How can I create a testing script with GDB - linux

I have a set of inputs that I want to use to test my program so see what input will hit a break point. I want to create a script to test these inputs one by one and if it hit the break point, print or save the result to a file.
Please let me know if it's possible and if yes, how can I do it. Thank you.

I'm not sure if I have exactly understood what you are asking for. But if I understood correctly, you want to write a program that:
Starts another program
Passes some pre-defined input to the other program
Checks if some breakpoint in the other program is hit
I don't know if this is possible using gdb, but it would be possible to write your own debugger:
Start the program to be tested using fork and one of the exec functions (such as execlp)
Before the exec function call ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME,0,0,0)
Call waitpid; if exec succeeded, the program will be stopped immediately. The "status code" (second argument) returned by waitpid will be 0x57F (assuming an x86 CPU).
If waitpid returns another exit code, exec failed and you cannot continue.
Use ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKTEXT,...) and ptrace(PTRACE_POKETEXT,...) to modify the program: You place a break point to some address by replacing the instruction at that address by a "breakpoint" instruction (on x86 CPUs: int3 which is byte 0xCC)
This means:
You have to know the addresses (not the line numbers) of the break points and write 0xCC to each address using ptrace().
Because PTRACE_POKETEXT can only modify 4 bytes (x86_32) or 8 bytes (x86_64) at once, you first have to read the old values of these 4 or 8 bytes using PTRACE_PEEKTEXT, modify 1 of 4 or 8 bytes and write all 4 or 8 bytes back.
If your program is not always loading to the same address (due to ASLR etc.) you can read the program counter (using PTRACE_PEEKUSER): It should be the (actual) address of the entry point of the program.
Call ptrace(PTRACE_CONT,pid,0,0) to start the program being tested
Call waitpid to wait for the program to be stopped or to exit
If waitpid returns 0x57F as "status code", you are in the breakpoint. You may now use kill(pid, SIGKILL) to stop your program.
You may use PTRACE_PEEKUSER to check the value of the program counter (rip on x86-64) so you know which breakpoint has been hit. Note that the program counter may be the address of the breakpoint plus 1, so if a breakpoint at address 0x12340000 has been hit, rip may be 0x12340001.
If waitpid returns any other value with the low byte 0x7F, the program caused an exception. You should use kill(pid,SIGKILL) to finally stop it.
Otherwise (if the low byte returned by waitpid is not 0x7F), the program has finished without causing an exception and without hitting any breakpoint.
Here some example code:
int pid, code;
long tmpLong;
pid=fork();
if(!pid)
{
ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME,0,0,0);
execlp("program_to_be_tested","program_to_be_tested",NULL);
exit(123);
}
waitpid(pid,&code,0);
if(code!=0x57F)
{
/* Starting the program failed ... */
}
else
{
/* Set breakpoints - here assuming x86-64 */
tmpLong=ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKDATA,pid,(void *)(address&~7),0);
((char *)&tmpLong)[address&7]=0xCC;
ptrace(PTRACE_POKEDATA,pid,(void *)(address&~7),(void *)tmpLong);
/* Continue the program */
ptrace(PTRACE_CONT,pid,0,0);
waitpid(pid,&code,0);
if((code&0xFF)!=0x7F)
{
/* Program did not hit a breakpoint
* and did not cause an exception */
}
else if(code==0x57F)
{
/* Breakpoint hit */
kill(pid,SIGKILL);
}
else
{
/* Program caused an exception */
kill(pid,SIGKILL);
}
}
To pass input to your program, you have two possible choices:
Run the debugger multiple times:
echo "Input to be tested" | ./myDebugger
Because your debugger does not read from STDIN, the input will be passed to the program to be tested.
Use pipe and dup2 when creating the child process:
...
pipe(pipes);
pid=fork();
if(!pid)
{
dup2(pipes[0],0);
close(pipes[0]);
close(pipes[1]);
...
}
close(pipes[0]);
write(pipes[1],"Input to be sent to program", ...);
...

