I am using a MockWebServiceServer to test the REST APIs. I am passing the values to it using #Runwith(Parameterized.class).
#RunWith(Parameterized.class)
public class MyAPITest {
protected static MockWebServiceServer mockServer;
private Message message;
public MyAPITest(Message messageIn) {
this.message = messageIn;
}
#BeforeClass
public static void setup(){
mockServer = MockWebServiceServer.createServer(applicationContext);
}
#Test
public final void testMethod() throws Throwable {
Source reqPayload1 = new StringSource("...");
Source reqPayload2 = new StringSource("...");
Source resPayload1 = new StringSource("...");
Source resPayload2 = new StringSource("...");
mockServer.expect(RequestMatchers.payload(reqPayload1 )).andRespond(ResponseCreators.withPayload(resPayload1 ));
//Unable to add below line as it throws exception. Unable to set multiple expectation
//mockServer.expect(RequestMatchers.payload(reqPayload2 )).andRespond(ResponseCreators.withPayload(resPayload2 ));
myClass.onMessage(this.message);
mockServer.verify();
}
#Parameters
public static Collection<Object[]> getParameters() {
//Read input data from file
}
}
Code works fine when I've only 1 input.
But it throws exception when I've more than one input.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Can not expect another connection, the test is already underway
at org.springframework.util.Assert.state(Assert.java:385)
at org.springframework.ws.test.client.MockWebServiceMessageSender.expectNewConnection(MockWebServiceMessageSender.java:64)
at org.springframework.ws.test.client.MockWebServiceServer.expect(MockWebServiceServer.java:162)
at com.rakuten.gep.newsletter.batch.ExacttargetMQJobTest.testOnMessage(ExacttargetMQJobTest.java:82)
I'm using Spring 3.2. I want to test my api with multiple inputs.
Related
I have a spring integration project with multiple tests that runs perfectly fine on Windows and Linux machines. Now, I've just bought a MacBook and tried running the tests on it. All of my file adapter tests (15) are failing.
The below example test verifies that when a file is placed in the inboundOutDirectory directory, that it's properly processed.
Test class example:
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(
initializers = ConfigFileApplicationContextInitializer.class,
classes = {StructuralEnricherIntegrationFlow.class, StructuralEnricherIntegrationFlowTests.Config.class})
#SpringIntegrationTest
#DirtiesContext
public class StructuralEnricherIntegrationFlowTests {
#Autowired
private MockIntegrationContext mockIntegrationContext;
#Autowired
private File inboundOutDirectory;
#Autowired
private File inboundProcessedDirectory;
#Autowired
private File inboundFailedDirectory;
#Autowired
private PollableChannel testChannel;
#After
public void tearDown() throws IOException {
FileUtils.cleanDirectory(inboundOutDirectory);
FileUtils.cleanDirectory(inboundProcessedDirectory);
FileUtils.cleanDirectory(inboundFailedDirectory);
}
#Test
public void testStructuralEnricherFlowEmptyResponse() throws Exception {
// given
String docId = "xxx";
// when
MessageHandler mockMessageHandler = mockMessageHandler().handleNextAndReply(m -> "{}");
this.mockIntegrationContext.substituteMessageHandlerFor("structuralEnricherEndpoint", mockMessageHandler);
String fileName = TestingUtils.createFileAggregated(docId, 1, ".json", inboundOutDirectory,
"{}");
// then
Message<String> receive = (Message<String>) testChannel.receive(3000);
JSONAssert.assertEquals(String.format("{xxx"),
receive.getPayload(), JSONCompareMode.LENIENT);
assertTrue(FileUtils.getFile(new File(this.inboundProcessedDirectory, fileName)).exists());
}
#Configuration
#EnableIntegration
public static class Config {
#Autowired
private File inboundOutDirectory;
#Bean
public PollableChannel testChannel() {
return new QueueChannel();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow processedDirectory(#Value("${pattern}") String pattern) {
return IntegrationFlows
.from(Files.inboundAdapter(inboundOutDirectory)
.regexFilter(pattern)
.useWatchService(true)
.watchEvents(FileReadingMessageSource.WatchEventType.CREATE),
e -> e.poller(Pollers.fixedDelay(100)))
.transform(Files.toStringTransformer())
.channel("testChannel")
.get();
}
}
}
It seems that the testChannel never receives a message as I'm getting a NullPointerException at receive.getPayload(). I've tried increasing the timeout but it didn't help.
