I'm currently using > /dev/null & to have Perl script A run Perl script B totally independently, and it works fine. Script B runs without throwing back any output and stays alive when Script A ends, even when my terminal session ends.
Not saying I need it, but is there a way to recapture its output if I wanted to?
Thanks
Your code framework may look like this:
#!/usr/bin/perl
# I'm a.pl
#...
system "b.pl > ~/b.out &";
while (1)
{
my $time = localtime;
my ($fsize, $mtime) = (stat "/var/log/syslog")[7,9];
print "syslog: size=$fsize, mtime=$mtime at $time\n";
sleep 60;
}
while the b.pl may look like:
#!/usr/bin/perl
# I'm b.pl
while (1)
{
my $time = localtime;
my $fsize_a = (stat "/var/log/auth.log")[7];
my $fsize_s = (stat "/var/log/syslog")[7];
print "fsize: syslog=$fsize_s auth.log=$fsize_a at $time\n";
sleep 60;
}
a.pl and b.pl do their job independently.
b.pl is called by a.pl as a background job, which sends its output to b.out(won't mess up the screen of a.pl)
You can read b.out from some other terminal, or after a.pl is finished(or when a.pl is put to background temporarily)
About terminating the two scripts:
`ctrl-c` for a.pl
`killall b.pl` for b.pl
Note:
b.pl will never terminate even when you terminate your terminal (Assumed that your terminal is run as a desktop application), so you don't need the `nohup` command to help. (Perhaps only useful in console)
If your b.pl may spit out error messages from time to time, then you still need to deal with its stderr. It's left as your homework.
Related
Within CI, I am running a bash script that calls many bash scripts.
./internals/declination/create "${RELEASE_VERSION}" "${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME}" > /dev/null
This doest not disable the stdout returned by the script.
The Gitlabi-CI runners stop logging after 100MB of log, It says Job's log exceeded limit of 10240000 bytes.
I know the log script can only grow up.
How can I optimize the output log size?
I don't need to have all the stdout, I can have stderr but then it will be a long running script without information.
Is there a way to display the commands which is running like when doing set -x?
Edit
Reading the answers, I was not able to solve my issue. I need to add that I am using nodejs to run the bash script that run the long bash script.
This is how I call my node script within .gitlab-ci.yml:
scripts:
- node my_script.js
Within my_script.js, I have:
exports.handler = () => {
const ls = spawn('bash', [path.join(__dirname, 'release.sh')], { stdio: 'inherit' });
ls.on('close', (code) => {
if (code !== 0) {
console.log(`ps process exited with code ${code}`);
process.exitCode = code;
}
});
};
Within my_script.sh, I have:
./internals/declination/create "${RELEASE_VERSION}" "${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME}" > /dev/null
You can selectively redirect file handles with exec.
exec >stdout 2>stderr
This however loses the connection to the terminal, so there is no simple way to output anything to the terminal after this point.
You can instead duplicate a file handle with m>&n where m is the number of the file descriptor to duplicate and n is the number of the new one (choose a big number like 99 to not accidentally clobber an existing handle).
exec 98<&1 # stdout
exec 99<&2 # stderr
exec >/dev/null 2>&1
:
To re-enable output,
exec 1<&98 2<&99
If you redirected to a temporary file instead of /dev/null you could obviously now show the tail of those files to the caller.
tail -n 100 "$TMPDIR"/stdout "$TMPDIR"/stderr
(On a shared server, probably use mktemp to create a unique temporary directory at the beginning of your script; static hard-coded file names make it impossible to run two builds at the same time.)
As you usually can't predict where the next error will happen, probably put all of this in a wrapper script which performs the redirection, runs the build, and finally displays the tail end of the temporary log files. Some build servers probably want to see some signs of life in the log file every few minutes, so perhaps tail a few lines every once in a while in a loop, too.
On the other hand, if there is just a single build command, the whole build job's stdout and stderr can simply be redirected to a log file, and you don't need to exec things back and forth. If you need to enable output selectively for portions of the script, use exec as above; but for wholesale redirection, just redirect the one command.
In summary, maybe your build script would look something like this.
#!/bin/sh
t=$(mktemp -t -d cibuild.XXXXXXXX) || exit
trap 'kill $buildpid; wait $buildpid; tail -n 500 "$t"/*; rm -rf "$t"' 0 1 2 3 5 15
# Your original commands here
${initial_process_wd}/internals/declination/create "${RELEASE_VERSION}" "${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME}">"$t"/stdout 2>"$t"/stderr &
buildpid=$!
while kill -0 $buildpid; do
sleep 180
date
tail -n 1 "$t"/*
done
wait
A flaw with this approach is that you lose timing information. A proper solution woud let you see when each line was produced, and display standard output and standard error intermixed in the order the messages were printed, perhaps with visible time stamps, and even with coloring hints (red time stamps for stderr?)
Option 1
If your script will output the error message to stderr, you can ignore all output to stdout by using command > /dev/null, where /dev/null is a black hole that will take away any output to it.
Option 2
If there's any pattern on your error message, you can use grep to filter out those error messages.
