Hey I'm really stuck on this one, basically tying to get a result of either 'hired' or 'available' (or 0 & 1 to represent) in B2, of BOTH the two conditions in B1 & A2, looking at the log table A6:B10 of when they are 'hired out'. I've tried VLOOKUP and many IF functions but neither quite work correctly.
One option here, though perhaps not the most graceful, would be to use VLOOKUP with the car and date as the key. The issue here is that there are multiple lookup values, namely the car and the particular date. To get around this, you could create a new column C which contains the concatenated car and date, e.g.
A | B | C | D
6 Car 1 | 03-01-2017 | Car 1 03-01-2017 | 0
7 Car 2 | 03-01-2017 | Car 2 03-01-2017 | 0
8 Car 3 | 04-01-2017 | Car 3 04-01-2017 | 0
9 Car 4 | 05-01-2017 | Car 4 05-01-2017 | 0
10 Car 2 | 06-01-2017 | Car 2 06-01-2017 | 0
To create column C, simply enter the following formula into cell C6 and then copy it down the entire column:
=CONCATENATE(A6, " ", B6)
Now you can use the following VLOOKUP formula in cell B2 to calculate whether a given ride is available on a certain date:
=IFERROR(VLOOKUP(A2&" "&B1,C6:D10,2,FALSE), 1)
Here I have hard-coded in column D the value 0 for every entry, to represent that these are rides which are already hired-out for that particular car and date. If our VLOOKUP formula finds a match, then it means the ride is hired-out. If VLOOKUP does not find a match, it would throw an error, in which case we display 1 to indicate availability.
Related
I have a sheet where I am recording what I eat:
Another where I keep an index of values to lookup
I tried
=SUM(VLOOKUP('Sheet1'!A2:A11,'Sheet2'!A2:E11,2,FALSE))
but that only returned the first match, so then I tried
=SUMPRODUCT(SUMIF('Sheet1'!A2:A11,'Sheet2'!A2:A11,'Sheet2'!B2:B11))
but that isn't working either.
does anyone have a solution, where I can also multiply the value of the return match by the # of servings in the first sheet?
Thanks!
If you want a single output of calories through SUMPRODUCT then you can use
=SUMPRODUCT(B2:B11*IFERROR(VLOOKUP(A2:A11,Sheet2!A2:B11,2,0),0))
If you are sure that all entries on Sheet 1 can be located on Sheet 2 then you can drop IFERROR portion like
=SUMPRODUCT(B2:B11*VLOOKUP(A2:A11,Sheet2!A2:B11,2,0)).
Beware that if a value is not found in Sheet 2 then formula will produce wrong result as IFERROR will multiply the serving quantity with 0.
I combine 2 tables into one sheet, Table 1 housed in Column A & B and Table 2 housed in Column D & E
In G2, "Total Serving Colories" enter formula :
=SUMPRODUCT(VLOOKUP(T(IF({1},A2:A12)),D2:E12,2,FALSE)*B2:B12)
It's not super-clear what you're trying to get at. But defining the "Calories Per Serving" in a range called "cals",
+---+---------+-----+--------------------------------+
| | A | B | C |
+---+---------+-----+--------------------------------+
| 1 | egg | 3 | =(VLOOKUP(A2,cals,2,FALSE))*B2 |
| 2 | oatmeal | 1.5 | =(VLOOKUP(A3,cals,2,FALSE))*B3 |
| 3 | shrimp | 2 | =(VLOOKUP(A4,cals,2,FALSE))*B4 |
+---+---------+-----+--------------------------------+
Results in:
I am trying to set up a smart conditional summing within Excel. But the range of functions available doesn't appear to provide what I am looking for.
I have two columns of numbers. In A, I have what we'll call indentation levels. In B, I have values.
For any particular row that has child indentations, I want to use a formula in B that will calculate the sum of values in B from the next row down to the next instance of that row's A value if the corresponding value in A is the minumum it has been so far.
e.g.
row | A | B | calc'd
--------------------
1 | 0 | 9 | y
2 | 2 | 2 |
3 | 1 | 7 | y
4 | 2 | 3 |
5 | 2 | 4 |
6 | 0 | 5 | y
7 | 1 | 5 |
So, for row 1, the sum range will be rows 2 through 5. This part, I can do with an OFFSET MATCH.
The SUMIF should include row 2, as A2 is the minimum value in A2:A2.
Likewise, it should include row 3, as A3 is the minimum value in A2:A3.
But it should not include rows 4 or 5 in the sum, because their A-column values are not the minimum "so far". (These values have already been "summed up" into row 3.)
How do I create a ranged sumif with this "minimum-so-far" condition?
I found a solution to this. Not quite as clean as I wanted, but it does the trick:
Add a helper value to column C, which is the "parent row" is will sum into.
For example, C5 {=MAX(ROW($9:5)*(A$1:A4<A5))} (note: array function).
Making the final equation for B1 =SUMIF(C2:Cn,"="&ROW(),B2:Bn) (where n is the upper limit of the working range).
As written here, inserting lines messes things up, but it can all be expanded with OFFSETs for row insertability.
I have two spreadsheets built. I want to be able to put what step a teacher is in which looks like this; BS, 1 or BS, 2 etc. (My second worksheet has each step and salary on it) I then would like the cell directly next to it to pull the correct salary amount from my other Worksheet.
I would add a picture, however it won't let me. Thank you for any help you can offer me.
