Detect the end of a request - fastify

Is it possible to detect the end of a request? I'm writing a plugin/middleware (with fastify-plugin) and I'm currently getting all the asset requests when I just want the route itself.
In Express I can place my middleware after the body parser and everything else so I get one request object. I'm quite new to fastify and I like it a lot.

Related

Express middleware know if incoming will be a 404

(i know there are a few official tools for SSR but we decided to roll our own for various reasons that are not important for this question)
We have a prototype of a server-side renderer running in nodejs for vue with Puppeteer. It works very well and now I would like to cache routes we want to cache. The cache invalidation is simple.
We intend to use Redis to hold the cache objects.
Proposed flow of the server:
Incoming request hits the express app
An express request middleware 1st checks if the route should be cached, if not return index.html. END else continue.
The same middleware checks if there is a Redis cache object based on incoming request object data, if yes return cache & END else continue.
Express router matches the request to a route, passes the request to the respective domain layer, creates the cache then returns it. END else next.
No express route found, handle 404 & END.
The question I have relates to proposed flow step 2
To know if the request should be cached is based on 2 parameters:
does the request cookie contain a valid token
is the request path one which is also defined in the express routes
The express routes currently look as follows, but is liable to evolve:
GET /channel/:name
GET /channel/:name/:tag
GET /item/:id
So, how in step 2 can we check if the incoming route is a route that would match the express router?
As said in first comment, express already provde a way to do this :
app.get('/channel/:name/:tag', YOUR_MIDDLEWARE, (req, res) => {
// Your Handler
})

Unable to get redirect response from Node server using res.writeHead() and .end()

I'm writing a server in Node.js. I've been using the send-data/json package to send responses, with much success. For example, at the end of my API call I use this code:
sendJson(res, res, {some: content})
This works great. However, I have a need to implement a URL redirect in one of my API endpoints. The code I am seeing everywhere to do this looks like this:
res.writeHead(302, {Location: 'http://myUrl.com'})
res.end()
However, this change causes my server to stop sending responses on this endpoint.
What am I missing?
Note: this is vanilla Node without Express.
Update: to clarify, based on contributions in the comments, this is the result of a GET request, so I expect that redirects should be enabled by default. I am still curious why no response is coming back from the server at all, regardless of whether it is an erroneous redirect attempt or a successful one.

