So I have this logo that fits the whole page. Is there anyway that, when the browser is resized I can move these paths? That way the height stays the same?
Example of what I want to achieve
Here's my svg code
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 1440 52" style="enable-background:new 0 0 1440 52;" xml:space="preserve">
<path d="M1428.4,6.9c-2.5-2.5-6-3.7-10.5-3.7h-7.6h-9.5v19.1H16.3V3.1H7.8v46.8h8.5V30.7h1384.5v19.1h0h9.4V30.6h7.5
c2.3,0,4.3-0.3,6-1c1.8-0.7,3.3-1.7,4.5-2.9c1.2-1.2,2.2-2.7,2.8-4.5c0.7-1.7,1-3.6,1-5.8C1432.2,12.1,1430.9,9.4,1428.4,6.9z
M1421.4,20.1c-1,1-2.8,1.9-5.2,2h-6v-12h6c2.3,0,4,0.6,5.2,1.8s1.7,2.7,1.7,4.4C1423.1,18.5,1421.8,19.8,1421.4,20.1z" />
</svg>
you can do something like this by using preserveAspectRatio="none" for the svg element together with a fixed height and width:100%. This would give tou what you need but the the stroke would be scaled differently on the vertical and horizontal.
To fix it you need to add vector-effect="non-scaling-stroke" for the path.
svg{height:100px; width:100%}
<svg viewBox="0 0 100 20" preserveAspectRatio="none">
<path stroke="black" stroke-width="5" vector-effect="non-scaling-stroke" d="M 1,5V15M1,10H97"/>
</svg>
Yes it is possible, with a bit of trickery. Below is a modified verion of your SVG that behaves how you want.
This matches your SVG exactly, but has a limitation. The trick we are using relies on extending the middle bar a long way to the left. Then covering up the left end of the bar with your vertical piece. But in your original SVG the vertical piece is not right at the left end of your SVG. So I've had to hide some of the extension with a white rectangle. This assumes your background will also be white. If it isn't you'll need to change that white rectangle to be the same colour as your page background.
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="100%" height="52">
<defs>
<path id="middle-and-right" transform="translate(-1440 0)"
d="M1428.4,6.9c-2.5-2.5-6-3.7-10.5-3.7h-7.6h-9.5v19.1
h -3000 v 8.4 h 3000
v19.1h0h9.4V30.6h7.5 c2.3,0,4.3-0.3,6-1c1.8-0.7,3.3-1.7,4.5-2.9c1.2-1.2,2.2-2.7,2.8-4.5c0.7-1.7,1-3.6,1-5.8C1432.2,12.1,1430.9,9.4,1428.4,6.9z
M1421.4,20.1c-1,1-2.8,1.9-5.2,2h-6v-12h6c2.3,0,4,0.6,5.2,1.8s1.7,2.7,1.7,4.4C1423.1,18.5,1421.8,19.8,1421.4,20.1z" />
</defs>
<use xlink:href="#middle-and-right" x="100%"/>
<rect x="-1" y="3.1" width="10" height="46.8" fill="white"/>
<rect x="7.8" y="3.1" width="8.5" height="46.8"/>
</svg>
If you want to get a better idea how the trick works, have a look at this version. I've modified the SVG to make the trick more apparent.
svg {
background-color: red;
overflow: visible;
}
rect {
opacity: 0.5;
}
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="100%" height="52">
<defs>
<path id="middle-and-right" transform="translate(-1440 0)"
d="M1428.4,6.9c-2.5-2.5-6-3.7-10.5-3.7h-7.6h-9.5v19.1
h -3000 v 8.4 h 3000
v19.1h0h9.4V30.6h7.5 c2.3,0,4.3-0.3,6-1c1.8-0.7,3.3-1.7,4.5-2.9c1.2-1.2,2.2-2.7,2.8-4.5c0.7-1.7,1-3.6,1-5.8C1432.2,12.1,1430.9,9.4,1428.4,6.9z
M1421.4,20.1c-1,1-2.8,1.9-5.2,2h-6v-12h6c2.3,0,4,0.6,5.2,1.8s1.7,2.7,1.7,4.4C1423.1,18.5,1421.8,19.8,1421.4,20.1z" />
</defs>
<use xlink:href="#middle-and-right" x="100%"/>
<rect x="-1" y="3.1" width="10" height="46.8" fill="white"/>
<rect x="7.8" y="3.1" width="8.5" height="46.8"/>
</svg>
However if you don't mind the vertical piece on the left end being moved so it's hard up against the left side of the SVG, then we can remove that restriction regarding the background. The new version below will work for any page background colour.
