()
rs = [len(r) for r in vals]
a = np.repeat(df.A, rs)
pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, np.concatenate(vals))), columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Option 3
I took a shot at generalizing this to work to flatten N columns and tile M columns, I'll work later on making it more efficient:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1,2,3], 'B': [[1,2], [1,2,3], [1]],
'C': [[1,2,3], [1,2], [1,2]], 'D': ['A', 'B', 'C']})
A B C D
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] A
1 2 [1, 2, 3] [1, 2] B
2 3 [1] [1, 2] C
def unnest(df, tile, explode):
vals = df[explode].sum(1)
rs = [len(r) for r in vals]
a = np.repeat(df[tile].values, rs, axis=0)
b = np.concatenate(vals.values)
d = np.column_stack((a, b))
return pd.DataFrame(d, columns = tile + ['_'.join(explode)])
unnest(df, ['A', 'D'], ['B', 'C'])
A D B_C
0 1 A 1
1 1 A 2
2 1 A 1
3 1 A 2
4 1 A 3
5 2 B 1
6 2 B 2
7 2 B 3
8 2 B 1
9 2 B 2
10 3 C 1
11 3 C 1
12 3 C 2
Functions
def wen1(df):
return df.set_index('A').B.apply(pd.Series).stack().reset_index(level=0).rename(columns={0: 'B'})
def wen2(df):
return pd.DataFrame({'A':df.A.repeat(df.B.str.len()),'B':np.concatenate(df.B.values)})
def wen3(df):
s = pd.DataFrame({'B': np.concatenate(df.B.values)}, index=df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len()))
return s.join(df.drop('B', 1), how='left')
def wen4(df):
return pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in df.values for z in y],columns=df.columns)
def chris1(df):
vals = np.array(df.B.values.tolist())
a = np.repeat(df.A, vals.shape[1])
return pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, vals.ravel())), columns=df.columns)
def chris2(df):
vals = df.B.values.tolist()
rs = [len(r) for r in vals]
a = np.repeat(df.A.values, rs)
return pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, np.concatenate(vals))), columns=df.columns)
Timings
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from timeit import timeit
res = pd.DataFrame(
index=['wen1', 'wen2', 'wen3', 'wen4', 'chris1', 'chris2'],
columns=[10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000, 10000],
dtype=float
)
for f in res.index:
for c in res.columns:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
df = pd.concat([df]*c)
stmt = '{}(df)'.format(f)
setp = 'from __main__ import df, {}'.format(f)
res.at[f, c] = timeit(stmt, setp, number=50)
ax = res.div(res.min()).T.plot(loglog=True)
ax.set_xlabel("N")
ax.set_ylabel("time (relative)")
Performance

Exploding a list-like column has been simplified significantly in pandas 0.25 with the addition of the explode() method:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
df.explode('B')
Out:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2

One alternative is to apply the meshgrid recipe over the rows of the columns to unnest:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def unnest(frame, explode):
def mesh(values):
return np.array(np.meshgrid(*values)).T.reshape(-1, len(values))
data = np.vstack(mesh(row) for row in frame[explode].values)
return pd.DataFrame(data=data, columns=explode)
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
print(unnest(df, ['A', 'B'])) # base
print()
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [3, 4]], 'C': [[1, 2], [3, 4]]})
print(unnest(df, ['A', 'B', 'C'])) # multiple columns
print()
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2, 3], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1]],
'C': [[1, 2, 3], [1, 2], [1, 2]], 'D': ['A', 'B', 'C']})
print(unnest(df, ['A', 'B'])) # uneven length lists
print()
print(unnest(df, ['D', 'B'])) # different types
print()
Output
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
A B C
0 1 1 1
1 1 2 1
2 1 1 2
3 1 2 2
4 2 3 3
5 2 4 3
6 2 3 4
7 2 4 4
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
4 2 3
5 3 1
D B
0 A 1
1 A 2
2 B 1
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 C 1

Problem Setup
Assume there are multiple columns with different length objects within it
df = pd.DataFrame({
'A': [1, 2],
'B': [[1, 2], [3, 4]],
'C': [[1, 2], [3, 4, 5]]
})
df
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5]
When the lengths are the same, it is easy for us to assume that the varying elements coincide and should be "zipped" together.
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2] # Typical to assume these should be zipped [(1, 1), (2, 2)]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5]
However, the assumption gets challenged when we see different length objects, should we "zip", if so, how do we handle the excess in one of the objects. OR, maybe we want the product of all of the objects. This will get big fast, but might be what is wanted.
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5] # is this [(3, 3), (4, 4), (None, 5)]?
OR
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5] # is this [(3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5)]
The Function
This function gracefully handles zip or product based on a parameter and assumes to zip according to the length of the longest object with zip_longest
from itertools import zip_longest, product
def xplode(df, explode, zipped=True):
method = zip_longest if zipped else product
rest = {*df} - {*explode}
zipped = zip(zip(*map(df.get, rest)), zip(*map(df.get, explode)))
tups = [tup + exploded
for tup, pre in zipped
for exploded in method(*pre)]
return pd.DataFrame(tups, columns=[*rest, *explode])[[*df]]
Zipped
xplode(df, ['B', 'C'])
A B C
0 1 1.0 1
1 1 2.0 2
2 2 3.0 3
3 2 4.0 4
4 2 NaN 5
Product
xplode(df, ['B', 'C'], zipped=False)
A B C
0 1 1 1
1 1 1 2
2 1 2 1
3 1 2 2
4 2 3 3
5 2 3 4
6 2 3 5
7 2 4 3
8 2 4 4
9 2 4 5
New Setup
Varying up the example a bit
df = pd.DataFrame({
'A': [1, 2],
'B': [[1, 2], [3, 4]],
'C': 'C',
'D': [[1, 2], [3, 4, 5]],
'E': [('X', 'Y', 'Z'), ('W',)]
})
df
A B C D E
0 1 [1, 2] C [1, 2] (X, Y, Z)
1 2 [3, 4] C [3, 4, 5] (W,)
Zipped
xplode(df, ['B', 'D', 'E'])
A B C D E
0 1 1.0 C 1.0 X
1 1 2.0 C 2.0 Y
2 1 NaN C NaN Z
3 2 3.0 C 3.0 W
4 2 4.0 C 4.0 None
5 2 NaN C 5.0 None
Product
xplode(df, ['B', 'D', 'E'], zipped=False)
A B C D E
0 1 1 C 1 X
1 1 1 C 1 Y
2 1 1 C 1 Z
3 1 1 C 2 X
4 1 1 C 2 Y
5 1 1 C 2 Z
6 1 2 C 1 X
7 1 2 C 1 Y
8 1 2 C 1 Z
9 1 2 C 2 X
10 1 2 C 2 Y
11 1 2 C 2 Z
12 2 3 C 3 W
13 2 3 C 4 W
14 2 3 C 5 W
15 2 4 C 3 W
16 2 4 C 4 W
17 2 4 C 5 W

My 5 cents:
df[['B', 'B2']] = pd.DataFrame(df['B'].values.tolist())
df[['A', 'B']].append(df[['A', 'B2']].rename(columns={'B2': 'B'}),
ignore_index=True)
and another 5
df[['B1', 'B2']] = pd.DataFrame([*df['B']]) # if values.tolist() is too boring
(pd.wide_to_long(df.drop('B', 1), 'B', 'A', '')
.reset_index(level=1, drop=True)
.reset_index())
both resulting in the same
A B
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 1 2
3 2 2

