We deployed our .net core application, and it is not working. I tried to debug by enabling stdoutLog in web.config:
<aspNetCore processPath="dotnet" arguments=".\myApp.dll" stdoutLogEnabled="true" stdoutLogFile="C:\inetpub\wwwroot\myAppQA\logs">
I also created the logs folder. I used the absolute path after trying relative path, too.
The log file was created 2 times only, and very inconsistently, and finally stopped being created at all. How can I make logging work?
Related
This question already has an answer here:
asp.net core web api published in IIS after moved to different IIS server pc gives error 500.19 (0x8007000d)
(1 answer)
Closed 2 years ago.
I have developed a Blazor WebAssembly App that will be used on a Server running Windows 2012 on our Intranet. This is targeting .Net 5.0 Core Hosted and Self-Contained. I need to deploy to IIS 8.5 and have some questions.
When I add the website in IIS, do I point to the root deploy directory with the executable and web.config?
Is there anything else I need to do so that IIS will find the index file in the wwwroot sub-directory?
Is is appropriate to put the deploy directory for this app directly under inetpub?
The publish task created a rather large BlaorDebugProxy directory. This is for release so I don't understand why this was created. Is there a way to prevent this from happening?
I want to access the app using ServerName\AppName. If I create the site with 'AppName' for the host name, will that work or is there something else I need to do?
When I try to browse to the site from IIS, I get a 500.19 'The requested page cannot be accessed because the related configuration data for the page is invalid.' I have not made changes to the file as it was created by the publish process. It is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<location path="." inheritInChildApplications="false">
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<add name="aspNetCore" path="*" verb="*" modules="AspNetCoreModuleV2" resourceType="Unspecified" />
</handlers>
<aspNetCore processPath=".\AppName.Server.exe" stdoutLogEnabled="false" stdoutLogFile=".\logs\stdout" hostingModel="inprocess" />
</system.webServer>
</location>
</configuration>
<!--ProjectGuid: 60862cf1-bea8-48f4-8ae9-270f2f537927-->
Any ideas why this is not working?
PLEASE NOTE that this is using the SELF-CONTAINED model.
Also, I have made sure that the directory has granted full permissions to the App Pool Identity for this App.
The answer below and the supposed duplicate all refer to installing the framework. However, I thought that the whole point of the self-contained model is that it does not rely on an installed framework.
I have searched extensively and see many references that touch on these issues but nothing that says specifically how to get IIS (especially an older version) to host the self-contained model. The Microsoft pages talk about advantages and disadvantages and how to create the files but no details about how to host them or the other questions I listed above.
Has anyone done this successfully who can provide some guidance?
Thanks !
Firstly, please ensure that the Asp.net Core IIS Hosting Bundle installer has been installed on the server.
https://dotnet.microsoft.com/download/dotnet/5.0
Besides, the identity under where your web application runs in IIS should have full access to the root folder of your website. Try to grant the IUSR account full control to that physical path.
Last, please refer to the below link to hosting Core-based web application in IIS.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/host-and-deploy/iis/?view=aspnetcore-3.1
Feel free to let me know if the problem still exists.
I have .NET Core 3.1 API which is deployed in Azure web application service. I had trouble running the application in Azure because of the error 500.37 ANCM Failed to Start Within Startup Time Limit. I managed to solve this issue by increasing startupTimeLimit in web.config (as you can see below).
But Now, when I'm running 2 instances in Azure web app service. One of the instances works just fine but the other one still has the same error.
Any ideas on how How to set startupTimeLimit for multiple instances in IIS?
web.config
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<!-- To customize the asp.net core module uncomment and edit the following section.
For more info see https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=838655 -->
<system.webServer>
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<remove name="X-Powered-By" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
<handlers>
<add name="aspNetCore" path="*" verb="*" modules="AspNetCoreModuleV2" resourceType="Unspecified" />
</handlers>
<aspNetCore processPath="dotnet" arguments=".\Clients.Api.dll" stdoutLogEnabled="false" stdoutLogFile=".\logs\stdout" startupTimeLimit="180" hostingModel="inprocess" >
</aspNetCore>
</system.webServer>
</configuration>
Edit:
I used azure web app Scale out (App Service plan) to increase the running instance to 2.
We solved this solution by increasing the startupTimeLimit to 300
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
<location>
<system.webServer>
<aspNetCore xdt:Transform="SetAttributes(startupTimeLimit)" startupTimeLimit="300">
</aspNetCore>
</system.webServer>
</location>
</configuration>
Finally I was able to fix this error.
It is a configuration error (.net core configuration). Azure App Services need an additional configuration of the project when it is in .net core 3.1.
The solution is:
In project file (asp.net or web api project) (*.proj) you have to place the following line just below TargetFramework:
<AspNetCoreHostingModel>OutOfProcess</AspNetCoreHostingModel>
Final *.proj file would be something like this :
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web"> <PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>netcoreapp3.1</TargetFramework>
<AspNetCoreHostingModel>OutOfProcess</AspNetCoreHostingModel>
<UserSecretsId>my-secrets-go-here</UserSecretsId>
<Version>1.1.0.0</Version>
<Authors>me</Authors>
<Company>TheCompany</Company>
<Platforms>AnyCPU;x64</Platforms>
</PropertyGroup>
...
</Project>
And that's it. After adding those changes and uploading a new version on your Azure App Service the application is going to be executed without errors (unless there's something else related to your code).
I was able to replicate this error by executing my project directly on IIS from my local, when you do that VS opens the web browser but the web page is never loaded.
