Related
This is obviously simple, but as a numpy newbe I'm getting stuck.
I have a CSV file that contains 3 columns, the State, the Office ID, and the Sales for that office.
I want to calculate the percentage of sales per office in a given state (total of all percentages in each state is 100%).
df = pd.DataFrame({'state': ['CA', 'WA', 'CO', 'AZ'] * 3,
'office_id': list(range(1, 7)) * 2,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999)
for _ in range(12)]})
df.groupby(['state', 'office_id']).agg({'sales': 'sum'})
This returns:
sales
state office_id
AZ 2 839507
4 373917
6 347225
CA 1 798585
3 890850
5 454423
CO 1 819975
3 202969
5 614011
WA 2 163942
4 369858
6 959285
I can't seem to figure out how to "reach up" to the state level of the groupby to total up the sales for the entire state to calculate the fraction.
Update 2022-03
This answer by caner using transform looks much better than my original answer!
df['sales'] / df.groupby('state')['sales'].transform('sum')
Thanks to this comment by Paul Rougieux for surfacing it.
Original Answer (2014)
Paul H's answer is right that you will have to make a second groupby object, but you can calculate the percentage in a simpler way -- just groupby the state_office and divide the sales column by its sum. Copying the beginning of Paul H's answer:
# From Paul H
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
np.random.seed(0)
df = pd.DataFrame({'state': ['CA', 'WA', 'CO', 'AZ'] * 3,
'office_id': list(range(1, 7)) * 2,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999)
for _ in range(12)]})
state_office = df.groupby(['state', 'office_id']).agg({'sales': 'sum'})
# Change: groupby state_office and divide by sum
state_pcts = state_office.groupby(level=0).apply(lambda x:
100 * x / float(x.sum()))
Returns:
sales
state office_id
AZ 2 16.981365
4 19.250033
6 63.768601
CA 1 19.331879
3 33.858747
5 46.809373
CO 1 36.851857
3 19.874290
5 43.273852
WA 2 34.707233
4 35.511259
6 29.781508
(This solution is inspired from this article https://pbpython.com/pandas_transform.html)
I find the following solution to be the simplest(and probably the fastest) using transformation:
Transformation: While aggregation must return a reduced version of the
data, transformation can return some transformed version of the full
data to recombine. For such a transformation, the output is the same
shape as the input.
So using transformation, the solution is 1-liner:
df['%'] = 100 * df['sales'] / df.groupby('state')['sales'].transform('sum')
And if you print:
print(df.sort_values(['state', 'office_id']).reset_index(drop=True))
state office_id sales %
0 AZ 2 195197 9.844309
1 AZ 4 877890 44.274352
2 AZ 6 909754 45.881339
3 CA 1 614752 50.415708
4 CA 3 395340 32.421767
5 CA 5 209274 17.162525
6 CO 1 549430 42.659629
7 CO 3 457514 35.522956
8 CO 5 280995 21.817415
9 WA 2 828238 35.696929
10 WA 4 719366 31.004563
11 WA 6 772590 33.298509
You need to make a second groupby object that groups by the states, and then use the div method:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
np.random.seed(0)
df = pd.DataFrame({'state': ['CA', 'WA', 'CO', 'AZ'] * 3,
'office_id': list(range(1, 7)) * 2,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999) for _ in range(12)]})
state_office = df.groupby(['state', 'office_id']).agg({'sales': 'sum'})
state = df.groupby(['state']).agg({'sales': 'sum'})
state_office.div(state, level='state') * 100
sales
state office_id
AZ 2 16.981365
4 19.250033
6 63.768601
CA 1 19.331879
3 33.858747
5 46.809373
CO 1 36.851857
3 19.874290
5 43.273852
WA 2 34.707233
4 35.511259
6 29.781508
the level='state' kwarg in div tells pandas to broadcast/join the dataframes base on the values in the state level of the index.
For conciseness I'd use the SeriesGroupBy:
In [11]: c = df.groupby(['state', 'office_id'])['sales'].sum().rename("count")
In [12]: c
Out[12]:
state office_id
AZ 2 925105
4 592852
6 362198
CA 1 819164
3 743055
5 292885
CO 1 525994
3 338378
5 490335
WA 2 623380
4 441560
6 451428
Name: count, dtype: int64
In [13]: c / c.groupby(level=0).sum()
Out[13]:
state office_id
AZ 2 0.492037
4 0.315321
6 0.192643
CA 1 0.441573
3 0.400546
5 0.157881
CO 1 0.388271
3 0.249779
5 0.361949
WA 2 0.411101
4 0.291196
6 0.297703
Name: count, dtype: float64
For multiple groups you have to use transform (using Radical's df):
In [21]: c = df.groupby(["Group 1","Group 2","Final Group"])["Numbers I want as percents"].sum().rename("count")
In [22]: c / c.groupby(level=[0, 1]).transform("sum")
Out[22]:
Group 1 Group 2 Final Group
AAHQ BOSC OWON 0.331006
TLAM 0.668994
MQVF BWSI 0.288961
FXZM 0.711039
ODWV NFCH 0.262395
...
