Bit of back story:
My Node app, called Sleepychat (in production, hosted on Heroku) recently started reporting Memory Limit Reached errors (at 512MB). Luckily, Heroku allows this and won't crash the app until 5 times is reached, so that's good. However, I find it strange that this occurred only just after a recent push to Heroku which involved nothing more than adding a page. My theory was that Heroku might have used a newer version of Node on the update, but it seems that isn't the case. I downgraded and the error still occurs.
My source can be found on GitHub. Line 185 is the connection code, and line 1553 is the disconnect code.
Now, I've had some time to run through the code using New Relic and Node Inspector to profile it, and it seems that any connection, whether allowed or immediately refused and disconnected, allocates a small amount of memory which isn't released upon disconnection.
For example, I navigate to localhost, the page connects on document ready, and New Relic shows a slight increase in memory. Usually about 500kb (which still seems large to me, but I'm guessing that's mostly the socket object). When I disconnect, no change occurs in New Relic. What's more interesting, is that I can spam page refreshes to rapidly spike memory usage. Earlier I mentioned that it doesn't matter whether or not the connection is refused. By this, I meant that after 3 connections within 15 seconds of each other, the site will immediately refuse new connections and disconnect.
Despite this, page refreshes (which automatically connect) increases RAM. I've looked through many times to see if I'm not releasing something, but to my knowledge, everything should be managed by the scope, so I have no idea what's leaking.
I've noticed some odd behavior once I added New Relic, though. Firstly, once Sleepychat hits its limit of 512MB, Heroku will report a Memory Limit Reached error, but New Relic will display as if a large chunk (~100MB) has been released. Despite that display, Heroku would later report an even higher usage on its next error. Secondly, New Relic reports a drop in memory usage whenever I use Node Inspector to record heap allocations, but goes right back up once I stop the recording.
Here's a snapshot file from Node Inspector (Actually an allocation timeline). 10 seconds in is when I start spamming page refreshes. Additionally, here's an image of what New Relic reports.
Snapshot: Snapshot File
New Relic:
I have no idea what's going on. Anyone have any ideas?
Background
I have a relatively simple node js application (essentially just expressjs + mongoose). It is currently running in production on an Ubuntu Server and serves about 20,000 page views per day.
Initially the application was running on a machine with 512 MB memory. Upon noticing that the server would essentially crash every so often I suspected that the application might be running out of memory, which was the case.
I have since moved the application to a server with 1 GB of memory. I have been monitoring the application and within a few minutes the application tends to reach about 200-250 MB of memory usage. Over longer periods of time (say 10+ hours) it seems that the amount keeps growing very slowly (I'm still investigating that).
I have been since been trying to figure out what is consuming the memory. I have been going through my code and have not found any obvious memory leaks (for example unclosed db connections and such).
Tests
I have implemented a handy heapdump function using node-heapdump and I have now enabled --expore-gc to be able to manually trigger garbage collection. From time to time I try triggering a manual GC to see what happens with the memory usage, but it seems to have no effect whatsoever.
I have also tried analysing heapdumps from time to time - but I'm not sure if what I'm seeing is normal or not. I do find it slightly suspicious that there is one entry with 93% of the retained size - but it just points to "builtins" (not really sure what the signifies).
Upon inspecting the 2nd highest retained size (Buffer) I can see that it links back to the same "builtins" via a setTimeout function in some Native Code. I suspect it is cache or https related (_cache, slabBuffer, tls).
Questions
Does this look normal for a Node JS application?
Is anyone able to draw any sort of conclusion from this?
What exactly is "builtins" (does it refer to builtin js types)?
Recently started playing with socket.io on my Digital Ocean droplet (1 core 1gb ram). I'm currently playing with twitter streams.
Currently, there is a single twitter stream which emits tweets only. The client takes the tweets and prints them to DOM.
The CPU usage is constantly moving back and fourth between 60& and 15% (generally arund 30-40) and ram usage is around 150mb.