Edit 1:
To show the command that is running, you can supply -x command to bash; therefore, your command will be
bash -x ${initial_process_wd}/internals/declination/create "${RELEASE_VERSION}" "${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME}" > /dev/null
bash will print the command executed to stderr
Edit 2:
If you want to reduce the size of the output file, you can pass it to gzip by using ${initial_process_wd}/internals/declination/create "${RELEASE_VERSION}" "${CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME}" | gzip > logfile.
To read the content of the logfile, you can use zcat logfile.
How to display a running clock in a linux terminal without using any for or while loop. Using these loops in scripts with 1 sec duration causes a significant load in the systems.
How about:
watch -n 1 date
Use watch to run a command periodically.
You can make a function which calls itself with a sleep :
#!/bin/bash
function showdate(){
printf '\033[;H' # Move the cursor to the top of the screen
date # Print the date (change with the format you need for the clock)
sleep 1 # Sleep (pause) for 1 second
showdate # Call itself
}
clear # Clear the screen
showdate # Call the function which will display the clock
If you execute this script it will run indefinitely until you hit CTRL-C
If you want to add the date to the terminal window title and your terminal supports it, you can do
#! /bin/bash
while :
do
printf '\033]0;%s\007' "$(date)"
sleep 1
done &
and it won't affect any other terminal output.
This post is ancient, but for anyone still looking for this kind of thing:
#!/bin/bash
printf '\033[;H'
while true; do date; sleep 1; done
This version avoids recursion (and stack faults!) while accomplishing the goal.
(For the record - I do prefer the watch version, but since the OP did not like that solution, I offered an improvement on the other solution.)
I am trying to follow log files in Perl on Fedora but unfortunately, Fedora uses journalctl to read binary log files that I cannot parse directly. This, according to my understanding, means I can only read Fedora's log files by calling journalctl.
I tried using IO::Pipe to do this, but the problem is that $p->reader(..) waits until journalctl --follow is done writing output (which will be never since --follow is like tail -F) and then allows me to print everything out which is not what I want. I would like to be able to set a callback function to be called each time a new line is printed to the process pipe so that I can parse/handle each new log event.
use IO::Pipe;
my $p = IO::Pipe->new();
$p->reader("journalctl --follow"); #Waits for process to exit
while (<$p>) {
print;
}
I assume that journalctl is working like tail -f. If this is correct, a simple open should do the job:
use Fcntl; # Import SEEK_CUR
my $pid = open my $fh, '|-', 'journalctl --follow'
or die "Error $! starting journalctl";
while (kill 0, $pid) {
while (<$fh>) {
print $_; # Print log line
}
sleep 1; # Wait some time for new lines to appear
seek($fh,0,SEEK_CUR); # Reset EOF
}
open opens a filehandle for reading the output of the called command: http://perldoc.perl.org/functions/open.html
seek is used to reset the EOF marker: http://perldoc.perl.org/functions/seek.html Without reset, all subsequent <$fh> calls will just return EOF even if the called script issued additional output in the meantime.
kill 0,$pid will be true as long as the child process started by open is alive.
You may replace sleep 1 by usleep from Time::HiRes or select undef,undef,undef,$fractional_seconds; to wait less than a second depending on the frequency of incoming lines.
AnyEvent should also be able to do the job via it's AnyEvent::Handle.
Update:
Adding use POSIX ":sys_wait_h"; at the beginning and waitpid $pid, WNOHANG) to the outer loop would also detect (and reap) a zombie journalctl process:
while (kill(0, $pid) and waitpid($pid, WNOHANG) != $pid) {
A daemon might also want to check if $pid is still a child of the current process ($$) and if it's still the original journalctl process.
I have no access to journalctl, but if you avoid IO::Pipe and open the piped output directly then the data will not be buffered
use strict;
use warnings 'all';
open my $follow_fh, '-|', 'journalctl --follow' or die $!;
print while <$follow_fh>;
I am having a problem getting bash to do exactly what I want, it's not a major issue, but annoying.
1.) I have a third party software I run that produces some output as stderr. Some of it is useful, some of it is regularly stuff I don't care about and I don't want this dumped to screen, however I do want the useful parts of the stderr dumped to screen. I figured the best way to achieve this was to pass stderr to a function, then use conditions in that function to either show the stderr or not.
2.) This works fine. However the solution I have implemented dumped out my errors at the right time, but then returns a bash prompt and I want to summarise the status of the errors at the end of the function, but echo-ing here prints the text after the prompt meaning that I have to press enter to get back to a clean prompt. It shall become clear with the example below.
My error stream generator:
./TestErrorStream.sh
#!/bin/bash
echo "test1" >&2
My function to process this:
./Function.sh
#!/bin/bash
function ProcessErrors()
{
while read data;
do
echo Line was:"$data"
done
sleep 5 # This is used simply to simulate the processing work I'm doing on the errors.
echo "Completed"
}
I source the Function.sh file to make ProcessErrors() available, then I run:
2> >(ProcessErrors) ./TestErrorStream.sh
I expect (and want) to get:
user#user-desktop:~/path$ 2> >(ProcessErrors) ./TestErrorStream.sh
Line was:test1
Completed
user#user-desktop:~/path$
However what I really get is:
user#user-desktop:~/path$ 2> >(ProcessErrors) ./TestErrorStream.sh
Line was:test1
user#user-desktop:~/path$ Completed
And no clean prompt. Of course the prompt is there, but "Completed" is being printed after the prompt, I want to printed before, and then a clean prompt to appear.