System info:
spring-boot-starter-parent 2.3.4.RELEASE
MacBook Pro 13 (2020) with macOS Big Sur 11.1
openjdk version "1.8.0_275"
The same test works for example on ubuntu with java version 1.8.0_275.
I'm not sure what's the problem so hopefully, you can help me out.
UPDATE
So it seems that the problem lies in the useWatchService(true) in the Files.inboundAdapter. This is how the processing of the document is currently triggered:
return IntegrationFlows
.from(Files.inboundAdapter(inboundOutDirectory)
.regexFilter(intermediatePattern)
.useWatchService(true)
.watchEvents(FileReadingMessageSource.WatchEventType.CREATE,
FileReadingMessageSource.WatchEventType.DELETE),
e -> e.poller(Pollers.fixedDelay(1000)
.taskExecutor(Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2))
.maxMessagesPerPoll(5)))
I have debugged this flow a bit more and it appears that when .useWatchService(true), then the adapter will pick up the file with a delay (it takes about 10 seconds). Not sure why it works differently on macOS. When I change it to .useWatchService(false), it works instantly.
Here is the util method that creates the files:
public static String createFileAggregated(String id, Integer documentId, String extension, File tmpDir, String content) throws Exception {
String filename = String.format("%s%04d%s", id, documentId, extension);
FileUtils.write(new File(tmpDir, filename), (Optional.ofNullable(content).orElse(filename)), "UTF-8", false);
return filename;
}
I am performing instrumentation testing, in that I am invoking one of the activities which call 2 APIs when activity is created.
Now I want to write instrumentation test cases for this activity, where I have to mock the API response with mockWebServer of mockito. My mocking code works fine when I call one single API, but it fails when two APIs are getting called simultaneously.
Even there is another scenario let's say, we have API to fetch recent message data, but before that, we always authenticate the user by sending refresh token.
In such cases, we need to call API which authenticates the user and then another API to fetch message data. Hence we need to call 2 APIs one after another, let's say in a single method. How will I mock authentication API response and messages API response while writing test cases of that single method?
How should I deal with this issue? Is there any other approach to deal with such a situation where we need to call more than one API at the same time?
Also, I have used SystemClock.sleep(4000); as my callbacks were getting performed asynchronously.
Below is my code to mock API:
public class MyAPIActivityTest {
#Rule
public InstantTaskExecutorRule mInstantTaskExecutorRule = new InstantTaskExecutorRule();
#Rule
public ActivityTestRule<MyAPIActivity> myAPIActivityTestRule = new ActivityTestRule<>(MyAPIActivity.class, true, false);
MockWebServer mockWebServer;
#Before
public void setUp() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}
#Test
public void checkVisibilityOfTaskListMockedValidData() throws Exception {
myAPIActivityTestRule.launchActivity(null);
String fileName = "json_files/valid_api_response.json";
mockWebServer = new MockWebServer();
int PORT_NUMBER = 50205;
mockWebServer.start(PORT_NUMBER);
ApiUrls.BASE_QUERY_URL = mockWebServer.url("/").toString();
mockWebServer.enqueue(new MockResponse()
.setBody(getStringFromFile(getContext(), fileName)));
SystemClock.sleep(4000);
Assert.assertEquals(View.VISIBLE, myAPIActivityTestRule.IvDataIsPresent.getVisibility());
Assert.assertEquals(View.GONE, myAPIActivityTestRule.IvDataNotPresent.getVisibility());
}
#After
public void tearDown() throws Exception {
mockWebServer.shutdown();
}
public static String convertStreamToString(InputStream inputStream) throws Exception {
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inputStream));
StringBuilder stringBuilder = new StringBuilder();
String line;
while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
stringBuilder.append(line).append(StringCharacters.NEW_LINE);
}
reader.close();
return stringBuilder.toString();
}
public static String getStringFromFile(Context context, String filePath) throws Exception {
final InputStream stream = context.getResources().getAssets().open(filePath);
String text = convertStreamToString(stream);
stream.close();
return text;
}
}
Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I wanted to debug the Seed() method in my Entity Framework database configuration class when I run Update-Database from the Package Manager Console but didn't know how to do it. I wanted to share the solution with others in case they have the same issue.
Here is similar question with a solution that works really well.
It does NOT require Thread.Sleep.