Because normally sublist length are different and join/merge is far more computational expensive. I retested the method for different length sublist and more normal columns.
MultiIndex should be also a easier way to write and has near the same performances as numpy way.
Surprisingly, in my implementation comprehension way has the best performance.
def stack(df):
return df.set_index(['A', 'C']).B.apply(pd.Series).stack()
def comprehension(df):
return pd.DataFrame([x + [z] for x, y in zip(df[['A', 'C']].values.tolist(), df.B) for z in y])
def multiindex(df):
return pd.DataFrame(np.concatenate(df.B.values), index=df.set_index(['A', 'C']).index.repeat(df.B.str.len()))
def array(df):
return pd.DataFrame(
np.column_stack((
np.repeat(df[['A', 'C']].values, df.B.str.len(), axis=0),
np.concatenate(df.B.values)
))
)
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from timeit import timeit
res = pd.DataFrame(
index=[
'stack',
'comprehension',
'multiindex',
'array',
],
columns=[1000, 2000, 5000, 10000, 20000, 50000],
dtype=float
)
for f in res.index:
for c in res.columns:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('abc'), 'C': list('def'), 'B': [['g', 'h', 'i'], ['j', 'k'], ['l']]})
df = pd.concat([df] * c)
stmt = '{}(df)'.format(f)
setp = 'from __main__ import df, {}'.format(f)
res.at[f, c] = timeit(stmt, setp, number=20)
ax = res.div(res.min()).T.plot(loglog=True)
ax.set_xlabel("N")
ax.set_ylabel("time (relative)")
Performance
Relative time of each method

I generalized the problem a bit to be applicable to more columns.
Summary of what my solution does:
In[74]: df
Out[74]:
A B C columnD
0 A1 B1 [C1.1, C1.2] D1
1 A2 B2 [C2.1, C2.2] [D2.1, D2.2, D2.3]
2 A3 B3 C3 [D3.1, D3.2]
In[75]: dfListExplode(df,['C','columnD'])
Out[75]:
A B C columnD
0 A1 B1 C1.1 D1
1 A1 B1 C1.2 D1
2 A2 B2 C2.1 D2.1
3 A2 B2 C2.1 D2.2
4 A2 B2 C2.1 D2.3
5 A2 B2 C2.2 D2.1
6 A2 B2 C2.2 D2.2
7 A2 B2 C2.2 D2.3
8 A3 B3 C3 D3.1
9 A3 B3 C3 D3.2
Complete example:
The actual explosion is performed in 3 lines. The rest is cosmetics (multi column explosion, handling of strings instead of lists in the explosion column, ...).
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df=pd.DataFrame( {'A': ['A1','A2','A3'],
'B': ['B1','B2','B3'],
'C': [ ['C1.1','C1.2'],['C2.1','C2.2'],'C3'],
'columnD': [ 'D1',['D2.1','D2.2', 'D2.3'],['D3.1','D3.2']],
})
print('df',df, sep='\n')
def dfListExplode(df, explodeKeys):
if not isinstance(explodeKeys, list):
explodeKeys=[explodeKeys]
# recursive handling of explodeKeys
if len(explodeKeys)==0:
return df
elif len(explodeKeys)==1:
explodeKey=explodeKeys[0]
else:
return dfListExplode( dfListExplode(df, explodeKeys[:1]), explodeKeys[1:])
# perform explosion/unnesting for key: explodeKey
dfPrep=df[explodeKey].apply(lambda x: x if isinstance(x,list) else [x]) #casts all elements to a list
dfIndExpl=pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in zip(dfPrep.index,dfPrep.values) for z in y ], columns=['explodedIndex',explodeKey])
dfMerged=dfIndExpl.merge(df.drop(explodeKey, axis=1), left_on='explodedIndex', right_index=True)
dfReind=dfMerged.reindex(columns=list(df))
return dfReind
dfExpl=dfListExplode(df,['C','columnD'])
print('dfExpl',dfExpl, sep='\n')
Credits to WeNYoBen's answer

Something pretty not recommended (at least work in this case):
df=pd.concat([df]*2).sort_index()
it=iter(df['B'].tolist()[0]+df['B'].tolist()[0])
df['B']=df['B'].apply(lambda x:next(it))
concat + sort_index + iter + apply + next.
Now:
print(df)
Is:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
If care about index:
df=df.reset_index(drop=True)
Now:
print(df)
Is:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2

df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[1,2]]})
pd.concat([df['A'], pd.DataFrame(df['B'].values.tolist())], axis = 1)\
.melt(id_vars = 'A', value_name = 'B')\
.dropna()\
.drop('variable', axis = 1)
A B
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 1 2
3 2 2
Any opinions on this method I thought of? or is doing both concat and melt considered too "expensive"?

I have another good way to solves this when you have more than one column to explode.
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[1,2]], 'C':[[1,2,3],[1,2,3]]})
print(df)
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2, 3]
1 2 [1, 2] [1, 2, 3]
I want to explode the columns B and C. First I explode B, second C. Than I drop B and C from the original df. After that I will do an index join on the 3 dfs.
explode_b = df.explode('B')['B']
explode_c = df.explode('C')['C']
df = df.drop(['B', 'C'], axis=1)
df = df.join([explode_b, explode_c])

df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[1,2]]})
out = pd.concat([df.loc[:,'A'],(df.B.apply(pd.Series))], axis=1, sort=False)
out = out.set_index('A').stack().droplevel(level=1).reset_index().rename(columns={0:"B"})
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
you can implement this as one liner, if you don't wish to create intermediate object

# Here's the answer to the related question in:
# https://stackoverflow.com/q/56708671/11426125
# initial dataframe
df12=pd.DataFrame({'Date':['2007-12-03','2008-09-07'],'names':
[['Peter','Alex'],['Donald','Stan']]})
# convert dataframe to array for indexing list values (names)
a = np.array(df12.values)
# create a new, dataframe with dimensions for unnested
b = np.ndarray(shape = (4,2))
df2 = pd.DataFrame(b, columns = ["Date", "names"], dtype = str)
# implement loops to assign date/name values as required
i = range(len(a[0]))
j = range(len(a[0]))
for x in i:
for y in j:
df2.iat[2*x+y, 0] = a[x][0]
df2.iat[2*x+y, 1] = a[x][1][y]
# set Date column as Index
df2.Date=pd.to_datetime(df2.Date)
df2.index=df2.Date
df2.drop('Date',axis=1,inplace =True)

In my case with more than one column to explode, and with variables lengths for the arrays that needs to be unnested.
I ended up applying the new pandas 0.25 explode function two times, then removing generated duplicates and it does the job !
df = df.explode('A')
df = df.explode('B')
df = df.drop_duplicates()

Below is a simple function for horizontal explode, based on #BEN_YO's answer.
import typing
import pandas as pd
def horizontal_explode(df: pd.DataFrame, col_name: str, new_columns: typing.Union[list, None]=None) -> pd.DataFrame:
t = pd.DataFrame(df[col_name].tolist(), columns=new_columns, index=df.index)
return pd.concat([df, t], axis=1)
Running example:
items = [
["1", ["a", "b", "c"]],
["2", ["d", "e", "f"]]
]
df = pd.DataFrame(items, columns = ["col1", "col2"])
print(df)
t = horizontal_explode(df=df, col_name="col2")
del t["col2"]
print(t)
t = horizontal_explode(df=df, col_name="col2", new_columns=["new_col1", "new_col2", "new_col3"])
del t["col2"]
print(t)
This the relevant output:
col1 col2
0 1 [a, b, c]
1 2 [d, e, f]
col1 0 1 2
0 1 a b c
1 2 d e f
col1 new_col1 new_col2 new_col3
0 1 a b c
1 2 d e f

demo = {'set1':{'t1':[1,2,3],'t2':[4,5,6],'t3':[7,8,9]}, 'set2':{'t1':[1,2,3],'t2':[4,5,6],'t3':[7,8,9]}, 'set3': {'t1':[1,2,3],'t2':[4,5,6],'t3':[7,8,9]}}
df = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(demo, orient='index')
print(df.head())
my_list=[]
df2=pd.DataFrame(columns=['set','t1','t2','t3'])
for key,item in df.iterrows():
t1=item.t1
t2=item.t2
t3=item.t3
mat1=np.matrix([t1,t2,t3])
row1=[key,mat1[0,0],mat1[0,1],mat1[0,2]]
df2.loc[len(df2)]=row1
row2=[key,mat1[1,0],mat1[1,1],mat1[1,2]]
df2.loc[len(df2)]=row2
row3=[key,mat1[2,0],mat1[2,1],mat1[2,2]]
df2.loc[len(df2)]=row3
print(df2)
set t1 t2 t3
0 set1 1 2 3
1 set1 4 5 6
2 set1 7 8 9
3 set2 1 2 3
4 set2 4 5 6
5 set2 7 8 9
6 set3 1 2 3
7 set3 4 5 6
8 set3 7 8 9

Flatten a tuple and keep the corresponding values for every value of the tuple [duplicate]

I have the following DataFrame where one of the columns is an object (list type cell):
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
Output:
A B
0 1 [1, 2]
1 2 [1, 2]
My expected output is:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
3 2 1
4 2 2
What should I do to achieve this?
Related question
Pandas column of lists, create a row for each list element
Good question and answer but only handle one column with list(In my answer the self-def function will work for multiple columns, also the accepted answer is use the most time consuming apply , which is not recommended, check more info When should I (not) want to use pandas apply() in my code?)

