I'm writing some code to get various data from a class (which extracts data from a '.csv' file). I was wondering if there was a way to call one of these methods based off the name of an input
I've attempted to create a function called get(), which takes in 'param_name' - the name of the method contained within the class that I want to call. I was wondering if there was a more elegant way to solve this without creating a large amount of if statements.
def get(param_name):
# Some initialisation of the .csv file goes here. This works as intended.
list_of_objects = [] # Initialised above, as a list of objects with methods function1(), function2() for getting data out of the .csv
for item in list_of_objects:
if param_name == "name of function 1":
return function1()
if param_name == "name of function 2":
return function2()
You could store your functions ina a dictionary as such:
function_dict = {
'function_1': function_1,
'function_2': function_2
}
To use these you could do:
function_to_use = function_dict.get(param_name)
function_to_use(*args, **kwargs) # *args, **kwargs are arguments to be used.
If you want to return a list after you have applied the function to all item in list_of_objects instead of the for loop you could do:
list(map(function_to_use, list_of_objects))
You could use __getattribute__:
class Alpha:
def f1(self):
print("F1")
x = Alpha()
x.__getattribute__('f1')()
You can do that using globals(), globals() returns a dict containing all methods and attributes.
def fun1():
print('this is fun1')
def fun2():
print('this is fun2')
def get(func_name):
globals()[func_name]()
get('fun1')
get('fun2')
Will Output:
this is fun1
this is fun2
Related
class Car:
def __init__(self,make,model,year):
self.make=make
self.model=model
self.year=year
self.odometer_reading=0
def get_details(self): #SELF allows access of attributes and methods of a class
details=print((f'The make is: {self.make}, the model is: {self.model}, & the year is: {self.year}\n'))
#return details without print function works? i.w. details=rest of the line without print + return details (next line)
def read_odometer(self): #reading the value (default)
print(f'\nReading: {self.odometer_reading}')
def update_odometer(self,mileage):
if mileage>=self.odometer_reading:
print('\nReading has been changed')
self.odometer_reading=mileage
else:
print('\nCan, not change ')
def increment_odometer(self,miles):
self.odometer_reading+=miles
x.get_details() #trying to modify print(x.get_details()) which does work. Why does print need to be supplied here?
#incrementing the odometer
print(x.increment_odometer(50)) #why is this none?
I am learning classes and am confused about some aspects:
Why is "return details" line needed for method get_details()? Normally a simple function call having def f(): print('a') works, hence the confusion.
print(x.increment_odometer(50)) is None. Perhaps a function return needed in increment_odometer() method?
Confusing points having been commented in the code. Please englighten me.
Sincerely.
I have two methods which take different number of arguments. Here are the two functions:
def jumpMX(self,IAS,list):
pass
def addMX(self,IAS):
pass
I am using a function which will return one of these functions to main.I have stored this returned function in a variable named operation.
Since the number of parameters are different for both,how do I identify which function has been returned?
if(operation == jumpMX):
operation(IAS,list)
elif(operation == addMX):
operation(IAS)
What is the syntax for this?Thanks in advance!
You can identify a function through its __name__ attribute:
def foo():
pass
print(foo.__name__)
>>> foo
...or in your case:
operation.__name__ #will return either "jumpMX" or "addMX" depending on what function is stored in operation
Here's a demo you can modify to your needs:
import random #used only for demo purposes
def jumpMX(self,IAS,list):
pass
def addMX(self,IAS):
pass
def FunctionThatWillReturnOneOrTheOtherOfTheTwoFunctionsAbove():
# This will randomly return either jumpMX()
# or addMX to simulate different scenarios
funcs = [jumpMX, addMX]
randomFunc = random.choice(funcs)
return randomFunc
operation = FunctionThatWillReturnOneOrTheOtherOfTheTwoFunctionsAbove()
name = operation.__name__
if(name == "jumpMX"):
operation(IAS,list)
elif(name == "addMX"):
operation(IAS)
You can import those functions and test for equality like with most objects in python.
classes.py
class MyClass:
#staticmethod
def jump(self, ias, _list):
pass
#staticmethod
def add(self, ias):
pass
main.py
from classes import MyClass
myclass_instance = MyClass()
operation = get_op() # your function that returns MyClass.jump or MyClass.add
if operation == MyClass.jump:
operation(myclass_instance, ias, _list)
elif operation == MyClass.add:
operation(myclass_instance, ias)
However, I must emphasize that I don't know what you're trying to accomplish and this seems like a terribly contrived way of doing something like this.
Also, your python code examples are not properly formatted. See the PEP-8 which proposes a standard style-guide for python.
I would like to define a decorator that will register classes by a name given as an argument of my decorator. I could read from stackoverflow and other sources many examples that show how to derive such (tricky) code but when adapted to my needs my code fails to produce the expected result. Here is the code:
import functools
READERS = {}
def register(typ):
def decorator_register(kls):
#functools.wraps(kls)
def wrapper_register(*args, **kwargs):
READERS[typ] = kls
return wrapper_register
return decorator_register
#register(".pdb")
class PDBReader:
pass
#register(".gro")
class GromacsReader:
pass
print(READERS)
This code produces an empty dictionary while I would expect a dictionary with two entries. Would you have any idea about what is wrong with my code ?
Taking arguments (via (...)) and decoration (via #) both result in calls of functions. Each "stage" of taking arguments or decoration maps to one call and thus one nested functions in the decorator definition. register is a three-stage decorator and takes as many calls to trigger its innermost code. Of these,
the first is the argument ((".pdb")),
the second is the class definition (#... class), and
the third is the class call/instantiation (PDBReader(...))
