I would like to map between UserDTO and User, but excluding one field, say city. How can I do that, cause I though that this approach would work, but it doesn't:
ModelMapper modelMapper = new ModelMapper();
modelMapper.typeMap(UserDTO.class,User.class).addMappings(mp -> {
mp.skip(User::setCity);
});
Because of the generic parameters, we couldn't use the lambda expression.
ModelMapper modelMapper = new ModelMapper();
modelMapper.addMappings(new PropertyMap<Dto, Source>() {
#Override
protected void configure() {
skip(destination.getBlessedField());
}
});
For the configuration to work need to add:
modelMapper.getConfiguration().setAmbiguityIgnored(true);
E.g.
ModelMapper modelMapper = new ModelMapper();
modelMapper.getConfiguration().setAmbiguityIgnored(true);
modelMapper.addMappings(clientPropertyMap);
modelMapper.map(UserDTO, User);
PropertyMap<UserDTO, User> clientPropertyMap = new PropertyMap<UserDTO, User>() {
#Override
protected void configure() {
skip(destination.getCity());
}
};
For the configuration to work need to add:
modelMapper.getConfiguration().setAmbiguityIgnored(true);
This is true only when the destination field matches to multiple source fields. Skipping the setting of a destination field will work without the above if there is either a 1-1 or a 0-1 match between source-destination.
Related
I have a class to take data from a database and every time I create a variable in the debug mode the name of the variable appears with the message 'this' is not available and I cannot save any type of data in it.
public class DatosPerfilUsuario {
RequestQueue requestQueue;
SharedPreferencias sharedPreferencias = new SharedPreferencias();
String[] StringSplit;
public void RetirarPerfilUsuario(final Context context, final ImageView imageView, final EditText nombre, final EditText nombreusuario, final EditText sexo, final EditText edad, final EditText email, final EditText bio){
StringRequest getRequest = new StringRequest(Request.Method.POST, DatosBase.CONEXION_DB_RETIRAR_PERFILUSUARIO, new Response.Listener<String>() {
#Override
public void onResponse(String response) {
if(response.equals("0")){
}else {
StringSplit = response.split("/");
}
}
}, new Response.ErrorListener() {
#Override
public void onErrorResponse(VolleyError error) {
}
}) {
protected Map<String,String> getParams(){
Map<String, String> params = new HashMap<String, String>();
params.put("NombreUsuario",sharedPreferencias.obtenerValorString(context,"Usuario").toLowerCase());
return params;
}
};
requestQueue = Volley.newRequestQueue(context);
requestQueue.add(getRequest);
}
Code
This situation happens to me with each type of variable that I create int, string, bool ...
I have different classes that do the same, but the problem only arises in this.
I have looked for a solution to the problem in google but there is very little information about this problem, if someone has the solution or understands why this problem is due I would appreciate your help.
UPDATED
It looks like this is not preventing you from compiling and running the code, only that you can't view the variable's contents in the debug window. Sorry. This is not uncommon. The debugger can't determine the this in the current context.
It looks like you may be using Android Studio? If so, check this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/37273436/12431728
OLD / WRONG
Your Response.Listener<String> is an anonymous class, so this refers to the anonymous class. Since StringSplit is a field of the outer class, you should be able to access it as:
OuterClassName.this.StringSplit = ...
Where OuterClassName is the name of the class that contains this code (and StringSplit).
How to create field variable automatically when I create method used that field. I've create template like this:
void $METHOD_NAME$() {
$FIELD_NAME$ = true;
}
when I type field name (e.g. mState) in method will create field as:
private boolean mState = false;
Hope someone help. Sorry my bad.
Given the screenshot of your template, you can also create a field with the following live template:
private boolean $param$ = false;
#Override
public void onBackPressed() {
if ($param$) super.onBackPressed();
android.widget.Toast.makeText(this, "$message$",
android.widget.Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
$param$ = true;
final Handler handler = new Handler();
handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
$param$ = false;
}
}, 100);
}
Where $param$ and $message$ are regular variables without anything special.
However, like I said in the comment on your question, I suggest to split it up in several smaller templates.
Consider to split it up in:
field + method with just:
private boolean $param$ = false;
#Override
public void onBackPressed() {
if ($param$) super.onBackPressed();
$param$ = true;
}
Then create a template for the message:
android.widget.Toast.makeText(this, "$message$", android.widget.Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
And last but not least, create a template for the postDelayed:
final Handler handler = new Handler();
handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
$END$
}
}, $delay$);
Note: the $delay$ as a bonus you can even give it a default value or create a list of predefined values for ease of use.