Name: count, dtype: float64
This seems to be slightly more performant than the other answers (just less than twice the speed of Radical's answer, for me ~0.08s).
I think this needs benchmarking. Using OP's original DataFrame,
df = pd.DataFrame({
'state': ['CA', 'WA', 'CO', 'AZ'] * 3,
'office_id': list(range(1, 7)) * 2,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999) for _ in range(12)]
})
0th Caner
NEW Pandas Tranform looks much faster.
df['sales'] / df.groupby('state')['sales'].transform('sum')
1.32 ms ± 352 µs per loop
(mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
1st Andy Hayden
As commented on his answer, Andy takes full advantage of vectorisation and pandas indexing.
c = df.groupby(['state', 'office_id'])['sales'].sum().rename("count")
c / c.groupby(level=0).sum()
3.42 ms ± 16.7 µs per loop
(mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
2nd Paul H
state_office = df.groupby(['state', 'office_id']).agg({'sales': 'sum'})
state = df.groupby(['state']).agg({'sales': 'sum'})
state_office.div(state, level='state') * 100
4.66 ms ± 24.4 µs per loop
(mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
3rd exp1orer
This is the slowest answer as it calculates x.sum() for each x in level 0.
For me, this is still a useful answer, though not in its current form. For quick EDA on smaller datasets, apply allows you use method chaining to write this in a single line. We therefore remove the need decide on a variable's name, which is actually very computationally expensive for your most valuable resource (your brain!!).
Here is the modification,
(
df.groupby(['state', 'office_id'])
.agg({'sales': 'sum'})
.groupby(level=0)
.apply(lambda x: 100 * x / float(x.sum()))
)
10.6 ms ± 81.5 µs per loop
(mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
So no one is going care about 6ms on a small dataset. However, this is 3x speed up and, on a larger dataset with high cardinality groupbys this is going to make a massive difference.
Adding to the above code, we make a DataFrame with shape (12,000,000, 3) with 14412 state categories and 600 office_ids,
import string
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
np.random.seed(0)
groups = [
''.join(i) for i in zip(
np.random.choice(np.array([i for i in string.ascii_lowercase]), 30000),
np.random.choice(np.array([i for i in string.ascii_lowercase]), 30000),
np.random.choice(np.array([i for i in string.ascii_lowercase]), 30000),
)
]
df = pd.DataFrame({'state': groups * 400,
'office_id': list(range(1, 601)) * 20000,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999)
for _ in range(12)] * 1000000
})
Using Caner's,
0.791 s ± 19.4 ms per loop
(mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
Using Andy's,
2 s ± 10.4 ms per loop
(mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
and exp1orer
19 s ± 77.1 ms per loop
(mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
So now we see x10 speed up on large, high cardinality datasets with Andy but a very impressive x20 speed up with Caner's.
Be sure to UV these three answers if you UV this one!!
Edit: added Caner benchmark
I realize there are already good answers here.
I nevertheless would like to contribute my own, because I feel for an elementary, simple question like this, there should be a short solution that is understandable at a glance.
It should also work in a way that I can add the percentages as a new column, leaving the rest of the dataframe untouched. Last but not least, it should generalize in an obvious way to the case in which there is more than one grouping level (e.g., state and country instead of only state).
The following snippet fulfills these criteria:
df['sales_ratio'] = df.groupby(['state'])['sales'].transform(lambda x: x/x.sum())
Note that if you're still using Python 2, you'll have to replace the x in the denominator of the lambda term by float(x).
I know that this is an old question, but exp1orer's answer is very slow for datasets with a large number unique groups (probably because of the lambda). I built off of their answer to turn it into an array calculation so now it's super fast! Below is the example code:
Create the test dataframe with 50,000 unique groups
import random
import string
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
np.random.seed(0)
# This is the total number of groups to be created
NumberOfGroups = 50000
# Create a lot of groups (random strings of 4 letters)
Group1 = [''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_uppercase) for _ in range(4)) for x in range(NumberOfGroups/10)]*10
Group2 = [''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_uppercase) for _ in range(4)) for x in range(NumberOfGroups/2)]*2
FinalGroup = [''.join(random.choice(string.ascii_uppercase) for _ in range(4)) for x in range(NumberOfGroups)]
# Make the numbers
NumbersForPercents = [np.random.randint(100, 999) for _ in range(NumberOfGroups)]
# Make the dataframe
df = pd.DataFrame({'Group 1': Group1,
'Group 2': Group2,
'Final Group': FinalGroup,
'Numbers I want as percents': NumbersForPercents})
When grouped it looks like:
Numbers I want as percents
Group 1 Group 2 Final Group
AAAH AQYR RMCH 847
XDCL 182
DQGO ALVF 132
AVPH 894
OVGH NVOO 650
VKQP 857
VNLY HYFW 884
MOYH 469
XOOC GIDS 168
HTOY 544
AACE HNXU RAXK 243
YZNK 750
NOYI NYGC 399
ZYCI 614
QKGK CRLF 520
UXNA 970
TXAR MLNB 356
NMFJ 904
VQYG NPON 504
QPKQ 948
...