Using res.locals in node.js model file

I am overall clueless about how and why you set up a node.js app, and how any of the app.use functions work - the tutorials on it don't explain the why of anything.
Anyway, I have socket.io, res.locals and index.js set up like so in the app.js root file.
const sockets = require('./models/socket')(io)
app.use(function (req, res, next) {
res.locals.user_id = req.session.user_id;
next();
});
const routes = require('./routes/index');
app.use('/', routes);
I'd like to be able to access res.locals in the socket.js model, like I can in index.js found in the routes folder.
I can't guess how to go about doing this. If anybody is able to explain how and why I can or can't that would be a bonus. Thanks!
Welcome to Expressjs, there are a few fundamentals you should probably research before going any further, they'll help solve some of your confusion. I'll give a brief explanation of them but I suggest you do further research. I'll then answer your actual question at the end.
Middleware and app.use
Expressjs is built upon an idea that everything is just "middleware". Middleware is a function which runs as part of a request chain. A request chain is essentially a single client request, which then goes through a chain of a number of middleware functions until it either reaches the end of the chain, exits early by returning a response to the client, or errors.
Express middleware is a function which takes the following three arguments.
req (request) - Representing the request made by a client to your
server.
res (response) - Representing the response you will return to
the client.
next - A way of telling express that your current
middleware function is done, and it should now call the next piece of
middleware. This can either be called "empty" as next(); or with an
error next(new Error());. If it is called empty, it will trigger
the next piece of middleware, if it is called with an error then it
will call the first piece of error middleware. If next is not called at the
end of a piece of middleware, then the request is deemed finished and the
response object is sent to the user.
app.use is a way of setting middleware, this means it will run for every request (unless next() is either not called by the previous piece of middleware for some reason, or it's called with an error). This middleware will run for any HTTP request type (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc).
app.use can take multiple arguments, the important ones for beginners to learn are: app.use(func) and app.use(path, func). The former sets "global" middleware which runs no matter what endpoint (url path) the client requests, the latter (with a specific path) is run only if that specific path is hit. I.e. app.use('/hello', (req, res, next) => { res.send('world'); }); will return "world" when the endpoint "/hello" is hit, but not if the client requests "/hi". Where as app.use((req, res, next) => { res.send('world'); }); would return "world" when you hit any endpoint.
There are more complex things you can do with this, but that's the basics of attaching middleware to your application. The order they are attached to the application, is the order in which they will run.
One more thing, this will blow your mind, an express application made with the standard const app = express() can also be used as middleware. This means you can create several express applications, and then mount them using app.use to a single express application. This is pretty advanced, but does allow you to do some really great things with Express.
Why can you not access res.locals in socket.io? (The real question)
Within your middleware handler, you are setting up a res.locals.use_id property. This only lives with that individual request, you can pass it around as long as the request is alive by passing it into other functions, but outside of that request it doesn't exist. res is literally the response object that tells Express how to respond to the clients request, you can set properties of it during the request but once that HTTP request has ended it's gone.
Socket.io is a way of handling web socket requests, not standard HTTP requests. Thus, in a standard express HTTP request you will not be able to hand off the connection to anything with socket.io, because the connection is a single short lived HTTP request. Likewise, you won't be able to do the same the other way.
If you wish to find the users id in a socket.io request, you'll have to do this within the socket.io request itself.
Right now, you're entering a piece of middleware for an Express.js request, you are then calling next() which runs the next piece of express middleware, at no point does it cross over into Socket.io realms. This is often confused by tutorials because Socket.io can handle requests across the same port as Express is listening on, but the two are not crossed over. So you will need to write separate middleware for both Express.js requests chains, and socket.io request chains. There are ways of writing this code once and then writing an adapter to use it across both platforms, but that's not what you've tried to do here.
I would suggest you look at doing just nodejs and express for a time before taking on socket.io as well, otherwise you're trying to learn a whole heap of technologies all at once is quite a lot to try and take on board all at once.