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="100%" height="52">
<defs>
<path id="middle-and-right" transform="translate(-1440 0)"
d="M1428.4,6.9c-2.5-2.5-6-3.7-10.5-3.7h-7.6h-9.5v19.1
h -3000 v 8.4 h 3000
v19.1h0h9.4V30.6h7.5 c2.3,0,4.3-0.3,6-1c1.8-0.7,3.3-1.7,4.5-2.9c1.2-1.2,2.2-2.7,2.8-4.5c0.7-1.7,1-3.6,1-5.8C1432.2,12.1,1430.9,9.4,1428.4,6.9z
M1421.4,20.1c-1,1-2.8,1.9-5.2,2h-6v-12h6c2.3,0,4,0.6,5.2,1.8s1.7,2.7,1.7,4.4C1423.1,18.5,1421.8,19.8,1421.4,20.1z" />
</defs>
<use xlink:href="#middle-and-right" x="100%"/>
<rect x="0" y="3.1" width="8.5" height="46.8"/>
</svg>
I have some SVG text that works fine on Firefox but in Chrome and Safari does not appear.
I have tried:
Adding padding to the svg container in case the text was being
cut-off,
Removing [xml:space="preserve'] from the text,
Adding a fill color inline.
<svg class="fraction_spinner" width="64" height="64" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<circle id="CS1_01-intro" cx="32" cy="32" r="25" fill="transparent"/>
<text class="spinner-text spinner-text__casestudy" xml:space="preserve">
<textPath xlink:href="#CS1_01-intro">Longform case study</textPath>
</text>
</svg>
I expect the text to render as it does in Firefox, but to no avail in Chrome and Safari
One of the enhancements in the SVG 2 specification is that textPath elements no longer need only point to path elements. They should now be able to point to any shape. Firefox has implemented that part of the SVG 2 specification, other browsers have not yet done so.
In fairness there are parts of SVG 2 that other browsers have implemented that Firefox has not.
You can draw a circle using a path instead which will work in all browsers.
Use a path instead of the circle:
<svg class="fraction_spinner" width="64" height="64" version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<!--<circle id="CS1_01-intro" cx="32" cy="32" r="25" fill="rgba(0,0,0,.3)"/>-->
<path id="CS1_01-intro" d="M57,32A25,25 0 0 1 7,32 A25,25,0 0 1 57,32z" />
<text class="spinner-text spinner-text__casestudy" font-size="16" fill="black">
<textPath xlink:href="#CS1_01-intro">Longform case study</textPath>
</text>
</svg>
I have used the code verbatim from this post to dynamically create SVG paths from Lats & Lngs and for 80% of the time it's working very nicely but I have several polygons that are not rendering correctly in SVG
I have prepared an example in JSFiddle showing 1 that works & 1 that doesn't ...
<div style="padding:20px;">
<div>
Top SVG = NOT Working
<svg width="200" height="200" viewBox="227.131 154.886 0.007 0.006">
<path d="M227.125,154.881 227.125,154.881 227.131,154.881 227.132,154.881 227.132,154.882 227.132,154.886 227.132,154.886 227.131,154.886 227.131,154.886 227.129,154.884 227.126,154.881z"> </path>
</svg>
</div>
<div>
Bottom SVG = Working
<svg width="200" height="200" viewBox="227.136 154.905 0.009 0.014">
<path d="M227.145,154.907 227.140,154.905 227.141,154.910 227.138,154.914 227.136,154.919 227.141,154.919 227.145,154.919 227.145,154.916 227.145,154.912z M227.139,154.914 227.140,154.913 227.141,154.913 227.141,154.913 227.141,154.914 227.140,154.914 227.139,154.914z"> </path>
</svg>
</div>
</div>
I'd appreciate it if someone could point out my issue.
ALSO - I would like to know how and where to include a stroke color & width in this html. Thanks!!
I think there are a couple of problems with the first SVG:
The viewBox is incorrect. It doesn't match the shape. It should be more like:
viewBox="227.125 154.881 0.007 0.005"
The first two values (minX and minY) were wrong. How did this happen? I don't know. The code in that question looks alright at first glance, but I haven't attempted to debug it.
Secondly, I think there is likely a floating point issue. There are five orders of magnitude difference between the x and y offset of the shape, and its size. It seems you may be striking some floating point rounding issues, or something like that.
If you reduce the x and y coordinates, the shape renders correctly.