Related

USB Serial port programming has "disastrous" results

I am currently working on a C program running on a Raspberry Pi 3 (Linux Ubuntu) that is intended to provide a web page interface for configuring networking on an embedded system.
The code is being developed using Code::Blocks with the GDB debugger. I'm using microhttpd for the web server and that, plus the various web pages, are all working great. I'm now working on the USB Serial link to the embedded system using information in "Serial Programming Guide for POSIX Operating Systems".
The code below is responsible for opening the USB Serial link to the target system and seems to work fine - once. If I close the program and restart it (either standalone on the command line or from within Code::Blocks) the second time microhttpd is hosed - browser windows will no longer connect. Further, from within Code::Blocks the debugger is also hosed - once the program is started it cannot be paused or stopped. The only way is to kill it by closing the project.
The problem is clearly within the function since I can comment out the call to it and everything works as it did previously. Unfortunately, once the problem happens the only solution seems to be to reboot the Pi.
I've done things like this before using a scripting language (Tcl) but this time around I'm looking for a performance boost from a non-interpreted language since the Pi will also be running a high bandwidth data logging program through a similar USB serial interface.
The code is shown below:
/******************************************************************************/
/* This function scans through the list of USB Serial ports and tries to */
/* establish communication with the target system. */
/******************************************************************************/
void tapCommInit(void) {
char line[128];
char port[15]; // this is always of the form "/dev/TTYACMn"
char *ptr;
FILE *ifd;
struct termios options;
uint8_t msgOut[3], msgIn[4];
msgOut[0] = REQ_ID; // now prepare the message to send
msgOut[1] = 0; // no data so length is zero
msgOut[2] = 0;
/**************************************************************************/
/* First, get the list of USB Serial ports. */
/**************************************************************************/
system("ls -l /dev/serial/by-path > usbSerial\n"); // get current port list
ifd = fopen("usbSerial", "r");
logIt(fprintf(lfd, "serial ports: \n"));
/**************************************************************************/
/* The main loop iterates through the file looking for lines containing */
/* "tty" which should be a valid USB Serial port. The port is configured */
/* in raw mode as 8N1 and an ID request command is sent, which has no */
/* data. If a response is received it's checked to see if the returned */
/* ID is a match. If not, the port is closed and we keep looking. If a */
/* match is found, tapState is set to "UP" and the function returns. If */
/* no match is found, tapState is left in the initial "DOWN" state. */
/**************************************************************************/
while(1) {
if (fgets(line, 127, ifd) == NULL) { // end of file?
break; // yes - break out and return
}
ptr = strstr(line, "tty"); // make sure the line contains a valid entry
if (ptr == NULL) {
continue; // nothing to process on this line
}
strcpy(port, "/dev/"); // create a correct pathname
strcat(port, ptr); // append the "ttyACMn" part of the line
port[strlen(port)-1] = 0; // the last character is a newline - remove it
logIt(fprintf(lfd," %s\n", port)); // we have a port to process now
cfd = open(port, O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY | O_NDELAY); // cfd is a global int
if (cfd == -1) {
logIt(fprintf(lfd, "Could not open port: %s\n", port));
continue; // keep going with the next one (if any)
}
fcntl(cfd, F_SETFL, 0); // blocking mode
tcgetattr(cfd, &options); // get the current port settings
options.c_cflag |= (CLOCAL | CREAD); // ena receiver, ignore modem lines
options.c_lflag &= ~(ICANON | ECHO | ECHOE | ISIG); // raw, no echo
options.c_oflag &= ~OPOST; // no special output processing
options.c_cc[VMIN] = 0; // minimum number of raw read characters
options.c_cc[VTIME] = 10; // timeout in deciseconds (1 second timeout)
tcsetattr(cfd, TCSANOW, &options); // set options right now
cfsetispeed(&options, B115200); // input baud rate
cfsetospeed(&options, B115200); // output baud rate
options.c_cflag &= ~(CSIZE | PARENB | // clear size bits, no parity
CSTOPB | CRTSCTS); // 1 stop bit, no hw flow control
options.c_cflag |= CS8; // now set size: 8-bit characters
options.c_cflag &= ~(IXON | IXOFF | IXANY); // no sw flow control
