Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
While I am trying to update android studio to 3.4.1 (Latest Stable Version) its failed with some error.
Error: some conflicts were found in the installation area that doesn't have a solution.
Error Snapshot
the only way you install the new version is:
Uninstall completely the actual version
Download the new version.
Install the new version.
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I tried adding the following in config.xml
<gap:plugin name="com.zendrive.phonegap.sdk" version="1.2.0" />
<gap:plugin name="nl.x-services.plugins.toast" />
This is not working.
I also tried installing plugin in app before uploading zip file on build.phonegap.com but that also didn't work. So, how can I actually install plugins in the app if you are using build.phonegap.com cloud build service?
If you follow the official documentation and still can't use the plugins, contact PhoneGap Build support.
Zendrive plugin documentation at PhoneGap Build
Zendrive plugin at GitHub
Toast plugin documentation at PhoneGap Build
Toast plugin at GitHub
PhoneGap Build community support
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
When install JDK I found src.zip in C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.xxx folder, but I can not find the javafx source code, I googled but found nothing (on http://openjdk.java.net/projects/openjfx/)
So, is javafx open source, and where can I get?
Update Sep 202
For further info see the closely related StackOverflow question:
JavaFX and OpenJDK
I'd close this question of a duplicate of the above one, but it has already been closed as off-topic and cannot be closed as a duplicate by me. Regardless, the linked question hasn't been closed as off-topic as of now and provides more answers with more detail, so it is a better place to look if you need more information,
Update Dec 2019
For current information on Open Source JavaFX, visit https://openjfx.io.
The current open source code repository for JavaFX is at https://github.com/openjdk/jfx.
At the source location linked you can find license files for open JavaFX (currently this license matches the license for open JDK).
Previous Answer
As of February 2013, JavaFX is partially open source and should become almost fully open source over the next few months. The source is hosted as part of the open-jfx project that you linked in your question.
The manifest of the tip of the JavaFX development branch for Java 8 is:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/master/rt/file/tip
The same page has a zip link, which allows you to easily download the available JavaFX source as a zip file.
The JavaFX source code is not included in the jdk src.zip file currently, but should be eventually before Java 8 is released.
Update
A February 2013 update for JavaFX OpenSource status has been published by the JavaFX development lead.
In short, it is not open source in that it is free to change & distribute for any purpose. JavaFX is licensed for internal use, excluding what they call commercial features.
Use of the Commercial Features for any commercial or production purpose requires a separate license from Oracle.
The license details for JavaFX are outlined in full here. (PDF version available from here)
You can get JavaFX from here.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to link in Netbeans 7.2.1 to the source of JavaFX 2.2.3, I've looked on the Oracle web site ... but I didn't find it ! any help is a welcome plz
JavaFX 2.2 is only partially open source.
You can download the parts which are open from the zip link at:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/2.2/master/rt
JavaFX 8
JavaFX 8 is completely open source today.
Source for building JavaFX 8 (and the SceneBuilder design tool) is available at:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/master/rt
Source code for later versions (including Java 8 updates), is in the source code forest, an overview of which is at:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx
Instructions for building JavaFX 8 with OpenJDK 8
If you don't need to build JavaFX 8 and just want the runtime sources in a zip, those are in the javafx-src.zip file from the JDK 8 download.
On OS X, the javafx-src.zip file is located at:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home/javafx-src.zip
IDE Setup
Instructions for configuring Idea to understand the source are here:
JavaFX source code not showing
For NetBeans, you could try:
How to attach missing java JDK sources in Netbeans 7
believe me if you already have installed latest version of jdk and set jdk version in netbeans then it will not ask.
in my case i found jar files in folder C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_07\jre\lib
just add all jar file in your project and you have done.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
(Before I start: I'm going to use Cabal for Everything that has Cabal in its name and has something to do with Haskell.)
Having had the usual "you need to update X to install Y, but this will break dependency Z" issue again the other day, I thought I'd just ask: why was Cabal not designed to be a full package manager, especially with the following features:
Versioning: install multiple versions of a package alongside each other, let packages pick the desired dependencies. If no package version is specified, use the latest one available.
Update packages - or better, also install the newest version.
Remove packages
Check package integrity
You see where this list is going. Right now, to me Cabal feels like a somewhat sophisticated build system (try finding out which version of Base your package requires when you want to start using it for the first time), that comes with a half-baked package installer.
So the question again: Why wasn't Cabal made a full-featured build/package system? I'm sure there was some design decision that led to the current state.
(This question was somewhat inspired by a rant on Reddit, but contrary to that guy don't mean to offend anyone by the above.) :-)
Installing multiple versions of the same package works perfectly well right now (try cabal install ansi-terminal-0.5.4 && cabal install ansi-terminal-0.5.5), but installing multiple instances of the same package version doesn't. This is something we'd very much like to support, since that would allow us to implement hermetic builds and solve the "dependency hell" problem, but it's not entirely trivial. There was a GSoC project this year to add support for multiple instances to ghc-pkg and Cabal, but the patches aren't in the mainline yet. Here's a video of the HIW 2012 talk about the project's results, and here's the description of the internal design.
As to your other questions, there actually used to be a cabal upgrade command for installing the latest versions of all currently installed packages, but it was removed since it could break your installation (again, having support for multiple instances of the same package version would fix this). Uninstallation support has been on the wish list for a while now, it's just that no-one had time to implement it yet. I guess that the same goes for digitally-signed packages and HTTPS.
Additionally, if you're interested in seeing some of these features implemented, patches to Cabal are always welcome, and with the move to GitHub it became easier than ever to contribute code (contributing cash is also fine if you can afford it - I think Well-Typed will be very happy to talk to you about this).
Update (September 2016): for an update on the current state of affairs see this post by Edward Z. Yang: cabal new-build is a package manager.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for Database Schema View in VS2012 Final Release for my Database Project which was created in VS2010. In earlier version I was using SSDT and Power Tools. Is it required to used both these tools in VS2012 Final Release also. I am not able to find on Solution Explorer . Please assist me where can I find Schema View button to toggle my solutionview and schema view. I am using VS2012 Ultimate x64 edition on Windows 7 Ultimate
As you mentioned this feature is in the SSDT Power Tools, although VS2012 compatibility is yet to be introduced.
However according to Sam Hughes [MSFT], it shouldn't be too far away:
Written August 23, 2012
I am literally working on [SSDT power tools for VS2012] right now, but I'm not prepared to
publicly announce a date other than "soon".
Source:
http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/9b0228c6-15d1-44de-9279-66dde12bf861
You can't, as that little gem is one of the things missing from SSDT.