i have created Webhook on blockcypher.
HOOK :-
{
"id": "ddab39b1-fa67-4889-8159-d3003cd2ad2a",
"token": "mytoken_hidden_for_security",
"url": "https://requestb.in/1dgi1hr1?uniqid=594167735dfd3",
"callback_errors": 0,
"event": "unconfirmed-tx",
"hash": "2b17f5589528f97436b5d563635b4b27ca8980aa20c300abdc538f2a8bfa871b"
}
i am getting callback for lots of transaction but i did't getting any callback for my transaction.
means when i send BTC to my blockcypher generated address then i did't get any callback for that.
Thank You.
For an unconfirmed webhook you have to provide an address. Typically you can't provide a transaction hash for unconfirmed because you usually know the hash after it's broadcasted.
Related
I published a bot using the Azure bot framework to the Azure cloud servers, and made an application that uses the Direct Line API 3.0 to send user responses and receive bot messages through HTTP requests. Everything works except that I'm not sure how to get the starting message of the bot at the start of the conversation. I open the conversation with the /v3/directline/conversations endpoint, but I'm not sure how to receive the first message of the bot (that is normally sent without any user interaction). A message request after opening the conversation doesn't include any bot responses, but the next message request after sending the first user input includes the first two messages of the bot (starting message and response to the user).
EDIT: From reading this I came to the conclusion that it will be easier to just use a custom event as a trigger for the welcome message. I updated my bot as follows to reflect this within bot composer, adding a new CUSTOM event trigger with a test response message:
However, I still can't seem to trigger this event via the Direct Line API. Currently, I send a request as follows, following the event activity structure:
{
"type": "event",
"channelId": "directline",
"from": { "id": "UnityUserId", "name": "Unity User 1" },
"value": "test",
"name": "welcome"
}
I then get a response with ID, normally indicating that the request was successfull. However, upon requesting the bot response messages, I get the following:
{
"activities": [
{
"type": "event",
"id": "5FZsHpWBxm1hjhWQYY7gr-eu|0000000",
"timestamp": "2022-04-09T14:39:15.90169Z",
"serviceUrl": "https://directline.botframework.com/",
"channelId": "directline",
"from": {
"id": "UnityUserId",
"name": "Unity User 1"
},
"conversation": {
"id": "5FZsHpWBxm1hjhWQYY7gr-eu"
},
"value": "test",
"name": "welcome"
}
],
"watermark": "0"
}
Indicating that the bot has no responses, which doesn't seem quite right when looking at the bot composer screenshot above. Is there something wrong with my current method?
Regards
The onMembersAdded event usually does the trick. Sample code is in https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/bot-service/bot-builder-send-welcome-message?view=azure-bot-service-4.0&tabs=csharp
I thought I remembered seeing the bot's welcome message when using Direct Line, so I tried to quickly repro it again. I connected a simple echo bot via Direct Line. Then I created a conversation, sent a simple message, and then retrieved all activities (all via REST calls), and the bot's welcome message was indeed present in the response, as you can see in this screenshot:
Perhaps you should use these Direct Line 3.0 API reference docs as opposed to the one you linked above. I followed these steps using the basic Echo bot sample, Postman, and a bot resource in Azure for simple and easy testing, but you could use a full application if you wish.
I've been experimenting with the Fusion Lifecycle webhooks in Forge and have been successful using the item created/updated events but the workflow transition webhooks aren't firing.
The webhooks are created in Forge according to the Docs, as you can see below, but none of the transitions performed in the workspace will trigger the call.
They were created using a three-legged token associated with a Fusion Lifecycle user that has the proper workflow permissions on the workspace.
The following JSON excerpt is the workflow. transition webhook as returned from developer.api.autodesk.com/webhooks/v1/hooks endpoint on Forge showing it was indeed created.
{
"hookId": "909fd040-4e34-11ea-a842-651c9013b5e8",
"tenant": "TENANTNAMEREMOVED4SO",
"callbackUrl": "callbackurl removed for SO",
"createdBy": "46FGNL6DBN6D",
"event": "workflow.transition",
"createdDate": "2020-02-13T07:43:45.988+0000",
"system": "adsk.flc.production",
"creatorType": "O2User",
"status": "active",
"scope": {
"workflow.transition": "urn:adsk.plm:tenant.workspace.workflow.transition:TENANTNAMEREMOVED4SO.119.1.765"
},
"hookAttribute": {
"creator": "D3 Forge Playground",
"notification": {
"class": "alert-danger",
"system": "flc"
}
},
"urn": "urn:adsk.webhooks:events.hook:909fd040-4e34-11ea-a842-651c9013b5e8",
"__self__": "/systems/adsk.flc.production/events/workflow.transition/hooks/909fd040-4e34-11ea-a842-651c9013b5e8"
}
I've pushed the workflow through the transition events numerous times and no webhook is being fired and no failed requests on our webhook receiving server either. if I mimic the payload for the workflow. transition event and post it to our endpoint, it is received as expected.
I have yet to see a live example of the workflow. transition webhook being fired and can't find any sample code from Autodesk using them. Not sure the service is even working as expected at this point even though the item.created and item.updated webhook events seem to work fine.
Has anyone successfully received a workflow. transition webhook from Autodesk Forge? If yes, could you provide some guidance on how?
Seems to be working fine on my end in a Production tenant. This is the payload I used to create the webhook:
{
"callbackUrl": "https://webhook.site/SOME_ID",
"scope": {
"workflow.transition": "urn:adsk.plm:tenant.workspace.workflow.transition:TENANT.107.1.421"
}
}
Does it look like the payload you used when creating the hook?
