I'm trying to convert input_image which is a tensor to numpy array.Following the already answered questions here and several others that suggested to use input_image.eval() or equivalently sess.run() for this conversion, I did the same, but it throws an error and apparently expects a feed_dict value for the sess.run(). But since here I'm not trying to run an operation dependent on unknown values, I don't see the need for the feed_dict here because all I'm doing here is just conversion.
Besides, just so as to check I also tried converting a tf.constant([1,2,3]) value right above it using the same method and it got successfully compiled despite its data type being the same as input_image. Here's my code which is the part of larger script:
def call(self, x):
input_image = Input(shape=(None, None, 3))
print(input_image.shape)
print(type(tf.constant([1,2,3])))
print(type(input_image))
print(type(K.get_session().run(tf.constant([1,2,3]))))
print(type(K.get_session().run(input_image)))
and here's the error:
(?, ?, ?, 3)
<class 'tensorflow.python.framework.ops.Tensor'>
<class 'tensorflow.python.framework.ops.Tensor'>
<class 'numpy.ndarray'>
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow_core/python/client/session.py", line 1365, in _do_call
return fn(*args)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow_core/python/client/session.py", line 1350, in _run_fn
target_list, run_metadata)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/tensorflow_core/python/client/session.py", line 1443, in _call_tf_sessionrun
run_metadata)
tensorflow.python.framework.errors_impl.InvalidArgumentError: 2 root error(s) found.
(0) Invalid argument: You must feed a value for placeholder tensor 'input_1' with dtype float and shape [?,?,?,3]
[[{{node input_1}}]]
[[input_1/_1051]]
(1) Invalid argument: You must feed a value for placeholder tensor 'input_1' with dtype float and shape [?,?,?,3]
[[{{node input_1}}]]
0 successful operations.
0 derived errors ignored.
I wonder why the former would work and the latter won't.
There is no such thing as "converting" a symbolic tensor to a numpy array, as the latter cannot hold the same kind of information as the former.
When you use eval() or session.run(), what you are doing is evaluating a symbolic expression to get a numerical result, which is a numpy array, but this is not a conversion. Evaluating an expression might or might not require additional input data (that's what the feed_dict is for), depending on the expression.
Evaluating a constant (tf.constant) does not require any input data, but evaluating your other expression does require the input data, so you cannot "convert" this to a numpy array.
Just adding to (or elaborating on) what #MatiasValdenegro said,
TensorFlow follows something called graph execution (or define-then-run). In other words, when you write a TensorFlow program it defines something called a data-flow graph which shows how the operations you defined are related to each other. And then you execute bits and pieces of that graph depending on the results you're after.
Let's consider two examples. (I am switching to a simple TensorFlow program instead of Keras bits as it makes things more clear - After all K.get_session() returns a Session object).
Example 1
Say you have the following program.
import tensorflow as tf
a = tf.placeholder(shape=[2,2], dtype=tf.float32)
b = tf.constant(1, dtype=tf.float32)
c = a * b
# Wrong: This is what you're doing essentially when you do sess.run(input_image)
with tf.Session() as sess:
print(sess.run(c))
# Right: You need to feed values that c is dependent on
with tf.Session() as sess:
print(sess.run(c, feed_dict={a: np.array([[1,2],[2,3]])}))
Whenever a resulting tensor (e.g. c) is dependent on a placeholder you cannot execute it and get the result without feeding values to all the dependent placeholders.
Example 2
When you define a tf.constant(1) this is not dependent on anything. In other words you don't need a feed_dict and can directly run eval() or sess.run() on it.
Update: Further explanation on why you need a feed_dict for input_image
TLDR: You need a feed_dict because your resulting Tensor is produced by an Input layer.
Your input_image is basically the resulting tensor you get by feeding something to the Input layer. Usually in Keras, you are not exposed to the internal placeholder level details. But you would do that via using model.fit() or model.evaluate(). You can see that Keras Input layer in fact uses a placeholder by analysing this line.
Hope I made my point clear that you do need to feed in a value to the placeholder to successfully evaluate the output of an Input layer. Because that basically holds a placeholder.
