I need to retrieve the value from an annotation such as this one that uses a string constant:
#Component(property = Constants.SERVICE_RANKING + ":Integer=10")
public class NyServiceImpl implements MyService {
But I am getting a kind of K_UNKNOWN and the doc says "the value is an expression that would need to be further analyzed to determine its kind". My question then is how do I perform this analysis? I could even manage to accept getting the plain source text value in this case.
The other answer looks basically OK, but let me suggest a way to avoid using the internal class org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.Annotation and its method findNode():
ISourceRange range = annotation.getSourceRange();
ASTNode annNode = org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.NodeFinder.perform(cu, range);
From here on you should be safe, using DOM API throughout.
Googling differently I found a way to resolve the expression. Still open to other suggestions if any. For those who might be interested, here is a snippet of code:
if (valueKind == IMemberValuePair.K_UNKNOWN) {
Annotation ann = (Annotation)annotation;
CompilationUnit cu = getAST(ann.getCompilationUnit());
ASTNode annNode = ann.findNode(cu);
NormalAnnotation na = (NormalAnnotation)annNode;
List<?> naValues = na.values();
Optional<?> optMvp = naValues.stream()
.filter(val-> ((MemberValuePair)val).getName().getIdentifier().equals(PROPERTY))
.findAny();
if (optMvp.isPresent()) {
MemberValuePair pair = (MemberValuePair)optMvp.get();
if (pair.getValue() instanceof ArrayInitializer) {
ArrayInitializer ai = (ArrayInitializer)pair.getValue();
for (Object exprObj : ai.expressions()) {
Expression expr = (Expression)exprObj;
String propValue = (String)expr.resolveConstantExpressionValue();
if (propValue.startsWith(Constants.SERVICE_RANKING)) {
return true;
}
}
}
else {
Expression expr = pair.getValue();
String propValue = (String)expr.resolveConstantExpressionValue();
if (propValue.startsWith(Constants.SERVICE_RANKING)) {
return true;
}
}
}
//report error
}
private CompilationUnit getAST(ICompilationUnit compUnit) {
final ASTParser parser = ASTParser.newParser(AST.JLS8);
parser.setKind(ASTParser.K_COMPILATION_UNIT);
parser.setSource(compUnit);
parser.setResolveBindings(true); // we need bindings later on
CompilationUnit unit = (CompilationUnit)parser.createAST(null);
return unit;
}
Related
In some cases the solver fails to find a solution for my model, which I think is there.
So I would like to populate a solution, and then check which constraint is violated.
How to do that with choco-solver?
Using choco-solver 4.10.6.
Forcing a solution
I ended up adding constraints to force variables to values of my presumed solution:
e.g.
// constraints to force given solution
vehicle2FirstStop[0].eq(model.intVar(4)).post();
vehicle2FirstStop[1].eq(model.intVar(3)).post();
nextStop[1].eq(model.intVar(0)).post();
nextStop[2].eq(model.intVar(1)).post();
...
and then
model.getSolver().showContradiction();
if (model.getSolver().solve()) { ....
Shows the first contradiction of the presumed solution, e.g.
/!\ CONTRADICTION (PropXplusYeqZ(sum_exp_49, mul_exp_51, ...
So the next step is to find out where terms such as sum_exp_49 come from.
Matching the contradiction terms with the code
Here is a simple fix for constraints which will hopefully provide enough information. We can override the post() and associates() methods of model, so that it dumps the java source filename and line number when a constraint is posted/variable is created.
