I have a large data acquisition and control program written in Python3.4.2 using GUI mostly developed on Glade 3.18.3, Gtk3.0 GObject running Debian 8 with XFCE.
There are timers that keep doing things, and these work fine. After startup, the program runs for some 3 - 7 days, then suddenly, all of the windows go blank and stay blank. Other applications are not affected. Memory and CPU usage is modest.
There are no indications of problems prior to the windows going blank. The windows show their title bars and respond normally to minimize, restore, move to another Workspace, etc. It looks like they are not getting repainted - no widgets are visible at all. The code is way too large to post here, and I am not able to isolate a specific problem area for lack of obvious symptoms other than the blank screens. There are no error messages or warnings.
The timers continue to run, acquire data and control things. This happens whether the program is run from the command line or under PyDev in Eclipse.
Things I have tried:
In the main timer loop, I put code to look for a file, and then exec the command in it, printing the results, so I have been able to mess with the program in real time:
Replace the usual Gtk.main() with a while loop whose variable, if not made false, will re-execute the Gtk.main(). Executing Gtk.main.quit() stops Gtk.main and starts it again. Windows still blank. Did this repeatedly to no avail.
Experimented with garbage collection with GC. Collecting garbage makes no different. Windows still blank.
Put in code to print percent of time consumed by the timer loops. Fairly steady around 18 - 20% of available CPU time, so nothing is hogging the CPU preventing re-paint.
I have a button that clears a label. I read the label, then executed a builder.get_object(...).activate command to the button. I re-read the label and it was now properly blank. So events and widgets appear to be working normally, at least to some extent.
Finally, if I click on the close X on the title bar, XFCE asks me if I want to wait or close now. So it seems as though there may be a disconnection or problem with signals and the OS, even though XXX.activate() works.
Web searching is in vain. Does anybody have ideas of what might be happening, useful diagnostics, or other suggestions? Many thanks!
April 27, 2017 Update:
I have taken two substantial steps to mostly work around problems. First, partly in response to a couple of Gtk crashes over the last few months, instead of ending the main program with:
Gtk.main()
I end with:
while wannalive:
try:
Gtk.main()
except:
pass
wannalive is True until user does a quit, so recovery is instant.
Second, I grouped all of the code for each window setup and initial population of static items into two functions. I also made another function for closing a window. These functions propagate to children, grandchildren windows. A function in the top window first, closes, then re-creates all windows, with one call. In operation, there are overlaps in what windows exist, but that is not a problem.
Above, I describe that I can inject code with an external program. The external program has a button that injects a call to that third function. In about five seconds or less, the result of a single button click is to replace all blank windows with functional windows. For my purposes in a controlled environment with a trained operator, this is acceptable.
Next, let me address the relationship between the timer loops and GUI events processing. I do use GObject.timeout_add(ms, somefunction). Experiment shows that a button that calls time.sleep(5) stalls the timer. Experiment shows that injecting time.sleep(5) in the timer loop stalls the GUI. This is consistent with my belief (correct me if I am wrong) that Python runs on a single thread. Therefore, bad code caught in an infinite loop should stall both the GUI and the timer loop. (The program has one timeout_add call.)
Related
I have made this AutoHotKey script after reading the manual, searching and troubleshooting for endless hours in the last few weeks:
#Persistent
#SingleInstance force
if A_Args[1] > 0
{
Menu, Tray, Icon, C:\blablabla\new notifications.png
}
else
{
Menu, Tray, Icon, C:\blablabla\no new notifications.png
}
This, I have compiled into test.exe. Then I call it like this from a terminal: test.exe 1, test.exe 0, test.exe 2, test.exe 3, etc.
If I do it slowly/manually, it works: it only ever keeps one instance of the script, showing visually as a nice little icon in the Notification area (as intended), never launching multiple instances.
However, when I started actually using it for real, by calling the same terminal command from my scripts, it often opens two or more instances, which are kept open and just make the Notification area longer and longer, ignoring the rule that it only can run as one instance ever.
I was able to "solve" it by introducing a short "sleep" in my script after each such command call, so that the same script never calls it too quickly in succession. However, today, I realized that multiple different scripts of mine often call it at the same time, or nearly at the same time. This means that my "clever" solution of sleeping falls short.
I then thought that I can use the database to keep track of when the last time a script called this, and don't do it if it's too soon, but if I did that, the whole point would be lost since I can no longer trust the icon to accurately tell me whether or not there are new notifications in my system. I'd constantly be wondering if there had been such a "race condition" and manually go and check anyway, defeating the point of this visual indication which is supposed to let me always know "at a glance" whether or not there are new notifications in my system.
Maybe I could have a loop in my scripts and repeatedly re-try if it detects that a notification has been sent too recently, but that means my scripts will potentially stall for a long time as they all send notifications (especially in the morning, when I wake up and kickstart my system). It just seems like the wrong solution.
Is there really no way to properly handle this in the script itself? As is obvious from my description, the #Persistent and #SingleInstance force rules aren't respected.
(I've had similar problems in the past with programs being unable to "handle" running commands too quickly, and I never know what to do about it except to introduce sleep. But even then, it often glitches out. For example, Notepad++ requires me to first open a document and then open it again with a specified line number, sleeping in between, or else it doesn't go to the specified line.)