<div style="padding:20px;">
<div>
Top SVG = NOT Working
<svg width="200" height="200" viewBox="7.125 4.881 0.007 0.005">
<path d="M7.125,4.881 7.125,4.881 7.131,4.881 7.132,4.881 7.132,4.882 7.132,4.886 7.132,4.886 7.131,4.886 7.131,4.886 7.129,4.884 7.126,4.881z"
stroke="red" stroke-width=".0002"/>
</svg>
</div>
<div>
Bottom SVG = Working
<svg width="200" height="200" viewBox="227.136 154.905 0.009 0.014">
<path d="M227.145,154.907 227.140,154.905 227.141,154.910 227.138,154.914 227.136,154.919 227.141,154.919 227.145,154.919 227.145,154.916 227.145,154.912z M227.139,154.914 227.140,154.913 227.141,154.913 227.141,154.913 227.141,154.914 227.140,154.914 227.139,154.914z"> </path>
</svg>
</div>
</div>
To avoid this problem with other shapes, you could modify the code to subtract the minX and minY value from all the coordinates. After you fix issue #1, though, of course!
The first SVG is located outside the drawing area/viewBox, however You can add the stroke inside the <g> tag that wraps the graphic, as in the second SVG theres two shapes and I added stroke to one only.
Check this code:
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px" viewBox="0 0 200 200" style="enable-background:new 0 0 200 200;" xml:space="preserve">
<g stroke-width="3" stroke="#00CF00">
<polygon points="15,81 113,9 170,172 52,189 "/>
</g>
</svg>
<br />
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px" viewBox="0 0 200 200" style="enable-background:new 0 0 200 200;" xml:space="preserve">
<circle cx="96.3" cy="93" r="62.3"/>
<g stroke-width="3" stroke="#FFFFFF">
<polygon style="fill:#00CF00;" points="71.7,56 144,92 71.7,128.3 "/></g>
</svg>
I'm new to SVG. I'm trying to put a SVG file with linkable regions (like an image map) on my page and make it responsive. The SVG displays, but the linkable areas aren't working in Chrome. Works fine in FF, IE11, and Edge.
<svg version="1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px" viewBox="0 0 880 371" style="enable-background:new 0 0 880 371;" xml:space="preserve">
<g id="Background_xA0_Image_1_">
<image style="overflow:visible;" width="880" height="371" id="Background_xA0_Image" xlink:href="data:image/jpeg;... />
</image>
</g>
<g id="Layer_2_xA0_Image_1_">
<a id="Layer_2_xA0_Image" xlink:href="http://www.example.com" transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 572 215)">
<image style="overflow:visible;" width="195" height="42" xlink:href="data:image/png;...>
</image>
</a>
</g>
<g id="Layer_1_xA0_Image_1_">
<a id="Layer_1_xA0_Image" xlink:href="http://www.anotherexample.com" transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 308 164)">
<image style="overflow:visible;" width="137" height="46" xlink:href="data:image/png;...>
</image>
</a>
</g>
</svg>
I'm working with a JPG file that I sliced up in Photoshop and then exported to a SVG from Illustrator. This is the code it produced.
Just realized elements within the svg are clickabel - the problem was actually the cursor not changing styles so I thought it wasn't working.
I added cursor:pointer; to the links and it looks good now.
My SVG is width="1200" height="600" viewBox="0 0 1200 600". It uses a clipPath from defs of another SVG.
<svg class="svg-def">
<defs>
<clipPath id="clip-1"> ...
</defs>
</svg>
<svg width="1200" height="600" viewBox="0 0 1200 600">
<g clip-path="url(#clip-1)">
...
</g>
</svg>
Demo
When .svg-def does not have width="1200" height="600" viewBox="0 0 1200 600" (the first image), on window width narrower than 1200, the right side is clipped. This is not desired.
I want the second image -- the clip is just the size of the SVG. The second image is good because the <clipPath> being used is from an <svg> element with the same width="1200" height="600" viewBox="0 0 1200 600"
<svg class="svg-def">
<defs>
<clipPath id="clip-1"> ...
</defs>
</svg>
<svg class="svg-def" width="1200" height="600" viewBox="0 0 1200 600">
<defs>
<clipPath id="clip-2"> ...
</defs>
</svg>
Questions
1) In <clipPath> <rect width="100%" height="100%"/>, what is 100% relative to?
2) The first clip's display width varies with window width (when the latter is narrow than 1200px). Narrower window width = narrower display width. What is the display width relative to?
3) So if I have an SVG which has only <defs>, its <svg> tag still has to have viewbox values, so that the other SVG which uses the definitions (and which scales with window width) can have definitions in correct sizes?