Can multiple azure functions read from single partition on event hub. Can they scale up more then number of partitions in event hub?
Yes, that is possible.
Let's say your Event Hub has N partitions. Function might be running on M instances (servers). Each partition will be locked by one of the servers, i.e. two servers won't concurrently process messages from the same partition. M <= N will hold.
Each server may run multiple function executions in parallel. They can be from multiple partitions, but also the server might process several events from the same batch from the same partition at the same time.
The simplest experiment which shows that:
1 partition in Event Hub
Azure Function which sleeps for 10 seconds for each event
Send 10 events to the hub at the same time
In the logs you will see that they were processed in parallel, not sequentially.
Related
I've Spark Streaming job which captures the near real time data from Azure Eventhub and runs 24/7.
More interestingly, my job fails at least 2 times a day with the below error. if I google the error, Microsoft docs gives me 'This exception is thrown if two or more PartitionReceiver instances connect to the same partition with different epoch values'. I'm not worried about data loss because spark Checkpointing will automatically take care of data when i restart the job, but my question is why the spark streaming job fails 2-3 times a day with the same error.
Has anybody faced the same issue, is there any solution/workaround available of this. Any help would be much appreciated.
error:
This exception is thrown if two or more Partitions Receiver instances connect to the same partition with different epoch values.
What is Partition Receiver?
This is a logical representation of receiving from a EventHub partition.
A PartitionReceiver is tied to a ConsumerGroup + Partition combination. If you are creating an epoch based PartitionReceiver (i.e. PartitionReceiver.Epoch != 0) you cannot have more than one active receiver per ConsumerGroup + Partition combo. You can have multiple receivers per ConsumerGroup + Partition combination with non-epoch receivers.
It sounds like you are running two instances of the application, two concurrent classes, or two applications that use the same event hub consumer group. Event hub consumer groups are effectively pointers to a point in time on the event stream. If you try and use one consumer group pointing with two instances of code, then you get a conflict like the one you are seeing.
Either:
Ensure you only have a single instance reading the consumer group at a time.
Use two consumer groups when you need two separate programs or sets of functionality to process the event hub at the same time.
If you are looking to parallelize for performance, look in to event hub Partitioning and how to take advantage of processing each partition independently.
There is also an alternative scenario where an event hub partition is switched over to another host as part of the event hub's internal load balancing. In this case you may see the error you are receiving. In this case, just log it and continue on.
For more details, refer "Features and terminology in Azure Event Hubs" and "Event Hubs Receiver Epoch".
Hope this helps.
We have an EventHub with a retention of 1 day, containing millions of messages. To consume this, we have an Azure Function which reads from this event hub via the Event Hub Binding. The function basically reads the raw bytes, deserializes it into a json, does some transformations, and outputs it to another event hub.
It takes an EventData[] as input, to allow us to receive a batch of EventData at once. We have configured it to receive 1024 messages per batch.
When we start the function, and it needs to reprocess the last 24 hours, it's only using 1 node of the available 5 we have in the app service plan, as can be seen in the metrics:
According to the docs, scaling should behave like this:
When your function is first enabled, there is only one instance of the function. Let's call this function instance Function_0. Function_0 has a single EventProcessorHost instance that has a lease on all ten partitions. This instance is reading events from partitions 0-9. From this point forward, one of the following happens:
New function instances are not needed: Function_0 is able to process all 1000 events before the Functions scaling logic kicks in. In this case, all 1000 messages are processed by Function_0.
An additional function instance is added: The Functions scaling logic determines that Function_0 has more messages than it can process. In this case, a new function app instance (Function_1) is created, along with a new EventProcessorHost instance. Event Hubs detects that a new host instance is trying read messages. Event Hubs load balances the partitions across the its host instances. For example, partitions 0-4 may be assigned to Function_0 and partitions 5-9 to Function_1.
N more function instances are added: The Functions scaling logic determines that both Function_0 and Function_1 have more messages than they can process. New function app instances Function_2...Functions_N are created, where N is greater than the number of event hub partitions. In our example, Event Hubs again load balances the partitions, in this case across the instances Function_0...Functions_9.
I believe we're hitting option #1, even though we have 24 hours of data on the event hub with only 1 node processing the data. At this rate it takes many hours to process, while 4 nodes are idle.
How does Azure Function know when to scale in this scenario, and can we influence this behavior?