This seems very weird to me as without socket.io things are a lot calmer.
Do you know what might be going on here?
If you're using node, 150mb ram might not be that atypical. node starts around ~100mb. Do you have any sort of console logging feature to check when your events are being emitted? there might be lots of things you aren't seeing, and marking them with console.log statements might make it very apparent
This problem is killing the stability of my production servers.
To recap, the basic idea is that my node server(s) sometimes intermittently slow down, sometimes resulting in Gateway Timeouts. As best as I can tell from my logs, something is blocking the node thread (meaning that the incoming request is not accepted), but I cannot for the life of me figure out what.
The problem ranges in severity. Sometimes what should be <100ms requests take ~10 seconds to complete; sometimes they never even get accepted by the node server at all. In short, it is as though some random task is working and blocking the node thread for a period of time, thus slowing down (or even blocking) incoming requests; the one thing I can say for sure is that the need-to-fix-symptom is a "Gateway Timeout".
The issue comes and goes without warning. I have not been able to correlate it against CPU usage, RAM usage, uptime, or any other relevant statistic. I've seen the servers handle a large load fine, and then have this error with a small load, so it does not even appear to be load-related. It is not unusual to see the error around 1am PST, which is the smallest load time of the day! Restarting the node app does seem to maybe make the problem go away for a while, but that really doesn't tell me much. I do wonder if it might be a bug in node.js... not very comforting, considering it is killing my production servers.
The first thing I did was to make sure I had upgraded node.js to the latest (0.8.12), as well as all my modules (here they are). Of course, I also have plenty of error catchers in place. I'm not doing anything funky like printing out lots to the console or writing to lots of files.
At first, I thought it was outbound HTTP requests blocking the incoming socket, because the express middleware was not even picking up the inbound request, but I gave up the theory because it looks like the node thread itself became busy.
Next, I went through all my code with JSHint and fixed literally every single warning, including a few accidental globals (forgetting to write "var") but this didn't help
After that, I assumed that perhaps I was running out of memory. But, my heap snapshots via nodetime are looking pretty good now (described below).
Still thinking that memory might be an issue, I took a look at garbage collection. I enabled the --nouse-idle-notification flag and did some more code optimization to NULL objects when they were not needed.
Still convinced that memory was the issue, I added the --expose-gc flag and executed the gc(); command every minute. This did not change anything, except to occasionally make requests a bit slower perhaps.
In a desperate attempt, I setup the "cluster" module to use 2 workers and automatically restart them every 30 min. Still, no luck.
I increased the ulimit to over 10,000 and kept an eye on the open files. There seem to be < 300 open files (or sockets) per node.js app, and increasing the ulimit thus had no impact.
I've been logging my server with nodetime and here's the jist of it:
CentOS 5.2 running on the Amazon Cloud (m1.large instance)
Greater than 5000 MB free memory at all times
Less than 150 MB heap size at all times
CPU usage is less than 60% at all times
I've also checked my MongoDB servers, which have <5% CPU usage and no requests are taking > 100ms to complete, so I highly doubt there's a bottleneck.
I've wrapped (almost) all my code using Q-promises (see code sample), and of course have avoided Sync() calls like the plague. I've tried to replicate the issue on my testing server (OSX), but have had little luck. Of course, this may be just because the production servers are being used by so many people in so many unpredictable ways that I simply cannot replicate via stress tests...
Many months after I first asked this question, I found the answer.
In a nutshell, the problem was that I was not piping a big asset when transferring it from one server to another. In other words, I was downloading an image from one server, before uploading it to a S3 bucket. Instead of streaming the download into the upload, I downloaded the file into memory, and then uploaded it.
I'm not sure why this did not show up as a memory spike, or elsewhere in my statistics.
