In python, I often use strings as templates, e.g.
templateUrl = '{host}/api/v3/{container}/{resourceid}'
params = {'host': 'www.api.com', 'container': 'books', 'resourceid': 10}
api.get(templateUrl.format(**params))
This allows for easy base class setup and the like. How can I do the same in dart?
I'm assuming I will need to create a utility function to parse the template and substitute manually but really hoping there is something ready to use.
Perhaps a TemplateString class with a format method that takes a Map of name/value pairs to substitute into the string.
Note: the objective is to have a generic "format" or "interpolation" function that doesn't need to know in advance what tags or names will exist in the template.
Further clarification: the templates themselves are not resolved when they are set up. Specifically, the template is defined in one place in the code and then used in many other places.
Dart does not have a generic template string functionality that would allow you to insert values into your template at runtime.
Dart only allows you to interpolate strings with variables using the $ syntax in strings, e.g. var string = '$domain/api/v3/${actions.get}'. You would need to have all the variables defined in your code beforehand.
However, you can easily create your own implementation.
Implementation
You pretty much explained how to do it in your question yourself: you pass a map and use it to have generic access to the parameters using the [] operator.
To convert the template string into something that is easy to access, I would simply create another List containing fixed components, like /api/v3/ and another Map that holds generic components with their name and their position in the template string.
class TemplateString {
final List<String> fixedComponents;
final Map<int, String> genericComponents;
int totalComponents;
TemplateString(String template)
: fixedComponents = <String>[],
genericComponents = <int, String>{},
totalComponents = 0 {
final List<String> components = template.split('{');
for (String component in components) {
if (component == '') continue; // If the template starts with "{", skip the first element.
final split = component.split('}');
if (split.length != 1) {
// The condition allows for template strings without parameters.
genericComponents[totalComponents] = split.first;
totalComponents++;
}
if (split.last != '') {
fixedComponents.add(split.last);
totalComponents++;
}
}
}
String format(Map<String, dynamic> params) {
String result = '';
int fixedComponent = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < totalComponents; i++) {
if (genericComponents.containsKey(i)) {
result += '${params[genericComponents[i]]}';
continue;
}
result += fixedComponents[fixedComponent++];
}
return result;
}
}
Here would be an example usage, I hope that the result is what you expected:
main() {
final templateUrl = TemplateString('{host}/api/v3/{container}/{resourceid}');
final params = <String, dynamic>{'host': 'www.api.com', 'container': 'books', 'resourceid': 10};
print(templateUrl.format(params)); // www.api.com/api/v3/books/10
}
Here it is as a Gist.
Here is my solution:
extension StringFormating on String {
String format(List<String> values) {
int index = 0;
return replaceAllMapped(new RegExp(r'{.*?}'), (_) {
final value = values[index];
index++;
return value;
});
}
String formatWithMap(Map<String, String> mappedValues) {
return replaceAllMapped(new RegExp(r'{(.*?)}'), (match) {
final mapped = mappedValues[match[1]];
if (mapped == null)
throw ArgumentError(
'$mappedValues does not contain the key "${match[1]}"');
return mapped;
});
}
}
This gives you a very similar functionality to what python offers:
"Test {} with {}!".format(["it", "foo"]);
"Test {a} with {b}!".formatWithMap({"a": "it", "b": "foo"})
both return "Test it with foo!"
It's even more easy in Dart. Sample code below :
String host = "www.api.com"
String container = "books"
int resourceId = 10
String templateUrl = "$host/api/v3/$container/${resourceId.toString()}"
With the map, you can do as follows :
Map<String, String> params = {'host': 'www.api.com', 'container': 'books', 'resourceid': 10}
String templateUrl = "${params['host']}/api/v3/${params['container']}/${params['resourceId']}"
Note : The above code defines Map as <String, String>. You might want <String, Dynamic> (and use .toString())
Wouldn't it be simplest to just make it a function with named arguments? You could add some input validation if you wanted to.
String templateUrl({String host = "", String container = "", int resourceid = 0 }) {
return "$host/api/v3/$container/$resourceId";
}
void main() {
api.get(templateUrl(host:"www.api.com", container:"books", resourceid:10));
}
Related
I need to retrieve the value from an annotation such as this one that uses a string constant:
#Component(property = Constants.SERVICE_RANKING + ":Integer=10")
public class NyServiceImpl implements MyService {
But I am getting a kind of K_UNKNOWN and the doc says "the value is an expression that would need to be further analyzed to determine its kind". My question then is how do I perform this analysis? I could even manage to accept getting the plain source text value in this case.