Greg, any chance you can try to trigger it again, and send me the date/time stamp with tenant name via a private message? I just tried it again in my Production tenant, and it seems to be working just fine when I perform the operation from both a v3 API call, and the UI. Feel free to file a support case if you want, too, and let me know the case number. I'd like to help you out here in understanding what's going on, because overall it looks OK from your side.
I am creating a simple bot using Azure LUIS and this is my first one. I made some decent progress after doing some research and also now integrated with Slack as channel to test it.
The bot functionality is working fine, but I am looking to identify the user. So that I can personalize the bot conversation and also to pull the user specific information from his profile table.
Is there anyway, that I can get a UID or any reference ID of the slack user and so I can store that in my user table along with user profile?
So next time, when the user greets the bot, the bot can say "Hello, John." instead of justing say "Hello."
Thanks!
Yes. You can use the channelData object to get the ApiToken, and user values. For example, in C#, you could use turnContext.Activity.ChannelData to get those values in JSON:
{{
"SlackMessage": {
"token": "............",
"team_id": "<TEAM ID>",
"event": {
"type": "message",
"text": "thanks",
"user": "<USER WHO MESSAGED>",
"channel": "............",
"channel_type": "channel"
},
"type": "event_callback",
"event_id": ""............",
"event_time": 1553119134,
"authed_users": [
"............",
"<USER WHO MESSAGED>"
]
},
"ApiToken": "<ACTUAL TOKEN HERE>"
}}
Then, using those two pieces of information, you can then retrieve info from Slack.
https://slack.com/api/users.info?token=<ACTUAL TOKEN HERE>&user=<USER WHO MESSAGED>&pretty=1
And get a response that has the info you need:
{
"ok": true,
"user": {
"id": "<USER WHO MESSAGED>",
"team_id": "<TEAM ID>",
"real_name": "Dana V",
Ideally, you would would probably want to have bot user state setup and check that first, then if not there, then make the API call to Slack, then store in state. Therefore further requests don't need to go to Slack, but will just pull from the state store.
Basically, you could/should do this in the onTurn event. First, create your user state storage such as here.
Then you could check for that value and write to it if not populated. This example on simple prompts, might be helpful. You won't need to prompt for your user's name, as this example does, but does read/write username from state. You could still use dialogs, but you won't need them for the name prompting as you are doing that dynamically.
You can see here where username is being set and here where it is being retrieved. In this case, it is in the dialogs, but again; you would/could just do in the turn context (using logic to get and if not there, set).
I found the solution by priting the whole session object, which is having all the required informaiton. This could be same as mentioned by Dana above, but after debugging, this follwing made simple without making any changes.
var slackID = session.message.address.user.id
With above, I am able to identify the user.
Thanks.
I do not have a programming problem. I want to make my payments robust with no redundant state in my server. I also want to avoid that a hacker forces a double delivery using the same paymentID.
I verify the express payment on my server using ...
paypal.payment.get(paymentID, function (error, payment)
it returns a json as expected ...
{
"id": "PAY-69X53496F3347611XLM3WZ2A",
"intent": "sale",
"state": "created",
"cart": "4MV88706BE6849235",
"payer": { ...
It shows that it was paid, I want to mark it as delivered. Can I set that payment at Paypal in a state that indicates that it is delivered?
For instance ...
"state": "delivered",
I did not get any suggestions so I assume there is none and fell back to a simple database where I persist the delivery state locally.
I've been trying to do various things through your Mail REST API today and not having much success... My project (using the api) has been running for at least a month now, but requests to your api are failing.
For example:
GET https://outlook.office365.com/EWS/OData/Me/messages (works)
GET https://outlook.office365.com/EWS/OData/Me/inbox (doesn't work)
Looking at the documentation, still says its available.
Trying to send an email using:
POST https://outlook.office365.com/EWS/OData/Me/Messages?MessageDisposition=SendAndSaveCopy also just returns 400 (Bad Request)
Any info about this?
Also, the http status codes returned are not useful at all; almost all errors return as 400's. In one instance, I didn't provide auth creds, and a 400 was returned instead of the appropriate 401. The accompanying status code detail could also be more helpful.
Thanks for the feedback and sorry for the inconvenience. We are currently deploying some non-backwards compatible changes described here, and this is causing your issues. The current set of changes including versioning support, and deploying non-backwards compatible changes won't cause issues for your app in the future. For the queries, that don't work, please use the following:
Accessing Inbox: https://outlook.office365.com/ews/odata/me/folders/inbox
Send email (new action called SendMail):
POST https://outlook.office365.com/ews/odata/me/sendmail
{
"Message":
{
"Subject": "Test message",
"Body":
{
"Content": "This is test message!"
},
"ToRecipients":
[
{ "EmailAddress": { "Address": "John#contoso.com", "Name": "John Doe" }},
{ "EmailAddress": { "Address": "Jane#fabrikam.com", "Name": "Jane Smith" }}
]
},
"SaveToSentItems": true
}
Hope this helps. We are updating the documentation to reflect the changes, and it should be available shortly. Thanks for the feedback on the HTTP status codes, we will review the status codes returned currently and make any fixes required.
Conversation support is in our roadmap but we don't yet have a timeline to share. Currently, you can search using https://outlook.office365.com/ews/odata/Folders/FolderId/Messages?$filter=ConversationId%20eq%20%%27ConversationID%27 but this will only return messages within the specified folder belonging to that conversation.
Let me know if you have any questions or need more info.
Thanks,
Venkat