Dspace JSPUI statistics not show values - statistics

I just installed Dspace 4.2. I added some items. But when I access the Community, collection or item statistics in the JSPUI view it does not show any value to me.
Any help ?
Thanks in advance.

if it is a fresh installation I strongly suggest to use a more recent version. My recommendation is to use dspace 5.10
https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/releases/tag/dspace-5.10
that is the best one in terms of stability, otherwise you can try dspace 6.3
Anyway, the latest version of the 4.x series is the 4.9 https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/releases/tag/dspace-4.9
The issues is probably due to issue in the SOLR statistics core but without additional information, logs file, is difficult to guess. Take a look to what is logged in the ${dspace.dir}/log/dspace.log ${dspace.dir}/log/solr.log when you access the statistics page

Related

Solr upgradation from 4.7 to 5.3

I need to upgrade my solr search from 4.7 version to 5.3.1 .
I am working on a linux platform.
Can you please provide me the steps that i need to follow .
Thank you!
I do not think that there is a definitive step by step guide for the upgrade that you are looking for.
I have a 4.3.x SOLR running in a production environment and I am contemplating the leap to upgrade to 5.x. However its clear that a lot has changed and that my upgrade is not going to be straight forward.
Also other priorities in my project have kept me from doing the upgrade.
So rest of the discussion is more a thought process than actual upgrade experience.
Last I researched I found the below links useful
https://support.lucidworks.com/hc/en-us/articles/203776523-How-to-upgrade-between-major-Solr-Versions
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Major+Changes+from+Solr+4+to+Solr+5
From the Major changes link you will notice that a lot has changed ..
Most notably there are changes to the index format, SolrJ removal of deprecated API and that the deployment is now as a standalone server instead of a war file.
So I would suggest that you ask yourself the following questions ...
Is it possible to recreate the index from scratch ? How much time does it take to create your complete index ? If your index can be recreated quickly then , I would suggest that you do that using 5.x engine on a separate machine, while your production environment is served by your existing server. Then plan a complete upgrade from 4.x to 5.x by simply pointing your Production instance to the new SOLR engine. This approach will give you a clean slate to start with and a brand new index (but with existing data).
If you have a very large index (e.g. it takes several days to recreate it from scratch), then you may want to perform an upgrade of the live index. In that case I suggest that you consider the following.
The SOLR upgrade guide mentions 4.10 as a version that is 4.x (so I assume its is easy to upgrade from any 4.x to 4.10) and has some features built in to help with the move to 5.x. So first upgrade to 4.10 ensure that your index continues to work properly. Then use the guides mentioned above to upgrade to 5.x

solr 1.4.1 solrj client with solr 3.6.2 server?

I've been trying to work through an issue that developed while attempting to upgrade our testing environment from 12.04 to 14.04 ubuntu on aws. Prior to this, the Package repository version of solr was 1.4.1 which matched our 1.4.1 solrj client integrated with our application.
Changing the base AMI to the 14.04 latest and running our default deploy caused solr 3.6.2 server to be installed. It appears it was accepting our configs without issue, however when our client tried to connect we received different errors:
The first was an unknown custom field, which we traced back to our deployment scripts not moving our schema.xml and solrconfig.xml to /etc/solr/conf/ but keeping it in the base directory.
We corrected this issue, and then ran into the following:
'exception: Invalid version or the data in not in 'javabin' format'
This was generated by a wrapper ontop of solrj, but I'll be honest and say I know nothing regarding Solr and that this may be on our end. I've asked our dev team to look at 2 options:
1) enabling: 'server.setParser(new XMLResponseParser());'
Which is the recommendation on the backwards compatibility for an older client.
2) updating our client in the application to 3.6.2
-I know less about the requirements on this.
My fall back is to revert to 1.4.1, but it appears it hasn't been touched since 2011, which makes me hesitant.
Any thoughts / suggestions would be appreciated!
Thanks!
I think the best option is to maintain the same version of Solr and Solrj.
I used for a lot of time Solr 1.4.1 and, while as you said, the most part of it works with newer versions without any problem, actually a lot of things have been changed since 1.4.*
I did your same porting last year, (from 1.4.1 to 3.6.1) and I can confirm you that the 2nd way is the right one: all changes you must do in your client code are just "formal" and very very quick.
Any workaround you could do for being able to communicate with a different version (between Solrj and Solr) is just, as the word says, a "workaround" and it could lead to unexpected (hidden) side-effects later.