I know object dtype columns makes the data hard to convert with pandas functions. When I receive data like this, the first thing that came to mind was to "flatten" or unnest the columns.
I am using pandas and Python functions for this type of question. If you are worried about the speed of the above solutions, check out user3483203's answer, since it's using numpy and most of the time numpy is faster. I recommend Cython or numba if speed matters.
Method 0 [pandas >= 0.25]
Starting from pandas 0.25, if you only need to explode one column, you can use the pandas.DataFrame.explode function:
df.explode('B')
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
0 2 1
1 2 2
Given a dataframe with an empty list or a NaN in the column. An empty list will not cause an issue, but a NaN will need to be filled with a list
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2, 3, 4],'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2], [], np.nan]})
df.B = df.B.fillna({i: [] for i in df.index}) # replace NaN with []
df.explode('B')
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
2 3 NaN
3 4 NaN
Method 1
apply + pd.Series (easy to understand but in terms of performance not recommended . )
df.set_index('A').B.apply(pd.Series).stack().reset_index(level=0).rename(columns={0:'B'})
Out[463]:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
0 2 1
1 2 2
Method 2
Using repeat with DataFrame constructor , re-create your dataframe (good at performance, not good at multiple columns )
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':df.A.repeat(df.B.str.len()),'B':np.concatenate(df.B.values)})
df
Out[465]:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
Method 2.1
for example besides A we have A.1 .....A.n. If we still use the method(Method 2) above it is hard for us to re-create the columns one by one .
Solution : join or merge with the index after 'unnest' the single columns
s=pd.DataFrame({'B':np.concatenate(df.B.values)},index=df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len()))
s.join(df.drop('B',1),how='left')
Out[477]:
B A
0 1 1
0 2 1
1 1 2
1 2 2
If you need the column order exactly the same as before, add reindex at the end.
s.join(df.drop('B',1),how='left').reindex(columns=df.columns)
Method 3
recreate the list
pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in df.values for z in y],columns=df.columns)
Out[488]:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
If more than two columns, use
s=pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in zip(df.index,df.B) for z in y])
s.merge(df,left_on=0,right_index=True)
Out[491]:
0 1 A B
0 0 1 1 [1, 2]
1 0 2 1 [1, 2]
2 1 1 2 [1, 2]
3 1 2 2 [1, 2]
Method 4
using reindex or loc
df.reindex(df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len())).assign(B=np.concatenate(df.B.values))
Out[554]:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
#df.loc[df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len())].assign(B=np.concatenate(df.B.values))
Method 5
when the list only contains unique values:
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[3,4]]})
from collections import ChainMap
d = dict(ChainMap(*map(dict.fromkeys, df['B'], df['A'])))
pd.DataFrame(list(d.items()),columns=df.columns[::-1])
Out[574]:
B A
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 3 2
3 4 2
Method 6
using numpy for high performance:
newvalues=np.dstack((np.repeat(df.A.values,list(map(len,df.B.values))),np.concatenate(df.B.values)))
pd.DataFrame(data=newvalues[0],columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Method 7
using base function itertools cycle and chain: Pure python solution just for fun
from itertools import cycle,chain
l=df.values.tolist()
l1=[list(zip([x[0]], cycle(x[1])) if len([x[0]]) > len(x[1]) else list(zip(cycle([x[0]]), x[1]))) for x in l]
pd.DataFrame(list(chain.from_iterable(l1)),columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Generalizing to multiple columns
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[3,4]],'C':[[1,2],[3,4]]})
df
Out[592]:
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4]
Self-def function:
def unnesting(df, explode):
idx = df.index.repeat(df[explode[0]].str.len())
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame({x: np.concatenate(df[x].values)}) for x in explode], axis=1)
df1.index = idx
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
unnesting(df,['B','C'])
Out[609]:
B C A
0 1 1 1
0 2 2 1
1 3 3 2
1 4 4 2
Column-wise Unnesting
All above method is talking about the vertical unnesting and explode , If you do need expend the list horizontal, Check with pd.DataFrame constructor
df.join(pd.DataFrame(df.B.tolist(),index=df.index).add_prefix('B_'))
Out[33]:
A B C B_0 B_1
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2] 1 2
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4] 3 4
Updated function
def unnesting(df, explode, axis):
if axis==1:
idx = df.index.repeat(df[explode[0]].str.len())
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame({x: np.concatenate(df[x].values)}) for x in explode], axis=1)
df1.index = idx
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
else :
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame(df[x].tolist(), index=df.index).add_prefix(x) for x in explode], axis=1)
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
Test Output
unnesting(df, ['B','C'], axis=0)
Out[36]:
B0 B1 C0 C1 A
0 1 2 1 2 1
1 3 4 3 4 2
Update 2021-02-17 with original explode function
def unnesting(df, explode, axis):
if axis==1:
df1 = pd.concat([df[x].explode() for x in explode], axis=1)
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
else :
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame(df[x].tolist(), index=df.index).add_prefix(x) for x in explode], axis=1)
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')

Option 1
If all of the sublists in the other column are the same length, numpy can be an efficient option here:
vals = np.array(df.B.values.tolist())
a = np.repeat(df.A, vals.shape[1])
pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, vals.ravel())), columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Option 2
If the sublists have different length, you need an additional step:
vals = df.B.values.tolist()
rs = [len(r) for r in vals]
a = np.repeat(df.A, rs)
pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, np.concatenate(vals))), columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Option 3
I took a shot at generalizing this to work to flatten N columns and tile M columns, I'll work later on making it more efficient:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1,2,3], 'B': [[1,2], [1,2,3], [1]],
'C': [[1,2,3], [1,2], [1,2]], 'D': ['A', 'B', 'C']})
A B C D
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] A
1 2 [1, 2, 3] [1, 2] B
2 3 [1] [1, 2] C
def unnest(df, tile, explode):
vals = df[explode].sum(1)
rs = [len(r) for r in vals]
a = np.repeat(df[tile].values, rs, axis=0)
b = np.concatenate(vals.values)
d = np.column_stack((a, b))
return pd.DataFrame(d, columns = tile + ['_'.join(explode)])
unnest(df, ['A', 'D'], ['B', 'C'])
A D B_C
0 1 A 1
1 1 A 2
2 1 A 1
3 1 A 2
4 1 A 3
5 2 B 1
6 2 B 2
7 2 B 3
8 2 B 1
9 2 B 2
10 3 C 1
11 3 C 1
12 3 C 2
Functions
def wen1(df):
return df.set_index('A').B.apply(pd.Series).stack().reset_index(level=0).rename(columns={0: 'B'})
def wen2(df):
return pd.DataFrame({'A':df.A.repeat(df.B.str.len()),'B':np.concatenate(df.B.values)})
def wen3(df):
s = pd.DataFrame({'B': np.concatenate(df.B.values)}, index=df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len()))
return s.join(df.drop('B', 1), how='left')
def wen4(df):
return pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in df.values for z in y],columns=df.columns)
def chris1(df):
vals = np.array(df.B.values.tolist())
a = np.repeat(df.A, vals.shape[1])
return pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, vals.ravel())), columns=df.columns)
def chris2(df):
vals = df.B.values.tolist()
rs = [len(r) for r in vals]
a = np.repeat(df.A.values, rs)
return pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, np.concatenate(vals))), columns=df.columns)
Timings
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from timeit import timeit
res = pd.DataFrame(
index=['wen1', 'wen2', 'wen3', 'wen4', 'chris1', 'chris2'],
columns=[10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000, 10000],
dtype=float
)
for f in res.index:
for c in res.columns:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
df = pd.concat([df]*c)
stmt = '{}(df)'.format(f)
setp = 'from __main__ import df, {}'.format(f)
res.at[f, c] = timeit(stmt, setp, number=50)
ax = res.div(res.min()).T.plot(loglog=True)
ax.set_xlabel("N")
ax.set_ylabel("time (relative)")
Performance