[50000 rows x 1 columns]
Array method of finding percentage:
# Initial grouping (basically a sorted version of df)
PreGroupby_df = df.groupby(["Group 1","Group 2","Final Group"]).agg({'Numbers I want as percents': 'sum'}).reset_index()
# Get the sum of values for the "final group", append "_Sum" to it's column name, and change it into a dataframe (.reset_index)
SumGroup_df = df.groupby(["Group 1","Group 2"]).agg({'Numbers I want as percents': 'sum'}).add_suffix('_Sum').reset_index()
# Merge the two dataframes
Percents_df = pd.merge(PreGroupby_df, SumGroup_df)
# Divide the two columns
Percents_df["Percent of Final Group"] = Percents_df["Numbers I want as percents"] / Percents_df["Numbers I want as percents_Sum"] * 100
# Drop the extra _Sum column
Percents_df.drop(["Numbers I want as percents_Sum"], inplace=True, axis=1)
This method takes about ~0.15 seconds
Top answer method (using lambda function):
state_office = df.groupby(['Group 1','Group 2','Final Group']).agg({'Numbers I want as percents': 'sum'})
state_pcts = state_office.groupby(level=['Group 1','Group 2']).apply(lambda x: 100 * x / float(x.sum()))
This method takes about ~21 seconds to produce the same result.
The result:
Group 1 Group 2 Final Group Numbers I want as percents Percent of Final Group
0 AAAH AQYR RMCH 847 82.312925
1 AAAH AQYR XDCL 182 17.687075
2 AAAH DQGO ALVF 132 12.865497
3 AAAH DQGO AVPH 894 87.134503
4 AAAH OVGH NVOO 650 43.132050
5 AAAH OVGH VKQP 857 56.867950
6 AAAH VNLY HYFW 884 65.336290
7 AAAH VNLY MOYH 469 34.663710
8 AAAH XOOC GIDS 168 23.595506
9 AAAH XOOC HTOY 544 76.404494
The most elegant way to find percentages across columns or index is to use pd.crosstab.
Sample Data
df = pd.DataFrame({'state': ['CA', 'WA', 'CO', 'AZ'] * 3,
'office_id': list(range(1, 7)) * 2,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999) for _ in range(12)]})
The output dataframe is like this
print(df)
state office_id sales
0 CA 1 764505
1 WA 2 313980
2 CO 3 558645
3 AZ 4 883433
4 CA 5 301244
5 WA 6 752009
6 CO 1 457208
7 AZ 2 259657
8 CA 3 584471
9 WA 4 122358
10 CO 5 721845
11 AZ 6 136928
Just specify the index, columns and the values to aggregate. The normalize keyword will calculate % across index or columns depending upon the context.
result = pd.crosstab(index=df['state'],
columns=df['office_id'],
values=df['sales'],
aggfunc='sum',
normalize='index').applymap('{:.2f}%'.format)
print(result)
office_id 1 2 3 4 5 6
state
AZ 0.00% 0.20% 0.00% 0.69% 0.00% 0.11%
CA 0.46% 0.00% 0.35% 0.00% 0.18% 0.00%
CO 0.26% 0.00% 0.32% 0.00% 0.42% 0.00%
WA 0.00% 0.26% 0.00% 0.10% 0.00% 0.63%
You can sum the whole DataFrame and divide by the state total:
# Copying setup from Paul H answer
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
np.random.seed(0)
df = pd.DataFrame({'state': ['CA', 'WA', 'CO', 'AZ'] * 3,
'office_id': list(range(1, 7)) * 2,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999) for _ in range(12)]})