Just Launches the debugger using this code.
Clipped from the answer
if (!System.Diagnostics.Debugger.IsAttached)
System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Launch();
The way I solved this was to open a new instance of Visual Studio and then open the same solution in this new instance of Visual Studio. I then attached the debugger in this new instance to the old instance (devenv.exe) while running the update-database command. This allowed me to debug the Seed method.
Just to make sure I didn't miss the breakpoint by not attaching in time I added a Thread.Sleep before the breakpoint.
I hope this helps someone.
If you need to get a specific variable's value, a quick hack is to throw an exception:
throw new Exception(variable);
A cleaner solution (I guess this requires EF 6) would IMHO be to call update-database from code:
var configuration = new DbMigrationsConfiguration<TContext>();
var databaseMigrator = new DbMigrator(configuration);
databaseMigrator.Update();
This allows you to debug the Seed method.
You may take this one step further and construct a unit test (or, more precisely, an integration test) that creates an empty test database, applies all EF migrations, runs the Seed method, and drops the test database again:
var configuration = new DbMigrationsConfiguration<TContext>();
Database.Delete("TestDatabaseNameOrConnectionString");
var databaseMigrator = new DbMigrator(configuration);
databaseMigrator.Update();
Database.Delete("TestDatabaseNameOrConnectionString");
But be careful not to run this against your development database!
I know this is an old question, but if all you want is messages, and you don't care to include references to WinForms in your project, I made some simple debug window where I can send Trace events.
For more serious and step-by-step debugging, I'll open another Visual Studio instance, but it's not necessary for simple stuff.
This is the whole code:
SeedApplicationContext.cs
using System;
using System.Data.Entity;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Windows.Forms;
namespace Data.Persistence.Migrations.SeedDebug
{
public class SeedApplicationContext<T> : ApplicationContext
where T : DbContext
{
private class SeedTraceListener : TraceListener
{
private readonly SeedApplicationContext<T> _appContext;
public SeedTraceListener(SeedApplicationContext<T> appContext)
{
_appContext = appContext;
}
public override void Write(string message)
{
_appContext.WriteDebugText(message);
}
public override void WriteLine(string message)
{
_appContext.WriteDebugLine(message);
}
}
private Form _debugForm;
private TextBox _debugTextBox;
private TraceListener _traceListener;
private readonly Action<T> _seedAction;
private readonly T _dbcontext;
public Exception Exception { get; private set; }
public bool WaitBeforeExit { get; private set; }
public SeedApplicationContext(Action<T> seedAction, T dbcontext, bool waitBeforeExit = false)
{
_dbcontext = dbcontext;
_seedAction = seedAction;
WaitBeforeExit = waitBeforeExit;
_traceListener = new SeedTraceListener(this);
CreateDebugForm();
MainForm = _debugForm;
Trace.Listeners.Add(_traceListener);
}
private void CreateDebugForm()
{
var textbox = new TextBox {Multiline = true, Dock = DockStyle.Fill, ScrollBars = ScrollBars.Both, WordWrap = false};
var form = new Form {Font = new Font(#"Lucida Console", 8), Text = "Seed Trace"};
form.Controls.Add(tb);
form.Shown += OnFormShown;
_debugForm = form;
_debugTextBox = textbox;
}
private void OnFormShown(object sender, EventArgs eventArgs)
{
WriteDebugLine("Initializing seed...");
try
{
_seedAction(_dbcontext);
if(!WaitBeforeExit)
_debugForm.Close();
else
WriteDebugLine("Finished seed. Close this window to continue");
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Exception = e;
var einner = e;
while (einner != null)
{
WriteDebugLine(string.Format("[Exception {0}] {1}", einner.GetType(), einner.Message));
WriteDebugLine(einner.StackTrace);
einner = einner.InnerException;
if (einner != null)
WriteDebugLine("------- Inner Exception -------");
}
}
}
protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (disposing && _traceListener != null)
{
Trace.Listeners.Remove(_traceListener);
_traceListener.Dispose();
_traceListener = null;
}
base.Dispose(disposing);
}
private void WriteDebugText(string message)
{
_debugTextBox.Text += message;
Application.DoEvents();
}
private void WriteDebugLine(string message)
{
WriteDebugText(message + Environment.NewLine);
}
}
}
And on your standard Configuration.cs
// ...
