I'm updating a value in my database under a field called message threads. Under that thread I want to store the keys of all the users and in that key I want their picture. From this I've constructed a loop containing the following:
firebase.database().ref('users/' + userUID + '/messageThreads/' + newThreadID).update({
"date": currentDate.getTime(),
"lastMessage": "",
"read": false,
"isGroup": true
});
console.log(groupUID);
firebase.database().ref('users/' + userUID + '/messageThreads/' + newThreadID + "/" + "userUID").update({
[groupUID]: [groupPic]
});
For some reason, under the database instead of the value of groupUID, it puts a zero.
Any suggestions?
The "0" was the array index (because you were pushing in the array [groupPic] instead of a plain value. That's easy, just use groupPic.
The dynamic key name is a bit trickier: the easiest way is to define the object ahead of time, before setting it in firebase:
var newVal = {};
newVal[groupUID] = groupPic;
firebase.database().ref('path/to/ref').update(newVal);
Or:
So I learned something today! (Thanks!) And now I understand how you wound up unintentionally using an array in the first place.
The shorthand notation you were using for the key was just fine, I'd just never seen it before. So this would work too, it's equivalent to the above (if potentially a bit more confusing to read, because it looks like it's going to be an array):
firebase.database().ref('path/to/ref').update({[groupUID]: groupPic});
Related
I have a json file called "GuideDB" which contains data about somethings.
GuildDB.json
{"GuideID":{"prefix":"","DJ":null,"Roles":""}}
Basically I want to access the data "Roles" in a way I can manage each element in that line, e.g.:
const myArray = GuildDB.Roles; //GuildDB.Roles is the only way to access that line.
myArray.forEach(element => {
console.log("<#&" + element + ">")
});
this code gives the error "forEach", because the array is not correctly formated.
How do I add Items in GuildDB.Roles?
client.database.guild.set(message.guild.id, {
prefix: GuildDB.prefix,
DJ: GuildDB.DJ,
Roles: GuildDB.Roles + ", " + createdRole.id, //Bug: First run always writes the comma first.
});
This will result the following:
{"GuideID":{"prefix":"","DJ":null,"Roles":", 123, 1234, 12345, 123456"}}
Which is not what I want.. and I don't care how this looks, I need to make it easy access to read/manage that data of Roles.
Hope anyone can help..
You can do something like this to convert Roles into array first and then use forEach loop on it.
const myArray = GuildDB.Roles.split(",");
So I have to go through a bunch of code to get some data from an iframe. the iframe has a lot of data but in there is an object called '_name'. the first key of name is 'extension_id' and its value is a big long string. the json object is enclosed in apostrophes. I have tried removing the apostrophes but still instead of 'extension_id_output' I get a single curly bracket. the json object looks something like this
Frame {
...
...
_name: '{"extension_id":"a big huge string that I need"} "a bunch of other stuff":"this is a valid json object as confirmed by jsonlint", "globalOptions":{"crev":"1.2.50"}}}'
}
it's a whole big ugly paragraph but I really just need the extension_id. so this is the code I'm currently using after attempt 100 or whatever.
var frames = await page.frames();
// I'm using puppeteer for this part but I don't think that's relevant overall.
var thing = frames[1]._name;
console.log(frames[1])
// console.log(thing)
thing.replace(/'/g, '"')
// this is to remove the apostrophes from the outside of the object. I thought that would change things before. it does not. still outputs a single {
JSON.parse(thing)
console.log(thing[0])
instead of getting a big huge string that I need or whatever is written in extension_id. I get a {. that's it. I think that is because the whole object starts with a curly bracket. this is confirmed to me because console.log(thing[2]) prints e. so what's going on? jsonlint says this is a valid json object but maybe it's just a big string and I should be doing some kind of split to grab whaat's between the first : and the first ,. I'm really not sure.
For two reasons:
object[0] doesn't return the value an object's "first property", it returns the value of the property with the name "0", if any (there probably isn't in your object); and
Because it's JSON, and when you're dealing with JSON in JavaScript code, you are by definition dealing with a string. (More here.) If you want to deal with the object that the JSON describes, parse it.
