i'm trying to use a express-validator to validate a hour. I sent this json:
{
"hour" : "10:30",
"day":"monday"
}
in the following code:
var regex = new RegExp('/^(10|11|12|[1-9]):[0-5][0-9]$/');
var hour = req.body.hour;
req.check('hour',"error to add hour").matches(regex);
var errors = req.validationErrors();
if(errors){
res.status(400).send(errors);
} else {
res.status(200).json({hour:'hour ok'});
}
the program throws me the following error:
[
{
"param": "hour",
"msg": "error to add hour",
"value": "10:30"
}
]
I think my error is in the validation of the regex. should send me {hour:'hour ok'}... please, help me!!!
I guess it works better if you use
new RegExp(/^(10|11|12|[1-9]):[0-5][0-9]$/);
or
new RegExp('^(10|11|12|[1-9]):[0-5][0-9]$');
If you use a string as an argument to the regexp constructor you have to skip the slashes at the beginning and end of the string.
Related
I'm trying to write an eslint rule that enforces making sure the name property is defined on any classes that extend from other Error/Exception named classes (and fixes them).
As far as I can tell, it works in the astexplorer.net individually, but when I'm running it alongside other rules, it ends up getting ran multiple times, so the name property ends up being repeated multiple times in the resulting "fixed" file.
Is there anything in particular I can do to prevent it being run multiple times? I'm assuming what's happening is that it's inserting my name = 'ClassName';, then prettier is needing to reformat the code, which it does, but then maybe it's re-running my rule? I'm not sure.
Rule/fix code shown below. I've tried things like using *fix and yield, but that doesn't seem to help either (see commented code below, based on information in the eslint documentation)
module.exports = {
meta: {
hasSuggestions: true,
type: 'suggestion',
docs: {},
fixable: 'code',
schema: [], // no options,
},
create: function (context) {
return {
ClassDeclaration: function (node) {
const regex = /.*(Error|Exception)$/;
// If the parent/superClass is has "Error" or "Exception" in the name
if (node.superClass && regex.test(node.superClass.name)) {
let name = null;
const className = node.id.name;
// Test class object name
if (!regex.test(className)) {
context.report({
node: node,
message: 'Error extensions must end with "Error" or "Exception".',
});
}
// Find name ClassProperty
node.body.body.some(function (a) {
if (a.type === 'ClassProperty' && a.key.name === 'name') {
name = a.value.value;
return true;
}
});
// Name property is required
if (!name) {
context.report({
node: node,
message: 'Error extensions should have a descriptive name',
fix(fixer) {
return fixer.replaceTextRange(
[node.body.range[0]+1, node.body.range[0]+1],
`name = '${className}';`
);
},
// *fix(fixer) {
// name = className;
// yield fixer.replaceTextRange(
// [node.body.range[0]+1, node.body.range[0]+1],
// `name = '${className}';`
// );
//
// // extend range of the fix to the range of `node.parent`
// yield fixer.insertTextBefore(node.body, '');
// yield fixer.insertTextAfter(node.body, '');
// },
});
}
}
},
};
},
};
Turns out I had the AST Explorer set to the wrong parser, so it was showing me the wrong string name for the ClassProperty node. I should have been using PropertyDefinition instead.
Using the mock function below along with the dev console:
This call will work:
chrome.webNavigation.onCompleted.addListener(processWebNavChange, filtera);
but when I actually pass in my real var filter it throws this error:
Uncaught TypeError: Could not add listener
My actual data looks like this:
{
url: [ {hostContains: ".im88rmbOwZ"} ]
}
function registerWebNavListener() {
var matchers = getUrlMatchers();
var filter = {
url: matchers
};
// test with mock data filtera that actually works
const filtera = {
url:
[
{hostContains: "example.com"},
]
}
if (matchers.length > 0) {
chrome.webNavigation.onCompleted.addListener(processWebNavChange, filtera);
}
}
async function processWebNavChange(data) {
}
Is there something wrong with my data structure that I'm actually using? I don't believe that the filter object I returned is incorrect
}
EDIT:
I added a new
const filterb = {
url: [ {hostContains: ".im88rmbOwZ"} ]
};
and it still fails with that. The single entry {hostContains: ".im88rmbOwZ"}, was the first item returned from getURLMatchers() which I used as an example of real data being returned.
The above comment on the upper-case letters was the cause of the issue. Converting everything to lowercase resolved the problem.
Although, I am not clear as to why that was a problem to begin with. (If there are any hints in the chromium source code event filter handlers, I'd appreciate it if it could be pointed out).
I have this JSON file: (EDITED)
{
"user": {
"S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1001": {
"username":"xyz",
"password":"xyz#123",
"email":"xyz#xyz.com",
"uid": 1100
},
"S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1002": {
"username":"abc",
"password":"abc#456",
"email":"abc#abc.de",
"uid": 2222
}
}
}
(the JSON file is valid)
and I need to get the values out of it. But when I try to parse the JSON file an error appears:
console.log(jsonContent.S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1001.username);
^^^^^
SyntaxError: Invalid or unexpected token
also, the username is underlined red from my syntax highlighter. (so there is something wrong)
So I searched the internet and found nothing about it.