I have an Azure Function that has EventHub trigger, with Consumption plan. In my test I shoot 3000 events to event hub using in a few batches. Since time for those 3000 events was almost 10 times bigger than the time for 300 events, I suspected that this Azure Function didn't scale to multiple VMs/instances.
To verify that hypothesis, I used a Guid static variable, which I initialized once and logged in every run of the function. All 3000 runs logged the same Guid.
That happens even if I specify following configuration in host.json:
"eventHub": {
"maxBatchSize": 1,
"prefetchCount": 10
}
Logic was that this would limit parallel processing within single instance and multiple instances would be started because of that, but again only 1 Guid is logged.
As a note, this is not the only function in App Service. Could that be the issue? What is the condition that needs to be satisfied so that Function is started on multiple VMs?
Edit:
I have 32 partitions and 20 throughput units. First issue was that I was using SendBatchAsync, which doesn't partition events. Even SendAsync didn't bring any scale, like it wasn't partitioning. So I created partitioned eventhub senders and did round robin partitioning when sending events in client application.
That increased number of events processed by AzureFunction, but still didn't create more than 1 VM.
Furthermore, number of events processed per second was much larger in the beginning (~200 in each moment), and after 2000 events, or near the end, they dropped to ~5. This has nothing to do with load of the system, as same behavior was observed with 9000 events, where slowing down happened after ~5k events.
This Azure function lasts 50-250 ms, depending on the load.
It also sends event to another Azure function through Azure Storage Queue trigger. What is interesting is that neither that function which is triggered by Queue trigger scales to more than 1 VM, and it has ~1k messages in queue at the beginning, before slowness of eventhub triggered azure function. Queue settings in host.json are "queues": {
"maxPollingInterval": 2000,
"visibilityTimeout" : "00:00:10",
"batchSize": 32,
"maxDequeueCount": 5,
"newBatchThreshold": 1
}
Thanks.
It depends on a few factors:
the number of partitions your event hub has and whether the events you are writing are being distributed across your partitions. Azure Functions uses Event Processor Host to process your workload and the maximum scale you can get in this mode is one VM per partition.
the per-event workload you're executing. For example if your function does nothing but log, those 3000 events could be processed in less than 5 seconds on a single VM. This would not warrant scaling your application onto multiple instances.
However if you're writing a batch of events across several partitions which takes several minutes in total to process and you don't see your throughput accelerating as your function scales up then that could indicate that something is not working right and would warrant further investigation.
Just have a couple of questions regarding the usage of Azure Functions with an EventHub in an IoT scenario.
EventHub has partitions. Typically messages from a specific device go to the same partition. How are the instances of an Azure Function distributed across EventHub partitions? Is it based on the performance? In case one instance of an Azure Function manages to process events from all partitions then it is enough otherwise one might end up with one instance of an Azure Function per EventHub partition?
What about the read-offset? Does this binding somehow records where it stopped reading the event stream? I thought the functions are meant to be stateless and here we have some state.
Thanks
Each instance of an Event Hub-Triggered Function is backed by only 1 EventProcessorHost(EPH) instance. Event Hub ensures that only 1 EPH can get a lease on a given partition.
Answer to Question 1:
Let's elaborate on this with a contrived example. Suppose we begin with the following setup and assumptions for an EventHub:
10 partitions.
1000 events distributed evenly across all partitions => 100 messages in each partition.
When your Function is first enabled, there is only 1 instance of the Function. Let's call this Function instance Function_0. Function_0 will have 1 EPH that manages to get a lease on all 10 partitions. Let this EPH be called EPH_0, and it will start reading events from partitions 0-9. From this point forward, one of the following will happen:
Only 1 Function instance is needed - Function_0 is able to process all 1000 before the Azure Functions' scaling logic kicks in.
Hence, all 1000 messages are processed by Function_0.
Add 1 more Function instance - Azure Functions' scaling logic determines that Function_0 seems sluggish, so a new instance
Function_1 is created, resulting in EPH_1. Event Hub detects that a new EPH instance is trying read messages. Event Hub will start load
balancing the partitions across the EPH instances, e.g., partitions
0-4 are assigned to EPH_0 and partitions 5-9 are assigned to EPH_1.
If all Function execution succeed without errors, both EPH_0 and
EPH_1 checkpoints successfully and all 1000 messages are processed. When check-pointing succeeds, all 1000 messages should never be retrieved again.