Assuming the name of the teacher and category of the teacher is in Sheet1 columns A and B
(A) | (B)
|
Max | 1
Tammy | 4
Alex | 2
and on Sheet 2 you have category and salary
(A) | (B)
|
1 | 30000
2 | 45000
3 | 75000
4 | 120000
Then in cell C1 on sheet 1 you would use the formula:
=VLOOKUP($B1,'Sheet2!$A$1:$B$4,2,0)
You would then copy this formula down as required.
Alternatively you could achieve the same results with an INDEX/MATCH combination
=INDEX('Sheet2'!$B$1:$B$4,MATCH(B1,'Sheet2'!$A1:$A$2),0)
Okay this one is a bit strange to explain, but I have a file like this:
A B
1 | Person
2 | Person test
3 | Record
4 | Record test
5 | Tiger
6 | Scott
7 | Scott test
8 | Scott test
9 | Scott test
As you can see, in column A the first row where a new value starts, column B is blank. What I need is to fill in a placeholder (NULL) value into column B if there is only one contiguous value in column A. So for the above example row 5 only has 1 contiguous value so the result should look like this:
A B
1 | Person
2 | Person test
3 | Record
4 | Record test
5 | Tiger (NULL)
6 | Scott
7 | Scott test
8 | Scott test
9 | Scott test
I tried something like this but doesn't work:
IF(EXACT($A5,$A4)=FALSE AND EXACT($A5,$A6)=FALSE, "(NULL)", $B5)
I just want a formula I can paste all the way down column B. Any suggestions?
=IF(OR(A2=A1,A2=A3),"Test","(NULL)")
Replace Test and (NULL) with the values you want to display.
This checks to see if the AX = A(X-1) or A(X+1). If either of those is true, then it means that AX is contiguous with another row.
I should note that I tested this with Excel 2013.
Also, if you want the formula to use the value already in BX when the rows are contiguous, then you can't do that in the same column.
I'm not sure if that's what you're asking to do, but the formula you tried would have been attempting to do that, creating a circular reference.
You can easily do this in column C. Replace "Test" with BX. Then, if you only want 2 rows in the end, you can copy and paste the values of column C into column B, then delete column C. But, this way you'll lose your formula.
Suppose you have your data like this:
This formula seem to work:
=IF(OR(A2=A1,A2=A3),IF(B2="","",B2),"(NULL)")
I have a longitudinal spreadsheet of adolescent growth.
ID | CollectionDate | DOB | MOTHER ID | Sex
1 | 1Aug03 | 3Apr90 | 12 | 1
1 | 4Sept04 | 3Apr90 | 12 | 1
1 | 1Sept05 | 3Apr90 | 12 | 1
2 | 1Aug03 | 21Dec91 | 12 | 0
2 | 4Sept04 | 21Dec91 | 12 | 0
2 | 1Sept05 | 21Dec91 | 12 | 0
3 | 1Aug03 | 30Jan89 | 23 | 0
3 | 4Sept04 | 30Jan89 | 23 | 0
This is a sample of how my data is formatted and some of the variables that I have. As you can see, since it is longitudinal, each individual has multiple measurements. In the actual database there are over 10 measurements per individual and over 250 individuals.
What I am wanting to do is input a value signifying the number of older brothers and older sisters each individual has. That is why I have included the Mother ID (because it represents genetic relatedness) and sex. These new variable columns would just say how many older siblings of each sex each individual has. Is there a formula that I could use to do this quickly?
=COUNTIFS($B:$B,"<>"&$B2,$H:$H,$H2,$AI:$AI,$AI2,$J:$J,"<"&$J2)
Create a column named Distinct with this formula
=1/COUNTIF([ID],[#ID])
Then you can find all the older 0-sexed siblings like this
=SUMPRODUCT(([DOB]>[#DOB])*([MOTHERID]=[#MOTHERID])*([Sex]=0)*([Distinct]))
Note that I made the data a Table and used table notation. If you're not familiar [COLUMNNAME] refers to the whole column and [#COLUMNNAME] refers to the value in that column on the current row. It's similar to saying $A:$A and A2 if you're dealing with column A.
The first formula gives you a value to count that will always result in 1 for a particular ID. So ID=1 has three lines and Distinct will result in .33333 for each line. When you add up the three lines you get 1. This is similar to a SELECT DISTINCT in Sql parlance.
The SUMPRODUCT formula sums [Distinct] for every row where the DOB is greater than the current DOB, the Mother is the same as the current Mother, and the Sex is zero.
I have a possible solution. It involves adding two columns -- One for "# older siblings" and one for "unique?". So here are all the headings I have currently:
A -- ID
B -- CollectionDate
C -- DOB
D -- MOTHER ID
E -- Sex
F -- # older siblings
G -- unique?
In G2, I added the following formula:
=IF(A2=A1,0,1)
And dragged down. As long as the data is sorted by ID, this will only display "1" once for each unique person.
In F2, I added the following formula:
=COUNTIFS(G:G,"=1",D:D,"="&D2,C:C,"<"&C2)
And dragged down. It seemed to work correctly for the sample data you provided.
The stipulations are:
You would need the two columns.
The data would need to be sorted by ID
I hope this helps.
You need a formula like this (for example, for row 2):
=COUNTIFS($A:$A,"<>"&$A2,$E:$E,$E2,$D:$D,$D2,$C:$C,"<"&$C2)
Assuming E:E is column for sex, D:D is column for mother ID and C:C is column for DOB.
Write this formula in H2 cell for example and drag it down.