node.js body on http request object vs body on express request object

I'm trying to build an http module that suppose to work with an express server.
while reading the http module api, I see that it doesn't save the body inside the request object.
So my questions are:
If I want to build an express server which works with the official http module, how should I get the body?
I consider to implement the http module in the following way: listening to the socket, and if I get content-length header, listetning to the rest of the socket stream till I get all the body, save it as a memeber of the http request, and only then send the request object to the express server handler.
What are the pros and cons of my suggestion above vs letting the express server to "listen" to the body of the request via request.on('data',callback(data))
I mean , why shouldn't I keep the body inside the 'request' object the same way I keep the headers?
It's hard to answer your question without knowing exactly what you want to do. But I can give you some detail about how the request body is handled by Node/Express, and hopefully you can take things from there.
When handling a request (either directly via Node's request handler, or through Express's request handlers), the body of the request won't automatically be received: you have to open an HTTP stream to receive it.
The type of the body content should be determined by the Content-Type request header. The two most common body types are application/x-www-form-urlencoded and multipart/form-data. It's possible, however, to use any content type you want, which is usually more common for APIs (for example, using application/json is becoming more common for REST APIs).
application/x-www-form-urlencoded is pretty straightforward; name=value pairs are URL encoded (using JavaScript's built-in encodeURIComponent, for example), then combined with an ampersand (&). They're usually UTF-8 encoded, but that can also be specified in Content-Type.
multipart/form-data is more complicated, and can also typically be quite large, as vkurchatkin's answer points out (meaning you may not want to bring it into memory).
Express makes available some middleware to automatically handle the various types of body parsing. Usually, people simply use bodyParser, though you have to be careful with that middleware. It's really just a convenience middleware that combines json, urlencoded, and multipart. However, multipart has been deprecated. Express is still bundling Connect 2.12, which still includes multipart. When Express updates its dependency, though, the situation will change.
As I write this, bodyParser, json, urlencoded, and multipart have all been removed from Connect. Everything but multipart has been moved into the module body-parser (https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser). If you need multipart support, I recommend Busboy (https://npmjs.org/package/busboy), which is very robust. At some point, Express will update it's dependency on Connect, and will most likely add a dependency to body-parser since it has been removed from Connect.
So, since bodyParser bundles deprecated code (multipart), I recommend explicitly linking in only json and urlencoded (and you could even omit json if you're not accepting any JSON-encoded bodies):
app.use(express.json());
app.use(express.urlencoded());
If you're writing middleware, you probably don't want to automatically link in json and urlencoded (much less Busboy); that would break the modular nature of Express. However, you should specify in your documentation that your middleware requires the req.body object to be available (and fail gracefully if it isn't): you can go on to say that json, urlencoded, and Busboy all provide the req.body object, depending on what kind of content types you need to accept.
If you dig into the source code for urlencoded or json, you will find that they rely on another Node module, raw-body, which simply opens the request stream and retrieves the body content. If you really need to know the details of retrieving the body from a request, you will find everything you need in the source code for that module (https://github.com/stream-utils/raw-body/blob/master/index.js).
I know that's a lot of detail, but they're important details!
You can do that, it fairly simple. bodyParser middleware does that, for example (https://github.com/expressjs/body-parser/blob/master/index.js#L27). The thing is, request body can be really large (file upload, for example), so you generally don't want to put that in memory. Rather you can stream it to disk or s3 or whatnot.

Express.js: Is this a RESTful interface?

I am pretty new to node and express.js and I'm new to the concept of REST applications as well. I want to code a typical CRUD app, some sort of diary. Hence, I have a collection of entries, can view a single entry and can add, edit and delete an entry.
I'm not quite getting yet, how URi's have to be set up to represent a REST conform API. I would create something like this in my app.js:
// GET REQUEST ROUTING
app.get('/', diary_router.home);
app.get('/entries/', diary_router.listEntries);
app.get('/entries/:id', diary_router.getSingleEntry);
// POST REQUEST ROUTING
app.post('/entries/', diary_router.addEntry);
// PUT REQUEST ROUTING
app.put('/entries/', diary_router.updateEntry);
// DELETE REQUEST ROUTING
app.delete('/entries/', diary_router.deleteEntry);
Could that be called a REST conform interface? Should I rather add the respective action in the routes, such as this and does the item-ID need to be shown in the URL for PUT and DELETE actions, too?:
// GET REQUEST ROUTING
app.get('/', diary_router.home);
app.get('/entries/', diary_router.listEntries);
app.get('/entries/show/:id', diary_router.getSingleEntry);
// POST REQUEST ROUTING
app.post('/entries/add/', diary_router.addEntry);
// PUT REQUEST ROUTING
app.put('/entries/update/:id', diary_router.updateEntry);
// DELETE REQUEST ROUTING
app.delete('/entries/delete/:id', diary_router.deleteEntry);
What would be best practice here? Any help is much appreciated.
B.
In the loose definition of REST that we seem to have converged on in web-land, the first option seems to fit best.
Edit: and yes, you should specify the ID in the PUT and DELETE routes.
HTTP is a really cool protocol for applying verbs (request methods) to nouns (URLs). In that spirit, it's probably best to use the request method to differentiate what you want to do to the resource that you're requesting.
Note: you can use the methodOverride middleware in express if you're worried about browsers not being able to use arbitrary HTTP methods.
The way the methodOverride middleware works is that you use an <input type="hidden" name="_method" value="PUT"> or similar to specify the method, despite it just being a regular POST request, and the methodOverride middleware will set the method property on the request that you get in your express application. This way, you can signal the intended request method without the client actually having to support that method.

Resources