Add N more function instances - Azure Functions' scaling logic determines that both Function_0 and Function_1 are still sluggish and
will repeat workflow 2 again for Function_2...N, where N>9. Event Hub will load balance the partitions across Function_0...9 instances.
Unique to Azure Functions' current scaling logic is the fact that N is >(number of partitions). This is done to ensure
that there are always instances of EPH readily available to quickly
get a lock on the partition(s). As a customer, you are only charged for the resources used when your Function instance executes, but you are not charged for this over-provisioning.
Answer to Question 2:
EPH uses a check-pointing mechanism to mark the last known successfully read message. An EventHub-Triggered Function can be setup to process 1 message or a batch of messages at a time. The option you choose needs to consider the following:
1. Speed of message processing - Processing messages in batches instead of a single message at a time is one of the factors that will speed up the ability of your Azure Function workflow to keep up with the incoming messages in your Event Hub.
2. Tolerance for duplicates - If check-pointing fails due to errors in your Function code/(Updated Aug 24th, 2017) timeout/partition least lost, then the next EPH that gets a lease on that partition will start retrieving messages from the last known checkpoint. Event Hub guarantees at-least-once delivery but not at-most-once delivery. Azure Functions will not attempt to change that behavior. If not having duplicate messages is a priority, then you will need to mitigate it in your workflow. As such, when check-pointing fails, there are more duplicate messages to manage if your Function is processing messages at batch level.
Function Apps are based on WebJobs SDK, which use EventHostProcessor to consume events from Event Hubs. So you can lookup information about EventHostProcessor and it will be applicable to your Function App.
Particularly, you can find the implementation of IEventProcessor
here.
To your questions:
Not sure what you mean by "one instance". One listener will be created per partition, but they can be both hosted inside a single App Plan Instance if the load is low. On the high level, you should not care much: in Consumption Plan you pay per execution time, no matter how many servers/processes/threads are running. Of course, you should care whether the auto-scaling works good enough for high load, but that needs to be tested anyway.
Functions are stateless in a sense that you can't save anything in-memory between two function executions. You are totally fine to save state in external storage. Function App will use PartitionContext.CheckpointAsync() for checkpointing of the current offset. Azure Storage is used internally; again you can read more about how it works in Event Hubs and EventHostProcessor docs, e.g. here.
I am working on the POC for Azure Event hubs to implement the same into our application.
Quick Brief on flow.
Created tool to read the CSV data from local folder and send it to event hub.
We are sending Event Data in Batch to event hub.
With 12 instance of tool (Parallel), I can send a total of 600 000 lines of messages to Event hub within 1 min.
But, On receiver side, to receive the 600 000 lines of data, it takes more than 10 mins.
Need to achieve
I would like to Match/double my egress speed on the receiver to
process the data. Existing Configuration
The configuration I have made user are
TU - 10 One Event hub with 32 Partition.
Coding logic goes same as mentioned in MSDN
Only difference is, I am sending line of data in a batch.
EventProcessorhost with options {MaxBatchSize= 1000000,
PrefetchCount=1000000
To achieve higher egress rate (aka faster processing pipeline) in eventhubs:
Create a Scaled-out pipeline - each partition in EventHub is the unit-of-scale for processing events out of EventHub. With the Scale you described (6Lakh events per min --> 10K events per sec - with 32 partitions - you already got this right). Make sure you create as many partitions as you envision your pipeline need in near future. Imagine analyzing traffic on a Highway and no. of lanes is the only limitation for the amount of traffic.
Equal load distribution across partitions: if you are using SendToASpecificPartition or SendUsingPartitionKey - you will need to take care of equal load distribution. If you use EventHubClient.Send(EventDataWithOutPartitionKey) - EventHubs service will make sure all of your partitions are equally loaded. If a single EventHub Partition is heavily loaded - the amount of time you can process all events on EventHub will be bound by no. of events on this Partition.
Scale-out physical resources on the Receiver/EventProcessorHost: most importantly Network (Sockets & bandwidth) & after-a-point, CPU & Memory. Use PartitionManagerOptions.MaxReceiveClients to increase the maximum number of EventHubClients (which has a dedicated MessagingFactory, which maps to 1 socket) created per EventProcessorHost instance. By default it is 16.
Let me know how it went... :)
More on Event Hubs.