Started getting this error when running my .net core 3.1 application on production. The error occurs immediately after updating the application. However, for me, running iisreset on cmd was enough to solve the error.
if application work perfect on development machine and this error exist on your production server that is not connected to internet
check event log and find if you have any error like this:
Failed extract of third-party root list from auto update cab at
you need just update server certificates
with Online option : connect server to internet
with Offline option: follow this guide
I have deployed a new application that contains a Web Project which communicates with a Web Core API.
I have used this link as a reference to set it up;
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/publishing/iis
IIS has been set up for a while on this test server, so some the steps did not need to be repeated.
In IIS if I browse the Web API is launches as follows.
But if I do likewise for the web project that uses it, I am getting this error:
Response status code does not indicate success: 404 (Not Found) for a simple get call to the Web API.
What should I be considering to fix this?
Multiple possibilities I see
You just browsed to the root url and you do not have any default page setup in IIS . To see the Web API,browse to the webapi url you have specified in your route.config file.
Default route will be like this based on your routing.Could you browse to
http://testweb.sherrygreengrp.com/api/<controller>
You do not have the Windows Server Hosting Bundle
Install the .NET Core Windows Server Hosting bundle on the hosting
system. The bundle will install the .NET Core Runtime, .NET Core
Library, and the ASP.NET Core Module. The module creates the
reverse-proxy between IIS and the Kestrel server. Note: If the system
doesn't have an Internet connection, obtain and install the Microsoft
Visual C++ 2015 Redistributable before installing the .NET Core
Windows Server Hosting bundle
ASP.NET CORE Module correctly configured .Do you have this setting in your web.config
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<add name="aspNetCore" path="*" verb="*" modules="AspNetCoreModule" resourceType="Unspecified" />
</handlers>
<aspNetCore processPath="%LAUNCHER_PATH%"
arguments="%LAUNCHER_ARGS%"
stdoutLogEnabled="false"
stdoutLogFile=".\logs\stdout" />
</system.webServer>
</configuration>
I found that the URI I needed on the deployment server needed to have the name of my application, whilst in development this was not needed. Once I made that correction it worked fine.
At the moment ASP.NET Core doesn't save proper values in web.config to bind site to IIS, see this:
<aspNetCore processPath="%LAUNCHER_PATH%" arguments="%LAUNCHER_ARGS%"
stdoutLogEnabled="false" stdoutLogFile=".\logs\stdout"
forwardWindowsAuthToken="false"/>
This variable are set only on publish. But I prefer to debug my site using following URLs:
http://localhost/zerosite-admin
http://localhost/zerosite-api
Is it possible?
Any best practices of how you develop are welcome!
Windows vista 32 bit - C# - .NET 4 - sqlite - IIS 7
I'm building a small project that contains is a custom HTTP handler where an user can request a XML file and the project will generate the file and send it to the user. It should be flexible enough to send something else too like e.g. json.
Everything was going well until I had to deploy the handler. I've created a library (dll) file which contains the logic for serving of the requested information. I've open IIS manager and I've created a virtual directory to the debug bin file (later on i made it an application. it did not make a difference).
I've followed countless examples and tutorials like these ones:
I started with this one: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308001
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb515343.aspx
msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/46c5ddfy.aspx
But with no luck. As you could have read I'm not using any asp.net website even though I do have a web.config that I've added to the bin folder and it looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<system.webServer>
<httpErrors errorMode="Detailed" />
<asp scriptErrorSentToBrowser="true" />
<directoryBrowse enabled="false" />
<handlers accessPolicy="Read, Script, Execute">
<add name="LigoManagedHandler" path="*" verb="*" type="Ligo.Service, Ligo" resourceType="Unspecified" preCondition="integratedMode" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
</configuration>
When I try to run handler in the browser get the following error:
Could not load file or assembly 'Ligo' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
Exception Details: System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'Ligo' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
I have tried so many possible combination in IIS manager to get it working ('httphandlers', 'classic mode' and so on ...) but i'm truly stuck. The information I've found on the internet is not helping much.
What am I doing wrong or missing to make it work?
Something in this rant triggered an idea, an I stumbled on the answer.
The line in all those tutorials that say put type="ClassName, AssemblyName" into the Handlers section in Web.Config are plain WRONG.
All I did was change this to type="AssemblyName.ClassName" and everything started working, in both a Web Site Project and a Web Application Project that I had created.
I'm running IIS 7.5 in integrated mode so YMMV.
Craig
I figure it out. I had to make a asp.net website project and add my dll as reference to this project.
I read this thread that provided this information which is not clear on the internet.
http://forums.asp.net/t/1088861.aspx/1?What+causes+the+quot+Could+not+load+type+quot+problem+
It should state that it is not possible to make the httphandler without a aspnet website project. or am i mistaken? the example on the internet are incorrect! or provide too little information.
I know, this is an old thread. However, I've been looking for an answer for a few days without finding a clear one. So, in case anyone comes across similar scenario.
You can create custom Http Handler as a stand-alone Class Library project and use it in IIS.
On IIS Add new Application with ASP4 Integrated mode. Place your compiled DLL into bin folder (this is what i was missing all along). Seems obvious that it should be there; took some time to figure this out. :)
web.config:
<configuration>
<system.web>
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.0" />
</system.web>
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<add verb="*" path="*.ogg" name="test" type="Namespace.Classname"/>
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
</configuration>
Hope this helps.
Cheers.