I use the online regular tool on the Internet, and it shows the right results.
But when I use python's re package, the results are different.
pattern = re.compile(u'(?<=slot).*?(?=(}]}}]|$))')
result = pattern.findall(data)
print(result)
I want to get a string that ends with '}]}}]' beginning with 'slot'
What your Regular Expression:
u'(?<=slot).*?(?=(}]}}]|$))'
does, is matching every sequence .?*, in a non-greedy way, such that the sequence is preceded by slot and is followed by these symbols }]}}] or by the end of the text $.
In the following example string I put in bold the matches, for this RegExp:
"Crazy Train slot Spider's Lullabyes }]}}]"
To achieve what you want you can use the following pattern:
pattern = re.compile(u'(?<=^slot).*(?=}]}}]$)')
The caret (^) ensures that you search slot from the very beginning, and the operator (?<...) discards slot from result. After that: you match everything .* until reach the end with the desired final }]}}], the operator (?=...) discards }]}}] of the result.
The match for the following text is put in bold:
"slot Spider's Lullabyes }]}}]"
Related
Here is example of string
Hi {{1}},
The status of your leave application has changed,
Leaves: {{2}}
Status: {{3}}
See you soon back at office by Management.
Expected Result:
Variables Count = 3
i tried python count() using if/else, but i'm looking for sustainable solution.
You can use regular expressions:
import re
PATTERN = re.compile(r'\{\{\d+\}\}', re.DOTALL)
def count_vars(text: str) -> int:
return sum(1 for _ in PATTERN.finditer(text))
PATTERN defines the regular expression. The regular expression matches all strings that contain at least one digit (\d+) within a pair of curly brackets (\{\{\}\}). Curly brackets are special characters in regular expressions, so we must add \. re.DOTALL makes sure that we don't skip over new lines (\n). The finditer method iterates over all matches in the text and we simply count them.
import re
s="facebook.com/https://www.facebook.com/test/"
re.findall("facebook\.com/[^?\"\'>&\*\n\r\\\ <]+?", s)
I only want as a result "facebook.com/test/" ... but I'm getting as a result --
facebook.com/h
facebook.com/t
What's wrong with my RE? I applied the "?" at the end of the expression thinking this would stop greediness, but it's being treated as 0 or 1 expression.
If I remove the "?" I get:
facebook.com/https://www.facebook.com/test/
The non-greedy modifier works forwards but not backwards, which means that when the first instance of facebook.com/ matches it will not be discarded unless the rest of the pattern fails to match, even if it's non-greedy.
To match the last instance of facebook.com/ you can use a negative lookahead pattern instead:
facebook\.com/(?!.*facebook\.com/)[^?\"\'>&\*\n\r\\\ <]+
Demo: https://replit.com/#blhsing/WordyAgitatedCallbacks
Need help with a regular expression to grab exactly n lines of text between two regex matches. For example, I need 17 lines of text and I used the example below, which does not work. I
Please see sample code below:
import re
match_string = re.search(r'^.*MDC_IDC_RAW_MARKER((.*?\r?\n){17})Stored_EGM_Trigger.*\n'), t, re.DOTALL).group()
value1 = re.search(r'value="(\d+)"', match_string).group(1)
value2 = re.search(r'value="(\d+\.\d+)"', match_string).group(1)
print(match_string)
print(value1)
print(value2)
I added a sample string to here, because SO does not allow long code string:
https://hastebin.com/aqowusijuc.xml
You are getting false positives because you are using the re.DOTALL flag, which allows the . character to match newline characters. That is, when you are matching ((.*?\r?\n){17}), the . could eat up many extra newline characters just to satisfy your required count of 17. You also now realize that the \r is superfluous. Also, starting your regex with ^.*? is superfluous because you are forcing the search to start from the beginning but then saying that the search engine should skip as many characters as necessary to find MDC_IDC_RAW_MARKER. So, a simplified and correct regex would be:
match_string = re.search(r'MDC_IDC_RAW_MARKER.*\n((.*\n){17})Stored_EGM_Trigger.*\n', t)
Regex Demo
I've been trying for about two hours now to write a regular expression which matches a single character that's not preceded or followed by the same character.
This is what I've got: (\d)(?<!\1)\1(?!\1); but it doesn't seem to work! (testing at https://regex101.com/r/whnj5M/6)
For example:
In 1111223 I would expect to match the 3 at the end, since it's not preceded or followed by another 3.
In 1151223 I would expect to match the 5 in the middle, and the 3 at the end for the same reasons as above.