using System.Windows.Forms;
using Data.Persistence.Migrations.SeedDebug;
// ...
namespace Data.Persistence.Migrations
{
internal sealed class Configuration : DbMigrationsConfiguration<MyContext>
{
public Configuration()
{
// Migrations configuration here
}
protected override void Seed(MyContext context)
{
// Create our application context which will host our debug window and message loop
var appContext = new SeedApplicationContext<MyContext>(SeedInternal, context, false);
Application.Run(appContext);
var e = appContext.Exception;
Application.Exit();
// Rethrow the exception to the package manager console
if (e != null)
throw e;
}
// Our original Seed method, now with Trace support!
private void SeedInternal(MyContext context)
{
// ...
Trace.WriteLine("I'm seeding!")
// ...
}
}
}
Uh Debugging is one thing but don't forget to call:
context.Update()
Also don't wrap in try catch without a good inner exceptions spill to the console.
https://coderwall.com/p/fbcyaw/debug-into-entity-framework-code-first
with catch (DbEntityValidationException ex)
I have 2 workarounds (without Debugger.Launch() since it doesn't work for me):
To print message in Package Manager Console use exception:
throw new Exception("Your message");
Another way is to print message in file by creating a cmd process:
// Logs to file {solution folder}\seed.log data from Seed method (for DEBUG only)
private void Log(string msg)
{
string echoCmd = $"/C echo {DateTime.Now} - {msg} >> seed.log";
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("cmd.exe", echoCmd);
}
I'm trying to write a target for NLog to send messages out to connected clients using SignalR.
Here's what I have now. What I'm wondering is should I be using resolving the ConnectionManager like this -or- somehow obtain a reference to the hub (SignalrTargetHub) and call a SendMessage method on it?
Are there performance ramifications for either?
[Target("Signalr")]
public class SignalrTarget:TargetWithLayout
{
public SignalR.IConnectionManager ConnectionManager { get; set; }
public SignalrTarget()
{
ConnectionManager = AspNetHost.DependencyResolver.Resolve<IConnectionManager>();
}
protected override void Write(NLog.LogEventInfo logEvent)
{
dynamic clients = GetClients();
var logEventObject = new
{
Message = this.Layout.Render(logEvent),
Level = logEvent.Level.Name,
TimeStamp = logEvent.TimeStamp.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff")
};
clients.onLoggedEvent(logEventObject);
}
private dynamic GetClients()
{
return ConnectionManager.GetClients<SignalrTargetHub>();
}
}
I ended up with the basic the same basic structure that I started with. Just a few tweaks to get the information I needed.
Added exception details.
Html encoded the final message.
[Target("Signalr")]
public class SignalrTarget:TargetWithLayout
{
protected override void Write(NLog.LogEventInfo logEvent)
{
var sb = new System.Text.StringBuilder();
sb.Append(this.Layout.Render(logEvent));
if (logEvent.Exception != null)
sb.AppendLine().Append(logEvent.Exception.ToString());
var message = HttpUtility.HtmlEncode(sb.ToString());
var logEventObject = new
{
Message = message,
Logger = logEvent.LoggerName,
Level = logEvent.Level.Name,
TimeStamp = logEvent.TimeStamp.ToString("HH:mm:ss.fff")
};
GetClients().onLoggedEvent(logEventObject);
}
private dynamic GetClients()
{
return AspNetHost.DependencyResolver.Resolve<IConnectionManager>().GetClients<SignalrTargetHub>();
}
}
In my simple testing it's working well. Still remains to be seen if this adds any significant load when under stress.
I'm trying to get windows workflows working, and I've become a little stumped.
I've gotten a single workflow working, but now I am trying to do something a little more complex: start a workflow, where each activity itself contains a workflow. (Picture something like the main program starts the activities "Input, logic, and output", and then each of those have additional activities like "prompt user, get input, etc.")
I've had it working fine, with the example from here (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg535667.aspx), when I am not passing any parameters from the main program to the activites. My question is, how exactly does the 'Variables' and 'metadata.SetVariablesCollection' work in the NativeActivity, and how to I get the parameters to the low level activities?
