In some other places I saw people suggesting to set:
spring.data.web.pageable.one-indexed-parameters=true
However, this is not changing anything in the behavior of my application. I've put this on the properties file of my SpringBoot application.
Am I missing something ?
You can use the PageableDefault annotation, i.e. #PageableDefault(page = 1) on your Controller method, e.g.:
#RestController
public class Controller {
public Page< DataEntity > getEntities(#PageableDefault(page = 1)Pageable pageable){
//repository call here...
}
}
Related
I am having problems to decorate the final class "DocumentGenerator" (in vendor/shopware/core/Checkout/Document/Service/DocumentGenerator.php) and overwrite the "generate" function inside of it.
I tried to decorate it the usual way, but an error is thrown because the "DocumentController" class excepts the original class and not my decorated one?
Argument 2 passed to Shopware\Core\Checkout\Document\DocumentGeneratorController::__construct() must be an instance of Shopware\Core\Checkout\Document\Service\DocumentGenerator
Its also not possible to extend from the class in my decorated class, because the "DocumentGenerator" is a final class.
My goal is to execute additional code, after an order document is generated. Previously I successfully used to decorate the "DocumentService" Class, but its marked as deprecated and shouldnt be used anymore. Also the "DocumentGenerator" class is used for the new "bulkedit" function for documents as of Version 6.4.14.0
I'm grateful for every tip.
As #j_elfering already wrote it's by design that you should not extend that class and therefore also shouldn't decorate it.
To offer a potential alternative:
Depending on what you want to do after a document has been generated it might be enough to add a subscriber to listen to document.written, check if it was a new document created and then work with the data from the payload for fetching/persisting data depending on that.
public static function getSubscribedEvents()
{
return [
'document.written' => 'onDocumentWritten',
];
}
public function onDocumentWritten(EntityWrittenEvent $event): void
{
foreach ($event->getWriteResults() as $result) {
if ($result->getOperation() !== EntityWriteResult::OPERATION_INSERT) {
// skip if the it's not a new document created
continue;
}
$payload = $result->getPayload();
// do something with the payload
}
}
Probably not what you want to hear but: The service is final in purpose as it is not intended to be decorated.
So the simple answer is you can't. Depending on your use case there may be other ways that don't rely on decoration.
I have created a custom mapper class as below but ABP does not automatically register and use it while mapping.
https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/4.4/Object-To-Object-Mapping#iobjectmapper-tsource-tdestination-interface
Sorry for less detail, i have added some below,
I have found that mycustommapperclass's interface different from my object mapper,
should I implement for all container types?
public class HierachyItemCustomMapper : IObjectMapper<HierachyItem, HierachyItemDto>, ITransientDependency
{
and my usage like
var nodeListDto = ObjectMapper.Map<IEnumerable<HierachyItem>, IEnumerable<HierachyItemDto>>(nodeList);
How can i handle this?
Obviously I am looking for a result instead of foreach iterator loop.
Edit:
it have found that it is known issue as below
https://github.com/abpframework/abp/issues/94
I've tried just before and it seems it works as expected.
This is my HierachyItemCustomMapper class which I've created in the Application layer. (It should be created in the Application layer.)
public class HierachyItemCustomMapper : IObjectMapper<HierachyItem, HierachyItemDto>, ITransientDependency
{
public HierachyItemDto Map(HierachyItem source)
{
return new HierachyItemDto
{
Name = source.Name
};
}
public HierachyItemDto Map(HierachyItem source, HierachyItemDto destination)
{
destination.Name = source.Name;
return destination;
}
}
I've just added a property named Name in my both classes (HierachyItem and HierachyItemDto) to test.
You probably didn't define it in the Application layer and that cause the problem. Can you check it?
It's simple , your defination is wrong
it should be like that
public class HierachyItemCustomMapper : IObjectMapper<IEnumerable<HierachyItem>,
IEnumerable<HierachyItemDto>>, ITransientDependency {}
as it searches for exact defination match , and if you want to add also capability of using ObjectMapper.Map<HierachyItem, HierachyItemDto>
you can make your custom mapper defination like that
public class HierachyItemCustomMapper : IObjectMapper<IEnumerable<HierachyItem>,
IEnumerable<HierachyItemDto>>, IObjectMapper<HierachyItem, HierachyItemDto> ,
ITransientDependency {}
and you will implement both
good luck
.exception.INSSTaxNotFoundException: INSS Tax not found with ID 1
Could someone help me?
I want mokite "inssTaxService.findById", I don't know how do.
I get this error: INSSTaxNotFoundException: INSS Tax not found with ID 1.
But I could like found the record and go on.
Can I do that in Service or Not?