My guess is Mongoose. If you are storing large payloads in Mongo, Mongoose can be pretty slow due to how it builds the Mongoose objects. See https://github.com/LearnBoost/mongoose/issues/950 for more details on the problem. If this is the problem you wouldn't see it in Mongo itself since the query returns quickly, but object instantiation could take 75x the query time.
Try setting up timers around (process.hrtime()) before and after you the Mongoose objects are being created to see if that might be the problem. If this is the problem, I would switch to using the node Mongo driver directly instead of going through Mongoose.
You are heavily leaking memory, try setting every object to null as soon as you don't need it anymore! Read this.
More information about hunting down memory leaks can be found here.
Give special attention to having multiple references to the same object and check if you have circular references, those are a pain to debug but will help you very much.
Try invoking the garbage collector manually every minute or so (I don't know if you can do this in node.js cause I'm more of a c++ and php coder). From my years of experience working with c++ I can tell you the most likely cause of your application slowing down over time is memory leaks, find them and plug them, you'll be ok!
Also assuming you're not caching and/or processing images, audio or video in memory or anything like that 150M heap is a lot! Those could be hundreds of thousands or even millions of small objects.
You don't have to be running out of memory for your application to slow down... just searching for free memory with that many objects already allocated is a huge job for the memory allocator, it takes a lot of time to allocate each new object and as you leak more and more memory that time only increases.
Is "--nouse-idle-connection" a mistake? do you really mean "--nouse_idle_notification".
I think it's maybe some issues about gc with too many tiny objects.
node is single process, so watch the most busy cpu core is much important than the load.
when your program is slow, you can execute "gdb node pid" and "bt" to see what node is busy doing.
What I'd do is set up a parallel node instance on the same server with some kind of echo service and test that one. If it runs fine, you narrow down your problem to your program code (and not a scheduler/OS-level problem). Then, step by step, include the modules and test again. Certainly this is a lot of work, takes long and I dont know if it is doable on your system.
If you need to get this working now, you can go the NASA redundancy route:
Bring up a second copy of your production servers, and put a proxy in front of them which routes each request to both stacks and returns the first response. I don't recommend this as a perfect long-term solution but it should help significantly reduce issues in production now, and help you gather log data that you could replay to recreate the issues on non-production servers.
Obviously, this is straight-forward for read requests, but more complex for commands which write to the db.
We have a similar problem with our Node.js server. It didn't scale well for weeks and we had tried almost everything as you had. Our problem was in the implicit backlog value which is set very low for high-concurrent environments.
http://nodejs.org/api/http.html#http_server_listen_port_hostname_backlog_callback
Setting the backlog to a significantly higher value (e.g. 10000) as well as tune networking in our kernel (/etc/sysctl.conf on Linux) as described in manual section helped a lot. From this time forward we don't have any timeouts in our Node.js server.
I have a web application that hangs under high loads. I'm not going to go into the specifics of the code because I really just want some troubleshooting advice and tooling recommendations.
It's a web app, so each request get's a thread. Under a high load test, the app begins to consume all of the cpu, while becoming unresponsive. I suspect that the request threads are hanging in the new code that we are testing. Due to the fact of the cpu consumption, I'm assuming this must be on my app side. My understanding, which could be wrong, is that total cpu consumption indicated my first troubleshooting efforts should be in looking at the code that's consuming those cycles.
What are some tools and/or methods for inspecting which threads are hanging and on what lines of code? Again, I can easily force the app into the problematic behavior.
I've found and been trying out visualvm. Seems like the perfect tool. Still open for suggestions though. I looked at eclipse TPTP and it seems to be end-of-life-ing as well as requiring a more heavy weight deployment.
You can insert logging messages at starting a thread and closing a thread. Then you start the application and inspect the output while penetrating the code.
Another way is to look for memory leaks. If you are sure you haven't one, you can extend the virtual memory of your JVM.
#chad: do you have Database in whole picture...you may want to start by looking what is happening at DB side...you can very well look into DB locks, current sessions etc.