I want to display a graph layed out by graphviz (via Data.GraphViz) in a Gtk window. The code I have does not automatically center the graph or size the diagram. I have setup a github repo with an example (see src/Main.hs at https://github.com/avras/diagrams-gtk-graphviz-example. I get the following output.
If I try showing a circle of radius one, I get the following output (which is expected). The code for this example is at src/Circle.hs in the same github repository. Main.hs and Circle.hs differ only in the diagram which is rendered (afaict).
How can I get the graph to be centered in the window with the right width automatically calculated?
I had to play around with the argument to mkWidth to get this picture. Also without setting lw 0.005 the result was the following. The line width seems to be very large.
EDIT Here is the result after the fix suggested by Joachim Breitner.
This is a guess, but I assume that the circle is centered on the origin (0,0), and the diagram is put in the unit square (between (0,0) and (1,1)).
I would guess that if you remove the line
GRC.translate (w/2) (h/2)
in Main.hs it will work.
Related
I am using three.js and created a basic scene with a few meshses rendered with some basic lighting . My torus geometry was previously pointy with few polygons but I was able to smooth it out by adding more segments but now I would like to straighten the lines out in my cube. They seem jaggy. In the pic I am including my render on the left seems a lot jaggier then the example I am following on the right. I have even set width and height segments to very large values (200). Any Ideas why the aliasing/jagginess?My render on left, example on right
I've been using inkscape to create SVGs. But I've come across a problem. I've created a simple plus sign with a 1px line width (as simple as you can imagine). It is currently in PNG format with a transparent background. I've imported it into inkscape so I can convert it into a SVG. However, when I use trace bitmap, Inkscape CHANGES THE SHAPE such that the straight lines that are one pixel wide are tappered with pointed ends! I've tried different options in the trace bitmap settings but nothing seems to work. I've also gone through a number of online free conversion sites with no luck.
I wouldn't mind just creating the plus sign using html and css but the exact position of the lines as well as the line thickness tends to move around between chrome and firefox. It's very strange.
..Help?
I think I figured it out. If I create a plus sign that is 2 px thick instead of 1 px thick, inkscape does not do its smoothing thing (as long as I have unticked smoothing options). So, I do this, but draw it much bigger than what I need. Then when I load it into my website I can reduce the size of it there, and voila the 2 px width becomes 1 px width!
Following Quote from this source:
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/image-projections.htm
Equirectangular image projections map the latitude and longitude
coordinates of a spherical globe directly onto horizontal and vertical
coordinates of a grid, where this grid is roughly twice as wide as it
is tall.
I have a 13312 px width and 6656 pixel height Panorama picture. It's a equirectangular projection of a room and have a 2:1 ratio.
I use following formular to calculate the xPosition:
var xPosition = ( panorama.width / 360 ) * azimuth
Azimuth = Phi = Heading = Angle to the left or right
How do I project this now on a 1366x768px browser screen?
I think my results are wrong, because it's not on the point where it should be.. it could be because the sphere has a distortion on the left and right:
Is there any formular to calculate the position with attention to the distortion and scale it to fit on the browser screen? I looked many (MANY) sources to find a solution for this, but they always just say that equirectangular are just lat and long.. they don't consider the distortion.
Last question: To find a special solution, I tryed to put a plane on the circle and expanded the line which shows the alpha angle. I though with Phytagoras I could find the position.. but this didn't worked either.. maybe I did something wrong? Is this the way even possible or am I doing it wrong?
edit
THIS is what I'm actually looking for: http://othree.github.io/360-panorama/three-2d/
The black grid in the background. What is the name of this? For what do I have to google or look for? When you start the 2D Panorama, if you want to get the coordinations of the top right corner of the window, what do you have to do?
The whole calculation problem was about to create a Google Streetview similiar view from a 2:1 equirectangular image. We already found a solution for this with a great help from Martin Matysiak (https://github.com/marmat | Google).
It's been a while so I can't give a direct answer to what the main solution is, but I can provide a URL to an AddOn Martin wrote for adding the custom Markers that we actually were trying to make.
You can follow https://github.com/marmat/google-maps-api-addons and look for yourself. In the end it helped a lot to solve the main problem and let us continue with our main Framework for Google Business Tours.
If you follow the link in the threejs demo you included, it would take you to the source code.
particularly look at:
https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/blob/dev/examples/webgl_panorama_equirectangular.html
and
https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/blob/dev/src/geometries/SphereBufferGeometry.js
not sure if there is distortion though. The distortion comes from the fact that the texture is mapped to the sphere, and the sphere is rendered in 3D (openGL).
I am trying to rotate a circle image using jquery rotate plugin. But, I observe that the circle image appears to be oscillating about it's center while rotating. Something like a linear movement.
In IE7, it's pretty much observable. In Chrome/Firefox, if you zoom a bit, this wobbling issue can be observed.
I tried to rotate the image using Raphael library too. But still, the circle was wobbling.
Then I rotated the image with a c# program to see if the problem is with the browsers' graphic engine. But even here this issue is observed. I even took various images to see if the circle was imperfect. But, all the images show this behavior.
Can this be happening because of anti aliasing? Or, is it just an optical illusion?
If not, then what else can be the reason?
I am using jqueryrotate plugin rotate method to do this. $('#circleimg').rotate(Position);
Check this jsFiddle. Btw, this is the kind of source code you can include yourself in your question to make answering it easier for others.
http://jsfiddle.net/KyJzQ/
I used this rotate plugin since you did not specify which one you used.
HTML
<img id="circleimg" src="http://i.imgur.com/KgUDClr.png">
<img id="circleimg2" src="http://i.imgur.com/sK4qP6z.png">
JAVASCRIPT
var rot = 0;
window.setInterval(function() {
$('#circleimg').rotate(rot);
$('#circleimg2').rotate(rot);
rot += 1;
},
5
);
I think the circle you've provided is not actually a perfect circle, hence the tiny "oscillations" you see.
I added another circle that I rendered myself. If you zoom in closely enough you will see jagged pixels moving around the edge of my circle, but I don't see any way around this since the jQuery plugin is not actually re-rendering the image. I don't see any of the "oscillating" you mention in my circle.
This issue is more about vector art than it is about programming. Get a nice vector graphics program and render the nicest circle you can. Even the one I made is not really that good. Or use HTML5 and canvas to draw dynamically, rather than moving a static image around.
I'm using Raphael to draw rectangles. Whoo-hoo!
Is there a way to right align contents of an SVG file?
Not just text, but shapes as well?
I can do the math and get the computed x value, but I'm looking for the lazy-simple solution.
Thank you.
There isn't. Unlike normal web pages where the window is resized and the content flows into it, when a Raphael paper is resized, there is no sort of flow, so aligning is irrelevant. Instead of setting align=right, you just set the right edge to be the same position you set the width of the paper to be. If you enlarge the paper, you can scale the contents with a single operation. Once you've set the position of the right edge, you've essentially set the align position. You don't need to re-set all edge values when the paper changes size, you just scale everything with one command. Hope that helps