if (write(cfd, msgOut, 3) < 3) {
logIt(fprintf(lfd, "Sending of output message failed\n"));
close(cfd);
continue;
}
if (read(cfd, msgIn, 4) != 4) {
logIt(fprintf(lfd, "Didn't get expected amount of return data\n"));
close(cfd);
continue;
}
if (msgIn[3] != HOST_ID) {
logIt(fprintf(lfd, "Got the wrong HOST_ID response\n"));
close(cfd);
continue;
}
logIt(fprintf(lfd, "Port found - communication established\n"));
tapState = UP;
break; // we're done - break out of the loop
}
fclose(ifd); // close and remove the file we created
remove("usbSerial");
}
from within Code::Blocks the debugger is also hosed - once the program is started it cannot be paused or stopped
It is far more likely that you do not understand your tools than that you have created an unkillable program.
It's easy enough to figure this out: divide and conquer. You've got a whole pile of unrelated components here. Start separating them and find out which pieces work fine in isolation and which continue to behave badly when disconnected from everything else. Then you'll have your culprit.
Specifically here, that means try running your program outside the IDE, then under command line gdb instead of GDB via the IDE.
Also, it should be possible to run your program without starting the web server piece, so that you can run the serial part of the app in isolation. This is not only good for debugging by minimizing confounding variables, it also encourages a loosely-coupled program design, which is a good thing in its own right.
In the end, you may find that the thing keeping your program from stopping is the web framework, Code::Blocks, or the way GDB operates on the Pi under Code::Blocks, rather than anything to do with the USB to serial adapter.
once the problem happens the only solution seems to be to reboot the Pi
If your program is still running in the background, then of course your next instance will fail if it tries to open the same USB port.
Don't guess, find out:
$ sudo lsof | grep ttyACM
or:
$ lsof -p $(pidof myprogram)
(Substitute pgrep if your system doesn't have pidof.)
I've done things like this before using a scripting language (Tcl) but this time around I'm looking for a performance boost from a non-interpreted language
Your serial port is running at 115,200 bps. Divide that by 10 to account for the stop and start bits, then flip the fraction to get seconds per byte, and you come to 87 microseconds per byte. And you only achieve that when the serial port is running flat-out, sending or receiving 11,500 bytes per second. Wanna take a guess at how many lines of code Tcl can interpret in 87 microseconds? Tcl isn't super-fast, but 87 microseconds is an eternity even in Tcl land.
Then on the other side of the connection, you have HTTP and a [W]LAN, likely adding another hundred milliseconds or so of delay per transaction.
Your need for speed is an illusion.
Now come back and talk to me again when you need to talk to 100 of these asynchronously, and then maybe we can start to justify C over Tcl.
(And I say this as one whose day job involves maintaining a large C++ program that does a lot of serial and network I/O.)
Now lets get to the many problems with this code:
system("ls -l /dev/serial/by-path > usbSerial\n"); // get current port list
ifd = fopen("usbSerial", "r");
Don't use a temporary where a pipe will suffice; use popen() here instead.
while(1) {
This is simply wrong. Say while (!feof(ifd)) { here, else you will attempt to read past the end of the file.
This, plus the next error, is likely the key to your major symptoms.
if (fgets(line, 127, ifd) == NULL) {
break;
There are several problems here:
You're assuming things about the meaning of the return value that do not follow from the documentation. The Linux fopen(3) man page isn't super clear on this; the BSD version is better:
The fgets() and gets() functions do not distinguish between end-of-file and error, and callers must use feof(3) and ferror(3) to determine which occurred.
Because fgets() is Standard C, and not Linux- or BSD-specific, it is generally safe to consult other systems' manual pages. Even better, consult a good generic C reference, such as Harbison & Steele. (I found that much more useful than K&R back when I was doing more pure C than C++.)
Bottom line, simply checking for NULL doesn't tell you everything you need to know here.
Secondarily, the hard-coded 127 constant is a code bomb waiting to go off, should you ever shrink the size of the line buffer. Say sizeof(line) here.
(No, not sizeof(line) - 1: fgets() leaves space for the trailing null character when reading. Again, RTFM carefully.)
The break is also a problem, but we'll have to get further down in the code to see why.