Model model = new Model("Vrp1RpV") {
/**
* retrieve the filename and line number of first caller outside of choco-solver from stacktrace
*/
String getSource() {
String source = null;
StackTraceElement[] stackTraceElements = Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace();
// starts from 3: thread.getStackTrace() + this.getSource() + caller (post() or associates())
for (int i = 3; i < stackTraceElements.length; i++) {
// keep rewinding until we get out of choco-solver packages
if (!stackTraceElements[i].getClassName().toString().startsWith("org.chocosolver")) {
source = stackTraceElements[i].getFileName() + ":" + stackTraceElements[i].getLineNumber();
break;
}
}
return source;
}
#Override
public void post(Constraint... cs) throws SolverException {
String source=getSource();
// dump each constraint along source location
for (Constraint c : cs) {
System.err.println(source + " post: " + c);
}
super.post(cs);
}
#Override
public void associates(Variable variable) {
System.err.println(getSource() + " associates: " + variable.getName());
super.associates(variable);
}
};
This will dump things like:
Vrp1RpV2.java:182 post: ARITHM ([prop(EQ_exp_47.EQ.mul_exp_48)])
Vrp1RpV2.java:182 associates: sum_exp_49
Vrp1RpV2.java:182 post: ARITHM ([prop(mul_exp_48.EQ.sum_exp_49)])
Vrp1RpV2.java:182 associates: EQ_exp_50
Vrp1RpV2.java:182 post: BASIC_REIF ([(stop2vehicle[2] = 1) <=> EQ_exp_50])
...
From there it is possible to see where sum_exp_49 comes from.
EDIT: added associates() thanks to #cprudhom suggestion on https://gitter.im/chocoteam/choco-solver
In python, I often use strings as templates, e.g.
templateUrl = '{host}/api/v3/{container}/{resourceid}'
params = {'host': 'www.api.com', 'container': 'books', 'resourceid': 10}
api.get(templateUrl.format(**params))
This allows for easy base class setup and the like. How can I do the same in dart?
I'm assuming I will need to create a utility function to parse the template and substitute manually but really hoping there is something ready to use.
Perhaps a TemplateString class with a format method that takes a Map of name/value pairs to substitute into the string.
Note: the objective is to have a generic "format" or "interpolation" function that doesn't need to know in advance what tags or names will exist in the template.
Further clarification: the templates themselves are not resolved when they are set up. Specifically, the template is defined in one place in the code and then used in many other places.
Dart does not have a generic template string functionality that would allow you to insert values into your template at runtime.
Dart only allows you to interpolate strings with variables using the $ syntax in strings, e.g. var string = '$domain/api/v3/${actions.get}'. You would need to have all the variables defined in your code beforehand.
However, you can easily create your own implementation.
Implementation
You pretty much explained how to do it in your question yourself: you pass a map and use it to have generic access to the parameters using the [] operator.
To convert the template string into something that is easy to access, I would simply create another List containing fixed components, like /api/v3/ and another Map that holds generic components with their name and their position in the template string.
class TemplateString {
final List<String> fixedComponents;
final Map<int, String> genericComponents;
int totalComponents;
TemplateString(String template)
: fixedComponents = <String>[],
genericComponents = <int, String>{},
totalComponents = 0 {
final List<String> components = template.split('{');
for (String component in components) {
if (component == '') continue; // If the template starts with "{", skip the first element.
final split = component.split('}');
if (split.length != 1) {
// The condition allows for template strings without parameters.
genericComponents[totalComponents] = split.first;
totalComponents++;
}
if (split.last != '') {
fixedComponents.add(split.last);
totalComponents++;
}
}
}
String format(Map<String, dynamic> params) {
String result = '';
int fixedComponent = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < totalComponents; i++) {
if (genericComponents.containsKey(i)) {
result += '${params[genericComponents[i]]}';
continue;
}
result += fixedComponents[fixedComponent++];
}
return result;
}
}
Here would be an example usage, I hope that the result is what you expected:
main() {
final templateUrl = TemplateString('{host}/api/v3/{container}/{resourceid}');
final params = <String, dynamic>{'host': 'www.api.com', 'container': 'books', 'resourceid': 10};
print(templateUrl.format(params)); // www.api.com/api/v3/books/10
}
Here it is as a Gist.
Here is my solution:
extension StringFormating on String {
String format(List<String> values) {
int index = 0;
return replaceAllMapped(new RegExp(r'{.*?}'), (_) {
final value = values[index];
index++;
return value;
});
}
String formatWithMap(Map<String, String> mappedValues) {
return replaceAllMapped(new RegExp(r'{(.*?)}'), (match) {
final mapped = mappedValues[match[1]];
if (mapped == null)
throw ArgumentError(
'$mappedValues does not contain the key "${match[1]}"');
return mapped;
});
}
}
This gives you a very similar functionality to what python offers:
"Test {} with {}!".format(["it", "foo"]);
"Test {a} with {b}!".formatWithMap({"a": "it", "b": "foo"})
both return "Test it with foo!"