Exploding a list-like column has been simplified significantly in pandas 0.25 with the addition of the explode() method:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
df.explode('B')
Out:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2

One alternative is to apply the meshgrid recipe over the rows of the columns to unnest:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def unnest(frame, explode):
def mesh(values):
return np.array(np.meshgrid(*values)).T.reshape(-1, len(values))
data = np.vstack(mesh(row) for row in frame[explode].values)
return pd.DataFrame(data=data, columns=explode)
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
print(unnest(df, ['A', 'B'])) # base
print()
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [3, 4]], 'C': [[1, 2], [3, 4]]})
print(unnest(df, ['A', 'B', 'C'])) # multiple columns
print()
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2, 3], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1]],
'C': [[1, 2, 3], [1, 2], [1, 2]], 'D': ['A', 'B', 'C']})
print(unnest(df, ['A', 'B'])) # uneven length lists
print()
print(unnest(df, ['D', 'B'])) # different types
print()
Output
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
A B C
0 1 1 1
1 1 2 1
2 1 1 2
3 1 2 2
4 2 3 3
5 2 4 3
6 2 3 4
7 2 4 4
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
4 2 3
5 3 1
D B
0 A 1
1 A 2
2 B 1
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 C 1

Problem Setup
Assume there are multiple columns with different length objects within it
df = pd.DataFrame({
'A': [1, 2],
'B': [[1, 2], [3, 4]],
'C': [[1, 2], [3, 4, 5]]
})
df
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5]
When the lengths are the same, it is easy for us to assume that the varying elements coincide and should be "zipped" together.
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2] # Typical to assume these should be zipped [(1, 1), (2, 2)]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5]
However, the assumption gets challenged when we see different length objects, should we "zip", if so, how do we handle the excess in one of the objects. OR, maybe we want the product of all of the objects. This will get big fast, but might be what is wanted.
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5] # is this [(3, 3), (4, 4), (None, 5)]?
OR
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5] # is this [(3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5)]
The Function
This function gracefully handles zip or product based on a parameter and assumes to zip according to the length of the longest object with zip_longest
from itertools import zip_longest, product
def xplode(df, explode, zipped=True):
method = zip_longest if zipped else product
rest = {*df} - {*explode}
zipped = zip(zip(*map(df.get, rest)), zip(*map(df.get, explode)))
tups = [tup + exploded
for tup, pre in zipped
for exploded in method(*pre)]
return pd.DataFrame(tups, columns=[*rest, *explode])[[*df]]
Zipped
xplode(df, ['B', 'C'])
A B C
0 1 1.0 1
1 1 2.0 2
2 2 3.0 3
3 2 4.0 4
4 2 NaN 5
Product
xplode(df, ['B', 'C'], zipped=False)
A B C
0 1 1 1
1 1 1 2
2 1 2 1
3 1 2 2
4 2 3 3
5 2 3 4
6 2 3 5
7 2 4 3
8 2 4 4
9 2 4 5
New Setup
Varying up the example a bit
df = pd.DataFrame({
'A': [1, 2],
'B': [[1, 2], [3, 4]],
'C': 'C',
'D': [[1, 2], [3, 4, 5]],
'E': [('X', 'Y', 'Z'), ('W',)]
})
df
A B C D E
0 1 [1, 2] C [1, 2] (X, Y, Z)
1 2 [3, 4] C [3, 4, 5] (W,)
Zipped
xplode(df, ['B', 'D', 'E'])
A B C D E
0 1 1.0 C 1.0 X
1 1 2.0 C 2.0 Y
2 1 NaN C NaN Z
3 2 3.0 C 3.0 W
4 2 4.0 C 4.0 None
5 2 NaN C 5.0 None
Product
xplode(df, ['B', 'D', 'E'], zipped=False)
A B C D E
0 1 1 C 1 X
1 1 1 C 1 Y
2 1 1 C 1 Z
3 1 1 C 2 X
4 1 1 C 2 Y
5 1 1 C 2 Z
6 1 2 C 1 X
7 1 2 C 1 Y
8 1 2 C 1 Z
9 1 2 C 2 X
10 1 2 C 2 Y
11 1 2 C 2 Z
12 2 3 C 3 W
13 2 3 C 4 W
14 2 3 C 5 W
15 2 4 C 3 W
16 2 4 C 4 W
17 2 4 C 5 W

My 5 cents:
df[['B', 'B2']] = pd.DataFrame(df['B'].values.tolist())
df[['A', 'B']].append(df[['A', 'B2']].rename(columns={'B2': 'B'}),
ignore_index=True)
and another 5
df[['B1', 'B2']] = pd.DataFrame([*df['B']]) # if values.tolist() is too boring
(pd.wide_to_long(df.drop('B', 1), 'B', 'A', '')
.reset_index(level=1, drop=True)
.reset_index())
both resulting in the same
A B
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 1 2
3 2 2

Because normally sublist length are different and join/merge is far more computational expensive. I retested the method for different length sublist and more normal columns.
MultiIndex should be also a easier way to write and has near the same performances as numpy way.
Surprisingly, in my implementation comprehension way has the best performance.
def stack(df):
return df.set_index(['A', 'C']).B.apply(pd.Series).stack()
def comprehension(df):
return pd.DataFrame([x + [z] for x, y in zip(df[['A', 'C']].values.tolist(), df.B) for z in y])
def multiindex(df):
return pd.DataFrame(np.concatenate(df.B.values), index=df.set_index(['A', 'C']).index.repeat(df.B.str.len()))
def array(df):
return pd.DataFrame(
np.column_stack((
np.repeat(df[['A', 'C']].values, df.B.str.len(), axis=0),
np.concatenate(df.B.values)
))
)
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from timeit import timeit
res = pd.DataFrame(
index=[
'stack',
'comprehension',
'multiindex',
'array',
],
columns=[1000, 2000, 5000, 10000, 20000, 50000],
dtype=float
)
for f in res.index:
for c in res.columns:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('abc'), 'C': list('def'), 'B': [['g', 'h', 'i'], ['j', 'k'], ['l']]})
df = pd.concat([df] * c)
stmt = '{}(df)'.format(f)
setp = 'from __main__ import df, {}'.format(f)
res.at[f, c] = timeit(stmt, setp, number=20)
ax = res.div(res.min()).T.plot(loglog=True)
ax.set_xlabel("N")
ax.set_ylabel("time (relative)")
Performance
Relative time of each method

I generalized the problem a bit to be applicable to more columns.
Summary of what my solution does:
In[74]: df
Out[74]:
A B C columnD
0 A1 B1 [C1.1, C1.2] D1
1 A2 B2 [C2.1, C2.2] [D2.1, D2.2, D2.3]
2 A3 B3 C3 [D3.1, D3.2]
In[75]: dfListExplode(df,['C','columnD'])
Out[75]:
A B C columnD
0 A1 B1 C1.1 D1
1 A1 B1 C1.2 D1
2 A2 B2 C2.1 D2.1
3 A2 B2 C2.1 D2.2
4 A2 B2 C2.1 D2.3
5 A2 B2 C2.2 D2.1
6 A2 B2 C2.2 D2.2
7 A2 B2 C2.2 D2.3
8 A3 B3 C3 D3.1
9 A3 B3 C3 D3.2
Complete example:
The actual explosion is performed in 3 lines. The rest is cosmetics (multi column explosion, handling of strings instead of lists in the explosion column, ...).
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df=pd.DataFrame( {'A': ['A1','A2','A3'],
'B': ['B1','B2','B3'],
'C': [ ['C1.1','C1.2'],['C2.1','C2.2'],'C3'],
'columnD': [ 'D1',['D2.1','D2.2', 'D2.3'],['D3.1','D3.2']],
})
print('df',df, sep='\n')
def dfListExplode(df, explodeKeys):
if not isinstance(explodeKeys, list):
explodeKeys=[explodeKeys]
# recursive handling of explodeKeys
if len(explodeKeys)==0:
return df
elif len(explodeKeys)==1:
explodeKey=explodeKeys[0]
else:
return dfListExplode( dfListExplode(df, explodeKeys[:1]), explodeKeys[1:])
# perform explosion/unnesting for key: explodeKey
dfPrep=df[explodeKey].apply(lambda x: x if isinstance(x,list) else [x]) #casts all elements to a list
dfIndExpl=pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in zip(dfPrep.index,dfPrep.values) for z in y ], columns=['explodedIndex',explodeKey])
dfMerged=dfIndExpl.merge(df.drop(explodeKey, axis=1), left_on='explodedIndex', right_index=True)
dfReind=dfMerged.reindex(columns=list(df))
return dfReind
dfExpl=dfListExplode(df,['C','columnD'])
print('dfExpl',dfExpl, sep='\n')
Credits to WeNYoBen's answer

