i have a list of tokenized documents,containing both unigrams, bi-grams and i would like to perform sklearn lda on it.i have tried the following code:
my_data =[['low-rank matrix','detection method','problem finding'],['probabilistic inference','problem finding','statistical learning','solution' ],['detection method','probabilistic inference','population','language']...]
tf_vectorizer = CountVectorizer(min_df=2, max_features=n_features,
stop_words='english')
tf = tf_vectorizer.fit_transform(mydata)
lda = LatentDirichletAllocation(n_topics=3, max_iter=5,random_state=10)
but when i print the output i get something like this:
topic 0:
detection,finding, solution ,method,problem
topic 1:
language, statistical , problem, learning,finding
and so on..
bigrams are broken and are separated from one another.i have 10,000 documents and already tokenize them, also the method for finding the bigram is not nltk based so i already did this.
is there any method to improve this without changing the input?
i am very new in using sklearn so apologies in advance if i am making some obvious mistake.
CountVectorizer has a ngram_range param which will be used for deciding if the vocabulary will contain uniqrams, or bigrams or trigrams etc:-
ngram_range : tuple (min_n, max_n)
The lower and upper boundary of the
range of n-values for different n-grams to be extracted. All values of
n such that min_n <= n <= max_n will be used.
For example:
ngram_range=(1,1) => Will include only unigrams
ngram_range=(1,2) => Will include unigrams and bigrams
ngram_range=(2,2) => Will include only bigrams
and so on...
You have not defined that, so default ngram_range=(1,1) and hence only unigrams are used here.
tf_vectorizer = CountVectorizer(min_df=2,
max_features=n_features,
stop_words='english',
ngram_range = (2,2)) # You need this
tf = tf_vectorizer.fit_transform(my_data)
Secondly, you say that you have already tokenize the data and show the lists of list (my_data) in your code. That doesnt work with CountVectorizer. For that, you need to pass a simple list of strings and CountVectorizer will automatically apply tokenizing on them. So you will need to pass on your own preprocessing steps to that. See other params 'preprocessor', 'tokenizer' and 'analyzer' in the linked documentation.
Related
Just curiosity, but I was debugging gensim's FastText code for replicating the implementation of Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) words, and I'm not being able to accomplish it.
So, the process i'm following is training a tiny model with a toy corpus, and then comparing the resulting vectors of a word in the vocabulary. That means if the whole process is OK, the output arrays should be the same.
Here is the code I've used for the test:
from gensim.models import FastText
import numpy as np
# Default gensim's function for hashing ngrams
from gensim.models._utils_any2vec import ft_hash_bytes
# Toy corpus
sentences = [['hello', 'test', 'hello', 'greeting'],
['hey', 'hello', 'another', 'test']]
# Instatiate FastText gensim's class
ft = FastText(sg=1, size=5, min_count=1, \
window=2, hs=0, negative=20, \
seed=0, workers=1, bucket=100, \
min_n=3, max_n=4)
# Build vocab
ft.build_vocab(sentences)
# Fit model weights (vectors_ngram)
ft.train(sentences=sentences, total_examples=ft.corpus_count, epochs=5)
# Save model
ft.save('./ft.model')
del ft
# Load model
ft = FastText.load('./ft.model')
# Generate ngrams for test-word given min_n=3 and max_n=4
encoded_ngrams = [b"<he", b"<hel", b"hel", b"hell", b"ell", b"ello", b"llo", b"llo>", b"lo>"]
# Hash ngrams to its corresponding index, just as Gensim does
ngram_hashes = [ft_hash_bytes(n) % 100 for n in encoded_ngrams]
word_vec = np.zeros(5, dtype=np.float32)
for nh in ngram_hashes:
word_vec += ft.wv.vectors_ngrams[nh]
# Compare both arrays
print(np.isclose(ft.wv['hello'], word_vec))
The output of this script is False for every dimension of the compared arrays.
It would be nice if someone could point me out if i'm missing something or doing something wrong. Thanks in advance!
The calculation of a full word's FastText word-vector is not just the sum of its character n-gram vectors, but also a raw full-word vector that's also trained for in-vocabulary words.
The full-word vectors you get back from ft.wv[word] for known-words have already had this combination pre-calculated. See the adjust_vectors() method for an example of this full calculation:
https://github.com/RaRe-Technologies/gensim/blob/68ec5b8ed7f18e75e0b13689f4da53405ef3ed96/gensim/models/keyedvectors.py#L2282
The raw full-word vectors are in a .vectors_vocab array on the model.wv object.
(If this isn't enough to reconcile matters: ensure you're using the latest gensim, as there have been many recent FT fixes. And, ensure your list of ngram-hashes matches the output of the ft_ngram_hashes() method of the library – if not, your manual ngram-list-creation and subsequent hashing may be doing something different.)
I have somewhat read a bunch of papers which talks about predicting missing words in a sentence. What I really want is to create a model that suggest a word from an incomplete sentence.
Example:
Incomplete Sentence :
I bought an ___________ because its rainy.