The other answer looks basically OK, but let me suggest a way to avoid using the internal class org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.Annotation and its method findNode():
ISourceRange range = annotation.getSourceRange();
ASTNode annNode = org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.NodeFinder.perform(cu, range);
From here on you should be safe, using DOM API throughout.
Googling differently I found a way to resolve the expression. Still open to other suggestions if any. For those who might be interested, here is a snippet of code:
if (valueKind == IMemberValuePair.K_UNKNOWN) {
Annotation ann = (Annotation)annotation;
CompilationUnit cu = getAST(ann.getCompilationUnit());
ASTNode annNode = ann.findNode(cu);
NormalAnnotation na = (NormalAnnotation)annNode;
List<?> naValues = na.values();
Optional<?> optMvp = naValues.stream()
.filter(val-> ((MemberValuePair)val).getName().getIdentifier().equals(PROPERTY))
.findAny();
if (optMvp.isPresent()) {
MemberValuePair pair = (MemberValuePair)optMvp.get();
if (pair.getValue() instanceof ArrayInitializer) {
ArrayInitializer ai = (ArrayInitializer)pair.getValue();
for (Object exprObj : ai.expressions()) {
Expression expr = (Expression)exprObj;
String propValue = (String)expr.resolveConstantExpressionValue();
if (propValue.startsWith(Constants.SERVICE_RANKING)) {
return true;
}
}
}
else {
Expression expr = pair.getValue();
String propValue = (String)expr.resolveConstantExpressionValue();
if (propValue.startsWith(Constants.SERVICE_RANKING)) {
return true;
}
}
}
//report error
}
private CompilationUnit getAST(ICompilationUnit compUnit) {
final ASTParser parser = ASTParser.newParser(AST.JLS8);
parser.setKind(ASTParser.K_COMPILATION_UNIT);
parser.setSource(compUnit);
parser.setResolveBindings(true); // we need bindings later on
CompilationUnit unit = (CompilationUnit)parser.createAST(null);
return unit;
}
I'm trying to multiply some string a by some integer b such that a * b = a + a + a... (b times). I've tried doing it the same way I would in python:
class Test {
static function main() {
var a = "Text";
var b = 4;
trace(a * b); //Assumed Output: TextTextTextText
}
}
But this raises:
Build failure Test.hx:6: characters 14-15 : String should be Int
There doesn't seem to be any information in the Haxe Programming Cookbook or the API Documentation about multiplying strings, so I'm wondering if I've mistyped something or if I should use:
class Test {
static function main() {
var a = "Text";
var b = 4;
var c = "";
for (i in 0...b) {
c = c + a;
}
trace(c); // Outputs "TextTextTextText"
}
}
Not very short, but array comprehension might help in some situations :
class Test {
static function main() {
var a = "Text";
var b = 4;
trace( [for (i in 0...b) a].join("") );
//Output: TextTextTextText
}
}
See on try.haxe.org.
The numeric multiplication operator * requires numeric types, like integer. You have a string. If you want to multiply a string, you have to do it manually by appending a target string within the loop.
The + operator is not the numeric plus in your example, but a way to combine strings.
You can achieve what you want by operator overloading:
abstract MyAbstract(String) {
public inline function new(s:String) {
this = s;
}
#:op(A * B)
public function repeat(rhs:Int):MyAbstract {
var s:StringBuf = new StringBuf();
for (i in 0...rhs)
s.add(this);
return new MyAbstract(s.toString());
}
}
class Main {
static public function main() {
var a = new MyAbstract("foo");
trace(a * 3); // foofoofoo
}
}
To build on tokiop's answer, you could also define a times function, and then use it as a static extension.
using Test.Extensions;
class Test {
static function main() {
trace ("Text".times(4));
}
}
class Extensions {
public static function times (str:String, n:Int) {
return [for (i in 0...n) str].join("");
}
}
try.haxe.org demo here
To build on bsinky answer, you can also define a times function as static extension, but avoid the array:
using Test.Extensions;
class Test {
static function main() {
trace ("Text".times(4));
}
}
class Extensions {
public static function times (str:String, n:Int) {
var v = new StringBuf();
for (i in 0...n) v.add(str);
return v.toString();
}
}
Demo: https://try.haxe.org/#e5937
StringBuf may be optimized for different targets. For example, on JavaScript target it is compiled as if you were just using strings https://api.haxe.org/StringBuf.html
The fastest method (at least on the JavaScript target from https://try.haxe.org/#195A8) seems to be using StringTools._pad.
public static inline function stringProduct ( s : String, n : Int ) {
if ( n < 0 ) {
throw ( 1 );
}
return StringTools.lpad ( "", s, s.length * n );
}
StringTools.lpad and StringTools.rpad can't seem to decide which is more efficient. It looks like rpad might be better for larger strings and lpad might be better for smaller strings, but they switch around a bit with each rerun. haxe.format.JsonPrinter uses lpad for concatenation, but I'm not sure which to recommend.