Something pretty not recommended (at least work in this case):
df=pd.concat([df]*2).sort_index()
it=iter(df['B'].tolist()[0]+df['B'].tolist()[0])
df['B']=df['B'].apply(lambda x:next(it))
concat + sort_index + iter + apply + next.
Now:
print(df)
Is:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
If care about index:
df=df.reset_index(drop=True)
Now:
print(df)
Is:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2

df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[1,2]]})
pd.concat([df['A'], pd.DataFrame(df['B'].values.tolist())], axis = 1)\
.melt(id_vars = 'A', value_name = 'B')\
.dropna()\
.drop('variable', axis = 1)
A B
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 1 2
3 2 2
Any opinions on this method I thought of? or is doing both concat and melt considered too "expensive"?

I have another good way to solves this when you have more than one column to explode.
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[1,2]], 'C':[[1,2,3],[1,2,3]]})
print(df)
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2, 3]
1 2 [1, 2] [1, 2, 3]
I want to explode the columns B and C. First I explode B, second C. Than I drop B and C from the original df. After that I will do an index join on the 3 dfs.
explode_b = df.explode('B')['B']
explode_c = df.explode('C')['C']
df = df.drop(['B', 'C'], axis=1)
df = df.join([explode_b, explode_c])

df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[1,2]]})
out = pd.concat([df.loc[:,'A'],(df.B.apply(pd.Series))], axis=1, sort=False)
out = out.set_index('A').stack().droplevel(level=1).reset_index().rename(columns={0:"B"})
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
you can implement this as one liner, if you don't wish to create intermediate object

# Here's the answer to the related question in:
# https://stackoverflow.com/q/56708671/11426125
# initial dataframe
df12=pd.DataFrame({'Date':['2007-12-03','2008-09-07'],'names':
[['Peter','Alex'],['Donald','Stan']]})
# convert dataframe to array for indexing list values (names)
a = np.array(df12.values)
# create a new, dataframe with dimensions for unnested
b = np.ndarray(shape = (4,2))
df2 = pd.DataFrame(b, columns = ["Date", "names"], dtype = str)
# implement loops to assign date/name values as required
i = range(len(a[0]))
j = range(len(a[0]))
for x in i:
for y in j:
df2.iat[2*x+y, 0] = a[x][0]
df2.iat[2*x+y, 1] = a[x][1][y]
# set Date column as Index
df2.Date=pd.to_datetime(df2.Date)
df2.index=df2.Date
df2.drop('Date',axis=1,inplace =True)

In my case with more than one column to explode, and with variables lengths for the arrays that needs to be unnested.
I ended up applying the new pandas 0.25 explode function two times, then removing generated duplicates and it does the job !
df = df.explode('A')
df = df.explode('B')
df = df.drop_duplicates()

Below is a simple function for horizontal explode, based on #BEN_YO's answer.
import typing
import pandas as pd
def horizontal_explode(df: pd.DataFrame, col_name: str, new_columns: typing.Union[list, None]=None) -> pd.DataFrame:
t = pd.DataFrame(df[col_name].tolist(), columns=new_columns, index=df.index)
return pd.concat([df, t], axis=1)
Running example:
items = [
["1", ["a", "b", "c"]],
["2", ["d", "e", "f"]]
]
df = pd.DataFrame(items, columns = ["col1", "col2"])
print(df)
t = horizontal_explode(df=df, col_name="col2")
del t["col2"]
print(t)
t = horizontal_explode(df=df, col_name="col2", new_columns=["new_col1", "new_col2", "new_col3"])
del t["col2"]
print(t)
This the relevant output:
col1 col2
0 1 [a, b, c]
1 2 [d, e, f]
col1 0 1 2
0 1 a b c
1 2 d e f
col1 new_col1 new_col2 new_col3
0 1 a b c
1 2 d e f

demo = {'set1':{'t1':[1,2,3],'t2':[4,5,6],'t3':[7,8,9]}, 'set2':{'t1':[1,2,3],'t2':[4,5,6],'t3':[7,8,9]}, 'set3': {'t1':[1,2,3],'t2':[4,5,6],'t3':[7,8,9]}}
df = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(demo, orient='index')
print(df.head())
my_list=[]
df2=pd.DataFrame(columns=['set','t1','t2','t3'])
for key,item in df.iterrows():
t1=item.t1
t2=item.t2
t3=item.t3
mat1=np.matrix([t1,t2,t3])
row1=[key,mat1[0,0],mat1[0,1],mat1[0,2]]
df2.loc[len(df2)]=row1
row2=[key,mat1[1,0],mat1[1,1],mat1[1,2]]
df2.loc[len(df2)]=row2
row3=[key,mat1[2,0],mat1[2,1],mat1[2,2]]
df2.loc[len(df2)]=row3
print(df2)
set t1 t2 t3
0 set1 1 2 3
1 set1 4 5 6
2 set1 7 8 9
3 set2 1 2 3
4 set2 4 5 6
5 set2 7 8 9
6 set3 1 2 3
7 set3 4 5 6
8 set3 7 8 9

How to use two for loops to copy a list variable into a location variable in a dataframe?

I have a dataframe which has 2 columns called locStuff and data. Someone was kind enough to show me how to index a location range in the df so that it correctly changes the data to a single integer attached to locStuff instead of the dataframe index, that works fine, now I cannot see how to change the data values of that location range with a list of values.
import pandas as pd
INDEX = list(range(1, 11))
LOCATIONS = [3, 10, 6, 2, 9, 1, 7, 5, 8, 4]
DATA = [94, 43, 85, 10, 81, 57, 88, 11, 35, 86]
# Make dataframe
DF = pd.DataFrame(LOCATIONS, columns=['locStuff'], index=INDEX)
DF['data'] = pd.Series(DATA, index=INDEX)
# Location and new value inputs
LOC_TO_CHANGE = 8
NEW_LOC_VALUE = 999
NEW_LOC_VALUE = [999,666,333]
LOC_RANGE = list(range(3, 6))
DF.iloc[3:6, 1] = ('%03d' % NEW_LOC_VALUE)
print(DF)
#I TRIED BOTH OF THESE SEPARATELY
for i in NEW_LOC_VALUE:
for j in LOC_RANGE:
DF.iloc[j, 1] = ('%03d' % NEW_LOC_VALUE[i])
print (DF)
i=0
while i<len(NEW_LOC_VALUE):
for j in LOC_RANGE:
DF.iloc[j, 1] = ('%03d' % NEW_LOC_VALUE[i])
i=+1
print(DF)
Neither of these work:
for i in NEW_LOC_VALUE:
for j in LOC_RANGE:
DF.iloc[j, 1] = ('%03d' % NEW_LOC_VALUE[i])
print (DF)
i=0
while i<len(NEW_LOC_VALUE):
for j in LOC_RANGE:
DF.iloc[j, 1] = ('%03d' % NEW_LOC_VALUE[i])
i=+1
I know how to do this using loops or list comprehensions for an empty list but no idea how to adapt what I have above for a DataFrame.
Expected behaviour would be:
locStuff data
1 3 999
2 10 43
3 6 85
4 2 10
5 9 81
6 1 57
7 7 88
8 5 333
9 8 35
10 4 666

Try setting locStuff as index, assign values, and reset_index:
DF.set_index('locStuff', inplace=True)
DF.loc[LOC_RANGE, 'data'] = NEW_LOC_VALUE
DF.reset_index(inplace=True)
Output:
locStuff data
0 3 999
1 10 43
2 6 85
3 2 10
4 9 81
5 1 57
6 7 88
7 5 333
8 8 35
9 4 666

python dataframe: split a row to several rows and add a new column [duplicate]

I have the following DataFrame where one of the columns is an object (list type cell):
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
Output:
A B
0 1 [1, 2]
1 2 [1, 2]
My expected output is:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
3 2 1
4 2 2
What should I do to achieve this?
Related question
Pandas column of lists, create a row for each list element
Good question and answer but only handle one column with list(In my answer the self-def function will work for multiple columns, also the accepted answer is use the most time consuming apply , which is not recommended, check more info When should I (not) want to use pandas apply() in my code?)

