I was learning Haxe. And I found that a code that is in the official manual doesn't be compiled in https://try.haxe.org/. and I wonder why and how to fix the code?
the code is the one in here: https://haxe.org/manual/types-enum-using.html
try.haxe.org assumes that the class that contains the entry point main() is called Test, while the code example you linked uses Main.
It appears to work fine once you change class Main to class Test in the code snippet: https://try.haxe.org/#68274
Note that some other code examples from the manual may not compile because try.haxe.org still runs Haxe 3.4.4, while the current release is 4.0.5. To work around this, people usually use this fork of try.haxe that lets you specify the Haxe version to use in the options tab:
http://try-haxe.mrcdk.com/
Related
Aite, [first poster here, pls don't bash]
So, I'm using the sound library, which I of course remembered to import, and works just fine, proof being given by the fact that all the other functions I used work as expected and give no problems neither in editor nor in execution.
Except, of course, for this little bugger of a pause() function, which I wrote as per below using no different a syntax from all the other functions, only to find out Processing isn't very keen on accepting its existence.
Problem shows both using 3.3.6 and 3.5.
Oh, and also, apparently isPlaying() returns an int, what's up with that?
If, as I'd suspect, that single line below won't be enough code to couple with the info to get to the bottom of it, here's a Dropbox link to the code (since it uses a bunch of files) so you can test it yourself.
It kinda won't work if you try to run it as is tho because it messes up when trying to load all the songs (in the last line of setup), yeah I kinda need some help with that too... works fine if you only load the first one tho!
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/di7mwit0w2l4513/AABipGDAdoKx277f8Hg_ZfhDa?dl=0
(Please, don't expect clear, extensively commented coding. I started working on this way before I learnt that was a thing. Deeply sorry. Of course, you can ask away about anything baffling you)
What did I try, er, writing it well???
I used .play(), .stop(), the volume ones, and they all, as per stated, work fine.
import processing.sound.*;
SoundFile[] songs= new SoundFile[1];
void setup(){
songs[0]=new SoundFile(this,"Small Bump.mp3");
songs[0].play();
}
void draw(){
}
void keyPressed(){
if (songs[0].isPlaying()==1)songs[0].pause();
}
When I copy your code into my Processing editor, I get a couple errors:
songs[0]="Small Bump.mp3";
The sounds array holds instances of SoundFile, but you're trying to store a String value here. Maybe you're looking for the SoundFile constructor?
if (songs[0].isPlaying()==1)
The isPlaying() function returns a boolean value, but you're comparing it to an int value.
songs[i].pause();
You haven't declared this i variable anywhere. Probably meant for this to be a 0.
If I fix all of these errors, then your code compiles fine.
You might want to take a look at the reference for the Sound library here.
The Sound library I had installed was 1.3.2, or something of the likes.
All the references I'd read were for 2.0+.
Having updated that through the "add library" menu, all was solved.
I am trying to write source code in one language and have it converted to both native c++ and JS source. Ideally the converted source should be human readable and resemble the original source as best it can. I was hoping haxe could solve this problem for me. So I code in haxescript and have it convert it to its corresponding C++ and JS source. However the examples I'm finding of haxe seems to create the final application for you. So with C++ it will use msbuild (or whatever compiler it finds) and creates the final exe for you from generated C++ code. Does haxe also create the c++ and JS source code for you to view or is it all done internally to haxe and not accessible? If it is accessible then is it possible to remove the building side of haxe so it simply creates the source code and stops?
Thanks
When you generate CPP all the intermediate files are generated and kept wherever you decide to generate your output (the path given using -cpp pathToOutput). The fact that you get an executable is probably because you are using the -main switch. That implies an entry point to your application but that is not really required and you can just pass to the command line a bunch of types that you want to have built in your output.
For JS it is very similar, a single JS file is generated and it only has an entry point if you used -main.
Regarding the other topic, does your Haxe code resembles the generated code the answer is yes, but ... some of the types (like Enum and Abstract) only exist in Haxe so they will generate code that functionally works but it might look quite different. Also Haxe has an always-on optimizer/analyzer that might mungle your code in unexpected ways (the analyzer can be disabled). I still find that it is not that difficult to figure out the Haxe source from the generated code. JS has support for source mapping which is really useful for debugging. So in the end, Haxe doesn't do anything to obfuscate your generated code but also doesn't do much to try to preserve it too strictly.
I've been tasked with creating conformance tests of user input, the task if fairly tricky and we need very high levels of reliability. The server runs on PHP, the client runs on JS, and I thought Haxe might reduce duplicative work.