# Add a column with the sales divided by state total sales.
df['sales_ratio'] = (df / df.groupby(['state']).transform(sum))['sales']
df
Returns
office_id sales state sales_ratio
0 1 405711 CA 0.193319
1 2 535829 WA 0.347072
2 3 217952 CO 0.198743
3 4 252315 AZ 0.192500
4 5 982371 CA 0.468094
5 6 459783 WA 0.297815
6 1 404137 CO 0.368519
7 2 222579 AZ 0.169814
8 3 710581 CA 0.338587
9 4 548242 WA 0.355113
10 5 474564 CO 0.432739
11 6 835831 AZ 0.637686
But note that this only works because all columns other than state are numeric, enabling summation of the entire DataFrame. For example, if office_id is character instead, you get an error:
df.office_id = df.office_id.astype(str)
df['sales_ratio'] = (df / df.groupby(['state']).transform(sum))['sales']
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for /: 'str' and 'str'
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
np.random.seed(0)
df = pd.DataFrame({'state': ['CA', 'WA', 'CO', 'AZ'] * 3,
'office_id': list(range(1, 7)) * 2,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999) for _ in range(12)]})
df.groupby(['state', 'office_id'])['sales'].sum().rename("weightage").groupby(level = 0).transform(lambda x: x/x.sum())
df.reset_index()
Output:
state office_id weightage
0 AZ 2 0.169814
1 AZ 4 0.192500
2 AZ 6 0.637686
3 CA 1 0.193319
4 CA 3 0.338587
5 CA 5 0.468094
6 CO 1 0.368519
7 CO 3 0.198743
8 CO 5 0.432739
9 WA 2 0.347072
10 WA 4 0.355113
11 WA 6 0.297815
I think this would do the trick in 1 line:
df.groupby(['state', 'office_id']).sum().transform(lambda x: x/np.sum(x)*100)
Simple way I have used is a merge after the 2 groupby's then doing simple division.
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
np.random.seed(0)
df = pd.DataFrame({'state': ['CA', 'WA', 'CO', 'AZ'] * 3,
'office_id': list(range(1, 7)) * 2,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999) for _ in range(12)]})
state_office = df.groupby(['state', 'office_id'])['sales'].sum().reset_index()
state = df.groupby(['state'])['sales'].sum().reset_index()
state_office = state_office.merge(state, left_on='state', right_on ='state', how = 'left')
state_office['sales_ratio'] = 100*(state_office['sales_x']/state_office['sales_y'])
state office_id sales_x sales_y sales_ratio
0 AZ 2 222579 1310725 16.981365
1 AZ 4 252315 1310725 19.250033
2 AZ 6 835831 1310725 63.768601
3 CA 1 405711 2098663 19.331879
4 CA 3 710581 2098663 33.858747
5 CA 5 982371 2098663 46.809373
6 CO 1 404137 1096653 36.851857
7 CO 3 217952 1096653 19.874290
8 CO 5 474564 1096653 43.273852
9 WA 2 535829 1543854 34.707233
10 WA 4 548242 1543854 35.511259
11 WA 6 459783 1543854 29.781508
df = pd.DataFrame({'state': ['CA', 'WA', 'CO', 'AZ'] * 3,
'office_id': list(range(1, 7)) * 2,
'sales': [np.random.randint(100000, 999999)
for _ in range(12)]})
grouped = df.groupby(['state', 'office_id'])
100*grouped.sum()/df[["state","sales"]].groupby('state').sum()
Returns:
sales
state office_id
AZ 2 54.587910
4 33.009225
6 12.402865
CA 1 32.046582
3 44.937684
5 23.015735
CO 1 21.099989
3 31.848658
5 47.051353
WA 2 43.882790
4 10.265275
6 45.851935
As someone who is also learning pandas I found the other answers a bit implicit as pandas hides most of the work behind the scenes. Namely in how the operation works by automatically matching up column and index names. This code should be equivalent to a step by step version of #exp1orer's accepted answer
With the df, I'll call it by the alias state_office_sales:
sales
state office_id
AZ 2 839507
4 373917
6 347225
CA 1 798585
3 890850
5 454423
CO 1 819975
3 202969
5 614011
WA 2 163942
4 369858
6 959285
state_total_sales is state_office_sales grouped by total sums in index level 0 (leftmost).
In: state_total_sales = df.groupby(level=0).sum()
state_total_sales
Out:
sales
state
AZ 2448009
CA 2832270
CO 1495486
WA 595859
Because the two dataframes share an index-name and a column-name pandas will find the appropriate locations through shared indexes like:
In: state_office_sales / state_total_sales
Out:
sales
state office_id
AZ 2 0.448640
4 0.125865
6 0.425496
CA 1 0.288022
3 0.322169
5 0.389809
CO 1 0.206684
3 0.357891
5 0.435425
WA 2 0.321689
4 0.346325
6 0.331986
To illustrate this even better, here is a partial total with a XX that has no equivalent. Pandas will match the location based on index and column names, where there is no overlap pandas will ignore it:
In: partial_total = pd.DataFrame(
data = {'sales' : [2448009, 595859, 99999]},
index = ['AZ', 'WA', 'XX' ]
)
partial_total.index.name = 'state'
Out:
sales
state
AZ 2448009
WA 595859
XX 99999
In: state_office_sales / partial_total
Out:
sales
state office_id
AZ 2 0.448640
4 0.125865
6 0.425496
CA 1 NaN
3 NaN
5 NaN
CO 1 NaN
3 NaN
5 NaN
WA 2 0.321689
4 0.346325
6 0.331986
This becomes very clear when there are no shared indexes or columns. Here missing_index_totals is equal to state_total_sales except that it has a no index-name.