#Test
void whenINSSTaxIdInformedThenReturnThisINSSTax() throws INSSTaxNotFoundException {
INSSTaxDTO expectedSavedInssTaxDTO = INSSTaxBuilder.builder().build().toINSSTaxDTO();
INSSTax expectedSavedInssTax = inssTaxMapper.toModel(expectedSavedInssTaxDTO);
when(inssTaxService.findById(expectedSavedInssTaxDTO.getId())).
thenReturn(expectedSavedInssTaxDTO);
assertEquals(expectedSavedInssTax.getId(), expectedSavedInssTaxDTO.getId());
assertEquals(expectedSavedInssTax.getDescription(), expectedSavedInssTaxDTO.getDescription());
assertEquals(expectedSavedInssTax.getSocialSecurityRatePercent(), expectedSavedInssTaxDTO.getSocialSecurityRatePercent());
}
What you might be missing is actually injecting the mock of inssTaxService inside your class which you are testing,
Your code would be something like this. Considering its a pure java code(not spring boot etc, you can change the code accordingly in that case).
Mock the service(Which i feel you have done else Mockito would have thrown and error)
InssTaxService mockedInssTaxService = Mockito.mock(InssTaxService.class);
//other impl on this mock for this e.g
when(mockedInssTaxService.findById(expectedSavedInssTaxDTO.getId())).
thenReturn(expectedSavedInssTaxDTO);
Inject the mocked object to the ClassToTest.
ClassToTest classToTest = new ClassToTest(mockedInssTaxService);
If you are using spring boot test you can use #MockBean or #Mock and #InjectMocks instead of new keyword
I am using Breeze with much success in my SPA, but seem to be stuck when trying to return parent->child data in a single query by using expand().
When doing a single table query, the $type in the JSON return is correct:
$type: MySPA.Models.Challenge, MySPA
However if I use expand() in my query I get the relational data, but the $type is this:
System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary 2[[System.String, mscorlib],[System.Object, mscorlib]]
Because of the $type is not the proper table + namespace, the client side code can't tell that this is an entity and exposes it as JSON and not a Breeze object (with observables, entityAspect, etc.).
At first I was using my own ContextProvider so that I could override the Before/After saving methods. When I had these problems, I reverted back to the stock EFContextProvider<>.
I am using EF5 in a database first mode.
Here's my controller code:
[BreezeController]
public class DataController : ApiController
{
// readonly ModelProvider _contextProvider = new ModelProvider();
readonly EFContextProvider<TestEntities> _contextProvider = new EFContextProvider<TestEntities>();
[HttpGet]
public string Metadata()
{
return _contextProvider.Metadata();
}
[Queryable(AllowedQueryOptions = AllowedQueryOptions.All)]
[HttpGet]
public IQueryable<Challenge> Challenges()
{
return _contextProvider.Context.Challenges;
}
[HttpPost]
public SaveResult SaveChanges(JObject saveBundle)
{
return _contextProvider.SaveChanges(saveBundle);
}
public IQueryable<ChallengeNote> ChallengeNotes()
{
return _contextProvider.Context.ChallengeNotes;
}
}
Here's my BreezeWebApiConfig.cs
public static void RegisterBreezePreStart()
{
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.Remove(GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Formatters.XmlFormatter);
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Routes.MapHttpRoute(
name: "BreezeApi",
routeTemplate: "breeze/{controller}/{action}"
);
}
Is there a configuration setting that I am missing?
Did you try "expanding" on server side? Is it needed to do expand on client side? I tried to do expand before but failed for me as well, did some research and decided I'd rather place it on server:
[HttpGet]
public IQueryable<Challenge> ChallengesWithNotes()
{
return _contextProvider.Context.Challenges.Include("ChallengeNotes");
}
This should be parsed as expected. On client side you would query for "ChallengeNotes" instead of "Challenges" and you wouldn't need to write expand part.
I strongly suspect that the problem is due to your use of the [Queryable] attribute.
You must use the [BreezeQueryable] attribute instead!
See the documentation on limiting queries.
We are aware that Web API's QueryableAttribute has been deprecated in favor of EnableQueryAttribute in Web API v.1.5. Please stick with BreezeQueryable until we've had a chance to write a corresponding derived attribute for EnableQuery. Check with the documentation for the status of this development.
I would like to have a test that goes through all methods available in a controller and retrieves roles associated with these methods. I understand that it should be a functional test (as opposed to a unit test), but I still do not know how to request the list of roles associated with a method.
Let's say I have this controller:
#Secured("hasAnyRole('ROLE_1')"
class MyController {
def methodA() {}
#Secured("hasAnyRole('ROLE_2')"
def methodB() {}
}
In my test I would like to have something like this:
assertEquals(['ROLE_1'],getRoles(MyController.class, "methodA"))
assertEquals(['ROLE_1', 'ROLE_2'],getRoles(MyController.class, "methodB"))
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
You can do this with the Reflection API. Something like:
Method m = MyController.class.getMethod("methodB");
Annotation[] annos = m.getAnnotations();
But I don't think that's a good validation for your method, since it only ensure that you write the role name correctly. I think it's better you try to call the action and check if the process redirect to denied.
#TestFor(MyController)
class MyControllerTests {
#Test
void shouldRedirectToDenied() {
SpringSecurityUtils.doWithAuth('username') {
controller.methodB()
assert controller.response.redirectedUrl == '/login/denied'
}
}
}
The doWithAuth closure will mock an authentication for the username, so it's the same to say: "do this code as if the username was logged in successfully".
It seems that you will need to use functional tests indeed. See Burt's comment. I'm still think that's not a valid effort create a test only to validate if the method have the annotation.