Given I have 2 classes, Foo and Bar:
public class Foo
{
private readonly List<Bar> _bars = new List<Bar>();
public int Id { get; private set; }
public string Name { get; private set; }
public IEnumerable<Bar> Bars => _bars;
public void AddBar(Bar bar)
{
_bars.Add(bar);
}
public static Foo Create(string name)
{
return new Foo { Name = name };
}
private Foo() { }
}
public class Bar
{
public int Id { get; private set; }
public string Description { get; private set; }
public static Bar Create(string description)
{
return new Bar { Description = description };
}
}
With 2 corresponding DTOs,
public class BarDto
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}
public class FooDto
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public List<BarDto> Bars { get; set; }
public FooDto()
{
Bars = new List<BarDto>();
}
}
And an AutoMapper/AutoMapper.Collection.EntityFrameworkCore setup of
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg =>
{
cfg.AddCollectionMappers();
cfg.UseEntityFrameworkCoreModel<DemoContext>();
cfg.CreateMap<BarDto, Bar>().EqualityComparison((src, dest) => src.Id == dest.Id);
cfg.CreateMap<FooDto, Foo>().ForMember(dest => dest.Bars, opt =>
{
opt.MapFrom(s => s.Bars);
opt.UseDestinationValue();
}).EqualityComparison((src, dest) => src.Id == dest.Id);
});
I have a use case whereby the incoming FooDto may contain inserted, appended, updated and deleted items in the Bars collection which I am attempting to handle by:
Looking up the existing entity from the database
Mapping changes from the DTO to the entity
Saving the changes to the database
However the following code produces an InvalidOperationException exception stating that "The instance of entity type 'Bar' cannot be tracked because another instance with the key value '{Id: 1}' is already being tracked. When attaching existing entities, ensure that only one entity instance with a given key value is attached"
var fooToUpdate = db.Foos.Include(_ => _.Bars).FirstOrDefault(_ => _.Id == fooDto.Id);
mapper.Map(fooDto, fooToUpdate);
db.SaveChanges();
My understanding was that becuase I am setting EqualityComparison for the BarDto -> Bar mapping it should update the tracked entity and the save operation should succeed becuase it was referencing the same object?
I am not sure if I'm going about this the wrong way or simply missing somthing in the configuration.
Update
It seems the problem I am facing may be related to this issue on github.
Related
I'm trying to create map for automapper to let me map those entity
Entities
public class Entity
{
...
public List<NavigationEntity> Navs { get; set; }
}
public class NavigationEntity
{
public int Id { get; set; }
}
DTO that need to be create with entities
public class EntityDto
{
...
public List<int> NavIds { get; set; }
}
This doesnt seem's to do the job! What could do the job ?
CreateMap<Entity, EntityDto>().ReverseMap();
CreateMap<NavigationEntity, int>().ConstructUsing(x => x.Id);
EDIT
Tried to add
CreateMap< List < SystemsTags >, List< int >>();
but still it doesnt map
First of all, you should rename public List<NavigationEntity> Navs { get; set; } and public List<int> NavIds { get; set; } to the same name. If it is still not working try to also change ConstructUsing to ConvertUsing. And if you need the reverseMap of Entity to EntityDTO you should also add
CreateMap<int, NavigationEntity>().ConvertUsing(x => new NavigationEntity { Id = x });
final code
public class Entity
{
...
public List<NavigationEntity> Navs { get; set; }
}
public class NavigationEntity
{
public int Id { get; set; }
}
public class EntityDto
{
...
public List<int> Navs { get; set; }
}
...
CreateMap<Entity, EntityDto>().ReverseMap();
CreateMap<NavigationEntity, int>().ConvertUsing(x => x.Id);
CreateMap<int, NavigationEntity>().ConvertUsing(x => new NavigationEntity { Id = x });
Having an issue with version 6.1.1. In the below, the result of the reverse map still has the Company object populated. Per this post, which shows what I am doing below, except they are ignoring a property, and I'm ignoring a complex object.
What am I missing?
CreateMap<Item, ItemViewModel>(MemberList.Destination)
.ReverseMap()
.ForMember(x => x.Company, x => x.Ignore())
;
With AutoMapper 6.1 you could use ForPath instead ForMember to ignore complex objects.
See How to ignore property with ReverseMap for further information.
I see not what is wrong, but here is a running sample:
namespace AutomapperTest2
{
internal class Program
{
#region Methods
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
// Configure the mappings
Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
cfg.CreateMap<ApplicantEducation, ApplicantEducationVM>();
cfg.CreateMap<Applicant, ApplicantVM>().ReverseMap()
.ForMember(x => x.Education, x => x.Ignore());
});
var config = new MapperConfiguration(cfg => cfg.CreateMissingTypeMaps = true);
var mapper = config.CreateMapper();
Applicant ap = new Applicant
{
Name = "its me",
Education =
new ApplicantEducation
{
SomeInt = 10,
SomeString = "sampleString"
}
};
// Map
ApplicantVM apVm = Mapper.Map<Applicant, ApplicantVM>(ap);
Applicant apBack = Mapper.Map<ApplicantVM, Applicant>(apVm);
}
#endregion
}
/// Your source classes
public class Applicant
{
public ApplicantEducation Education { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ApplicantEducation
{
public int SomeInt { get; set; }
public string SomeString { get; set; }
}
// Your VM classes
public class ApplicantVM
{
public string Description { get; set; }
public ApplicantEducationVM Education { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class ApplicantEducationVM
{
public int SomeInt { get; set; }
public string SomeString { get; set; }
}
}
}
I have this Party class which contains an object data type coming from a service. It can contain two different member types for the Item property.
public class Party
{
public string DMVID {get; set;}
public object Item { get; set; }
}
and this DTO
public class PartyDTO
{
public string DMVID {get; set;}
public BusinessDTO BusinessItem { get; set; }
public IndividualDTO IndividualItem { get; set; }
}
How can I map the output of the Item to BusinessItem or IndividualItem.