I know object dtype columns makes the data hard to convert with pandas functions. When I receive data like this, the first thing that came to mind was to "flatten" or unnest the columns.
I am using pandas and Python functions for this type of question. If you are worried about the speed of the above solutions, check out user3483203's answer, since it's using numpy and most of the time numpy is faster. I recommend Cython or numba if speed matters.
Method 0 [pandas >= 0.25]
Starting from pandas 0.25, if you only need to explode one column, you can use the pandas.DataFrame.explode function:
df.explode('B')
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
0 2 1
1 2 2
Given a dataframe with an empty list or a NaN in the column. An empty list will not cause an issue, but a NaN will need to be filled with a list
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2, 3, 4],'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2], [], np.nan]})
df.B = df.B.fillna({i: [] for i in df.index}) # replace NaN with []
df.explode('B')
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
2 3 NaN
3 4 NaN
Method 1
apply + pd.Series (easy to understand but in terms of performance not recommended . )
df.set_index('A').B.apply(pd.Series).stack().reset_index(level=0).rename(columns={0:'B'})
Out[463]:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
0 2 1
1 2 2
Method 2
Using repeat with DataFrame constructor , re-create your dataframe (good at performance, not good at multiple columns )
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':df.A.repeat(df.B.str.len()),'B':np.concatenate(df.B.values)})
df
Out[465]:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
Method 2.1
for example besides A we have A.1 .....A.n. If we still use the method(Method 2) above it is hard for us to re-create the columns one by one .
Solution : join or merge with the index after 'unnest' the single columns
s=pd.DataFrame({'B':np.concatenate(df.B.values)},index=df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len()))
s.join(df.drop('B',1),how='left')
Out[477]:
B A
0 1 1
0 2 1
1 1 2
1 2 2
If you need the column order exactly the same as before, add reindex at the end.
s.join(df.drop('B',1),how='left').reindex(columns=df.columns)
Method 3
recreate the list
pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in df.values for z in y],columns=df.columns)
Out[488]:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
If more than two columns, use
s=pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in zip(df.index,df.B) for z in y])
s.merge(df,left_on=0,right_index=True)
Out[491]:
0 1 A B
0 0 1 1 [1, 2]
1 0 2 1 [1, 2]
2 1 1 2 [1, 2]
3 1 2 2 [1, 2]
Method 4
using reindex or loc
df.reindex(df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len())).assign(B=np.concatenate(df.B.values))
Out[554]:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
#df.loc[df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len())].assign(B=np.concatenate(df.B.values))
Method 5
when the list only contains unique values:
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[3,4]]})
from collections import ChainMap
d = dict(ChainMap(*map(dict.fromkeys, df['B'], df['A'])))
pd.DataFrame(list(d.items()),columns=df.columns[::-1])
Out[574]:
B A
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 3 2
3 4 2
Method 6
using numpy for high performance:
newvalues=np.dstack((np.repeat(df.A.values,list(map(len,df.B.values))),np.concatenate(df.B.values)))
pd.DataFrame(data=newvalues[0],columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Method 7
using base function itertools cycle and chain: Pure python solution just for fun
from itertools import cycle,chain
l=df.values.tolist()
l1=[list(zip([x[0]], cycle(x[1])) if len([x[0]]) > len(x[1]) else list(zip(cycle([x[0]]), x[1]))) for x in l]
pd.DataFrame(list(chain.from_iterable(l1)),columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Generalizing to multiple columns
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[3,4]],'C':[[1,2],[3,4]]})
df
Out[592]:
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4]
Self-def function:
def unnesting(df, explode):
idx = df.index.repeat(df[explode[0]].str.len())
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame({x: np.concatenate(df[x].values)}) for x in explode], axis=1)
df1.index = idx
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
unnesting(df,['B','C'])
Out[609]:
B C A
0 1 1 1
0 2 2 1
1 3 3 2
1 4 4 2
Column-wise Unnesting
All above method is talking about the vertical unnesting and explode , If you do need expend the list horizontal, Check with pd.DataFrame constructor
df.join(pd.DataFrame(df.B.tolist(),index=df.index).add_prefix('B_'))
Out[33]:
A B C B_0 B_1
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2] 1 2
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4] 3 4
Updated function
def unnesting(df, explode, axis):
if axis==1:
idx = df.index.repeat(df[explode[0]].str.len())
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame({x: np.concatenate(df[x].values)}) for x in explode], axis=1)
df1.index = idx
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
else :
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame(df[x].tolist(), index=df.index).add_prefix(x) for x in explode], axis=1)
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
Test Output
unnesting(df, ['B','C'], axis=0)
Out[36]:
B0 B1 C0 C1 A
0 1 2 1 2 1
1 3 4 3 4 2
Update 2021-02-17 with original explode function
def unnesting(df, explode, axis):
if axis==1:
df1 = pd.concat([df[x].explode() for x in explode], axis=1)
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')
else :
df1 = pd.concat([
pd.DataFrame(df[x].tolist(), index=df.index).add_prefix(x) for x in explode], axis=1)
return df1.join(df.drop(explode, 1), how='left')

Option 1
If all of the sublists in the other column are the same length, numpy can be an efficient option here:
vals = np.array(df.B.values.tolist())
a = np.repeat(df.A, vals.shape[1])
pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, vals.ravel())), columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Option 2
If the sublists have different length, you need an additional step:
vals = df.B.values.tolist()
rs = [len(r) for r in vals]
a = np.repeat(df.A, rs)
pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, np.concatenate(vals))), columns=df.columns)
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
Option 3
I took a shot at generalizing this to work to flatten N columns and tile M columns, I'll work later on making it more efficient:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1,2,3], 'B': [[1,2], [1,2,3], [1]],
'C': [[1,2,3], [1,2], [1,2]], 'D': ['A', 'B', 'C']})
A B C D
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2, 3] A
1 2 [1, 2, 3] [1, 2] B
2 3 [1] [1, 2] C
def unnest(df, tile, explode):
vals = df[explode].sum(1)
rs = [len(r) for r in vals]
a = np.repeat(df[tile].values, rs, axis=0)
b = np.concatenate(vals.values)
d = np.column_stack((a, b))
return pd.DataFrame(d, columns = tile + ['_'.join(explode)])
unnest(df, ['A', 'D'], ['B', 'C'])
A D B_C
0 1 A 1
1 1 A 2
2 1 A 1
3 1 A 2
4 1 A 3
5 2 B 1
6 2 B 2
7 2 B 3
8 2 B 1
9 2 B 2
10 3 C 1
11 3 C 1
12 3 C 2
Functions
def wen1(df):
return df.set_index('A').B.apply(pd.Series).stack().reset_index(level=0).rename(columns={0: 'B'})
def wen2(df):
return pd.DataFrame({'A':df.A.repeat(df.B.str.len()),'B':np.concatenate(df.B.values)})
def wen3(df):
s = pd.DataFrame({'B': np.concatenate(df.B.values)}, index=df.index.repeat(df.B.str.len()))
return s.join(df.drop('B', 1), how='left')
def wen4(df):
return pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in df.values for z in y],columns=df.columns)
def chris1(df):
vals = np.array(df.B.values.tolist())
a = np.repeat(df.A, vals.shape[1])
return pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, vals.ravel())), columns=df.columns)
def chris2(df):
vals = df.B.values.tolist()
rs = [len(r) for r in vals]
a = np.repeat(df.A.values, rs)
return pd.DataFrame(np.column_stack((a, np.concatenate(vals))), columns=df.columns)
Timings
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from timeit import timeit
res = pd.DataFrame(
index=['wen1', 'wen2', 'wen3', 'wen4', 'chris1', 'chris2'],
columns=[10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000, 10000],
dtype=float
)
for f in res.index:
for c in res.columns:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
df = pd.concat([df]*c)
stmt = '{}(df)'.format(f)
setp = 'from __main__ import df, {}'.format(f)
res.at[f, c] = timeit(stmt, setp, number=50)
ax = res.div(res.min()).T.plot(loglog=True)
ax.set_xlabel("N")
ax.set_ylabel("time (relative)")
Performance