I am trying to send binary data, i.e. byte arrays, using yaml. According to the yaml documentation, Yaml Binary Type, this is supported. On the Java side I use SnakeYaml and if a value of byte[] is passed, then the yaml correctly gives !!binary.
This functionality does not seem to be supported "out of the box" in YamlDotNet. The below code snippet creates a sequence of integer values:
IDictionary<string, object> data = new Dictionary<string, object>();
const string value = ":| value: <XML> /n\n C:\\cat";
byte[] bytes = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(value);
data.Add(ValueKey, bytes);
// Turn the object representation into text
using (var output = new StringWriter())
{
var serializer = new Serializer();
serializer.Serialize(output, data);
return output.ToString();
}
Output like:
val:\r- 58\r- 124\r- 32\r- 118\r- 97\r- 108\r- 117\r- 101\r- 58\r- 32\r- 60\r- 88\r- 77\r- 76\r- 62\r- 32\r- 47\r- 110\r- 10\r- 32\r- 67\r- 58\r- 92\r- 99\r- 97\r- 116\r
But I would like something more like:
val: !!binary |-
OnwgdmFsdWU6IDxYTUw+IC9uCiBDOlxjYXQ=
Can anyone recommend a workaround?
The preferred way to add support for custom types is to use a custom IYamlTypeConverter. A possible implementation for the !!binary type would be:
public class ByteArrayConverter : IYamlTypeConverter
{
public bool Accepts(Type type)
{
// Return true to indicate that this converter is able to handle the byte[] type
return type == typeof(byte[]);
}
public object ReadYaml(IParser parser, Type type)
{
var scalar = (YamlDotNet.Core.Events.Scalar)parser.Current;
var bytes = Convert.FromBase64String(scalar.Value);
parser.MoveNext();
return bytes;
}
public void WriteYaml(IEmitter emitter, object value, Type type)
{
var bytes = (byte[])value;
emitter.Emit(new YamlDotNet.Core.Events.Scalar(
null,
"tag:yaml.org,2002:binary",
Convert.ToBase64String(bytes),
ScalarStyle.Plain,
false,
false
));
}
}
To use the converter in the Serializer, you simply need to register it using the following code:
var serializer = new Serializer();
serializer.RegisterTypeConverter(new ByteArrayConverter());
For the Deserializer, you also need to register the converter, but you also need to add a tag mapping to resolve the !!binary tag to the byte[] type:
var deserializer = new Deserializer();
deserializer.RegisterTagMapping("tag:yaml.org,2002:binary", typeof(byte[]));
deserializer.RegisterTypeConverter(new ByteArrayConverter());
A fully working example can be tried here
For anyone that's interested.... I fixed this by creating the string myself and adding the !!binary tag, and also doing some clean up. Below is the code.
ToYaml:
IDictionary<string, string> data = new Dictionary<string, string>();
string byteAsBase64Fromat = Convert.ToBase64String("The string to convert");
byteAsBase64Fromat = "!!binary |-\n" + byteAsBase64Fromat + "\n";
data.Add(ValueKey, byteAsBase64Fromat);
string yaml;
using (var output = new StringWriter())
{
var serializer = new Serializer();
serializer.Serialize(output, data);
yaml = output.ToString();
}
string yaml = yaml.Replace(">", "");
return yaml.Replace(Environment.NewLine + Environment.NewLine, Environment.NewLine);
And then back by:
string binaryText = ((YamlScalarNode)data.Children[new YamlScalarNode(ValueKey)]).Value
String value = Convert.FromBase64String(binaryText);
I would like to replace my global string constants with a nested enum for the keys I'm using to access columns in a database.
The structure is as follows:
enum DatabaseKeys {
enum User: String {
case Table = "User"
case Username = "username"
...
}
...
}
Each table in the database is an inner enum, with the name of the table being the enum's title. The first case in each enum will be the name of the table, and the following cases are the columns in its table.
To use this, it's pretty simple:
myUser[DatabaseKeys.User.Username.rawValue] = "Johnny"
But I will be using these enums a lot. Having to append .rawValue to every instance will be a pain, and it's not as readable as I'd like it to be. How can I access the String value without having to use rawValue? It'd be great if I can do this:
myUser[DatabaseKeys.User.Username] = "Johnny"
Note that I'm using Swift 2. If there's an even better way to accomplish this I'd love to hear it!
While I didn't find a way to do this using the desired syntax with enums, this is possible using structs.
struct DatabaseKeys {
struct User {
static let identifier = "User"
static let Username = "username"
}
}
To use:
myUser[DatabaseKeys.User.Username] = "Johnny"
Apple uses structs like this for storyboard and row type identifiers in the WatchKit templates.