In: missing_index_totals = state_total_sales.rename_axis("")
missing_index_totals
Out:
sales
AZ 2448009
CA 2832270
CO 1495486
WA 595859
In: state_office_sales / missing_index_totals
Out: ValueError: cannot join with no overlapping index names
df.groupby('state').office_id.value_counts(normalize = True)
I used value_counts method, but it returns percentage like 0.70 and 0.30, not like a 70 and 30.
One-line solution:
df.join(
df.groupby('state').agg(state_total=('sales', 'sum')),
on='state'
).eval('sales / state_total')
This returns a Series of per-office ratios -- can be used on it's own or assigned to the original Dataframe.
I'm pretty new in python / pandas, so its probably pretty simple question...but I can't handle it:
I have two dataframe loaded from Oracle SQL. One with 300 rows / 2 column and second with one row/one column. I would like to add column from second dataset to the first for each row as new column. But I can only get it for the first row and the others are NaN.
`import cx_Oracle
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import xgboost as xgb
from sklearn.externals import joblib
dsn_tns = cx_Oracle.makedsn('127.0.1.1', '1521', 'orcl')
conn = cx_Oracle.connect(user='MyName', password='MyPass', dsn=dsn_tns)
d_score = pd.read_sql_query(
'''
SELECT
ID
,RESULT
,RATIO_A
,RATIO_B
from ORCL_DATA
''', conn) #return 380 rows
d_score['ID'] = d_score['ID'].astype(int)
d_score['RESULT'] = d_score['RESULT'].astype(int)
d_score['RATIO_A'] = d_score['RATIO_A'].astype(float)
d_score['RATIO_B'] = d_score['RATIO_B'].astype(float)
d_score_features = d_score.iloc [:,2:4]
#d_train_target = d_score.iloc[:,1:2] #target is RESULT
DM_train = xgb.DMatrix(data= d_score_features)
loaded_model = joblib.load("bst.dat")
pred = loaded_model.predict(DM_train)
i = pd.DataFrame({'ID':d_score['ID'],'Probability':pred})
print(i)
s = pd.read_sql_query('''select max(id_process) as MAX_ID_PROCESS from PROCESS''',conn) #return only 1 row
m =pd.DataFrame(data=s, dtype=np.int64,columns = ['MAX_ID_PROCESS'] )
print(m)
i['new'] = m ##Trying to add MAX_ID_PROCESS to all rows
print(i)
i =
ID Probability
0 20101 0.663083
1 20105 0.486774
2 20106 0.441300
3 20278 0.703176
4 20221 0.539185
....
379 20480 0.671976
m =
MAX_ID_PROCESS
0 274
i =
ID_MATCH Probability new
0 20101 0.663083 274.0
1 20105 0.486774 NaN
2 20106 0.441300 NaN
3 20278 0.703176 NaN
4 20221 0.539185 NaN
I need value 'new' for all rows...
Since your second dataframe is only having one value, you can assign it like this:
df1['new'] = df2.MAX_ID_PROCESS[0]
# Or using .loc
df1['new'] = df2.MAX_ID_PROCESS.loc[0]
In your case, it should be:
i['new'] = m.MAX_ID_PROCESS[0]
You should now see:
ID Probability new
0 20101 0.663083 274.0
1 20105 0.486774 274.0
2 20106 0.441300 274.0
3 20278 0.703176 274.0
4 20221 0.539185 274.0
As we know that we can append one column of dataframe1 to dataframe2 as new column using the code: dataframe2["new_column_name"] = dataframe1["column_to_copy"].
We can extend this approach to solve your problem.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df1 = pd.DataFrame()
df1["ColA"] = [1, 12, 32, 24,12]
df1["ColB"] = [23, 11, 6, 45,25]
df1["ColC"] = [10, 25, 3, 23,15]
print(df1)
Output:
ColA ColB ColC
0 1 23 10
1 12 11 25
2 32 6 3
3 24 45 23
4 12 25 15
Now we create a new dataframe and add a row to it.
df3 = pd.DataFrame()
df3["ColTest"] = [1]
Now we store the value of the first row of the second dataframe as we want to add it to all the rows in dataframe1 as a new column:
val = df3.iloc[0]
print(val)
Output:
ColTest 1
Name: 0, dtype: int64
Now, we will store this value for as many rows as we have in dataframe1.
rows = len(df1)
for row in range(rows):
df3.loc[row]=val
print(df3)
Output:
ColTest
0 1
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 1
Now we will append this column to the first dataframe and solve your problem.
df["ColTest"] = df3["ColTest"]
print(df)
Output:
ColA ColB ColC ColTest
0 1 23 10 1
1 12 11 25 1
2 32 6 3 1
3 24 45 23 1
4 12 25 15 1
I have a very large dataframe with 1,000 columns. The first few columns occur only once, denoting a customer. The next few columns are representative of multiple encounters with the customer, with an underscore and the number encounter. Every additional encounter adds a new column, so there is NOT a fixed number of columns -- it'll grow with time.
Sample dataframe header structure excerpt:
id dob gender pro_1 pro_10 pro_11 pro_2 ... pro_9 pre_1 pre_10 ...