Exploding a list-like column has been simplified significantly in pandas 0.25 with the addition of the explode() method:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
df.explode('B')
Out:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2

One alternative is to apply the meshgrid recipe over the rows of the columns to unnest:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def unnest(frame, explode):
def mesh(values):
return np.array(np.meshgrid(*values)).T.reshape(-1, len(values))
data = np.vstack(mesh(row) for row in frame[explode].values)
return pd.DataFrame(data=data, columns=explode)
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2]]})
print(unnest(df, ['A', 'B'])) # base
print()
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2], 'B': [[1, 2], [3, 4]], 'C': [[1, 2], [3, 4]]})
print(unnest(df, ['A', 'B', 'C'])) # multiple columns
print()
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [1, 2, 3], 'B': [[1, 2], [1, 2, 3], [1]],
'C': [[1, 2, 3], [1, 2], [1, 2]], 'D': ['A', 'B', 'C']})
print(unnest(df, ['A', 'B'])) # uneven length lists
print()
print(unnest(df, ['D', 'B'])) # different types
print()
Output
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
A B C
0 1 1 1
1 1 2 1
2 1 1 2
3 1 2 2
4 2 3 3
5 2 4 3
6 2 3 4
7 2 4 4
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
4 2 3
5 3 1
D B
0 A 1
1 A 2
2 B 1
3 B 2
4 B 3
5 C 1

Problem Setup
Assume there are multiple columns with different length objects within it
df = pd.DataFrame({
'A': [1, 2],
'B': [[1, 2], [3, 4]],
'C': [[1, 2], [3, 4, 5]]
})
df
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5]
When the lengths are the same, it is easy for us to assume that the varying elements coincide and should be "zipped" together.
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2] # Typical to assume these should be zipped [(1, 1), (2, 2)]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5]
However, the assumption gets challenged when we see different length objects, should we "zip", if so, how do we handle the excess in one of the objects. OR, maybe we want the product of all of the objects. This will get big fast, but might be what is wanted.
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5] # is this [(3, 3), (4, 4), (None, 5)]?
OR
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2]
1 2 [3, 4] [3, 4, 5] # is this [(3, 3), (3, 4), (3, 5), (4, 3), (4, 4), (4, 5)]
The Function
This function gracefully handles zip or product based on a parameter and assumes to zip according to the length of the longest object with zip_longest
from itertools import zip_longest, product
def xplode(df, explode, zipped=True):
method = zip_longest if zipped else product
rest = {*df} - {*explode}
zipped = zip(zip(*map(df.get, rest)), zip(*map(df.get, explode)))
tups = [tup + exploded
for tup, pre in zipped
for exploded in method(*pre)]
return pd.DataFrame(tups, columns=[*rest, *explode])[[*df]]
Zipped
xplode(df, ['B', 'C'])
A B C
0 1 1.0 1
1 1 2.0 2
2 2 3.0 3
3 2 4.0 4
4 2 NaN 5
Product
xplode(df, ['B', 'C'], zipped=False)
A B C
0 1 1 1
1 1 1 2
2 1 2 1
3 1 2 2
4 2 3 3
5 2 3 4
6 2 3 5
7 2 4 3
8 2 4 4
9 2 4 5
New Setup
Varying up the example a bit
df = pd.DataFrame({
'A': [1, 2],
'B': [[1, 2], [3, 4]],
'C': 'C',
'D': [[1, 2], [3, 4, 5]],
'E': [('X', 'Y', 'Z'), ('W',)]
})
df
A B C D E
0 1 [1, 2] C [1, 2] (X, Y, Z)
1 2 [3, 4] C [3, 4, 5] (W,)
Zipped
xplode(df, ['B', 'D', 'E'])
A B C D E
0 1 1.0 C 1.0 X
1 1 2.0 C 2.0 Y
2 1 NaN C NaN Z
3 2 3.0 C 3.0 W
4 2 4.0 C 4.0 None
5 2 NaN C 5.0 None
Product
xplode(df, ['B', 'D', 'E'], zipped=False)
A B C D E
0 1 1 C 1 X
1 1 1 C 1 Y
2 1 1 C 1 Z
3 1 1 C 2 X
4 1 1 C 2 Y
5 1 1 C 2 Z
6 1 2 C 1 X
7 1 2 C 1 Y
8 1 2 C 1 Z
9 1 2 C 2 X
10 1 2 C 2 Y
11 1 2 C 2 Z
12 2 3 C 3 W
13 2 3 C 4 W
14 2 3 C 5 W
15 2 4 C 3 W
16 2 4 C 4 W
17 2 4 C 5 W

My 5 cents:
df[['B', 'B2']] = pd.DataFrame(df['B'].values.tolist())
df[['A', 'B']].append(df[['A', 'B2']].rename(columns={'B2': 'B'}),
ignore_index=True)
and another 5
df[['B1', 'B2']] = pd.DataFrame([*df['B']]) # if values.tolist() is too boring
(pd.wide_to_long(df.drop('B', 1), 'B', 'A', '')
.reset_index(level=1, drop=True)
.reset_index())
both resulting in the same
A B
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 1 2
3 2 2

Because normally sublist length are different and join/merge is far more computational expensive. I retested the method for different length sublist and more normal columns.
MultiIndex should be also a easier way to write and has near the same performances as numpy way.
Surprisingly, in my implementation comprehension way has the best performance.
def stack(df):
return df.set_index(['A', 'C']).B.apply(pd.Series).stack()
def comprehension(df):
return pd.DataFrame([x + [z] for x, y in zip(df[['A', 'C']].values.tolist(), df.B) for z in y])
def multiindex(df):
return pd.DataFrame(np.concatenate(df.B.values), index=df.set_index(['A', 'C']).index.repeat(df.B.str.len()))
def array(df):
return pd.DataFrame(
np.column_stack((
np.repeat(df[['A', 'C']].values, df.B.str.len(), axis=0),
np.concatenate(df.B.values)
))
)
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from timeit import timeit
res = pd.DataFrame(
index=[
'stack',
'comprehension',
'multiindex',
'array',
],
columns=[1000, 2000, 5000, 10000, 20000, 50000],
dtype=float
)
for f in res.index:
for c in res.columns:
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('abc'), 'C': list('def'), 'B': [['g', 'h', 'i'], ['j', 'k'], ['l']]})
df = pd.concat([df] * c)
stmt = '{}(df)'.format(f)
setp = 'from __main__ import df, {}'.format(f)
res.at[f, c] = timeit(stmt, setp, number=20)
ax = res.div(res.min()).T.plot(loglog=True)
ax.set_xlabel("N")
ax.set_ylabel("time (relative)")
Performance
Relative time of each method

