I would like to understand how Keras sets up weights to be shared. Specifically, I would like to use a convolutional 1D layer for processing a time-frequency representation of an audio signal and feed it into an RNN (perhaps a GRU layer) that has:
local support (e.g. like the Conv1D layer with a specified kernel size). Things that are far away in frequency from an output are unlikely to affect the output.
Shared weights, that is I train only a single set of weights across all of the neurons in the RNN layer. Similar inferences should work at lower or higher frequencies.
Essentially, I'm looking for many of the properties that we find in the 2D RNN layers. I've been looking at some of the Keras source code for the convnets to try to understand how weight sharing is implemented, but when I see the weight allocation code in the layer build methods (e.g. in the _Conv class), it's not clear to me how the code is specifying that the weights for each filter are shared. Is this buried in the backend? I see that the backend call is to a specific 1D, 2D, or 3D convolution.
Any pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.
Thank you - Marie
Related
I work on multitask learning convolutional neural netowrk. It performs the semantic segmentationa and pixel-wise depth estimation task. After decoder output, feature maps resolution is (240,240) which i want to upsample to achieve input resolution of (480,480). Can anyone help to understand that which of the following locations of upsampling layer could results into better performance ? or does appropriate location of upsampling layer has any significant impact on result ?if yes then could you please elaborate it ?
Apply Umsampling before final output layer and use strided or padded convolution layer to mantain resolution as input image (480,480)?
Apply upsampling after final output layer
I have trained network, in which, I have used upsampling layer before the final prediction and then used padding in convolution layer to maintain desired resolution. I read that if we use upsampling before final prediction, then it enables network to learn a more spatial information and make finer predictions since it deals with higher resolution feature maps. But it will increase computation burden.
I am currently pursuing undergraduation, I am working on CNN model to recognize Telegu characters.
This Questions has two parts,
I have a (32,32,1) shape Telegu character images, I want to train my CNN model to recognize the character. So, what should be my model architecture and how to decide the architecture, no of parameters and hidden layers. I know that my case is exactly same as handwritten digit recognition, but I want to know how to decide those parameters. Is there any common practice in building such architecture.
Operation Conv2D (32, (5,5)) means 32 filters of size 5x5 are applied on to the input, my question is are these filters all same or different, if different what kind of filters are initialized and who decides them?
I tried to surf internet but everywhere I go, the answer I get is Conv2D operation applies filters on input and does the convolution operation.
To decide which model architecture would be best, you need to experiment. Thats the only way. As you want to classify, VGG architecture would be a good starting point I believe. You need to experiment with number of parameters as it depends on your problem. You can use Keras Tuner for it: https://keras.io/keras_tuner/
For kernel initialization, as far as I know convolutional layers in Keras uses Glorot Uniform Initialization but you can change that by using kernel_initializer parameter. Long story short, convolutional layers are initialized with a distribution function and as training goes filters change the values inside, which is learning process. https://keras.io/api/layers/initializers
Edit: I forgot to inform you that I suggest VGG architecture but in a way you downsize the models a lot. Your input shape is little so if your model is too much deep, you will overfit really quickly.
I am new to ML and Pytorch and I have the following problem:
I am looking for a Fully Convolutional Network architecture in Pytorch, so that the input would be an RGB image (HxWxC or 480x640x3) and the output would be a single channel image (HxW or 480x640). In other words, I am looking for a network that will preserve the resolution of the input (HxW), and will loose the channel dimension. All of the networks that I've came across (ResNet, Densenet, ...) end with a fully connected layer (without any upsampling or deconvolution). This is problematic for two reasons:
I am restricted with the choice of the input size (HxWxC).
It has nothing to do with the output that I expect to get (a single channel image HxW).
What am I missing? Why is there even a FC layer? Why is there no up-sampling, or some deconvolution layers after feature extraction? Is there any build-in torchvision.model that might suit my requirements? Where can I find such pytorch architecture? As I said, I am new in this field so I don't really like the idea of building such a network from scratch.
Thanks.
You probably came across the networks that are used in classification. So they end up with a pooling and a fully connected layer to produce a fixed number of categorical output.
Have a look at Unet
https://lmb.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/people/ronneber/u-net/
Note: the original unet implementation use a lot of tricks.
You can simply downsample and then upsample symmetrically to do the work.
Your kind of task belongs to dense classification tasks, e.g. segmentation. In those tasks, we use fully convolution nets (see here for the original paper). In the FCNs you don't have any fully-connected layers, because when applying fully-connected layers you lose spatial information which you need for the dense prediction. Also have a look at the U-Net paper. All state-of-the art architectures use some kind of encoder-decoder architecture extended for example with a pyramid pooling module.
There are some implementations in the pytorch model zoo here. Search also Github for pytorch implementations for other networks.
Could anyone explains for me the differences between Time-Distributed Layers (from Keras Wrapper) and ConvLSTM-2D (Convolutional LSTM), for purposes, usage, etc.?
Both applies to a sequence of data.
Time Distributed is a very straightforward layer wrapper which only applies a layer (usually dense layer) on each time point. You need it when you need to change the shape of output tensor, especially the dimension of features, instead of sample size and time step.
ConvLSTM2D, is much more complex. You need to understand cnn and rnn layer first, where LSTM is one of most popular rnn. LSTM itself is applied on a sequence of of tensor, which is used for NLP, time series and for each time step the input is 1-dimension. cnn, the conv part, is usually used to learn from image, which is 2-dimension but don't have a sequence (time step). Combined together, convLSTM is used to learn image in a sequence, like video.
I want to know if the filters' weights in a, for example, 2D convolution layer in Keras are shared along the spatial dimensions by default. If yes, is there any way to have not shared weights?
I found that LocallyConnected2D does what I am looking for.
The LocallyConnected2D layer works similarly to the Conv2D layer, except that weights are unshared, that is, a different set of filters is applied at each different patch of the input.
I'm not clear on what your asking but:
The weights in the a single convolutional layer are shared. That is, the filters share the same weights with each stride.
However The weights between two convolutonal layers are not shared by default in keras.
There is no getting around shared wiegths in the filters within the conv layer. Since the execution of the convolution if offloaded to C++ libraries.
See this answer for further reference, in particular:
The implementation of tf.nn.conv2d() is written in C++, which invokes
optimized code using either Eigen (on CPU) or the cuDNN library (on
GPU). You can find the implementation here.