I know this one would not work. Mapper.CreateMap<Party, PartyDTO>();
I don't know if conditional mapping can solve this or a resolver like this one.
Hey maybe this will help you out! I tested it, but i am using AutoMapper just for two days!
Allright here are your noted classes!!!
public class Party
{
public string DMVID { get; set; }
public object Item { get; set; }
}
public class PartyDTO
{
public string DMVID { get; set; }
public BuisnessDTO BusinessItem { get; set; }
public IndividualDTO IndividualItem { get; set; }
}
public class BuisnessDTO
{
public int Number
{
get;
set;
}
}
public class IndividualDTO
{
public string Message
{
get;
set;
}
}
and here your is the MapperConfiguration for this current scenario!
// Edit There was no need here for some conditions
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<Party, PartyDTO>()
.ForMember(dto => dto.BusinessItem, map =>
map.MapFrom(party => party.Item as BuisnessDTO);
)
.ForMember(dto => dto.IndividualItem, map =>
map.MapFrom(party => party.Item as IndividualDTO);
);
// And this is another way to achive the mapping in this scenario
AutoMapper.Mapper.CreateMap<PartyDTO, Party>()
.ForMember(party => party.Item, map => map.MapFrom( dto => (dto.BusinessItem != null) ? (dto.BusinessItem as object) : (dto.IndividualItem as object)));
And i created this sample for it!
Party firstParty = new Party()
{
DMVID = "something",
Item = new BuisnessDTO()
{
Number = 1
}
};
Party secondParty = new Party()
{
DMVID = "something",
Item = new IndividualDTO()
{
Message = "message"
}
};
PartyDTO dtoWithBuisness = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<PartyDTO>(firstParty);
PartyDTO dtoWithIndividual = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map < PartyDTO>(secondParty);
Party afterParty = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map<Party>(dtoWithBuisness);
afterParty = AutoMapper.Mapper.Map < Party>(dtoWithIndividual);
Of course there are other possibility, but I think thats exactly what you wanted.
I'm having a bit of trouble getting some OrmLite stuff to work - been using document databases a bit too long I think! Given I have the following models:
public class ListingEvent
{
public ListingEvent()
{
}
[AutoIncrement]
[PrimaryKey]
public int Id {
get ;
set;
}
public string Name { get; set; }
[ForeignKey(typeof(Location))]
public int LocationId {
get;
set;
}
}
public class Location
{
public Location()
{
ListingEvents = new List<ListingEvent>();
}
[AutoIncrement]
[PrimaryKey]
public int Id {
get ;
set;
}
public string Name { get; set; }
[Reference]
public List<ListingEvent> ListingEvents { get; set; }
}
And the following query:
var listingEvents = db.Select<ListingEventDto> (
db.From<Model.ListingEvent>()
.Join<Model.ListingEvent, Model.Location> ()
.Where<Model.ListingEvent> (le => locationIds.Contains (le.LocationId) && le.Name.Contains (request.Query))
.Or<Model.ListingEvent, Model.Location>((le, l) => l.Name.Contains(request.Query) == true)
.Limit (skip: request.Skip, rows: request.Take));
Why on earth (baring in mind I have tried every connotation of this!) am I getting this error:
error CodeInvalidOperationException message variable 'l' of type 'Model.Location' referenced from scope '', but it is not defined
The issue was in the expression below, i.e. a method expression on a column from a joined table:
.Or<Model.ListingEvent, Model.Location>((le, l) => l.Name.Contains(request.Query))
This issue was resolved in this commit, available from v4.0.33+ that's been published to MyGet.
I have two classes with a one to many relationship.
public partial class Client
{
public Client()
{
this.Client_Local = new HashSet<Client_Local>();
}
public System.Guid Guid { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Client_Local> Client_Local { get; set; }
}
public partial class Client_Local
{
public System.Guid LocalGuid { get; set; }
public System.Guid Guid { get; set; }
public string CultureID { get; set; }
public string LocalName { get; set; }
public virtual Client Client { get; set; }
}
The mapping classes are:
class ClientMapping : EntityTypeConfiguration<Client>
{
public ClientMapping()
{
this.HasKey(entity => entity.Guid); //As newsequentialid()
this.ToTable("Client");
this.Property(entity => entity.Guid).HasDatabaseGeneratedOption(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity);
}
}
class Client_LocalMapping : EntityTypeConfiguration<Client_Local>
{
public Client_LocalMapping()
{
this.HasKey(entity => entity.LocalGuid); // as As newsequentialid()
this.ToTable("Client_Local");
this.Property(entity => entity.LocalGuid).HasDatabaseGeneratedOption(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity);
this.HasRequired<Client>(e => e.Client).WithMany(p => p.Client_Locals).HasForeignKey<Guid>(c => c.Guid);
}
}
I can create new instances of client class and save them to the database successfully. But when I try and add a Client_Local class and save it to the database I get "A dependent property in a ReferentialConstraint is mapped to a store-generated column. Column: 'Guid'.".
The key fields are generated in sql as newsequentialid for performance reasons. And there is a foreign key relationship between Client_Local.Guid and Client.Guid.
Retrieving data from the database works with the above mapping classes. Any help would be greatly appreciated.