I generalized the problem a bit to be applicable to more columns.
Summary of what my solution does:
In[74]: df
Out[74]:
A B C columnD
0 A1 B1 [C1.1, C1.2] D1
1 A2 B2 [C2.1, C2.2] [D2.1, D2.2, D2.3]
2 A3 B3 C3 [D3.1, D3.2]
In[75]: dfListExplode(df,['C','columnD'])
Out[75]:
A B C columnD
0 A1 B1 C1.1 D1
1 A1 B1 C1.2 D1
2 A2 B2 C2.1 D2.1
3 A2 B2 C2.1 D2.2
4 A2 B2 C2.1 D2.3
5 A2 B2 C2.2 D2.1
6 A2 B2 C2.2 D2.2
7 A2 B2 C2.2 D2.3
8 A3 B3 C3 D3.1
9 A3 B3 C3 D3.2
Complete example:
The actual explosion is performed in 3 lines. The rest is cosmetics (multi column explosion, handling of strings instead of lists in the explosion column, ...).
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df=pd.DataFrame( {'A': ['A1','A2','A3'],
'B': ['B1','B2','B3'],
'C': [ ['C1.1','C1.2'],['C2.1','C2.2'],'C3'],
'columnD': [ 'D1',['D2.1','D2.2', 'D2.3'],['D3.1','D3.2']],
})
print('df',df, sep='\n')
def dfListExplode(df, explodeKeys):
if not isinstance(explodeKeys, list):
explodeKeys=[explodeKeys]
# recursive handling of explodeKeys
if len(explodeKeys)==0:
return df
elif len(explodeKeys)==1:
explodeKey=explodeKeys[0]
else:
return dfListExplode( dfListExplode(df, explodeKeys[:1]), explodeKeys[1:])
# perform explosion/unnesting for key: explodeKey
dfPrep=df[explodeKey].apply(lambda x: x if isinstance(x,list) else [x]) #casts all elements to a list
dfIndExpl=pd.DataFrame([[x] + [z] for x, y in zip(dfPrep.index,dfPrep.values) for z in y ], columns=['explodedIndex',explodeKey])
dfMerged=dfIndExpl.merge(df.drop(explodeKey, axis=1), left_on='explodedIndex', right_index=True)
dfReind=dfMerged.reindex(columns=list(df))
return dfReind
dfExpl=dfListExplode(df,['C','columnD'])
print('dfExpl',dfExpl, sep='\n')
Credits to WeNYoBen's answer

Something pretty not recommended (at least work in this case):
df=pd.concat([df]*2).sort_index()
it=iter(df['B'].tolist()[0]+df['B'].tolist()[0])
df['B']=df['B'].apply(lambda x:next(it))
concat + sort_index + iter + apply + next.
Now:
print(df)
Is:
A B
0 1 1
0 1 2
1 2 1
1 2 2
If care about index:
df=df.reset_index(drop=True)
Now:
print(df)
Is:
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2

df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[1,2]]})
pd.concat([df['A'], pd.DataFrame(df['B'].values.tolist())], axis = 1)\
.melt(id_vars = 'A', value_name = 'B')\
.dropna()\
.drop('variable', axis = 1)
A B
0 1 1
1 2 1
2 1 2
3 2 2
Any opinions on this method I thought of? or is doing both concat and melt considered too "expensive"?

I have another good way to solves this when you have more than one column to explode.
df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[1,2]], 'C':[[1,2,3],[1,2,3]]})
print(df)
A B C
0 1 [1, 2] [1, 2, 3]
1 2 [1, 2] [1, 2, 3]
I want to explode the columns B and C. First I explode B, second C. Than I drop B and C from the original df. After that I will do an index join on the 3 dfs.
explode_b = df.explode('B')['B']
explode_c = df.explode('C')['C']
df = df.drop(['B', 'C'], axis=1)
df = df.join([explode_b, explode_c])

df=pd.DataFrame({'A':[1,2],'B':[[1,2],[1,2]]})
out = pd.concat([df.loc[:,'A'],(df.B.apply(pd.Series))], axis=1, sort=False)
out = out.set_index('A').stack().droplevel(level=1).reset_index().rename(columns={0:"B"})
A B
0 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 1
3 2 2
you can implement this as one liner, if you don't wish to create intermediate object

# Here's the answer to the related question in:
# https://stackoverflow.com/q/56708671/11426125
# initial dataframe
df12=pd.DataFrame({'Date':['2007-12-03','2008-09-07'],'names':
[['Peter','Alex'],['Donald','Stan']]})
# convert dataframe to array for indexing list values (names)
a = np.array(df12.values)
# create a new, dataframe with dimensions for unnested
b = np.ndarray(shape = (4,2))
df2 = pd.DataFrame(b, columns = ["Date", "names"], dtype = str)
# implement loops to assign date/name values as required
i = range(len(a[0]))
j = range(len(a[0]))
for x in i:
for y in j:
df2.iat[2*x+y, 0] = a[x][0]
df2.iat[2*x+y, 1] = a[x][1][y]
# set Date column as Index
df2.Date=pd.to_datetime(df2.Date)
df2.index=df2.Date
df2.drop('Date',axis=1,inplace =True)

In my case with more than one column to explode, and with variables lengths for the arrays that needs to be unnested.
I ended up applying the new pandas 0.25 explode function two times, then removing generated duplicates and it does the job !
df = df.explode('A')
df = df.explode('B')
df = df.drop_duplicates()

Below is a simple function for horizontal explode, based on #BEN_YO's answer.
import typing
import pandas as pd
def horizontal_explode(df: pd.DataFrame, col_name: str, new_columns: typing.Union[list, None]=None) -> pd.DataFrame:
t = pd.DataFrame(df[col_name].tolist(), columns=new_columns, index=df.index)
return pd.concat([df, t], axis=1)
Running example:
items = [
["1", ["a", "b", "c"]],
["2", ["d", "e", "f"]]
]
df = pd.DataFrame(items, columns = ["col1", "col2"])
print(df)
t = horizontal_explode(df=df, col_name="col2")
del t["col2"]
print(t)
t = horizontal_explode(df=df, col_name="col2", new_columns=["new_col1", "new_col2", "new_col3"])
del t["col2"]
print(t)
This the relevant output:
col1 col2
0 1 [a, b, c]
1 2 [d, e, f]
col1 0 1 2
0 1 a b c
1 2 d e f
col1 new_col1 new_col2 new_col3
0 1 a b c
1 2 d e f

demo = {'set1':{'t1':[1,2,3],'t2':[4,5,6],'t3':[7,8,9]}, 'set2':{'t1':[1,2,3],'t2':[4,5,6],'t3':[7,8,9]}, 'set3': {'t1':[1,2,3],'t2':[4,5,6],'t3':[7,8,9]}}
df = pd.DataFrame.from_dict(demo, orient='index')
print(df.head())
my_list=[]
df2=pd.DataFrame(columns=['set','t1','t2','t3'])
for key,item in df.iterrows():
t1=item.t1
t2=item.t2
t3=item.t3
mat1=np.matrix([t1,t2,t3])
row1=[key,mat1[0,0],mat1[0,1],mat1[0,2]]
df2.loc[len(df2)]=row1
row2=[key,mat1[1,0],mat1[1,1],mat1[1,2]]
df2.loc[len(df2)]=row2
row3=[key,mat1[2,0],mat1[2,1],mat1[2,2]]
df2.loc[len(df2)]=row3
print(df2)
set t1 t2 t3
0 set1 1 2 3
1 set1 4 5 6
2 set1 7 8 9
3 set2 1 2 3
4 set2 4 5 6
5 set2 7 8 9
6 set3 1 2 3
7 set3 4 5 6
8 set3 7 8 9

Develop Reference

node.js excel linux python-3.x azure haskell apache-spark rust .htaccess string

Pandas: apply list of functions on columns, one function per column - python-3.x

You could do something like: # list containing functions fun_list = [] # assume df is your dataframe for i, fun in enumerate(fun_list): df.iloc[:,i] = fun(df.iloc[:,i])

You can simply apply to specific column df['x'] = df['X'].apply(lambda x: x*2)

Related

Pandas DataFrame: Same operation on multiple sets of columns

Create a new dataframe from list of strings from each row of dataframe [duplicate]

Flatten a tuple and keep the corresponding values for every value of the tuple [duplicate]

How to use two for loops to copy a list variable into a location variable in a dataframe?

python dataframe: split a row to several rows and add a new column [duplicate]

Categories

Resources