Here's an example of parsing it and getting the value of the extension_id property from it:
const parsed = JSON.parse(frames[1]._name);
console.log(parsed.extension_id); // The ID
I'm trying to create individual dictionary entries while looping through some input data. Part of the data is used for the key, while a different part is used as the value associated with that key. I'm running into a problem (due to Python's "everything is an object, and you reference that object" operations method) with this as ever iteration through my loop alters the key set in previous iterations, thus overwriting the previously set value, instead of creating a new dict key and setting it with its own value.
popcount = {}
for oneline of datafile:
if oneline[:3] == "POP":
dat1, dat2, dat3, dat4, dat5, dat6 = online.split(":")
datid = str.join(":", [dat2, dat3])
if datid in popcount:
popcount[datid] += int(dat4)
else:
popcount = { datid : int(dat4) }
This iterates over seven lines of data (datafile is a list containing that information) and should create four separate keys for datid, each with their own value. However, what ends up happening is that only the last value for datid exist in the dictionary when the code is run. That happens to be the one that has duplicates, and they get summed properly (so, at least i know that part of the code works, but the other key entries just are ... gone.
The data is read from a file, is colon (:) separated, and treated like a string even when its numeric (thus the int() call in the if datid in popcount).
What am I missing/doing wrong here? So far I haven't been able to find anything that helps me out on this one (though you folks have answered a lot of other Python questions i've run into, even if you didn't know it). I know why its failing; or, i think i do -- it is because when I update the value of datid the key gets pointed to the new datid value object even though I don't want it to, correct? I just don't know how to fix or work around this behavior. To be honest, its the one thing I dislike about working in Python (hopefully once I grok it, I'll like it better; until then...).
Simply change your last line
popcount = { datid : int(dat4) } # This does not do what you want
This creates a new dict and assignes it to popcount, throwing away your previous data.
What you want to do is add an entry to your dict instead:
popcount[datid] = int(dat4)
I've been tasked with an ExactTarget task, which uses Ampscript. Trying to learn on the go here. See code snippet below:
%%[
Var #testString, #testOutput
Set #testString = Qwerty
Set #testOutput = BuildRowsetFromString(#testString,"~")
]%%
TestOutput:%%= v(#testOutput) =%%
The code works if the testString contains a ~, but when there is no ~ character in the string, the ouput is blank. Is this correct by design? Do I need to add a conditional to check for the presence of the ~ character?
That's the expected behavior. The BuildRowsetFromString() function alone isn't going to return any value when displayed, you're going to need to use Row() and Field() in order to pull the value out.
Using your example:
%%[
Var #testString, #testOutput
Set #testString = "Qwerty"
Set #testOutput = BuildRowsetFromString(#testString,"~")
]%%
RowCount: %%=RowCount(#testOutput)=%%
TestOutput: %%=v(#testOutput)=%%
The RowCount() function returns a value of 1, essentially saying it knows there's at least one 'row' in there. To display that one value, you'll need to wrap that value with Field() and Row():
TestOutput: %%=Field(Row(#testOutput,1),1)=%%
If you want to display other values in the string, say you were passing "Qwerty~Second~Third", you'll need to either change the number at the Row() function or perform a loop.
References
Using Loops
BuildRowsetFromString() Function
what is the proper way to implement an autocomplete search with undescore?
i have a simple array (cities) and a text input field ($.autocomplete). when the user enters the first letters in the auto-complete textfield, it should output an array with all the cities starting with the entered letters (term).
cities:
["Graz","Hamburg","Innsbruck","Linz","München","Other","Salzburg","Wien"]
eventlistener:
$.autocomplete.addEventListener("change", function(e){
var cities = cities_array;
var term = $.autocomplete.value;
var results = _.filter(cities, function (city){
return
});
console.log(results + "this is results");
});
I’ve tried it with _.contains, but it only returns the city when its a complete match (e.g Graz is only output when „Graz“ is entered but not when „Gr“ is entered).
the _.filter/._select collection at http://underscorejs.org/docs/underscore.html are not very clear for me and the closest i found here is filtering JSON using underscore.
but i don’t understand the indexOf part.
thx for any suggestions!
By using #filter and #indexOf, you can get quite close to a pretty decent autocomplete.
What #indexOf does is that it checks the string if it contains the inputVal.
If it does not contain it it'll return -1 therefore our predicate below will work without fail.
Another small trick here is that you (read I) wanted it to be possible to search for s and get a hit for Innsbruck and Salzburg alike therefore I threw in #toLowerCase so that you always search in lower case.
return _.filter(cities, function(city) {
return city.toLowerCase().indexOf(inputVal.toLowerCase()) >= 0;
});