This is what I am currently trying:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Activities;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Activities.Statements;
namespace Project1
{
internal class MainProgram
{
internal static void Main(string[] args)
{
try
{
var act = new SimpleSequence();
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Activities.Add((Activity)(new WriteSomeText()));
act.Variables.Add(new Variable<string> ("stringArg", "TEXT"));
WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(act);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
System.Console.WriteLine("EXCEPTION: {0}", ex);
}
}
public class WriteSomeText : CodeActivity
{
[RequiredArgument]
public InArgument<string> stringArg { get; set; }
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context)
{
string output = context.GetValue(stringArg);
System.Console.WriteLine(output);
}
}
public class SimpleSequence : NativeActivity
{
Collection<Activity> activities;
Collection<Variable> variables;
Variable<int> current = new Variable<int> { Default = 0 };
public Collection<Activity> Activities
{
get
{
if (this.activities == null)
this.activities = new Collection<Activity>();
return this.activities;
}
set
{
this.activities = value;
}
}
public Collection<Variable> Variables
{
get
{
if (this.variables == null)
this.variables = new Collection<Variable>();
return this.variables;
}
set
{
this.variables = value;
}
}
protected override void CacheMetadata(NativeActivityMetadata metadata)
{
metadata.SetChildrenCollection(this.activities);
metadata.SetVariablesCollection(this.variables);
metadata.AddImplementationVariable(this.current);
}
protected override void Execute(NativeActivityContext context)
{
if (this.Activities.Count > 0)
context.ScheduleActivity(this.Activities[0], onChildComplete);
}
void onChildComplete(NativeActivityContext context, ActivityInstance completed)
{
int currentExecutingActivity = this.current.Get(context);
int next = currentExecutingActivity + 1;
if (next < this.Activities.Count)
{
context.ScheduleActivity(this.Activities[next], this.onChildComplete);
this.current.Set(context, next);
}
}
}
}
}
This ends up throwing the following exception:
EXCEPTION: System.Activities.InvalidWorkflowException: The following errors were encountered while processing the workflow tree:
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
'WriteSomeText': Value for a required activity argument 'stringArg' was not supplied.
at System.Activities.Validation.ActivityValidationServices.ThrowIfViolationsExist(IList`1 validationErrors)
at System.Activities.Hosting.WorkflowInstance.ValidateWorkflow(WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensionManager)
at System.Activities.Hosting.WorkflowInstance.RegisterExtensionManager(WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensionManager)
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.EnsureInitialized()
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.RunInstance(WorkflowApplication instance)
at System.Activities.WorkflowApplication.Invoke(Activity activity, IDictionary`2 inputs, WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensions, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.Activities.WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(Activity workflow, TimeSpan timeout, WorkflowInstanceExtensionManager extensions)
at System.Activities.WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(Activity workflow)
at Project1.MainProgram.Main(String[] args) in c:\users\user\documents\visual studio 2010\Projects\ModelingProject1\Project1\MainProgram.cs:line 25
I know, I only pass 1 parameter, but the exception still says that I am missing 3 parameters. I am missing something as to how to do this properly.
You're correctly declaring stringArg as an InArgument but you're not passing any value to it when calling it inside SimpleSequence.
You can pass something using the constructor, while constructing the all activity itself, like this:
public class WriteSomeText : CodeActivity
{
[RequiredArgument]
public InArgument<string> stringArg { get; set; }
public WriteSomeText(string stringArg)
{
this.stringArg = stringArg;
}
protected override void Execute(CodeActivityContext context
{
string output = context.GetValue(stringArg);
System.Console.WriteLine(output);
}
}
// Calling the activity like this:
internal static void Main(string[] args)
{
var act = new SimpleSequence()
{
Activities =
{
new WriteSomeText("hello"),
new WriteSomeText("world"),
new WriteSomeText("!")
}
};
WorkflowInvoker.Invoke(act);
Console.WriteLine("Press any key to exit");
Console.ReadKey();
}
Also notice that is a best practice to use the constructor to initialize collections:
public SimpleSequence()
{
activities = new Collection<Activity>();
variables = new Collection<Variable>();
}
This way is even more intuitive to initialize the activity:
var act = new SimpleSequence()
{
Activities =
{
new WriteSomeText("hello"),
new WriteSomeText("world"),
new WriteSomeText("!")
},
Variables =
{
new Variable<int>("myNewIntVar", 10),
// ....
}
};
EDIT:
There are a couple of other ways to approach the problem. This is your best friend while starting in the WF4 world.
Check WF\Basic\CustomActivities\Code-Bodied for a little push with this particular case.