Moving on:
strcat(port, ptr); // append the "ttyACMn" part of the line
Two problems here:
You're blindly assuming that strlen(ptr) <= sizeof(port) - 6. Use strncat(3) instead.
(The prior line's strcpy() (as opposed to strncpy()) is justifiable because you're copying a string literal, so you can see that you're not overrunning the buffer, but you should get into the habit of pretending that the old C string functions that don't check lengths don't even exist. Some compilers will actually issue warnings when you use them, if you crank the warning level up.)
Or, better, give up on C strings, and start using std::string. I can see that you're trying to stick to C, but there really are things in C++ that are worth using, even if you mostly use C. C++'s automatic memory management facilities (not just string, but also auto_ptr/unique_ptr and more) fall into this category.
Plus, C++ strings operate more like Tcl strings, so you'll probably be more comfortable with them.
Factual assertions in comments must always be true, or they are likely mislead you later, potentially hazardously so. Your particular USB to serial adapter may use /dev/ttyACMx, but not all do. There's another common USB device class used by some serial-to-USB adapters that causes them to show up under Linux as ttyUSBx. More generally, a future change may change the device name in some other way; you might port to BSD, for example, and now your USB to serial device is called /dev/cu.usbserial, blowing your 15-byte port buffer. Don't assume.
Even with the BSD case aside, your port buffer should not be smaller than your line buffer, since you are concatenating the latter onto the former. At minimum, sizeof(port) should be sizeof(line) + strlen("/dev/"), just in case. If that seems excessive, it is only because 128 bytes for the line buffer is unnecessarily large. (Not that I'm trying to twist your arm to change it. RAM is cheap; programmer debugging time is expensive.)
Next:
fcntl(cfd, F_SETFL, 0); // blocking mode
File handles are blocking by default in Unix. You have to ask for a nonblocking file handle. Anyway, blasting all the flags is bad style; you don't know what other flags you're changing here. Proper style is to get, modify, then set, much like the way you're doing with tcsetattr():
int flags;
fcntl(cfd, F_GETFL, &flags);
flags &= ~O_NONBLOCK;
fcntl(cfd, F_SETFL, flags);
Well, you're kind of using tcsetattr() correctly:
tcsetattr(cfd, TCSANOW, &options);
...followed by further modifications to options without a second call to tcsetattr(). Oops!
You weren't under the impression that modifications to the options structure affect the serial port immediately, were you?
if (write(cfd, msgOut, 3) < 3) {
logIt(fprintf(lfd, "Sending of output message failed\n"));
close(cfd);
continue;
}
Piles of wrong here:
You're collapsing the short-write and error cases. Handle them separately:
int bytes = write(cfd, msgOut, 3);
if (bytes == 0) {
// can't happen with USB, but you may later change to a
// serial-to-Ethernet bridge (e.g. Digi One SP), and then
// it *can* happen under TCP.
//
// complain, close, etc.
}
else if (bytes < 0) {
// plain failure case; could collapse this with the == 0 case
// close, etc
}
else if (bytes < 3) {
// short write case
}
else {
// success case
}
You aren't logging errno or its string equivalent, so when (!) you get an error, you won't know which error:
logIt(fprintf(lfd, "Sending of output message failed: %s (code %d)\n",
strerror(errno), errno));
Modify to taste. Just realize that write(2), like most other Unix system calls, has a whole bunch of possible error codes. You probably don't want to handle all of them the same way. (e.g. EINTR)
After closing the FD, you're leaving it set to a valid FD value, so that on EOF after reading one line, you leave the function with a valid but closed FD value! (This is the problem with break above: it can implicitly return a closed FD to its caller.) Say cfd = -1 after every close(cfd) call.
Everything written above about write() also applies to the following read() call, but also:
if (read(cfd, msgIn, 4) != 4) {
There's nothing in POSIX that tells you that if the serial device sends 4 bytes that you will get all 4 bytes in a single read(), even with a blocking FD. You are especially unlikely to get more than one byte per read() with slow serial ports, simply because your program is lightning fast compared to the serial port. You need to call read() in a loop here, exiting only on error or completion.
And just in case it isn't obvious:
remove("usbSerial");
You don't need that if you switch to popen() above. Don't scatter temporary working files around the file system where a pipe will do.