Update 2: How to feed to your Input layer
So, appears you can use feed_dict with Keras Input layer in the following manner. Instead of defining shape argument you straight away pass a placeholder to the tensor argument, which will bypass the internal placeholder creation in the layer.
from tensorflow.keras.layers import InputLayer
import numpy as np
import tensorflow.keras.backend as K
x = tf.placeholder(shape=[None, None, None, 3], dtype=tf.float32)
input_image = Input(tensor=x)
arr = np.array([[[[1,1,1]]]])
print(arr.shape)
print(K.get_session().run(input_image, feed_dict={x: arr}))
Related
I am trying to perform dimensionality reduction using PCA, where outputs is a list of tensors where each tensor has a shape of (1, 3, 32,32). Here is the code:
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
pca = PCA(10)
pca_result = pca.fit_transform(output)
But I keep getting this error, regardless of whatever I tried:
ValueError: only one element tensors can be converted to Python scalars
I know that the tensors with size(1,3, 32,32) is making the issue, since its looking for 1 element as the error puts it, but do not know how to solve it.
I have tried flattening each tensor with looping over output (don't know if its the right way of solving this issue), using the following code but it leads to error in pca:
new_outputs = []
for i in outputs:
for j in i:
j = j.cpu()
j = j.detach().numpy()
j = j.flatten()
new_outputs.append(j)
pca_result = pca.fit_transform(new_output)
I would appreciate if anybody can help with this error whether the flattening approach I took, is correct.
PS:I have read the existing posts (post1,post2) discussing this error but none of them could solve my problem.
Assuming your Tensors are stored in a matrix with shape like (10, 3, 32, 32) where 10 corresponds to number of Tensors, you should flatten each like that:
import torch
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
data= torch.rand((10, 3, 32, 32))
pca = PCA(10)
pca_result = pca.fit_transform(data.flatten(start_dim=1))
data.flatten(start_dim=1) makes your data to be in shape (10, 3*32*32)
The error you posted is actually related to one of the post you linked. The PCA estimator expects array-like object with fit() method and you provided a list of Tensors.
I'm running a training code using pyhtorch and numpy.
This is the plot_example function:
def plot_example(low_res_folder, gen):
files=os.listdir(low_res_folder)
gen.eval()
for file in files:
image=Image.open("test_images/" + file)
with torch.no_grad():
upscaled_img=gen(
config1.both_transform(image=np.asarray(image))["image"]
.unsqueeze(0)
.to(config1.DEVICE)
)
save_image(upscaled_img * 0.5 + 0.5, f"saved/{file}")
gen.train()
The problem I have is that the unsqueeze attribute raises the error:
File "E:\Downloads\esrgan-tf2-masteren\modules\train1.py", line 58, in train_fn
plot_example("test_images/", gen)
File "E:\Downloads\esrgan-tf2-masteren\modules\utils1.py", line 46, in plot_example
config1.both_transform(image=np.asarray(image))["image"]
AttributeError: 'numpy.ndarray' object has no attribute 'unsqueeze'
The network is GAN network and gen() represents the Generator.
Make sure image is a tensor in the shape of [batch size, channels, height, width] before entering any Pytorch layers.
Here you have
image=np.asarray(image)
I would remove this numpy conversion and keep it a torch.tensor.
Or if you really want it to be a numpy array, then right before it enters your generator make sure to use torch.from_numpy() as shown in this documentation on your numpy image before it gets unsqueezed: https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.from_numpy.html
This function is ofcourse an alternative if you don't want to get rid of that original conversion.
Sarthak Jain
I'm trying to use PyTorch with complex loss function. In order to accelerate the code, I hope that I can use the PyTorch multiprocessing package.
The first trial, I put 10x1 features into the NN and get 10x4 output.
After that, I want to pass 10x4 parameters into a function to do some calculation. (The calculation will be complex in the future.)
After calculating, the function will return a 10x1 array in total. This array will be set as NN_energy and calculate loss function.
Besides, I also want to know if there is another method to create a backward-able array to store the NN_energy array, instead of using
NN_energy = net(Data_in)[0:10,0]
Thanks a lot.