Is it possible to update Alloy UI to newest version in Liferay?

My current version of Liferay (6.2) has Alloy UI with few bugs.
Those bugs are repaired in newest version of Alloy Ui. Is it possible to use newest version of Alloy Ui instead of the old one?
Thank you.
I think it's possible, but there's a good chance, that you have to do extensive testing before doing it on your production environment and possibly some hand work also will be needed to make it work (if there is major version change, I think it won't work anyway because of the huge changes in the code base).

How cleared issues in the issues.liferay.com can be applied in our Liferay Portal

I want to know how to apply the issue changes done in the Liferay Issues can be applied in our portal.
For example my issues are cleared in the following links,
https://issues.liferay.com/browse/LPS-14417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
https://issues.liferay.com/browse/LPS-14220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
I want to apply the issue changed in the above links in my portal.
Please some one help me to achieve this.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Dinesh M K
You have to see the resolution and fix version stated.
the second issue says :
Fix Version/s: --Sprint 12/11, 6.1.0 CE RC1
and that means that the issue was solved in all Portals after version 6.1.0 CE.
the first issue , is no longer reproducible, and duplicate of https://issues.liferay.com/browse/LPS-14220 which is again solved in 6.1.0 CE RC1
In other words, If your portal is older than this version, you can't do anything. You'll have to upgrade to version 6.1.0 RC1 or later
It seems that the fixed-in version is a bit weirdly set in those issues - e.g. LPS-14220 is a subtask of a story in LPS-14414, which is stated as completed for 6.2.0. Careful: I did not fully read through all of the issue's descriptions, links and mix what I read with the answer (and comment to) #yannicuLar gave
Basically, this seems to be a new feature. The way to backport it to your installation is to identify the relevant commits (e.g. download the repository from https://github.com/liferay/liferay-portal or https://github.com/liferay/liferay-plugins, identify the relevant commits (they all contain the LPS number), "backport" them (e.g. see if they can just be applied to your codebase or if they need manual adaptation because the whole code changed.
Some features are easier to backport than others, I can't tell about the complexity for this one.
In order to separate your changes from Liferay's core changes, you should try to implement this in plugins (or patched plugins) rather than changing the original code and recompile. Most likely it's only the kaleo-web plugin that's effected, but if there are core changes, you'd be better of having them isolated in plugins.
The simplest (and most futureproof) possibility is to wait a bit for 6.2 (RCs are already out) and upgrade your portal to this version. If you want to stay on a version that gets updates, you should do this soon anyway.

Migrate Liferay 5 -> 5.2

We have a liferay portal running on a hosting company, and We want to bring it to our own structure. So, I've downloaded the excellent bitnami stack and loaded it in our vmware server.
I've no experience on liferay whatsoever, all I know its that it uses mysql as database. Is there any docs on how to do it?
Tks!
Use the Liferay's Wiki:
5.0 to 5.1: http://www.liferay.com/community/wiki/-/wiki/Main/Upgrade+Instructions+from+5.0+to+5.1
5.1. to 5.2: http://www.liferay.com/community/wiki/-/wiki/Main/Upgrade+Instructions+from+5.1+to+5.2
I recommend to do a 2-step upgrade since direct upgrade from 5.0 to 5.2 is more troublesome.
There have been reports that it's some work to upgrade older versions to the latest and greatest, so you should be prepared for some efforts.
That said, the way you should go is to backup the previous installation (e.g. all directories, database entries etc) and deploy that on your own server. This installation then is updated to the latest version by installing the latest version and pointing it to the data from the previous installation. During the first startup, liferay will (given sufficient privileges on mysql) update the database structure and everything it needs. Keep your backup ready and test thoroughly if everything is upgraded the way you intended it to be.
Also you need to keep an eye on your customized stuff - if you have portlets or other components that use the liferay api, you might need to upgrade those manually to take changed APIs into account.
Theoretically that should be it. I've heard of people having had some problems with this - but it all depends on your level of customization and utilization of features in liferay.
The liferay folks intend to circumvent this in future with their EE environment, where you get better defined upgrade paths and long term support with minor upgrades to your environment, keeping APIs and database requirements stable. I'd hope that even upgrades between major versions will benefit from this, but have not yet tried it.

Resources