Here is my code:
const fs = require('fs');
const filename = "C:/Users/Jonas/Documents/Visual_Studio_Code/Node.js/json.json"
contents = fs.readFileSync(filename);
jsonContent = JSON.parse(contents);
console.log(jsonContent.S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1001.username);
For the case I need it, I cant edit the problematic part S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1001.
I also tried to set it like this: console.log(jsonContent."S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1001".username); but that's ever wronger.
For any more information please ask.
You need to use the square bracket notation because the property name has hyphens in it which JavaScipt interprets as the minus (-) operator:
jsonContent['S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1001'].username;
Snippet:
const jsonContent = {
"S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1001": {
"username":"xyz",
"password":"xyz#123",
"email":"xyz#xyz.com",
"uid": 1100
},
"S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1002": {
"username":"abc",
"password":"abc#456",
"email":"abc#abc.de",
"uid": 2222
}
}
const name = jsonContent['S-1-5-21-2659826518-2396530539-1407762326-1001'].username;
console.log(name);
I'm trying to put a JSON object "Synced" (Which you will see in the code)
This is the code for a function "addServer(userid, serverid)"
The function is being required from another javascript file
db.all(`SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Tag = ? LIMIT 1`, userid, async(error,element) => {
if(element[0].Synced === '') {
var sJSON = {
users:{
[userid]:4,
},
servers:[`${serverid}`]
}
var serverJSON = JSON.stringify(sJSON)
console.log(serverJSON)
} else {
//Else statement not done yet
}
db.run(`UPDATE Users SET Synced = "${serverJSON}" WHERE Tag = "${userid}"`)
})
Solved. Needed to change quoting.
As Dave Newton said, I had to check my quoting. What I did was change my double quotes to single quotes which solved the problem.
I'm trying to get some info out of a API call in Nodejs, structured something like a JSON:
{
"generated":"2019-11-04T09:34:11+00:00",
"event":{
"id":"19040956",
"start_":"2019-11-16T11:30:00+00:00",
"event_context":{
"sport":{
"id":"1",
"name":"Soccer"
}
}
}
}
I'm not sure about the presence of none of these fields(Json could be incomplete).
Is there a better way to get the value of "name" in JSON.event.event_context.sport.name without an ugly if to not get errors like "cannot get field 'sport' of undefined"?
Currently, I'm doing
if(json.event && json.event.event_context && json.event.event_context.sport) {
return json.event.event_context.sport.name;
}
Is there a better way?
Thank you!
what do you mean by saying "I'm not sure about the presence of none of these fields"?
i don't understand what your'e trying to achieve.
Looks like there is also an interesting package that will allow more conditions on searching json :
https://www.npmjs.com/package/jspath
let getNested = (path, obj) => {
return path.split(".").reduce( getPath, obj);
}
let getPath = (path, key) => {
return (path && path[key]) ? path[key] : null
}
let test = {
"foo": "bar",
"baz": { "one": 1, "two": ["to", "too", "two"] },
"event": { "event_context": { "sport": { "name": "soccer" } } }
}
console.log(getNested("none", test))
console.log(getNested("baz.one", test))
console.log(getNested("baz.two", test))
console.log(getNested("event.event_context.sport.name", test))
You can use lodash get to get a potentially deeply-nested value, and also specify a default in case it doesnt exist.
Example
const _ = require('lodash');
const my_object = {
"generated":"2019-11-04T09:34:11+00:00",
"event":{
"id":"19040956",
"start_":"2019-11-16T11:30:00+00:00",
"event_context":{
"sport":{
"id":"1",
"name":"Soccer"
}
}
};
_.get(my_object, 'event.event_context.sport.name'); // "Soccer"
_.get(my_object, 'event.event_context.sport.nonExistentField', 'default val'); // "default val"
Article: https://medium.com/#appi2393/lodash-get-or-result-f409e73e018b
You can check by using a function to check object keys like :
function checkProperty(checkObject, checkstring){
if(!checkstring)
return false;
var propertiesKeys = checkstring.split('.');
propertiesKeys.forEach(element => {
if(!checkObject|| !checkObject.hasOwnProperty(element)){
return false;
} else {
checkObject= checkObject[element];
}
})
return true;
};
var objectToCheck = {
"generated":"2019-11-04T09:34:11+00:00",
"event":{
"id":"19040956",
"start_":"2019-11-16T11:30:00+00:00",
"event_context":{
"sport":{
"id":"1",
"name":"Soccer"
}
}
}
}
if (checkProperty(objectToCheck ,'event.event_context.sport.name'))
console.log('object to find is : ', objectToCheck .event.event_context.sport.name;)
Yeah there are better ways!
For example, you could use lodash's get() method to reach a nested value.
var object = { 'a': [{ 'b': { 'c': 3 } }] };
_.get(object, 'a[0].b.c');
// => 3
But there is also a native solution.
Currently (11.2019) only Babel can handle this.
I am speaking of Optional chaining. It's new in the Ecmascript world.
Why I like it? Look here!
// Still checks for errors and is much more readable.
const nameLength = db?.user?.name?.length;
What happens when db, user, or name is undefined or null? With the optional chaining operator, JavaScript initializes nameLength to undefined instead of throwing an error.
If you are using Babel as a compiler then you could use it now.
Related link: https://v8.dev/features/optional-chaining