Suggested Words:
umbrella
soup
jacket
From the journal I have read, they have utilized Microsoft Sentence Completion Dataset for predicting missing words from a sentence.
Example :
Incomplete Sentence :
Im sad because you are __________
Missing Word Options:
a) crying
b) happy
c) pretty
d) sad
e) bad
I don't want to predict a missing word from a list of options. I want to suggest a list of words from an incomplete sentence. Is it feasible? Please enlighten me cause Im really confused. What is state of the art model I can use for suggesting a list of words (semantically coherent) from an incomplete sentence?
Is it necessary that the list of suggested words as an output is included in the training dataset?
This is exactly how the BERT model was trained: mask some random words in the sentence, and make your network predict these words. So yes, it is feasible. And not, it is not necessary to have the list of suggested words as a training input. However, these suggested words should be the part of the overall vocabulary with which this BERT has been trained.
I adapted this answer to show how the completion function may work.
# install this package to obtain the pretrained model
# ! pip install -U pytorch-pretrained-bert
import torch
from pytorch_pretrained_bert import BertTokenizer, BertForMaskedLM
tokenizer = BertTokenizer.from_pretrained('bert-base-uncased')
model = BertForMaskedLM.from_pretrained('bert-base-uncased')
model.eval(); # turning off the dropout
def fill_the_gaps(text):
text = '[CLS] ' + text + ' [SEP]'
tokenized_text = tokenizer.tokenize(text)
indexed_tokens = tokenizer.convert_tokens_to_ids(tokenized_text)
segments_ids = [0] * len(tokenized_text)
tokens_tensor = torch.tensor([indexed_tokens])
segments_tensors = torch.tensor([segments_ids])
with torch.no_grad():
predictions = model(tokens_tensor, segments_tensors)
results = []
for i, t in enumerate(tokenized_text):
if t == '[MASK]':
predicted_index = torch.argmax(predictions[0, i]).item()
predicted_token = tokenizer.convert_ids_to_tokens([predicted_index])[0]
results.append(predicted_token)
return results
print(fill_the_gaps(text = 'I bought an [MASK] because its rainy .'))
print(fill_the_gaps(text = 'Im sad because you are [MASK] .'))
print(fill_the_gaps(text = 'Im worried because you are [MASK] .'))
print(fill_the_gaps(text = 'Im [MASK] because you are [MASK] .'))
The [MASK] symbol indicates the missing words (there can be any number of them). [CLS] and [SEP] are BERT-specific special tokens. The outputs for these particular prints are
['umbrella']
['here']
['worried']
['here', 'here']
The duplication is not surprising - transformer NNs are generally good at copying words. And from semantic point of view, these symmetric continuations look indeed very likely.
Moreover, if it is not a random word which is missing, but exactly the last word (or last several words), you can utilize any language model (e.g. another famous SOTA language model, GPT-2) to complete the sentence.
I am new to NLP, how to find the similarity between 2 sentences and also how to print scores of each word. And also how to implement the gensim word2Vec model.
Try this code:
here my two sentences :
sentence1="I am going to India"
sentence2=" I am going to Bharat"
from gensim.models import word2vec
import numpy as np
words1 = sentence1.split(' ')
words2 = sentence2.split(' ')
#The meaning of the sentence can be interpreted as the average of its words
sentence1_meaning = word2vec(words1[0])
count = 1
for w in words1[1:]:
sentence1_meaning = np.add(sentence1_meaning, word2vec(w))
count += 1
sentence1_meaning /= count
sentence2_meaning = word2vec(words2[0])
count = 1
for w in words2[1:]:
sentence2_meaning = np.add(sentence2_meaning, word2vec(w))
count += 1
sentence2_meaning /= count
#Similarity is the cosine between the vectors
similarity = np.dot(sentence1_meaning, sentence2_meaning)/(np.linalg.norm(sentence1_meaning)*np.linalg.norm(sentence2_meaning))
You can train the model and use the similarity function to get the cosine similarity between two words.
Here's a simple demo:
from gensim.models import Word2Vec
from gensim.test.utils import common_texts
model = Word2Vec(common_texts,
size = 500,
window = 5,
min_count = 1,
workers = 4)
word_vectors = model.wv
word_vectors.similarity('computer', 'computer')
The output will be 1.0, of course, which indicates 100% similarity.
After your from gensim.models import word2vec, word2vec is a Python module – not a function that you can call as word2vec(words1[0]) or word2vec(w).
So your code isn't even close to approaching this correctly, and you should review docs/tutorials which demonstrate the proper use of the gensim Word2Vec class & supporting methods, then mimic those.
As #david-dale mentions, there's a basic intro in the gensim docs for Word2Vec:
https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/models/word2vec.html
The gensim library also bundles within its docs/notebooks directory a number of Jupyter notebooks demonstrating various algorithms & techniques. The notebook word2vec.ipynb shows basic Word2Vec usage; you can also view it via the project's source code repository at...
https://github.com/RaRe-Technologies/gensim/blob/develop/docs/notebooks/word2vec.ipynb
...however, it's really best to run as a local notebook, so you can step through the execution cell-by-cell, and try different variants yourself, perhaps even adapting it to use your data instead.