The end goal for this is to be able to find pairs (and only pairs) of characters in strings (e.g. to find 11 in 112223 or 44 in 123544) and I was going to try and match single isolated characters, and then add a {2} to it to find pairs, but I can't even seem to get isolated characters to match!
Any help would be much appreciated, I thought I knew RegEx pretty well!
P.S. I'm testing in JS on regex101.com because it wouldn't let me use variable length lookbacks in Python on there, and I'm using the regex library to allow for this in my actual implementation.
Your regex is close, but by using simply (\d) you are consuming characters, which prevents the other match from occurring. Instead, you can use a positive lookahead to set the capture group and then test for any occurrences of the captured digit not being surrounded by copies of itself:
(?=.*?(.))(?<!\1)\1(?!\1)
By using a lookahead you avoid consuming any characters and so the regex can match anywhere in the string.
Note that in 1151223 this returns 5, 1 and 3 because the third 1 is not adjacent to any other 1s.
Demo on regex101 (requires JS that supports variable width lookbehinds)
The pattern you tried does not match because this part (\d)(?<!\1) can not match.
It reads as:
Capture a digit in group 1. Then, on the position after that captured
digit, assert what is captured should not be on the left.
You could make the pattern work by adding for example a dot after the backreference (?<!\1.) to assert that the value before what you have just matched is not the same as group 1
Pattern
(\d)(?<!\1.)\1(?!\1)
Regex demo | Python demo
Note that you have selected ECMAscript on regex101.
Python re does not support variable width lookbehind.
To make this work in Python, you need the PyPi regex module.
Example code
import regex
pattern = r"(\d)(?<!\1.)\1(?!\1)"
test_str = ("1111223\n"
"1151223\n\n"
"112223\n"
"123544")
matches = regex.finditer(pattern, test_str)
for matchNum, match in enumerate(matches, start=1):
print(match.group())
Output
22
11
22
11
44
#Theforthbird has provided a good explanation for why your regular explanation does not match the characters of interest.
Each character matched by the following regular expression is neither preceded nor followed by the same character (including characters at the beginning and end of the string).
r'^.$|^(.)(?!\1)|(?<=(.))(?!\2)(.)(?!\3)'
Demo
Python's re regex engine performs the following operations.
^.$ match the first char if it is the only char in the line
| or
^ match beginning of line
(.) match a char in capture group 1...
(?!\1) ...that is not followed by the same character
| or
(?<=(.)) save the previous char in capture group 2...
(?!\2) ...that is not equal to the next char
(.) match a character and save to capture group 3...
(?!\3) ...that is not equal to the following char
Suppose the string were "cat".
The internal string pointer is initially at the beginning of the line.
"c" is not at the end of the line so the first part of the alternation fails and the second part is considered.
"c" is matched and saved to capture group 1.
The negative lookahead asserting that "c" is not followed by the content of capture group 1 succeeds, so "c" is matched and the internal string pointer is advanced to a position between "c" and "a".
"a" fails the first two parts of the assertion so the third part is considered.
The positive lookbehind (?<=(.)) saves the preceding character ("c") in capture group 2.
The negative lookahead (?!\2), which asserts that the next character ("a") is not equal to the content of capture group 2, succeeds. The string pointer remains just before "a".
The next character ("a") is matched and saved in capture group 3.
The negative lookahead (?!\3), which asserts that the following character ("t") does not equal the content of capture group 3, succeeds, so "a" is matched and the string pointer advances to just before "t".
The same steps are performed when evaluating "t" as were performed when evaluating "a". Here the last token ((?!\3)) succeeds, however, because no characters follow "t".
I have a problem with splitting string into two parts on special character.
For example:
12345#data
or
1234567#data
I have 5-7 characters in first part separated with "#" from second part, where are another data (characters,numbers, doesn't matter what)
I need to store two parts on each side of # in two variables:
x = 12345
y = data
without "#" character.
I was looking for some Lua string function like splitOn("#") or substring until character, but I haven't found that.
Use string.match and captures.
Try this:
s = "12345#data"
a,b = s:match("(.+)#(.+)")
print(a,b)
See this documentation:
First of all, although Lua does not have a split function is its standard library, it does have string.gmatch, which can be used instead of a split function in many cases. Unlike a split function, string.gmatch takes a pattern to match the non-delimiter text, instead of the delimiters themselves
It is easily achievable with the help of a negated character class with string.gmatch:
local example = "12345#data"
for i in string.gmatch(example, "[^#]+") do
print(i)
end
See IDEONE demo
The [^#]+ pattern matches one or more characters other than # (so, it "splits" a string with 1 character).