I'm having an issue using rails-admin and Active Storage at the same time. I saw that you can modify the value of labels with the label method. For example, for the "user #1" thing:
def name
email
end
The problem is that I have an Asset model to upload multiple files, but I see this:
Ugly attachment id
If I try to do the same trick (just to see if every file is now called "sdsd"):
def files
'sdsd'
end
Then this shows up:
undefined method `signed_id' for "sdsd":String
I tried making a reset of the database but it didn't work at all. Any ideas? I just want to show every filename instead of that ugly id's.
Related
Context: I'm building a car dealership app using Django 3.1.4, and trying to implement a feature where by every time a new ad is created, so is a new folder (via the upload_to method) within /media/ that will only contain that newly created ad's photos.
I've gotten this working somewhat using date formatting (see below) but I need this new folder to be named one of the fields belonging to the model(see the second code snippet).
photo_4 = models.ImageField(upload_to='photos/%Y/%m/%d', blank=True)
For example, every newly created ad would use the title field..
class Vehicles(models.Model):
CONDITION_CHOICES = [("Brand New","Brand New"),("Used", "Used")]
FUEL_CHOICES = [("Petrol","Petrol"),("Diesel", "Diesel"),("Electric", "Electric"),("Hybrid", "Hybrid")]
TRANSMISSION_CHOICES = [("Automatic","Automatic"),("Manual", "Manual")]
title = models.CharField(max_length=200, default = "Ad Title & Folder Name")
def folder_name(self, title):
return self.title
make = models.CharField(max_length=100)
Ideally then, the media folder would look something like
/media/
Opel Astra VXR/
Mercedes E200/
I understand that many others have done something similar but all the examples I found use the 'user' and instead I need to use a model field (belonging to the model that is being created) as the folder name.
Closing notes:
The function in the second code snippet was just something I was trialing.
Also, this is still in development, so in prod I fully intent to direct all media to an S3 bucket down the line.
As documented
upload_to may also be a callable, such as a function. This will be
called to obtain the upload path, including the filename. This
callable must accept two arguments and return a Unix-style path (with
forward slashes) to be passed along to the storage system. The two
arguments are:
instance ( An instance of the model where the FileField is defined. )
filename ( The filename that was originally given to the file )
For example:
def user_directory_path(instance, filename):
# file will be uploaded to MEDIA_ROOT/user_<id>/<filename>
return 'user_{0}/{1}'.format(instance.user.id, filename)
Found the soloution and wanted to post it for the next person who might need it. It turned out to be a syntax issue on my formatting . This did the trick and now opens a new folder for each ad and their photos. It also updates the original folder with any new photos added to the preexisting ad.
Title and function below:
title = models.CharField(max_length=200, default = "Ad Title & Folder Name")
def upload_photo_to(self, filename):
return f'{self.title}/{filename}'
Photo field and how it was applied:
photo_1 = models.ImageField(upload_to=upload_photo_to, blank=True)
I am using node-storage in the following code to store a value in a file, however when I create a new storage object changes from another storage object are not yet saved. I need a way to save the changes before creating the new storage object.
Below is a program called code.js which I am running like so in the console: node code.js. If you run it you will see that the first time it is run the key value pair doesn't yet exist however it does exist the second time.
key = "key"
storage = require('node-storage')
const store1 = new storage("file")
const store2 = new storage("file")
store1.put(key,'val')
console.log(store2.get(key))
My motivation for this is that I want to be able to have a function called "set" which takes a key and a value and sets the key value pair in a dictionary of values that is store in a file. I want to be able to refer to this dictionary later, with for example a 'get' function, and have the changes present.
I am thinking there might be a function called "save" or something similar that applies the changes to the file. Is there such a function or some other solution?
node-storage saves the changes in the dictionary to disk after every call to put or remove. This is not the issue.
Your problem is that the dictionary in store2 has not been updated with the new properties. node-storage only loads the file from disk when the object is first created.
My suggestion would be to only have one instance of storage per file.
However, if this is not possible, then you might want to consider updating store2's cache before you get the property. This can be done using:
store2.store = store2._load();
This may not be the best for performance, as _load loads the entire file from disk synchronously every time it is called, so try to limit its use.
I require some help on being able to get around displaying an endpoint from a SOAP Request.
Below I have a piece of code which retrieves an endpoint from a SOAP Request named 'TestAvailability' and outputs it to a file (the code is within a groovy script step).
def endpoint = testRunner.testCase.getTestStepByName('TestStep').get
Now here is the catch, in the file it outputs the endpoint as so:
ENDPOINT: ${#Project#BASE_URL}this_is_the_endpoint
The reason it displays ${#Project#BASE_URL} is because this is a variable set at project level so that the user can select their relevant environment from a drop down menu and that value will be displayed for the variable: ${#Project#BASE_URL}
But I don't want the project variable to be displayed but instead its value like so if ${#Project#BASE_URL} is set to 'testenv'
ENDPOINT: testenv_this_is_the_endpoint
My question is how do I change the code in order to display the endpoint correctly when outputted to a file?
