Why is this code giving inaccurate result? - python-3.x

I am trying to print sum of all prime numbers between 2 and a given number N that would be input by the user. so if the input number is 10 the output should be 17. my code below though it works but not providing accurate results. what seems to be the issue here?
N=int(input())
sum_prime=0`enter code here`
#Calculate primes between 2 to N
for value in range(2,N+1):
if value>1:
for i in range(2,value//2+1):
if value%i==0:
break
else:
sum_prime+=value
print(sum_prime)

I understood your error. You add numbers to sum_prime even though the loops to check if it really a prime aren't finished. You have to move the addition out of the loop, like this for instance:
N=int(input())
sum_prime=0
#Calculate primes between 2 to N
for value in range(2,N+1):
is_prime = True # note that I have added a new variable
for i in range(2,value//2+1):
if value%i==0:
is_prime = False
break
if is_prime:
sum_prime += value # the addition is now out of the inner loop
print(sum_prime)
If I input 10, it correctly outputs:
17

Related

I need the code to stop after break and it should not print max(b)

Rahul was learning about numbers in list. He came across one word ground of a number.
A ground of a number is defined as the number which is just smaller or equal to the number given to you.Hence he started solving some assignments related to it. He got struck in some questions. Your task is to help him.
O(n) time complexity
O(n) Auxilary space
Input Description:
First line contains two numbers ‘n’ denoting number of integers and ‘k’ whose ground is to be check. Next line contains n space separated numbers.
Output Description:
Print the index of val.Print -1 if equal or near exqual number
Sample Input :
7 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sample Output :
2
`
n,k = 7,3
a= [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
b=[]
for i in range(n):
if k==a[i]:
print(i)
break
elif a[i]<k:
b.append(i)
print(max(b))
`
I've found a solution, you can pour in if you've any different views
n,k = 7,12
a= [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
b=[]
for i in range(n):
if k==a[i]:
print(i)
break
elif a[i]<k:
b.append(i)
else:
print(max(b))
From what I understand, these are the conditions to your question,
If can find number, print the number and break
If cannot find number, get the last index IF it's less than value k
Firstly, it's unsafe to manually input the length of iteration for your list, do it like this:
k = 3
a= [1,7,2,2,5,1,7]
finalindex = 0
for i, val in enumerate(a):
if val==k:
finalindex = i #+1 to index because loop will end prematurely
break
elif val>=k:
continue
finalindex = i #skip this if value not more or equal to k
print(finalindex) #this will either be the index of value found OR if not found,
#it will be the latest index which value lesser than k
Basically, you don't need to print twice. because it's mutually exclusive. Either you find the value, print the index or if you don't find it you print the latest index that is lesser than K. You don't need max() because the index only increases, and the latest index would already be your max value.
Another thing that I notice, if you use your else statement like in your answer, if you have two elements in your list that are larger than value K, you will be printing max() twice. It's redundant
else:
print(max(b))

The sum of the primes below 10 is 2 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 17. Find the sum of all the primes below two million.(I am not getting what is wrong in this code)

sum = 2
x=3
y=5000
for i in range (x,y):
for j in range (2,i):
if i%j==0:
break
elif i%j!=0 and j==i-1:
sum += i
if i==y-1 and y<2000000:
x=y
y+=5000
else:
continue
print(sum)
**I am not getting what is wrong in this code. By running this I came to know that the Last If and Else statement are not running **
Given your code, there are a couple of things wrong. First, sum is a python function name and should never be used as a variable name. It will get you into trouble in more ways than I care to think about. Second, the last else statement is not needed, because whether the if clause above it is or is not executed executed, the for loop will be executed again. Third, I don't understand the purpose of y and the magical value 5000, unless you are trying to provide an end value for your loop. The problem with this approach is you seem to try and extend it's range in increments of 5000. The problem is that once the initial for loop is executed, it creates a local iterable from x to 5000, and subsequent changes to y do not affect the for loops range.
I would approach the problem differently, by creating a list of primes and then use the python sum method to add all the values. Here is the code:
def sum_primes(max_prime):
""" Return Sum of primes Less than max_prime"""
primes = [2]
indx_num = 3
while primes[-1] <= max_prime:
update = True
for prime in primes:
if indx_num == prime or indx_num % prime == 0:
update = False
break
if update:
primes.append(indx_num)
indx_num += 2
#return summ of all values except the last
return sum(primes[:-1])
Executing sum_primes(2000000)
yields 1709600813