Note2: Instead of $param$ = false; I've replaced it with $END$. This will position your cursor here once you've selected the delay. Now you can type mState = false manually here, or whatever code you need in the context at that moment. This makes the template much more flexible and easier to use.
PS. I suppose you want to call super.onBackPressed() only when the value is false (on the first invocation). In that case use if (!$param$) instead.
// Update:
In order to group the newly added field with the other fields and not halfway somewhere in your class between other methods, rearrange the code
via the menu with: Code -> rearrange code.
To customise this, check your arrangement settings under: settings -> code style -> <language> -> arrangement
I have an extremely odd error and wondered if anyone knew the reason for this.
When I create a new DataObject and TableController called Content and ContentController respectively, it doesn't register the tablecontroller and the help documentation it automatically generates has lost its styling.
I can't connect to the controller at all but all other controllers work as expected.
If I just rename it to DataController and that's just the name of the controller, not the dataobject everything works perfectly.
Is ContentController a reserved word of some kind or is this just specifically happening on my machine?
public class DataController : TableController<Content>
{
protected override void Initialize(HttpControllerContext controllerContext)
{
base.Initialize(controllerContext);
MobileContext context = new MobileContext();
DomainManager = new EntityDomainManager<Content>(context, Request, Services);
}
// GET tables/Content
public IQueryable<Content> GetAllContent()
{
return Query();
}
// GET tables/Content/48D68C86-6EA6-4C25-AA33-223FC9A27959
public SingleResult<Content> GetContent(string id)
{
return Lookup(id);
}
// PATCH tables/Content/48D68C86-6EA6-4C25-AA33-223FC9A27959
public Task<Content> PatchContent(string id, Delta<Content> patch)
{
return UpdateAsync(id, patch);
}
// POST tables/Content/48D68C86-6EA6-4C25-AA33-223FC9A27959
public async Task<IHttpActionResult> PostContent(Content item)
{
Content current = await InsertAsync(item);
return CreatedAtRoute("Tables", new { id = current.Id }, current);
}
// DELETE tables/Content/48D68C86-6EA6-4C25-AA33-223FC9A27959
public Task DeleteContent(string id)
{
return DeleteAsync(id);
}
}
An MVC project will create an application directory called Content. This will override your route mapping to the ContentController.
You can get around this if desired through changing RouteMaps and other trickery although probably the simpliest answer is to change the name of the controller...
I want to use RazorEngine to generate some html files. It's easy to generate strings first, then write them to files. But if the generated strings are too large, that will cause memory issues.
So I wonder is there a non-cached way to use RazorEngine, like using StreamWriter as its output rather than a string.
I google this for a while, but with no luck.
I think use a custom base template should be the right way, but the documents are so few(even out of date) on the offcial homepage of RazorEngine.
Any hint will be helpful!
OK. I figured it out.
Create a class that inherits TemplateBase<T>, and take a TextWrite parameter in the constructor.
public class TextWriterTemplate<T> : TemplateBase<T>
{
private readonly TextWriter _tw;
public TextWriterTemplate(TextWriter tw)
{
_tw = tw;
}
// override Write and WriteLiteral methods, write text using the TextWriter.
public override void Write(object value)
{
_tw.Write(value);
}
public override void WriteLiteral(string literal)
{
_tw.Write(literal);
}
}
Then use the template as this:
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (var sw = new StreamWriter(#"output.txt"))
{
var config = new FluentTemplateServiceConfiguration(c =>
c.WithBaseTemplateType(typeof(TextWriterTemplate<>))
.ActivateUsing(context => (ITemplate)Activator.CreateInstance(context.TemplateType, sw))
);
using (var service = new TemplateService(config))
{
service.Parse("Hello #Model.Name", new {Name = "Waku"}, null, null);
}
}
}
The content of output.txt should be Hello WAKU.
I have written some code like this.
public void Preview()
{
_printTemplate = new MarineBunkerPrintTemplate();
UpdateInfo();
_printTemplate.SetInfo();
}
Here whenever i call Preview() method i am creating new object of _printTemplate, Instead of i have to check existing object available or not avilable means i have to delete existing and i have to create new and use or some other way.
I don't know the context in which it is used, but how about:
public void Preview()
{
if (_printTemplate == null)
{
_printTemplate = new MarineBunkerPrintTemplate();
}
UpdateInfo();
_printTemplate.SetInfo();
}