This stage is broken as it does not instantiate the class.
In order to store the class itself in the dictionary, store it at the second stage. As the instances are not to be stored, remove the third stage.
def register(typ): # first stage: file extension
"""Create a decorator to register its target for the given `typ`"""
def decorator_register(kls): # second stage: Reader class
"""Decorator to register its target `kls` for the previously given `typ`"""
READERS[typ] = kls
return kls # <<< return class to preserve it
return decorator_register
Take note that the result of a decorator replaces its target. Thus, you should generally return the target itself or an equivalent object. Since in this case the class is returned immediately, there is no need to use functools.wraps.
READERS = {}
def register(typ): # first stage: file extension
"""Create a decorator to register its target for the given `typ`"""
def decorator_register(kls): # second stage: Reader class
"""Decorator to register its target `kls` for the previously given `typ`"""
READERS[typ] = kls
return kls # <<< return class to preserve it
return decorator_register
#register(".pdb")
class PDBReader:
pass
#register(".gro")
class GromacsReader:
pass
print(READERS) # {'.pdb': <class '__main__.PDBReader'>, '.gro': <class '__main__.GromacsReader'>}
If you don't actually call the code that the decorator is "wrapping" then the "inner" function will not fire, and you will not create an entry inside of READER. However, even if you create instances of PDBReader or GromacsReader, the value inside of READER will be of the classes themselves, not an instance of them.
If you want to do the latter, you have to change wrapper_register to something like this:
def register(typ):
def decorator_register(kls):
#functools.wraps(kls)
def wrapper_register(*args, **kwargs):
READERS[typ] = kls(*args, **kwargs)
return READERS[typ]
return wrapper_register
return decorator_register
I added simple init/repr inside of the classes to visualize it better:
#register(".pdb")
class PDBReader:
def __init__(self, var):
self.var = var
def __repr__(self):
return f"PDBReader({self.var})"
#register(".gro")
class GromacsReader:
def __init__(self, var):
self.var = var
def __repr__(self):
return f"GromacsReader({self.var})"
And then we initialize some objects:
x = PDBReader("Inside of PDB")
z = GromacsReader("Inside of Gromacs")
print(x) # Output: PDBReader(Inside of PDB)
print(z) # Output: GromacsReader(Inside of Gromacs)
print(READERS) # Output: {'.pdb': PDBReader(Inside of PDB), '.gro': GromacsReader(Inside of Gromacs)}
If you don't want to store the initialized object in READER however, you will still need to return an initialized object, otherwise when you try to initialize the object, it will return None.
You can then simply change wrapper_register to:
def wrapper_register(*args, **kwargs):
READERS[typ] = kls
return kls(*args, **kwargs)
I am working with pymongo and am wanting to ensure that data saved can be loaded even if additional data elements have been added to the schema.
I have used this for classes that don't need to have the information processed before assigning it to class attributes:
class MyClass(object):
def __init__(self, instance_id):
#set default values
self.database_id = instance_id
self.myvar = 0
#load values from database
self.__load()
def __load(self):
data_dict = Collection.find_one({"_id":self.database_id})
for key, attribute in data_dict.items():
self.__setattr__(key,attribute)
However, in classes that I have to process the data from the database this doesn't work:
class Example(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
self.database_id = None
self.member_dict = {}
self.load()
def load(self):
data_dict = Collection.find_one({"name":self.name})
self.database_id = data_dict["_id"]
for element in data_dict["element_list"]:
self.process_element(element)
for member_name, member_info in data_dict["member_class_dict"].items():
self.member_dict[member_name] = MemberClass(member_info)
def process_element(self, element):
print("Do Stuff")
Two example use cases I have are:
1) List of strings the are used to set flags, this is done by calling a function with the string as the argument. (def process_element above)
2) A dictionary of dictionaries which are used to create a list of instances of a class. (MemberClass(member_info) above)
I tried creating properties to handle this but found that __setattr__ doesn't look for properties.
I know I could redefine __setattr__ to look for specific names but it is my understanding that this would slow down all set interactions with the class and I would prefer to avoid that.
I also know I could use a bunch of try/excepts to catch the errors but this would end up making the code very bulky.
I don't mind the load function being slowed down a bit for this but very much want to avoid anything that will slow down the class outside of loading.
So the solution that I came up with is to use the idea of changing the __setattr__ method but instead to handle the exceptions in the load function instead of the __setattr__.
def load(self):
data_dict = Collection.find_one({"name":self.name})
for key, attribute in world_data.items():
if key == "_id":
self.database_id = attribute
elif key == "element_list":
for element in attribute:
self.process_element(element)
elif key == "member_class_dict":
for member_name, member_info in attribute.items():
self.member_dict[member_name] = MemberClass(member_info)
else:
self.__setattr__(key,attribute)
This provides all of the functionality of overriding the __setattr__ method without slowing down any future calls to __setattr__ outside of loading the class.
I have 2 functions as follows:
def test1(var):
return var*2
def test2(var):
return var*4
I want to pass a variable to form part of the code, something like below:
var='test2'
def new_test(var,4):
return var(4)
And I expect the output to be 16 (i.e. output from test2)
In excel, it is achievable via the function of =indirect(...). Is there any way to achieve that in Python?
Yes, instead of this:
var = 'test2'
def new_test(var, 4):
return var(4)
You can do this directly:
var = test2
def new_test(var, 4):
return var(4)
Functions are first class objects in Python.