I tried to clean up entire codebase with Resharper's "Default configuration with regions". But Resharper is not creating any new regions.
CodeMaid works great but I don't want to use both tools - CodeMaid & Resharper.
I am primarily using CodeMaid since it generates regions in below format, Resharper doesn't.
#region Public Properties
#endregion Public Properties
#region Public Methods
#endregion Public Methods
#region Private Methods
#endregion Private Methods
//...
What I am looking for is Resharper's standard configuration file that I can import and should generate regions per above format. Resharper's File Layout editor/designer is very confusing.
Can ReSharper insert/normalize regions like CodeMaid does?
Yes, it can.
And, while I personally think expanding regions like that is a nightmare, here's where you set it:)
So, basically, you create or edit a pattern where you specify the groupings, and if you want to enclose something in a region, drag it from the toolbox, and then drop stuff into it.
Be carefull not to overdo it, I've been there, and now I am rather using the 'remove regions' feature of auto cleanup.
Related
I'm using this NetResource class to send files to a network drive and it looks like this:
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
public class NetResource
{
public ResourceScope Scope;
public ResourceType ResourceType;
public ResourceDisplayType DisplayType;
public int Usage;
public string LocalName;
public string RemoteName;
public string Comment;
public string Provider;
}
Now it's very important that the order of these fields stay the same, as hinted on by the StructLayout attribute.
However, when someone would run a resharper cleanup, resharper decides to move the fields around and that would break the code.
Is there any way of telling rehsarper to not mess with it? I feel like if I can't do that, someone is going to eventually break the code and have no idea where to look.
But a mediocre solution to that I think would be to create a unittest that can check if there layout is as expected.
Edit: I've seen this answer, but it is outdated and requires resharper settings to be updated. I will also not be guaranteed that coworkers use this resharper setting. I'm looking for a way to add it in the code, just like you can do // ReSharper disable once InconsistentNaming
I see a couple of solutions here:
You might mark the class with NoReorderAttribute from the JetBrains.Annotations (there are several ways to add them to a project). Then ReSharper will stop reordering members inside the marked code entity.
It is mostly about already mentioned answer, I will show you how to get the same things in last ReSharper builds. All you need is to add "System.Runtime.InteropServices.StructLayoutAttribute" to "Non-reorderable types" pattern in ReSharper | Options | Code Editing | C# | File Layout.
Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
To make sure your colleagues use the same settings in ReSharper, save this change to the Solution team shared layer (Save To at the bottom of the Options dialog). Then if any of your colleagues opens the solution, ReSharper will automatically use the setting from this layer with no additional actions required.
Resharper 2016.1 is notify unused public methods. Is there a way to disable this notifications global? I want only disable notification of unused public methods. Unused private methods should be notified nevertheless.
You'll need to turn off Solution Wide Analysis (ReSharper → Options → Code Inspection Settings). This will disable a number of inspections, but also disable marking public methods as being unused. Alternatively, you can use ReSharper's annotations, and add an attribute such as [PublicAPI] to the public methods that are used externally.
Private methods will remain marked as unused, because that only requires ReSharper to analyse a single class, rather than the whole solution.
I have resharper 2018.1. I don't know if this is version specific but in addition to #citizenmatt's answer you also need to make sure that "Show non-private type members when solution-wide analysis is off" is unchecked on the same options page. You could search for 'solution wide' in top left search of resharper options to quickly get on that page as per the image below.
In my current project we have many parts where we have something as follows:
var request = new ThingRequest {someId = };
ThingResponse response = dispatcher.Get<ThingResponse>(request);
Where dispatcher fetches a class with the name ThingRequestHandler that handles the actual logic.
public class ThingRequestHandler : RequestHandler<ThingRequest, ThingResponse>
This system is great for keeping it SOLID but I'm having trouble navigating easily.
Currently I use R# to goto class and -as I now the class name to follow convention- manually type the class name. This usually works but makes my head jump from thinking about the problem to thinking about a class name.
I would love to be able to navigate to my ThingRequestHandler from my dispatcher.Get line with one keystroke or click.
Is there a way Visual studio 2012, R# or any other plugin or macro would help me do this?
In R# 8+ they made a loads of improvements and especially to the navigation. They introduced CamelHumps which could be very useful in your case. For example you could navigate to ThingRequestHandler just by typing trh.
I'm trying to build a Monogame view inside a RelativeLayout from my MvvmCross monodroid Activity view.
An android Activity inherits from Microsoft.Xna.Framework.AndroidGameActivity to be able to run a Monogame inside a RelativeLayout (working).
My MvvmCross Activity inherits from MvxBindingActivityView(working).
So, I need a way to run the game and bind some datas within the same activity.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Loosely speaking, you can translate any Activity to an MvxActivity by inheriting some interfaces and by then cutting and pasting a small amount of code which does the basic loading and assignation of the ViewModel.
e.g. see the #Region and IMvxAndroidView<TViewModel> added to make MvxActivityView.cs from a normal Activity.
e.g. it's the same region and interface used for adapting a specialised Activity like Google's MapActivity into MvxMapActivityView.cs
At this level, the Activity/View has a ViewModel which can be used in C# code, but has no clever xml inflation - it has no clever Binding support.
Code can be written at this level - I've shipped apps without binding - but many users prefer to add DataBinding too...
To add this DataBinding support, you need to add a bit more code which provides BindingInflate, storage of bindings, disposal of bindings, etc.
e.g. a raw MvxActivityView is extended using the IMvxBindingActivity interface and a #region like: MvxBindingActivityView.cs
e.g. MvxMapActivityView is extended using the same region and interface: MvxBindingMapActivityView.cs
So to extend your the custom AndroidGameActivity:
Inherit from AndroidGameActivity to get ViewModelOwningGameActivity<T> and cut and paste the IMvxAndroidView<TViewModel> interface and #region from MvxActivityView<T> to provide the ViewModel methods, fields and properties.
Then assuming you want binding:
Inherit from ViewModelOwningGameActivity<T> to get BindingGameActivity<T> and cut and paste the IMvxBindingActivity and #region from MvxBindingActivityView<T> to get the binding methods
For specialist Activities you may want to add more - e.g. you may could add some custom helper methods for the MapActivity to plot points and lines, or for GameActivity to do whatever games do... but this is up to individual implementations.
Sorry about the cut and paste of code required in adapting Activities - I have tried to keep this to a minimum. However, writing Mvx is the one time so far that I've really wanted Multiple Inheritance or Mixins in C#
I'm trying to modify the EditorPart controller for my web part. Basically what I want is to have my custom controls inside a box like the standard properties that can toggle between visible and hidden.
I've been googling for a while, but I cannot seem to find an answer.
Just to clarify: I know I can use the Category property to accomplish this when adding web part properties directly to the web part, but I've extended the EditorPart controller and so I don't think I can simply add [Category("Feed settings")] to the TextBox and LiteralControls I'm creating (correct?).
What you'd need for a standard property is to mark it with the Category attribute:
[Category("My Category")]
public string FeedQuery { get; set; }
(You'll need to add the System.ComponentModel namespace to your class file).
For editor parts it is not so simple. It appears that you can't add them to the standard categories. It is possible to style the editor part to resemble the OOB panels as shown here