bash - How to keep launching a program until it exits with 0

Wrote a python script that does a task that may be running for a few hours. Since it communicates with a remote server, the script may fail if there's a connection error. What I'd like to do is to keep relaunching it if its exit code is not 0. Is it possible with bash?
Some pseudo-C if my wording is not clear:
int exitcode;
do
{
exitcode = MyPythonScript();
} while (exitcode != 0);
until MyPythonScript
do
: Nothing
done
That exits when the command exits with a true (success) status. You can put a sleep, or an error report, or anything else you want in the body of the loop in place of the 'do nothing but always succeed' command :. You can add arguments to the script as desired, of course (and I/O redirections, etc).

how to validate sigprocmask is working

I am using sigprocmask to block signal and getting my process killed.
It works but is there a way to validate that say using /proc/<pid>/status
If I remove sigprocmask statements below the code does not work but I do not see any difference in /proc/<pid>/status with resepct to SigIgn,SigCgt,SigPnd ,Sig*
my $sigset_old = POSIX::SigSet->new;
my $sigset = POSIX::SigSet->new;
$sigset->emptyset();
$sigset->addset(&POSIX::SIGPOLL);
POSIX::sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK,$sigset,$old_sigset);
while(1)
{
POSIX::RT::Signal::sigwait($sigset);
POSIX::sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK,$old_sigset)
<some code>
...
...
}
Instead of:
POSIX::sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK,$old_sigset)
do:
POSIX::sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,$old_sigset)
The old signal mask does not contain your POLL signal, so it is not unblocked in the second call. What you want is either to set the old signal mask like shown or to unblock your signal with
POSIX::sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK,$sigset)
This is incorrectly documented in many places in the internet e.g. https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/perl-cookbook/1565922433/ch16s21.html
Seems like often, one copies from the other.

Ncurses shell escape drops parent process output

I'm using Ubuntu Linux 12.04 and writing a program that uses ncurses. My program has an option to execute subordinate processes (a "shell escape"). Before creating the subordinate process I do
reset_shell_mode( );
putp( exit_ca_mode ); // From <term.h>
Then when the subordinate process exits I restore my curses display with
putp( enter_ca_mode ); // From <term.h>
reset_prog_mode( );
refresh( );
This works fine. However, my program wants to also output some information just before launching the the subordinate process. It also wants to output some additional information when the subordinate process exits but before returning to a full curses display. Thus I have (abbreviated):
reset_shell_mode( );
putp( exit_ca_mode );
printf( "Don't forget... blah, blah\n" );
system( external_command );
printf( "Updating, etc\n" );
putp( enter_ca_mode );
reset_prog_mode( );
refresh( );
The problem is that the text produced by my program immediately before and after the call to system( ) does not appear. I guess maybe it's still going into some curses related buffer. I don't know.
How can I get the parent process to also output on the terminal as well as the child process?
Curses keeps its own buffer with an idea of what the screen should look like. When you call refresh(), it adjusts the screen to match that buffer, which means everything that curses doesn't know about will be overwritten (*).
printf, and the output of any external command, bypass that buffer, going directly to the screen (more exactly, to standard output, which happens to be connected to the screen, because they inherit their standard output from your shell).
So, to get your printf output into curses, you need to replace printf with printw. To get the output of the other program into curses, you have to capture its output into your program, then feed it to curses.
The easy way to do this is redirect the output to a file, then read the file:
system("ls > tempfile");
if ((fp=fopen("tempfile", "r"))!=NULL) {
while (fgets(buf, sizeof buf, fp))
printw("%s", buf);
fclose(fp);
}
WARNING: this example is stripped down a lot, to give you an idea. It doesn't catch errors well, it uses fgets which is prone to all sorts of buffer overflows, and it uses a constant name for the temporary file which causes a lot of concurrency problems.
A better way is to create a pipe between your process and the program you're trying to run:
int p[2];
pipe(p);
if (fork()==0) { // child process
close(1);
dup(p[1]);
close(p[1]);
close(p[0]);
execlp("ls", "ls", NULL);
} else { // parent process
close(p[1]);
if ((fp=fdopen(p[0], "r"))!=NULL) {
while (fgets(buf, sizeof buf, fp))
printw("%s", buf);
fclose(fp);
}
}
Again, this example is stripped down a lot (and i typed it directly into the browser, never compiled or ran it). To really understand it, and add all the missing error checking, learn about the linux/unix process model, pipes, file descriptors vs. C file pointers - there's lots of tutorials out there, and this is far beyond your original question.
But, to sum it up: if you want curses to put anything on the screen, you have to use the appropriate curses functions. Everything that bypasses curses might get overwritten as soon as curses refreshes the screen.
(*) If curses thinks there's only difference between the screen and the internal buffer, it will update only the different charactes, not the whole screen. So, if your external program writes to parts of the screen that curses thinks don't have to be updated, it will leave those parts alone, which means part of your program's output will remain.
In the example
reset_shell_mode( );
putp( exit_ca_mode );
printf( "Don't forget... blah, blah\n" );
system( external_command );
printf( "Updating, etc\n" );
putp( enter_ca_mode );
reset_prog_mode( );
refresh( );
The reset_shell_mode() call tries to restore the terminal settings. There is one problem. curses (generally speaking, not just ncurses) sets the terminal modes to "raw" (to allow your input characters to be read without interference by I/O buffering), but it also sets output-buffering (for performance).
It does this with some variant of setvbuf, which according to the standard cannot reliably be turned off/on:
The setvbuf() function may be used after the stream pointed to by stream is associated with an open file but before any other operation (other than an unsuccessful call to setvbuf()) is performed on the stream.
That's not just a fine detail; some implementations dump core if you try to discard buffering. So ncurses stays in line. But again there's something to note:
until late 2012 (to fix a problem with signals), ncurses used the same buffer for its output as the standard output (or whatever stream was fed into its initialization).
since then, ncurses uses a separate buffer. There are special cases such as putp which use the same output buffering, but printw uses a separate buffer which ncurses flushes during its repainting operations such as refresh.
In either case, the fix for this example would be to use fflush when using a different output stream than the preceding call. This should work:
reset_shell_mode( );
putp( exit_ca_mode );
printf( "Don't forget... blah, blah\n" );
fflush(stdout); // added
system( external_command );
printf( "Updating, etc\n" );
putp( enter_ca_mode );
fflush(stdout); // added
reset_prog_mode( );
refresh( );