You can use CustomStringConvertible protocol for this.
From documentation,
String(instance) will work for an instance of any type, returning its
description if the instance happens to be CustomStringConvertible.
Using CustomStringConvertible as a generic constraint, or accessing a
conforming type's description directly, is therefore discouraged.
So, if you conform to this protocol and return your rawValue through the description method, you will be able to use String(Table.User) to get the value.
enum User: String, CustomStringConvertible {
case Table = "User"
case Username = "username"
var description: String {
return self.rawValue
}
}
var myUser = [String: String]()
myUser[String(DatabaseKeys.User.Username)] = "Johnny"
print(myUser) // ["username": "Johnny"]
You can use callAsFunction (New in Swift 5.2) on your enum that conforms to String.
enum KeychainKey: String {
case userId
case email
}
func callAsFunction() -> String {
return self.rawValue
}
usage:
KeychainKey.userId()
You can do this with custom class:
enum Names: String {
case something, thing
}
class CustomData {
subscript(key: Names) -> Any? {
get {
return self.customData[key.rawValue]
}
set(newValue) {
self.customData[key.rawValue] = newValue
}
}
private var customData = [String: Any]()
}
...
let cData = CustomData()
cData[Names.thing] = 56
Edit:
I found an another solution, that working with Swift 3:
enum CustomKey: String {
case one, two, three
}
extension Dictionary where Key: ExpressibleByStringLiteral {
subscript(key: CustomKey) -> Value? {
get {
return self[key.rawValue as! Key]
}
set {
self[key.rawValue as! Key] = newValue
}
}
}
var dict: [String: Any] = [:]
dict[CustomKey.one] = 1
dict["two"] = true
dict[.three] = 3
print(dict["one"]!)
print(dict[CustomKey.two]!)
print(dict[.three]!)
If you are able to use User as dictionary key instead of String (User is Hashable by default) it would be a solution.
If not you should use yours with a nested struct and static variables/constants.
I would like to create a method that orders an IEnumerable List by a given property where the property is passed into the method by a string i.e. (Mind you the first code example does not work, but the second does and is what I am trying to emulate dynamically).
string sortName = "SerialNumber";
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(what do I stick in here);
that would be equivalent to
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(p => p.SerialNumber);
How can I accomplish this?
Are you saying you want to pass the order by in to your method? If so, you can use this:
Expression<Func<PartSummary, bool>> orderByClause
Then you can do this:
partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(orderByClause);
Then you can handle your order by in your business layer or wherever you wish.
Okay, update: If you want to pass in the column name as a string you can do something like as follows:
Create a static class for an extension method (reference: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/linqprojectgeneral/thread/39028ad2-452e-409f-bc9e-d1b263e921f6/):
static class LinqExtensions
{
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string sortingColumn, bool isAscending)
{
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(sortingColumn))
{
return source;
}
ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(source.ElementType, String.Empty);
MemberExpression property = Expression.Property(parameter, sortingColumn);
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(property, parameter);
string methodName = isAscending ? "OrderBy" : "OrderByDescending";
Expression methodCallExpression = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), methodName,
new Type[] { source.ElementType, property.Type },
source.Expression, Expression.Quote(lambda));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(methodCallExpression);
}
}
Then you can create your method:
static IQueryable<PartSummary> FunctionToCreateList()
{
IList<PartSummary> list = new List<PartSummary>();
list.Add(new PartSummary
{
Id = 1,
SerialNumber = "A",
});
list.Add(new PartSummary
{
Id = 2,
SerialNumber = "B",
});
return list.AsQueryable();
}
And then call your method:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
IQueryable<PartSummary> partOrderedList = FunctionToCreateList();
PartSummary partSummary = new PartSummary();
string sortBy = "Id";
partOrderedList = partOrderedList.OrderBy(sortBy, false);
foreach (PartSummary summary in partOrderedList)
{
Console.WriteLine(summary.Id + ", " + summary.SerialNumber);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
Now you can pass in the column name as a string and sort.
Hope this helps!
You can also avoid extending and just use a compiled expression tree to accomplish this:
public Func<T, object> ResolveToProperty<T>(String propertyName)
{
Type t = typeof(T);
var paramExpression = Expression.Parameter(t, "element");
var propertyExpression = Expression.Property(paramExpression, propertyName);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, object>>(propertyExpression, paramExpression).Compile();
}
string sortName = "SerialNumber";
IEnumerable<PartSummary> partList = FunctionToCreateList();
var partOrderedList = partList.OrderBy(ResolveToProperty<PartSummary>(sortName));