Full Code:
import torch
import numpy as np
from torch.autograd import Variable
from torch import multiprocessing
def func(msg,BOP):
ans = (BOP[msg][0]+BOP[msg][1]/BOP[msg][2])*BOP[msg][3]
return ans
class Net(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self, n_feature, n_hidden_1, n_hidden_2, n_output):
super(Net, self).__init__()
self.hidden_1 = torch.nn.Linear(n_feature , n_hidden_1) # hidden layer
self.hidden_2 = torch.nn.Linear(n_hidden_1, n_hidden_2) # hidden layer
self.predict = torch.nn.Linear(n_hidden_2, n_output ) # output layer
def forward(self, x):
x = torch.tanh(self.hidden_1(x)) # activation function for hidden layer
x = torch.tanh(self.hidden_2(x)) # activation function for hidden layer
x = self.predict(x) # linear output
return x
if __name__ == '__main__': # apply_async
Data_in = Variable( torch.from_numpy( np.asarray(list(range( 0,10))).reshape(10,1) ).float() )
Ground_truth = Variable( torch.from_numpy( np.asarray(list(range(20,30))).reshape(10,1) ).float() )
net = Net( n_feature=1 , n_hidden_1=15 , n_hidden_2=15 , n_output=4 ) # define the network
optimizer = torch.optim.Rprop( net.parameters() )
loss_func = torch.nn.MSELoss() # this is for regression mean squared loss
NN_output = net(Data_in)
args = range(0,10)
pool = multiprocessing.Pool()
return_data = pool.map( func, zip(args, NN_output) )
pool.close()
pool.join()
NN_energy = net(Data_in)[0:10,0]
for i in range(0,10):
NN_energy[i] = return_data[i]
loss = torch.sqrt( loss_func( NN_energy , Ground_truth ) ) # must be (1. nn output, 2. target)
print(loss)
Error messages:
File
"C:\ProgramData\Anaconda3\lib\site-packages\torch\multiprocessing\reductions.py",
line 126, in reduce_tensor
raise RuntimeError("Cowardly refusing to serialize non-leaf tensor which requires_grad, "
RuntimeError: Cowardly refusing to serialize non-leaf tensor which
requires_grad, since autograd does not support crossing process
boundaries. If you just want to transfer the data, call detach() on
the tensor before serializing (e.g., putting it on the queue).
First of all, Torch Variable API is deprecated since a very long time, just don't use it.
Next, torch.from_numpy( np.asarray(list(range( 0,10))).reshape(10,1) ).float() is wrong at many levels: np.asarray of list is useless since a copy will be performed anyway, and np.array takes list as input by design. Then, np.arange is available to return a range as numpy array, and it is also available on Torch. Next, specifying both dimension for reshape is useless and error prone, you could simply do reshape((-1, 1)), or even better unsqueeze(-1).
Here is the simplified expression torch.arange(10, dtype=torch.float32, requires_grad=True).unsqueeze(-1).
Using multiprocessing pool is a bad practice if using batch processing is possible. It will be both way more efficient and readable. Indeed, performing N small algebraic operations in parallel is always slower and a larger single algebraic operation, and even more on GPU. More importantly, computing the gradient is not supported by multiprocessing, hence the error that you get. Yet, this is partially true, because it is supports for tensors on cpu since 1.6.0. Have a lok, to the official release changelog.
Could you post a more representative example of what func method could be to make sure you really need it ?
NB: Distributed autograd as you are looking is now available in Pytorch as an experimental feature available in beta since 1.6.0. Have a look to the official documentation.
I'm using Pytorch for some robotics Reinforcement Learning tasks. I'd like to use both images and information about the state as observations for this task. The implementation I'm using does not directly support this so I'm making some amendments. Expected observations are either state, as a 1 dimensional Tensor, or images as a 3 dimensional Tensor (channels, width, height). In my task I would like the observation to be a tuple of Tensors.
In many places in my codebase, the observation is of course expected to be a single Tensor, not a tuple of Tensors. Is there an easy way to treat a tuple of Tensors as a single Tensor?