I'm trying to re-order the columns based on the number after the column name, so all _1 should be together, all _2 should be together, etc, like so:
id dob gender pro_1 pre_1 que_1 fre_1 gen_1 pro2 pre_2 que_2 fre_2 ...
(Note that the re-order should order the numbers correctly; the current order treats them like strings, which orders 1, 10, 11, etc. rather than 1, 2, 3)
Is this possible to do in pandas, or should I be looking at something else? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!
EDIT:
Alternatively, is it also possible to re-arrange column names based on the string part AND number part of the column names? So the output would then look similar to the original, except the numbers would be considered so that the order is more intuitive:
id dob gender pro_1 pro_2 pro_3 ... pre_1 pre_2 pre_3 ...
EDIT 2.0:
Just wanted to thank everyone for helping! While only one of the responses worked, I really appreciate the effort and learned a lot about other approaches / ways to think about this.
Here is one way you can try:
# column names copied from your example
example_cols = 'id dob gender pro_1 pro_10 pro_11 pro_2 pro_9 pre_1 pre_10'.split()
# sample DF
df = pd.DataFrame([range(len(example_cols))], columns=example_cols)
df
# id dob gender pro_1 pro_10 pro_11 pro_2 pro_9 pre_1 pre_10
#0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
# number of columns excluded from sorting
N = 3
# get a list of columns from the dataframe
cols = df.columns.tolist()
# split, create an tuple of (column_name, prefix, number) and sorted based on the 2nd and 3rd item of the tuple, then retrieved the first item.
# adjust "key = lambda x: x[2]" to group cols by numbers only
cols_new = cols[:N] + [ a[0] for a in sorted([ (c, p, int(n)) for c in cols[N:] for p,n in [c.split('_')]], key = lambda x: (x[1], x[2])) ]
# get the new dataframe based on the cols_new
df_new = df[cols_new]
# id dob gender pre_1 pre_10 pro_1 pro_2 pro_9 pro_10 pro_11
#0 0 1 2 8 9 3 6 7 4 5
Luckily there is a one liner in python that can fix this:
df = df.reindex(sorted(df.columns), axis=1)
For Example lets say you had this dataframe:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df = pd.DataFrame({'Name': [2, 4, 8, 0],
'ID': [2, 0, 0, 0],
'Prod3': [10, 2, 1, 8],
'Prod1': [2, 4, 8, 0],
'Prod_1': [2, 4, 8, 0],
'Pre7': [2, 0, 0, 0],
'Pre2': [10, 2, 1, 8],
'Pre_2': [10, 2, 1, 8],
'Pre_9': [10, 2, 1, 8]}
)
print(df)
Output:
Name ID Prod3 Prod1 Prod_1 Pre7 Pre2 Pre_2 Pre_9
0 2 2 10 2 2 2 10 10 10
1 4 0 2 4 4 0 2 2 2
2 8 0 1 8 8 0 1 1 1
3 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 8
Then used
df = df.reindex(sorted(df.columns), axis=1)
Then the dataframe will then look like:
ID Name Pre2 Pre7 Pre_2 Pre_9 Prod1 Prod3 Prod_1
0 2 2 10 2 10 10 2 10 2
1 0 4 2 0 2 2 4 2 4
2 0 8 1 0 1 1 8 1 8
3 0 0 8 0 8 8 0 8 0
As you can see, the columns without underscore will come first, followed by an ordering based on the number after the underscore. However this also sorts of the column names, so the column names that come first in the alphabet will be first.
You need to split you column on '_' then convert to int:
c = ['A_1','A_10','A_2','A_3','B_1','B_10','B_2','B_3']
df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(0,100,(2,8)), columns = c)
df.reindex(sorted(df.columns, key = lambda x: int(x.split('_')[1])), axis=1)
Output:
A_1 B_1 A_2 B_2 A_3 B_3 A_10 B_10
0 68 11 59 69 37 68 76 17
1 19 37 52 54 23 93 85 3
Next case, you need human sorting:
import re
def atoi(text):
return int(text) if text.isdigit() else text
def natural_keys(text):
'''
alist.sort(key=natural_keys) sorts in human order
http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/200712/human_sorting.html
(See Toothy's implementation in the comments)
'''
return [ atoi(c) for c in re.split(r'(\d+)', text) ]
df.reindex(sorted(df.columns, key = lambda x:natural_keys(x)), axis=1)
Output:
A_1 A_2 A_3 A_10 B_1 B_2 B_3 B_10
0 68 59 37 76 11 69 68 17
1 19 52 23 85 37 54 93 3
Try this.