However, I'm having trouble with deadcode removal. Since I am just creating helper functions (utilObject.isMeaningOfLife(42)) I don't have a main program that calls each one. I tried adding #:keep: to a utility class, but it was cut out anyway.
I tried to specify that utility class through the -main switch, but I had to add a dummy main() method and this doesn't scale beyond that single class.
You can force the inclusion of all the files defined in a given package and its sub packages to be included in the build using a compiler argument.
haxe --macro include('my.package') ..etc
This is a shortcut to the macro.Compiler.include function.
As you can see the signature of this function allows you to do it recursive and also exclude packages.
static include (pack:String, rec:Bool = true, ?ignore:Array<String>, ?classPaths:Array<String>):Void
I think you don't have to use #:keep in that case for each library class.
I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for, I hope it helps.
Otherwise this could be helpful checks:
Is it bad that the code is cut away if you don't use it?
It could also be the case some code is inlined in the final output?
Compile your code using the compiler flag -dce std as mentioned in comments.
If you use the static analyzer, don't use it.
Add #:keep and reference the class+function somewhere.
Otherwise provide minimal setup if you can reproduce.
I have IntelliJ 12 and some groovy code (along with a pile of java code) in a project.
In intelliJ, i can see class A's import of some groovy code, and i have also included the library that has that code.
However, while the package itself is in one colour (for the import), the actual class being imported is in red, which implies an issue of some sort. Hovering the mouse over it reveals no issue though.
When i run a "make" or a "rebuild project" is where the problems start - i get
Groovyc: unable to resolve class com.blah.blah.blah.A
How can i resolve this?
Currently, my project setup is like so:
Under "Libraries" in (Project Structure -> Project Settings -> Libraries) I have:
the jar file with all the groovy code
the src jar file with all the groovy code
In the "Modules" section i have the - well, i don't know what to call it, the column isn't labelled - the library name from the libraries section associated with the src and class files, and the little "export" button beside it is ticked.
Incidentally, opening the class in intelliJ never shows the source code, which given the source is included struck me as weird.
Is there anything else I should need to do?
I've worked this one out, but if anybody knows why groovy cannot be in the "Resource Patterns" list and wants an upvote, do chime in
Oh, right.
I removed the !?*.groovy entry from the list of, um, entries in the File : Settings -> Compiler -> Resource Patterns thingy.
It doesn't seem to matter if "use external build" is on or off for this, but the !?*.groovy; entry cannot be there.
I wonder if anybody knows why?
I had the same problem and had to Add Framework Support and add Groovy to the project to get round this problem.
I created the project using gradle.
I just got your question in my Google results as I had a similar issue. My problem was that I was able to get the groovy code in my IntelliJ 12 project to compile ok, but it wasn't getting wired in properly when I tried to run unit tests within the IDE.
After some investigation, I uncovered that groovy and logback libraries were all set up in the project to be available in the runtime stage of the Maven build of the project, but that resulted in them not being available in the test stage. To fix this, I ended up manually updating the groovy-all and the logback libraries scope from runtime to provided under File->Project Structure->Modules->Dependencies. This allowed me to both compile and test within the IDE while including the Groovy modules as well as the Java modules.
Perhaps you had something similar going on in your project?
Six years later, I also just got this question near the top of my search results.
In my project my Unable to load class 'groovy.text.SimpleTemplateEngine' problem was actually due to a codenarc issue. I was able to resolve the issue by adding the following to build.gradle:
// codenarc version issue work-around
configurations.codenarc {
resolutionStrategy.eachDependency { DependencyResolveDetails d ->
if (d.requested.group == 'org.codehaus.groovy') {
d.useVersion '2.4.7'
}
}
}
Today i decided to see up Groovy source code and to built up my programming muscles in Groovy. I downloaded the Groovy Source code 1.8 from this link. But how do i proceed? In sense which folder first i have to see, so that i can understand better how groovy works(because there are many folders like benchmarks,bootstraps, src etc). May be this seems to be stupid question but i wanna to ask it.
Correct me if am worng.
The source code is inside src/main.
The unit tests all live inside src/test.
I found a good place to start looking was inside the huge class:
src/main/org/codehaus/groovy/runtime/DefaultGroovyMethods.java
This is where a lot of the extra Groovy methods are defined, so you can pick your favourite function (such as String.capitalize for example) and find the definition of that method (around line 9561, but that might be different in the version of the code you have downloaded)
You should then be able to (for example) change how something works, and check that the unit tests still function by calling
ant test
from the root folder, then you should see it build and test reports should be created and placed in the target folder
I tend to use a combination of find and grep to locate the area in the source that I am interested in, then slowly expand out from that class as I find other things that relate to it...
Hope this helps...it's a bit of a big question to try and cover