For example, I would like:
observation.to(device)
to work as normal when observation is a single Tensor, and call .to(device) on each Tensor when observation is a tuple of Tensors.
It should be simple enough to create a data type that can support this, but I'm wondering does such a data type already exist? I haven't found anything so far.
If your tensors are all of the same size, you can use torch.stack to concatenate them into one tensor with one more dimension.
Example:
>>> import torch
>>> a=torch.randn(2,1)
>>> b=torch.randn(2,1)
>>> c=torch.randn(2,1)
>>> a
tensor([[ 0.7691],
[-0.0297]])
>>> b
tensor([[ 0.4844],
[-0.9142]])
>>> c
tensor([[ 0.0210],
[-1.1543]])
>>> torch.stack((a,b,c))
tensor([[[ 0.7691],
[-0.0297]],
[[ 0.4844],
[-0.9142]],
[[ 0.0210],
[-1.1543]]])
You can then use torch.unbind to go the other direction.
I am working on OCR model. my final goal is to convert OCR code into coreML and deploy it into ios.
I have looked and run a couple of the github source codes namely:
here
here
as you have a look on them they all implemented loss as a custom layer with lambda layer.
the problem start when I want to convert this to coreML.
my piece of the code to convert to CoreMl:
import coremltools
def convert_lambda(layer):
# Only convert this Lambda layer if it is for our swish function.
if layer.function == ctc_lambda_func:
params = NeuralNetwork_pb2.CustomLayerParams()
# The name of the Swift or Obj-C class that implements this layer.
params.className = "x"
# The desciption is shown in Xcode's mlmodel viewer.
params.description = "A fancy new loss"
return params
else:
return None
print("\nConverting the model:")
# Convert the model to Core ML.
coreml_model = coremltools.converters.keras.convert(
model,
# 'weightswithoutstnlrchangedbackend.best.hdf5',
input_names="image",
image_input_names="image",
output_names="output",
add_custom_layers=True,
custom_conversion_functions={"Lambda": convert_lambda},
)
but it raises error
Converting the model:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/sgnbx/Downloads/projects/CRNN-with-STN-master/CRNN_with_STN.py", line 201, in <module>
custom_conversion_functions={"Lambda": convert_lambda},
File "/home/sgnbx/anaconda3/envs/tf_gpu/lib/python3.6/site-packages/coremltools/converters/keras/_keras_converter.py", line 760, in convert
custom_conversion_functions=custom_conversion_functions)
File "/home/sgnbx/anaconda3/envs/tf_gpu/lib/python3.6/site-packages/coremltools/converters/keras/_keras_converter.py", line 556, in convertToSpec
custom_objects=custom_objects)
File "/home/sgnbx/anaconda3/envs/tf_gpu/lib/python3.6/site-packages/coremltools/converters/keras/_keras2_converter.py", line 255, in _convert
if input_names[idx] in input_name_shape_dict:
IndexError: list index out of range
Input name length mismatch
I am kind of not sure I can resolve this as I did not find anything relevant to this error to resolve.
In other hand most codes for OCR have Custom Loss function which probably again I face with the same problem.
So in the end I have two question:
Do you know how to resolve this error
my main question do you know any source code for OCR which is in KERAS (As i have to convert it to coreMl) and do not have custom loss function so it will be ok converting to CoreMl without problem?
Thanks in advance:)
just to make my question thorough:
this is the custom loss function in the source I am working:
def ctc_lambda_func(args):
iy_pred, ilabels, iinput_length, ilabel_length = args
# the 2 is critical here since the first couple outputs of the RNN
# tend to be garbage:
iy_pred = iy_pred[:, 2:, :] # no such influence
return backend.ctc_batch_cost(ilabels, iy_pred, iinput_length, ilabel_length)
loss_out = Lambda(ctc_lambda_func, output_shape=(1,), name='ctc')
([fc_2, labels, input_length, label_length])
and then use it in compile:
model.compile(loss={'ctc': lambda y_true, y_pred: y_pred}, optimizer=sgd)
CoreML doesn't allow you train model, so it's not important to have a loss function or not. If you only want to use CRNN as predictor on iOS , you should just convert base_model in second link.