To re-order the columns based on the number after the column name
cols_fixed = df.columns[:3] # change index no based on your df
cols_variable = df.columns[3:] # change index no based on your df
cols_variable = sorted(cols_variable, key=lambda x : int(x.split('_')[1])) # split based on the number after '_'
cols_new = cols_fixed + cols_variable
new_df = pd.DataFrame(df[cols_new])
To re-arrange column names based on the string part AND number part of the column names
cols_fixed = df.columns[:3] # change index no based on your df
cols_variable = df.columns[3:] # change index no based on your df
cols_variable = sorted(cols_variable)
cols_new = cols_fixed + cols_variable
new_df = pd.DataFrame(df[cols_new])
So i'm trying to solve this pandas exercise. I got this data set of Real estate firm from Kaggle and the data frame df looks like this.
id location type price
0 44525 Golden Mile House 4400000
1 44859 Nagüeles House 2400000
2 45465 Nagüeles House 1900000
3 50685 Nagüeles Plot 4250000
4 130728 Golden Mile House 32000000
5 130856 Nagüeles Plot 2900000
6 130857 Golden Mile House 3900000
7 130897 Golden Mile House 3148000
8 3484102 Marinha Plot 478000
9 3484124 Marinha Plot 2200000
10 3485461 Marinha House 1980000
So now,I have to find which property is undervalued or overvalued and which one has the genuine price on the basis of columns location and type. The desired result should look like this:
id location type price Over_val Under_val Norm_val
0 44525 Golden Mile House 4400000 0 0 1
1 44859 Nagüeles House 2400000 0 0 1
2 45465 Nagüeles House 1900000 0 0 1
3 50685 Nagüeles Plot 4250000 0 1 0
4 130728 Golden Mile House 32000000 1 0 0
5 130856 Nagüeles Plot 2900000 0 1 0
6 130857 Golden Mile House 3900000 0 0 1
7 130897 Golden Mile House 3148000 0 0 1
8 3484102 Marinha Plot 478000 0 0 1
9 3484124 Marinha Plot 2200000 0 0 1
10 3485461 Marinha House 1980000 0 1 0
Have been stuck on it for a while. What logic should I try in solving this problem?
Here's my solution. Explanation included as inline comments. There are probably ways to do this in lesser number of steps; I'll be interested to learn too.
import pandas as pd
# Replace this with whatever you have to load your data. This is set up for a sample data file I used
df = pd.read_csv('my_sample_data.csv', encoding='latin-1')
# Mean by location - type
mdf = df.set_index('id').groupby(['location','type'])['price'].mean().rename('mean').to_frame().reset_index()
# StdDev by location - type
sdf = df.set_index('id').groupby(['location','type'])['price'].std().rename('sd').to_frame().reset_index()
# Merge back into the original dataframe
df = df.set_index(['location','type']).join(mdf.set_index(['location','type'])).reset_index()
df = df.set_index(['location','type']).join(sdf.set_index(['location','type'])).reset_index()
# Add the indicator columns
df['Over_val'] = 0
df['Under_val'] = 0
df['Normal_val'] = 0
# Update the indicators
df.loc[df['price'] > df['mean'] + 2 * df['sd'], 'Over_val'] = 1
df.loc[df['price'] < df['mean'] - 2 * df['sd'], 'Under_val'] = 1
df['Normal_val'] = df['Over_val'] + df['Under_val']
df['Normal_val'] = df['Normal_val'].apply(lambda x: 1 if x == 0 else 0)
Here is another possible method. At 2 standard deviations there are no qualifying properties. There is one property at one std dev.
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame(data={}, columns=["id", "location", "type", "price"])
# data is already entered, left out for this example
df["id"] = prop_id
df["location"] = location
df["type"] = prop_type
df["price"] = price
# a function that returns the mean and standard deviation
def mean_std_dev(row):
mask1 = df["location"] == row["location"]
mask2 = df["type"] == row["type"]
df_filt = df[mask1 & mask2]
mean_price = df_filt["price"].mean()
std_dev_price = df_filt["price"].std()
return [mean_price, std_dev_price]
# create two columns and populate with the mean and std dev from function mean_std_dev
df[["mean", "standard deviation"]] = df.apply(
lambda row: pd.Series(mean_std_dev(row)), axis=1
)
# create final columns
df["Over_val"] = df.apply(
lambda x: 1 if x["price"] > x["mean"] + x["standard deviation"] else 0, axis=1
)
df["Under_val"] = df.apply(
lambda x: 1 if x["price"] < x["mean"] - x["standard deviation"] else 0, axis=1
)
df["Norm_val"] = df.apply(
lambda x: 1 if x["Over_val"] + x["Under_val"] == 0 else 0, axis=1
)
# delete the mean and standard deviation columns
df.drop(["mean", "standard deviation"], axis=1)
I have a csv file in the format shown below:
I have written the following code that reads the file and randomly deletes the rows that have steering value as 0. I want to keep just 10% of the rows that have steering value as 0.