It's even more easy in Dart. Sample code below :
String host = "www.api.com"
String container = "books"
int resourceId = 10
String templateUrl = "$host/api/v3/$container/${resourceId.toString()}"
With the map, you can do as follows :
Map<String, String> params = {'host': 'www.api.com', 'container': 'books', 'resourceid': 10}
String templateUrl = "${params['host']}/api/v3/${params['container']}/${params['resourceId']}"
Note : The above code defines Map as <String, String>. You might want <String, Dynamic> (and use .toString())
Wouldn't it be simplest to just make it a function with named arguments? You could add some input validation if you wanted to.
String templateUrl({String host = "", String container = "", int resourceid = 0 }) {
return "$host/api/v3/$container/$resourceId";
}
void main() {
api.get(templateUrl(host:"www.api.com", container:"books", resourceid:10));
}
I would like to replace my global string constants with a nested enum for the keys I'm using to access columns in a database.
The structure is as follows:
enum DatabaseKeys {
enum User: String {
case Table = "User"
case Username = "username"
...
}
...
}
Each table in the database is an inner enum, with the name of the table being the enum's title. The first case in each enum will be the name of the table, and the following cases are the columns in its table.
To use this, it's pretty simple:
myUser[DatabaseKeys.User.Username.rawValue] = "Johnny"
But I will be using these enums a lot. Having to append .rawValue to every instance will be a pain, and it's not as readable as I'd like it to be. How can I access the String value without having to use rawValue? It'd be great if I can do this:
myUser[DatabaseKeys.User.Username] = "Johnny"
Note that I'm using Swift 2. If there's an even better way to accomplish this I'd love to hear it!
While I didn't find a way to do this using the desired syntax with enums, this is possible using structs.
struct DatabaseKeys {
struct User {
static let identifier = "User"
static let Username = "username"
}
}
To use:
myUser[DatabaseKeys.User.Username] = "Johnny"
Apple uses structs like this for storyboard and row type identifiers in the WatchKit templates.
You can use CustomStringConvertible protocol for this.
From documentation,
String(instance) will work for an instance of any type, returning its
description if the instance happens to be CustomStringConvertible.
Using CustomStringConvertible as a generic constraint, or accessing a
conforming type's description directly, is therefore discouraged.
So, if you conform to this protocol and return your rawValue through the description method, you will be able to use String(Table.User) to get the value.
enum User: String, CustomStringConvertible {
case Table = "User"
case Username = "username"
var description: String {
return self.rawValue
}
}
var myUser = [String: String]()
myUser[String(DatabaseKeys.User.Username)] = "Johnny"
print(myUser) // ["username": "Johnny"]
You can use callAsFunction (New in Swift 5.2) on your enum that conforms to String.
enum KeychainKey: String {
case userId
case email
}
func callAsFunction() -> String {
return self.rawValue
}
usage:
KeychainKey.userId()
You can do this with custom class:
enum Names: String {
case something, thing
}
class CustomData {
subscript(key: Names) -> Any? {
get {
return self.customData[key.rawValue]
}
set(newValue) {
self.customData[key.rawValue] = newValue
}
}
private var customData = [String: Any]()
}
...
let cData = CustomData()
cData[Names.thing] = 56
Edit:
I found an another solution, that working with Swift 3:
enum CustomKey: String {
case one, two, three
}
extension Dictionary where Key: ExpressibleByStringLiteral {
subscript(key: CustomKey) -> Value? {
get {
return self[key.rawValue as! Key]
}
set {
self[key.rawValue as! Key] = newValue
}
}
}
var dict: [String: Any] = [:]
dict[CustomKey.one] = 1
dict["two"] = true
dict[.three] = 3
print(dict["one"]!)
print(dict[CustomKey.two]!)
print(dict[.three]!)