How to create an execve() child process with the right tty settings to run 'vi' yet still redirect IO back to the parent process?

How do I get a forked, execve() child process that can run 'vi', etc. and redirect all IO to the parent process?
I'm trying to pass shells through from an embedded Linux process to the PC software interface connected over the network. The IO for the shell process is packaged into app-specific messages for network transport over our existing protocol.
First I was just redirecting IO using simply pipe2(), fork(), dup2(), and execve(). This didn't give me a tty on the remote side, so screen, etc. didn't work.
Now I'm using forkpty, and screen mostly works, but many many other don't (vi, stty, etc). It appears the current problem is that the child process doesn't control the tty.
I've been experimenting with TIOCSCTTY, but haven't had much luck.
Here's more or less what I've got:
bool ExternalProcess::launch(...)
{
...
winsize winSize;
winSize.ws_col = 80;
winSize.ws_row = 25;
winSize.ws_xpixel = 10;
winSize.ws_ypixel = 10;
_pid = forkpty(&_stdin, NULL, NULL, &winSize);
//ioctl(_stdin, TIOCNOTTY, NULL);
if (!_pid && (_pid != -1))
{
// this is the child process
char tty[4096];
strncpy(tty, ttyname(STDIN_FILENO), sizeof(tty));
tty[sizeof(tty)-1]=0;
FILE* fp = fopen("debug.txt", "wt"); // no error checking - temporary test code
fprintf(fp, "slave TTY %s", tty);
//if (ioctl(_stdin, TIOCSCTTY, NULL) < 0)
if (ioctl(STDIN_FILENO, TIOCSCTTY, NULL) < 0)
{
fprintf(fp, "ioctl() TIOCSCTTY %s\n", strerror(errno));
fflush(fp);
}
else
{
fprintf(fp, "SET CONTROLLING TTY!");
fflush(fp);
}
fclose(fp);
// command, args, env populated elsewhere
execve(command, args, env);
...
// fail path
_exit(-1);
return false;
}
_stdout = _stdin;
...
// enter select() loop reading/writing _stdin, _stdout
}
I am getting results in the debug file like:
slave TTY /dev/pts/5
SET CONTROLLING TTY!
but still many apps are failing with tcsetattr() errors. Am I right in thinking this is a controlling tty problem? How do I fix it?
EDIT
Minor correction. When I do the ioctl TIOCSCTTY on STDIN_FILENO, then it works as in the debug file above, but the IO redirection back to the parent process is disrupted.
EDIT 2
Okay, I'm starting to understand this better. Looking at the kernel source for the ioctl behind tcsetattr(), the processes I am calling are being sent SIGTTIN and SIGTTOU when trying to change the tty.
Only a foreground process can do that, and they're running as if they're background processes. I tried setting those signals to SIG_IGN after forking and before the execve(), but that didn't work. The semantics of this I understand, but it's safe in my redirection scenario for the execve()'d processes to act as if they're foreground processes. The question is... how to make it so? I will continue to search in the kernel code for clues.
Ugh! It's bash, the shell I was calling with execve().
If it detects that stderr is not attached to a tty, then it enters this special mode where child processes cause SIGTTOU.
I found a mention of this problem here.
When I stopped redirecting stderr away from the tty, then it now seems to work as planned.

Resources