i have a web application which is created using .net framework 2.0 which is running on windows server 2003.is it possible to migrate that to Microsoft azure.if so does it require an entire rebuild on azure?
A really useful utility for this case is Azure Migration Assistant.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/downloads/migration-assistant/
It will check all your IIS sites and show you if it can be moved up to an App Service, checking target framework, port bindings, etc.
If everything is ok, it can do the migration for you.
Worst case scenario, you can move your application to Azure inside a VM.
It depends on what you mean by "migrate".
If you think about moving as is, you have an option to choose IaaS, where you'll just get a VM and do what you want on it. That'll give you both full control as well as full responsibility over your app.
Otherwise, if you want to avail of the PaaS offering, you'll have to make minor tweaks to your application (assuming the framework version is supported).
Related
Having being unsuccessful to find a decent resource I am finally asking it over here. I have a legacy .Net Frmework Windows Service (which is now migrated to .Net Framework 4.7.2) which I want to eventually migrate to Azure PaaS. After looking around I found 3 ways I could do that and not counting the options like hiding it behind a web app hosted in IIS because I do not think that is the correct solution. I think the correct ways are:
1) Use Worker Role: This is provided by the legacy Cloud Services platform and due to its slow deployments and staging costs is out of question.
2) Use Web Jobs: It may need code changes but I am unable to find a decent article or tutorial in the context of windows services.
3) Use Containers: This seems to be the solution most suitable but I want some expert to guide me through it as I am completely new to docker and azure. Since the service is in .Net Framework, the target OS could only be Windows Server Core(https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/modernize-with-azure-and-containers/modernize-existing-apps-to-cloud-optimized/deploy-existing-net-apps-as-windows-containers) but when I pull the image I get the message that it "cannot be used on this platform". I am using Windows 10. Does this mean that I need to be working on Windows server family OS to be able to pull image which effectively means that to be able to deploy .Net Framework application in an Azure container, I need to be working on Windows Server OS.
Links to a few good reads or videos are welcome as I am unable to find may be because I am not searching it correctly. I would imagine that windows service migration to Azure is a common scenario but I may be wrong.
Do follow the steps mentioned here
,
https://github.com/dotnet-architecture/eShopModernizing/wiki/02.-How-to-containerize-the-.NET-Framework-web-apps-with-Windows-Containers-and-Docker
Also for your windows service, you do have a couple of other options as well
1) Convert your app into an Azure Function and run it on timer trigger. But your app must complete execution within 5 minutes.
2) Deploy your app as a timer triggered web job.
I am developing Mobile App .Net server and want to use the service on self hosted servers for production usage. The service will be deployed on IIS instead of Azure portal. I am working on offline data sync feature using Microsoft.Azure.Mobile.Server package. And for client Microsoft.Azure.Mobile.Client is being used. And all these packages and dependent libraries are open source as its available on github.
So, what about its licencing? Is there any limitation or licencing clause that restricts from using these applications without Azure portal?
Or its free to use?
As you mentioned, these libraries are open source licensed with Apache 2.0. So, you can use them without any problem, as long as you mention the original authors.
I have a web app that has been developed using Glassfish server, and am looking to change hosts to Microsoft Azure.
The trouble is, Azure appears to not support Glassfish as a web container, and instead only currently offers Jetty or Tomcat.
Unless I'm missing something, I believe I will need to convert my server to run with one of the two above options, although obviously if there is a method to run GF on Azure that's the ideal option.
Looks like there is a concept named 'worker roles' which can be used to do this.
Have a look at this article: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dachou/2011/01/17/run-java-with-glassfish-in-windows-azure/
More information:
Microsoft Azure and Glassfish
GlassFish and Java EE 6 everywhere, even in the Azure cloud!
I think you're looking at Web Apps, which doesn't include Glassfish. But that doesn't stop you from simply spinning it up in your own VMs (or web/worker role instances, assuming you can install it in an automated way, in Windows).
Note: to deploy Cloud Services (web/worker roles) you're limited to Visual Studio and Eclipse (on Windows) for creating the deployment package.
Current my company delivers our software to our customers through a Citrix Xenapp Server. As administrators we are able to launch instances of the servers and our customers are only able to launch their specific application
My Question is does Windows Azure also offer this type of environment. I am looking to deploy a new version of our application and I am leaning towards Azure, but if that is the direction we go in I would like to migrate all of our existing system to Azure and not maintain both Azure and Citrix.
Greg,
In principle yes you can do this, but you can't just plug in Azure as a direct replacement for XenApp (with zero/minimal effort). Azure effectively has it's own runtime. While it is Windows based and there is certainly potential to reuse code in an existing app in an Azure equivalent, you would need to re-write your app to make it run in Azure.
Given your app is running on XenApp it is likely it is a fat client app, i.e. most of its logic lives in the main executable that you run on XenApp, with potentially some other back end services being utilised. In comparison you should think of Azure as a platform for providing web apps. So you would re-architect the app as an Azure hosted web app, then you could deploy it via Azure in a multi-tenanted manner to your customers who would then access it through a browser rather than a Citrix Receiver.
Regards,
Donovan
What type of projects/software applications are suitable for Azure and why?
Thanks
Rather than thinking of what can be supported in Azure, it might be more helpful to think about its challenges as you decide to port your app over:
Web applications. Since a Web Role hosts IIS, you'll generally have little issue porting a general-purpose asp.net or asp.net mvc website to Azure. There are some glitches you'll run into - see my related answer for more details.
UI. If your app has specific output similar to a WinForms app, you won't be able to run it since you have no video output.
GPU dependencies. If you're doing some background processing dependenton a specific GPU, you won't be able to run in an Azure VM.
Registry and other system-level access. If your app needs to update the registry or run an MSI, you won't be able to install your app.
Instance affinity. If your app requires session stickiness (e.g. a logged-in user MUST visit the same server instance with each access), you won't be able to accomplish this.
COM interop. COM interop is very limited, since you can't install anything via the registry. If you rely on Excel Services, you won't have that capability.
SQL limitations. SQL Azure is limited to 50GB today, and offers no ability to custom-tune the server instance. Also, while it does support a big subset of SQL Server, it doesn't support 100% of SQL Server, so it's possible some of your sprocs may no longer work. There's no SQL Agent today, so you'd need to recreate that functionality in a worker process.
That's just a quick braindump of some challenges you might run into - I'm sure there are others.
Just keep in mind that Azure is providing Windows 2008 Server images for your app to run on, so if your app can run in that environment today, and doesn't require things I listed, you should be in pretty good shape.
You can make most of the .NET projects working in Azure. Azure has support of following project types: web site (both ASP.NET and ASP.NET MVC), worker (background application) and wcf service.
Don't forget security too - there's various ways of authenticating onto Azure but none are as simple as just setting IIS/ASP to windows auth.