If you are able to use User as dictionary key instead of String (User is Hashable by default) it would be a solution.
If not you should use yours with a nested struct and static variables/constants.
public IEnumerable<CustomBo> FindBy(Expression<Func<CustomBo, bool>> predicate)
{
Mapper.CreateMap<Expression<Func<CustomBo, bool>>, Expression<Func<Entity, bool>>>();
var newPredicate = Mapper.Map<Expression<Func<Entity, bool>>>(predicate);
IQueryable<Entity> query = dbSet.Where(newPredicate);
Mapper.CreateMap<Entity,CustomBo>();
var searchResult = Mapper.Map<List<CustomBo>>(query);
return searchResult;
}
I want to map customBo type to Entity Type..
Here customBo is my model and Entity is Database entity from edmx.
I'm using AutoMapper.
I'm Getting following Error
Could not find type map from destination type Data.Customer to source type Model.CustomerBO. Use CreateMap to create a map from the source to destination types.
Could not find type map from destination type Data.Customer to source type Model.CustomerBO. Use CreateMap to create a map from the source to destination types.
Any Suggession what I'm missiong here..
Thanks
I find a work around. I create my custom methods to map Expression.
public static class MappingHelper
{
public static Expression<Func<TTo, bool>> ConvertExpression<TFrom, TTo>(this Expression<Func<TFrom, bool>> expr)
{
Dictionary<Expression, Expression> substitutues = new Dictionary<Expression, Expression>();
var oldParam = expr.Parameters[0];
var newParam = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TTo), oldParam.Name);
substitutues.Add(oldParam, newParam);
Expression body = ConvertNode(expr.Body, substitutues);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TTo, bool>>(body, newParam);
}
static Expression ConvertNode(Expression node, IDictionary<Expression, Expression> subst)
{
if (node == null) return null;
if (subst.ContainsKey(node)) return subst[node];
switch (node.NodeType)
{
case ExpressionType.Constant:
return node;
case ExpressionType.MemberAccess:
{
var me = (MemberExpression)node;
var newNode = ConvertNode(me.Expression, subst);
MemberInfo info = null;
foreach (MemberInfo mi in newNode.Type.GetMembers())
{
if (mi.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property)
{
if (mi.Name.ToLower().Contains(me.Member.Name.ToLower()))
{
info = mi;
break;
}
}
}
return Expression.MakeMemberAccess(newNode, info);
}
case ExpressionType.AndAlso:
case ExpressionType.OrElse:
case ExpressionType.LessThan:
case ExpressionType.LessThanOrEqual:
case ExpressionType.GreaterThan:
case ExpressionType.GreaterThanOrEqual:
case ExpressionType.Equal: /* will probably work for a range of common binary-expressions */
{
var be = (BinaryExpression)node;
return Expression.MakeBinary(be.NodeType, ConvertNode(be.Left, subst), ConvertNode(be.Right, subst), be.IsLiftedToNull, be.Method);
}
default:
throw new NotSupportedException(node.NodeType.ToString());
}
}
}
Now I'm calling it like
public CustomBo FindBy(Expression<Func<CustomBo, bool>> predicateId)
{
var newPredicate = predicateId.ConvertExpression<CustomBo, Entity>();
}
Still if anyone know how to do it by automapper then plz let me know.
Thanks
Looks like this was added after your asked your question: Expression Translation (UseAsDataSource)
Now all you have to do is dbSet.UseAsDataSource().For<CustomBo>().Where(expression).ToList();. Much nicer!
I'm using Reflection to get all the fields of my class in c#, but now I want to get the GC Generation of each variable in my class. How can I do this?
CSkyclass
{
float time = 0;
}
Sky = new CSkyclass();
void GetGeneration()
{
FieldInfo[] FieldArray = typeof(CSkyclass).GetFields(flags);
foreach(System.Reflection.FieldInfo Field in FieldArray)
{
string name = Field.Name; //"time"
int g = GC.GetGeneration(name); //should = GC.GetGeneration(Sky.time);
}
}
Is this even possible?
Thanks
You're trying to get the generation of the field's value:
GC.GetGeneration(field.GetValue(someInstance));