Locating prime numbers using for loop(s) in Python

So first of all, I realise there are much easier ways to get a list of prime numbers, but I'm just doing this to learn. I have a very poor understanding of a lot of this (as you'll see) so sorry if this is a dumb question. I'm trying to learn.
#make an empty list to store primes in
primes = list()
#make a variable to easily change the amount of numbers I test for primality
high_val = 15
#Allocate a range that I will test all numbers in for primality
for n in range(2, high_val):
#Within the previous for loop, start another for loop to test every integer against every
#value inside the primes list
for p in primes:
if n % p == 0:
print(%s is not prime" % n)
else:
#If n is prime, I add it to the list and print that it is prime
primes.append(n)
print("%s is a prime" % n)
I don't know if those comments make it harder to read, but that's my logic. There is no print output for the function. So I figured, there's just no value in primes, I need to give it something to compare to. So I added a primes.append(2) at the start immediately after the first line, and changed the range to (3, high_val)...
If I do that, it ends up printing about 5 times for every number that it is prime and 5 more messages saying it is not prime. Clearly I'm doing something massively wrong, if anyone knows where I went wrong and/or how to fix this that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
The thing is that you are missing some flags: you are printing if the number is prime every time you check it against another number. You should print it only after iterating over all primes.
About this, consider using all:
primes = [2]
high_val = 15
for n in range(3, high_val, 2):
if all(n % p == 0 for p in primes):
print(f"{n} is prime")
primes.append(n)
else:
print(f"{n} is not prime")
ps: I didn't test it.

Python 3, any better/cleaner way to write these functions that use for loops?

I'm trying to write code in the most simplest and cleanest way possible. I've found a few ways to shorten and simplify my code through functions that I've never seen before or through using other methods. I'd like to expand my knowledge on writing code using various (but simple) methods, and also expand my function 'vocabulary'.
Here are the functions:
1. Perfect number:
If a number's divisors' sum is equal to the number itself, it is a perfect number. We dont count the number itself as a divisor. E.g. 6's divisors are 1, 2, 3. The sum of the divisors is 6. Therefore 6 is a perfect number.
def perfect_number(num):
if type(num) != int or num < 0:
return None
divisors = []
total = 0
for x in range(num):
if num % (x+1) == 0:
if num != x+1:
divisors += [x+1]
for x in divisors:
total += x
if total == num:
return True
return False
2. Pattern:
A function that takes a positive integer and prints a pattern as follows:
pattern(1): '#-'
pattern(2): '#-#--'
pattern(5): '#-#--#---#----#-----'
def pattern(num):
if type(num) != int or num < 0:
return None
output = ''
for x in range(num):
output += '#'+('-'*(x+1))
return output
3. Reversed Numbers:
A function that takes 2 integers. It goes through every number in the range between those 2 numbers, if one of those numbers is a palindrome (the same thing backwards e.g. 151 is a 'palindrome'), it will increase a variable by 1. That variable is then returned.
invert_number(num) returns the opposite of num as an integer.
def reversed_numbers(low, high):
output = 0
for x in range(low,high+1):
if invert_number(x) == x:
output += 1
return output
It is assumed that low is lower than high.
If I broke a rule or if this doesnt fit here, please tell me where I can post it/how I can improve. Thanks :)

Please can someone explain me these commands about python?

>>> for n in range(2, 10):
... for x in range(2, n):
... if n % x == 0:
... print(n, 'equals', x, '*', n//x)
... break
... else:
... # loop fell through without finding a factor
... print(n, 'is a prime number')
...
2 is a prime number
3 is a prime number
4 equals 2 * 2
5 is a prime number
6 equals 2 * 3
7 is a prime number
8 equals 2 * 4
9 equals 3 * 3
I don't understand what the above command wants to do.
I know about looping but can you explain what this command is actually doing?
Python's for and while loops have a feature that may look confusing to people who are more familiar with those loops in other programming languages: You can put an else clause after the loop body.
The else block will be run only if the loop terminated in the normal way (a for loop reaching the end of the iterable or a while loop's condition being false). It will not be run if the loop was terminated by a break statement.
In the code you're looking at, the inner loop tests to see if the number n is prime by testing if it can be evenly divided by any x value. If an x does divide it exactly, the factors x and n // x are printed and a break statement ends the loop.
If no such factor is found in the range, the loop ends. As I mentioned above, this the situation where the else block is run. It prints that n is prime.

Resources