NOTE: This is a minimum working example, and it's contrived. While other solutions to my error stream problem are welcome I also want to understand how to make bash run this script the way I want it to.
Thanks for your help
Joey
Your problem is that the while loop stay stick to stdin until the program exits.
The release of stdin occurs at the end of the "TestErrorStream.sh", so your prompt is almost immediately available compared to what remains to process in the function.
I suggest you wrap the command inside a script so you'll be able to handle the time you want before your prompt is back (I suggest 1sec more than the suspected time needed for the function to process the remaining lines of codes)
I successfully managed to do this like that :
./Functions.sh
#!/bin/bash
function ProcessErrors()
{
while read data;
do
echo Line was:"$data"
done
sleep 5 # simulate required time to process end of function (after TestErrorStream.sh is over and stdin is released)
echo "Completed"
}
./TestErrorStream.sh
#!/bin/bash
echo "first"
echo "firsterr" >&2
sleep 20 # any number here
./WrapTestErrorStream.sh
#!/bin/bash
source ./Functions.sh
2> >(ProcessErrors) ./TestErrorStream.sh
sleep 6 # <= this one is important
With the above you'll get a nice "Completed" before your prompt after 26 seconds of processing. (Works fine with or without the additional "time" command)
user#host:~/path$ time ./WrapTestErrorStream.sh
first
Line was:firsterr
Completed
real 0m26.014s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
user#host:~/path$
Note: the process substitution ">(ProcessErrors)" is a subprocess of the script "./TestErrorStream.sh". So when the script ends, the subprocess is no more tied to it nor to the wrapper. That's why we need that final "sleep 6"
#!/bin/bash
function ProcessErrors {
while read data; do
echo Line was:"$data"
done
sleep 5
echo "Completed"
}
# Open subprocess
exec 60> >(ProcessErrors)
P=$!
# Do the work
2>&60 ./TestErrorStream.sh
# Close connection or else subprocess would keep on reading
exec 60>&-
# Wait for process to exit (wait "$P" doesn't work). There are many ways
# to do this too like checking `/proc`. I prefer the `kill` method as
# it's more explicit. We'd never know if /proc updates itself quickly
# among all systems. And using an external tool is also a big NO.
while kill -s 0 "$P" &>/dev/null; do
sleep 1s
done
Off topic side-note: I'd love to see how posturing bash veterans/authors try to own this. Or perhaps they already did way way back from seeing this.
I'm using Thread::Pool::Simple to create a few working threads. Each working thread does some stuff, including a call to chdir followed by an execution of an external Perl script (from the jbrowse genome browser, if it matters). I use capturex to call the external script and die on its failure.
I discovered that when I use more then one thread, things start to be messy. after some research. it seems that the current directory of some threads is not the correct one.
Perhaps chdir propagates between threads (i.e. isn't thread-safe)?
Or perhaps it's something with capturex?
So, how can I safely set the working directory for each thread?
** UPDATE **
Following the suggestions to change dir while executing, I'd like to ask how exactly should I pass these two commands to capturex?
currently I have:
my #args = ( "bin/flatfile-to-json.pl", "--gff=$gff_file", "--tracklabel=$track_label", "--key=$key", #optional_args );
capturex( [0], #args );
How do I add another command to #args?
Will capturex continue die on errors of any of the commands?
I think that you can solve your "how do I chdir in the child before running the command" problem pretty easily by abandoning IPC::System::Simple as not the right tool for the job.
Instead of doing
my $output = capturex($cmd, #args);
do something like:
use autodie qw(open close);
my $pid = open my $fh, '-|';
unless ($pid) { # this is the child
chdir($wherever);
exec($cmd, #args) or exit 255;
}
my $output = do { local $/; <$fh> };
# If child exited with error or couldn't be run, the exception will
# be raised here (via autodie; feel free to replace it with
# your own handling)
close ($fh);
If you were getting a list of lines instead of scalar output from capturex, the only thing that needs to change is the second-to-last line (to my #output = <$fh>;).
More info on forking-open is in perldoc perlipc.
The good thing about this in preference to capture("chdir wherever ; $cmd #args") is that it doesn't give the shell a chance to do bad things to your #args.
Updated code (doesn't capture output)
my $pid = fork;
die "Couldn't fork: $!" unless defined $pid;
unless ($pid) { # this is the child
chdir($wherever);
open STDOUT, ">/dev/null"; # optional: silence subprocess output
open STDERR, ">/dev/null"; # even more optional
exec($cmd, #args) or exit 255;
}
wait;
die "Child error $?" if $?;
I don't think "current working directory" is a per-thread property. I'd expect it to be a property of the process.
It's not clear exactly why you need to use chdir at all though. Can you not launch the external script setting the new process's working directory appropriately instead? That sounds like a more feasible approach.