df = pd.read_csv(filename, header=None, names = ["center", "left", "right", "steering", "throttle", 'break', 'speed'])
df = df.drop(df.query('steering==0').sample(frac=0.90).index)
However, I get the following error:
df = df.drop(df.query('steering==0').sample(frac=0.90).index)
locs = rs.choice(axis_length, size=n, replace=replace, p=weights)
File "mtrand.pyx", line 1104, in mtrand.RandomState.choice
(numpy/random/mtrand/mtrand.c:17062)
ValueError: a must be greater than 0
Can you guys help me?
sample DataFrame built with #andrew_reece's code
In [9]: df
Out[9]:
center left right steering throttle brake
0 center_54.jpg left_75.jpg right_39.jpg 1 0 0
1 center_20.jpg left_81.jpg right_49.jpg 3 1 1
2 center_34.jpg left_96.jpg right_11.jpg 0 4 2
3 center_98.jpg left_87.jpg right_34.jpg 0 0 0
4 center_67.jpg left_12.jpg right_28.jpg 1 1 0
5 center_11.jpg left_25.jpg right_94.jpg 2 1 0
6 center_66.jpg left_27.jpg right_52.jpg 1 3 3
7 center_18.jpg left_50.jpg right_17.jpg 0 0 4
8 center_60.jpg left_25.jpg right_28.jpg 2 4 1
9 center_98.jpg left_97.jpg right_55.jpg 3 3 0
.. ... ... ... ... ... ...
90 center_31.jpg left_90.jpg right_43.jpg 0 1 0
91 center_29.jpg left_7.jpg right_30.jpg 3 0 0
92 center_37.jpg left_10.jpg right_15.jpg 1 0 0
93 center_18.jpg left_1.jpg right_83.jpg 3 1 1
94 center_96.jpg left_20.jpg right_56.jpg 3 0 0
95 center_37.jpg left_40.jpg right_38.jpg 0 3 1
96 center_73.jpg left_86.jpg right_71.jpg 0 1 0
97 center_85.jpg left_31.jpg right_0.jpg 3 0 4
98 center_34.jpg left_52.jpg right_40.jpg 0 0 2
99 center_91.jpg left_46.jpg right_17.jpg 0 0 0
[100 rows x 6 columns]
In [10]: df.steering.value_counts()
Out[10]:
0 43 # NOTE: 43 zeros
1 18
2 15
4 12
3 12
Name: steering, dtype: int64
In [11]: df.shape
Out[11]: (100, 6)
your solution (unchanged):
In [12]: df = df.drop(df.query('steering==0').sample(frac=0.90).index)
In [13]: df.steering.value_counts()
Out[13]:
1 18
2 15
4 12
3 12
0 4 # NOTE: 4 zeros (~10% from 43)
Name: steering, dtype: int64
In [14]: df.shape
Out[14]: (61, 6)
NOTE: make sure that steering column has numeric dtype! If it's a string (object) then you would need to change your code as follows:
df = df.drop(df.query('steering=="0"').sample(frac=0.90).index)
# NOTE: ^ ^
after that you can save the modified (reduced) DataFrame to CSV:
df.to_csv('/path/to/filename.csv', index=False)
Here's a one-line approach, using concat() and sample():
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
# first, some sample data
# generate filename fields
positions = ['center','left','right']
N = 100
fnames = ['{}_{}.jpg'.format(loc, np.random.randint(100)) for loc in np.repeat(positions, N)]
df = pd.DataFrame(np.array(fnames).reshape(3,100).T, columns=positions)
# generate numeric fields
values = [0,1,2,3,4]
probas = [.5,.2,.1,.1,.1]
df['steering'] = np.random.choice(values, p=probas, size=N)
df['throttle'] = np.random.choice(values, p=probas, size=N)
df['brake'] = np.random.choice(values, p=probas, size=N)
print(df.shape)
(100,3)
The first few rows of sample output:
df.head()
center left right steering throttle brake
0 center_72.jpg left_26.jpg right_59.jpg 3 3 0
1 center_75.jpg left_68.jpg right_26.jpg 0 0 2
2 center_29.jpg left_8.jpg right_88.jpg 0 1 0
3 center_22.jpg left_26.jpg right_23.jpg 1 0 0
4 center_88.jpg left_0.jpg right_56.jpg 4 1 0
5 center_93.jpg left_18.jpg right_15.jpg 0 0 0
Now drop all but 10% of rows with steering==0:
newdf = pd.concat([df.loc[df.steering!=0],
df.loc[df.steering==0].sample(frac=0.1)])
With the probability weightings I used in this example, you'll see somewhere between 50-60 remaining entries in newdf, with about 5 steering==0 cases remaining.
Using a mask on steering combined with a random number should work:
df = df[(df.steering != 0) | (np.random.rand(len(df)) < 0.1)]
This does generate some extra random values, but it's nice and compact.
Edit: That said, I tried your example code and it worked as well. My guess is the error is coming from the fact that your df.query() statement is returning an empty dataframe, which probably means that the "sample" column does not contain any zeros, or alternatively that the column is read as strings rather than numeric. Try converting the column to integer before running the above snippet.