When you reach that level, note that:
these models require far more than just a few sentences as training - so ideally you'd either have (a) many sentences from the same domain as those you're comparing, so that the model can learn words in those contexts; (b) a model trained from a compatible corpus, which you then apply to your out-of-corpus sentences.
using the average of all the word-vectors in a sentence is just one relatively-simple way to make a vector for a longer text; there are many other more-sophisticated ways. One alternative very similar to Word2Vec is the 'Paragraph Vector' algorithm also available in gensim as the class Doc2Vec.
I am using tfidfvectorizer to score terms from many different corpus.
Here is my code
tfidf = TfidfVectorizer(ngram_range=(1,1), stop_words = 'english', min_df = 0.5)
for corpus in all_corpus:
tfidf.fit_transform(corpus)
The number of documents in each corpus is various, so when building the vocabulary, some corpus remains empty and return an error:
after pruning, no terms remain. Try a lower min_df or higher max_df
I don't want to change the min or max DF. What I need is when there is no terms, the transforming process is skipped. So I made a conditional filter like below
for corpus in all_corpus:
tfidf.fit_transform(corpus)
if tfidf.shape[0] > 0:
\\execute some code here
However, the condition couldn't work. Is there way to fix this?
All answers and comments are really appreciated. Thanks
First, a minimum working example for your problem is I believe, the following:
from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfVectorizer
tfidf = TfidfVectorizer(ngram_range=(1,1), stop_words = 'english', min_df = 0.5)
tfidf.fit_transform(['not I you'])
I could not replicate an error message that contains the part of the error message you share, but this gives me a ValueError as all the words in my document are English stop words. (The code runs if one removes stop_words = 'english' in the snippet above.)
One way of handling the error in the case of a for-loop is to use a try/except block.
for corpus in all_corpus:
try:
tfidf.fit_transform(corpus)
except ValueError:
print('Transforming process skipped')
# Here you can do more stuff
continue # go to the beginning of the for-loop to start the next iteration
# Here goes the rest of the code for corpus for which the transform functioned
I am having a word embedding file as shown below click here to see the complete file in github.I would like to know the procedure for generating word embeddings So that i can generate word embedding for my personal dataset
in -0.051625 -0.063918 -0.132715 -0.122302 -0.265347
to 0.052796 0.076153 0.014475 0.096910 -0.045046
for 0.051237 -0.102637 0.049363 0.096058 -0.010658
of 0.073245 -0.061590 -0.079189 -0.095731 -0.026899
the -0.063727 -0.070157 -0.014622 -0.022271 -0.078383
on -0.035222 0.008236 -0.044824 0.075308 0.076621
and 0.038209 0.012271 0.063058 0.042883 -0.124830
a -0.060385 -0.018999 -0.034195 -0.086732 -0.025636
The 0.007047 -0.091152 -0.042944 -0.068369 -0.072737
after -0.015879 0.062852 0.015722 0.061325 -0.099242
as 0.009263 0.037517 0.028697 -0.010072 -0.013621
Google -0.028538 0.055254 -0.005006 -0.052552 -0.045671
New 0.002533 0.063183 0.070852 0.042174 0.077393
with 0.087201 -0.038249 -0.041059 0.086816 0.068579
at 0.082778 0.043505 -0.087001 0.044570 0.037580
over 0.022163 -0.033666 0.039190 0.053745 -0.035787
new 0.043216 0.015423 -0.062604 0.080569 -0.048067
I was able to convert each words in a dictionary to the above format by following the below steps:
initially represent each words in the dictionary by unique integer
take each integer one by one and perform array([[integer]]) and give it as input array in below code
then the word corresponding to integer and respective output vector can be stored to json file ( i used output_array.tolist() for storing the vector in json format)
import numpy as np
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Embedding
model = Sequential()
model.add(Embedding(dictionary_size_here, sizeof_embedding_vector, input_length= input_length_here))
input_array = array([[integer]]) #each integer is fed one by one using a loop
model.compile('rmsprop', 'mse')
output_array = model.predict(input_array)
Reference
How does Keras 'Embedding' layer work?
It is important to understand that there are multiple ways to generate an embedding for words. The popular word2vec, for example, can generate word embeddings using CBOW or Skip-grams.
Hence, one could have multiple "procedures" to generate word embeddings. One of the easier to understand method (albeit with its drawbacks) to generate an embedding is using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). The steps are briefly described below.
Create a Term-Document matrix. i.e. terms as rows and the document it appears in as columns.
Perform SVD
Truncate the output vector for the term to n dimension. In your example above, n = 5.
You can have a look at this link for a more detailed description using word2vec's skipgram model to generate an embedding. Word2Vec Tutorial - The Skip-Gram Model.
For more information on SVD, you can look at this and this.