You have a trivial issue. Since it is using property expansion in the endpoint, it request to expand it.
All you need is to change below statement
From:
testResult.append "\n\nENDPOINT: " +endpoint
To:
testResult.append "\n\nENDPOINT: ${context.expand(endpoint)}"
Following these guides https://developers.google.com/apps-script/guides/rest/quickstart/target-script and https://developers.google.com/apps-script/guides/rest/quickstart/nodejs, I am trying to use the Execution API in node to return some data that are in a Google Spreadsheet.
I have set the script ID to be the Project Key of the Apps Script file. I have also verified that running the function in the Script Editor works successfully.
However, when running the script locally with node, I get this error:
The API returned an error: Error: ScriptError
I have also made sure the script is associated with the project that I use to auth with Google APIs as well.
Does anyone have any suggestion on what I can do to debug/ fix this issue? The error is so generic that I am not sure where to look.
UPDATE: I've included a copy of the code in this JSBin (the year function is the entry point)
https://jsbin.com/zanefitasi/edit?js
UPDATE 2: The error seems to be caused by the inclusion of this line
var spreadsheet = SpreadsheetApp.open(DriveApp.getFileById(docID));
It seems that I didn't request the right scopes. The nodejs example include 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive', but I also needed to include 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets' in the SCOPES array. It seems like the error message ScriptError is not very informative here.
In order to find what scopes you'd need, to go the Script Editor > File > Project Properties > Scopes. Remember to delete the old credentials ~/.credentials/old-credential.json so that the script will request a new one.
EDIT: With the update in information I took a closer look and saw you are returning a non-basic type. Specifically you are returning a Sheet Object.
The basic types in Apps Script are similar to the basic types in
JavaScript: strings, arrays, objects, numbers and booleans. The
Execution API can only take and return values corresponding to these
basic types -- more complex Apps Script objects (like a Document or
Sheet) cannot be passed by the API.
https://developers.google.com/apps-script/guides/rest/api
In your Account "Class"
this.report = spreadsheet.getSheetByName(data.reportSheet);
old answer:
'data.business_exp' will be null in this context. You need to load the data from somewhere. Every time a script is called a new instance of the script is created. At the end of execution chain it will be destroyed. Any data stored as global objects will be lost. You need to save that data to a permanent location such as the script/user properties, and reloaded on each script execution.
https://developers.google.com/apps-script/reference/properties/
I am getting below error when I run the Orchestration and try to assign value to a promoted property by reading the value of another promoted property.
Error in Suspended Orchestration:
Inner exception: There is no value associated with the property BankProcesses.Schemas.Internal_ID' in the message.
Detail:
I have 2 XSD schemas, 1 for calling a stored procedure and reading its response and another to write it into a flat file. The internal ID returned in the response from SP needs to be passed to a node in another XSD schema to write to a flat file format.
I have promoted an element from the response schema and also promoted an element from the schema to write to flat file. I am assigning the value to promoted propeties as below:
strInternalId = msgCallHeaderSP_Response(BankProcesses.Schemas.Internal_ID);
msgCallSP(BankProcesses.Schemas.Header_Internal_ID) = strInternalId;
But when I run the orchestration I get the error as mentioned above. I have checked the reponse from stored procedure and the reponse XML does contain some value but I am unable to assign that value to another schema. Please advice
Thanks,
Mayur
You can use exists to check the existence of property.
if(BankProcesses.Schemas.Internal_ID exists msgCallHeaderSP_Response)
{
strInternalId = msgCallHeaderSP_Response(BankProcesses.Schemas.Internal_ID);
msgCallSP(BankProcesses.Schemas.Header_Internal_ID) = strInternalId;
}
One scenario that might cause this error is that there is no Header_Internal_ID element in the message you are trying to modify. Can you inspect the message before modification to ensure that there is an element whose value should be changed - drop the message out to a file location, maybe.
If this is the case, then just ensure that you create this element when you instantiate you r message for the first time - even if you initially set it to an empty element.
HTH
To check if the property exists, you can use this syntax:
BMWFS.LS.BizTalk.CFS.BankProcesses.Schemas.Internal_ID exists msgCallHeaderSP_Response
However, if the case is that the source field would always be there, you have to work backwards to find out why the Property is not appearing on the Context.
If it's coming from a Port, is the message passign through an XmlDisassembler Component? If it's coming from another Orchestration, are you actually setting the Property?
The easiest way to look at the Context is to route the Message, msgCallHeaderSP_Response, to a Stopped Send Port. You can then view the Context in BizTalk Administrator.