I develop a SCADA in python3 with the help of PyQt. I expect my program to continuously indicate various parameters received through RS-485 interface, however, within several minutes from the start (it is always a different time), the GUI stops to update itself. At the same time, the GUI stays responsive and if I were to click on one of the animated QAbstractButtons it has, the GUI starts to work as intended again for a short period of time. The problem occurs on both Linux and Windows.
The program has several worker threads: one for RS-485 exchange, one for reading/writing various data to disk, one for decoding received package and refreshing data in memory, one for request queue management, etc. They all work in loops of while (True): time.sleep(...) - do the job. The GUI is implemented in the main thread.
The data is indicated with QLabels. The QLabel.setText is added to painterEvent() of QWidgets containing the QLabels.
When the GUI stops updating, the other threads are up and running: the exchange is functioning, the request queue is forming, etc. Despite not being updated, the GUI stays responsive and reacts to QAbstractButton clicks.
I tried adding gui.update() or app.processEvents() into one of the worker threads, tried force updating through QTimer in the main thread. The result is the same: it works for a short while and then stops.
I tried increasing the time.sleep of the refresh thread and force updating the main widget over longer intervals of time (0.5 to 5 seconds) and it seems to help the situation a lot, this way it can run for several minutes, but it still does not solve the problem.
I would love to show the code, but the whole thing is way too bulky to post here and if I could narrow it down to a at least a hundred lines, I would have already solved the issue by now. So if any of you could at least share some general considerations on what to look for, I would be very happy.
update:
This seems to work, I'll leave it running for a few hours tomorrow to confirm:
update_timer = QTimer()
update_timer.setSingleShot(False)
update_timer.timeout.connect(self.gui.repaint)
update_timer.setInterval(500)
update_timer.start()
I assume that self.gui.update() did not work because dataChanged() was probably not emitted and control passed instead of doing repaint(). As far as I understand, the solution above is not the right way to update widgets.
So, the question actually boils down to the following:
What is the right way to update the main QWidget and how do I let the program know it needs to be redrawn, probably using dataChanged() signal?
The answer is simple. Never do anything related to PyQt from outside the main thread. Even if it seems the only logical way to do something.
After I 'fixed' the issue with the gui not being updated, I stumbled into a more serious problem: the program crashed every now and then. As it turns out, the GUI not being updated was only the top of the iceberg. The uptime was usually 2 to 7 minutes, I received a few glibc errors ("corrupted double-linked list" and "double free or corrution"). As it turns out, the source of the problem was inside refresh thread that has several hundreds of lines updating gui:
self.gui.screen_name.device_name.setCrash()
where setCrash() changes widget color and palette, or even more direct things like
self.gui.screen_name.label_name.setText(str(value))
I tracked down everything even loosely related to gui from the main file (the place where all the threading took place) and restyled it. Now it only has one worker thread - the RS-485, the rest are wrapped into separate QTimers.
This is what it was:
class Main():
def __init__():
self.plots_thread = Thread(target = self.plots_refresh)
self.plots_thread.start()
def plots_refresh():
while True:
time.sleep(0.5)
#do stuff
And this is what it is now:
class Main():
def __init__():
self.plots_refresh_timer = QTimer()
self.plots_refresh_timer.setSingleShot(False)
self.plots_refresh_timer.timeout.connect(self.plots_refresh)
self.plots_refresh_timer.setInterval(499) #prime number
self.plots_refresh_timer.start()
def plots_refresh():
#do stuff
This time the program has been running for over an hour and never crashed. After coming to conclusion that this was THE fix, I refactored the really messy test file and resumed testing - again, no troubles for half an hour.
Sublime text 2 is freezing from time to time, when I have many selections in large files. After a while it continues. I am on windows 2008.
For example it happens when I hit ctrl-d many times or even keep it pressed to add many selections. It adds selections, then stops, and after a while continues adding selections.
I suspect this is due to garbage collection.
Is there a way to avoid this or make the freeze period shorter? Maybe give it more memory, or even better less memory so gc is more frequent but much shorter.
Or maybe this is some sort of swapping or missing or wrong temp file config.
What is the reason and is there a good solution for it?
Sublime Text 3 may freeze too. Plugins can cause that.
First thing
...you may want to do is run command CTRL + SHIFT + P -> Plugin Development: Profile Events. You will get a list of events which different plugins are listening to and time it taken for them to process the event.
Give special attention to on_modified event. Quote from sublime docs:
Expensive operations in event listeners can cause Sublime Text to
become unresponsive, especially in events triggered frequently, like
on_modified() and on_selection_modified(). Be careful of how much work
is done in these and don’t implement events you don’t need, even if
they just pass.
This was my case: a plugin was meticulously processing every on_modified event which resulted in overflowing the thread queue and freezing ST.
Also
... don't forget that Sublime Text has a console where you sometimes can find useful messages and tracebacks. To reveal console use a key binding CTRL+`. Working for a while with your eye on the console may help you get the idea if something is going on wrong.
It recently starting freezing for me too, each time I'd re-focus on code in a Sublime window, whether that be alt-tabbing or even searching the command palette!
What fixed it up quickly for me was Reverting to a Freshly Installed State, then restoring those folders.
Update: It turned out to be Git Conflict Resolver
, perfectly responsive after disabling.
This question is old, and the issue did not occur with later versions anymore.
So I suspect it was fixed at some point.
If you still experience freezing in sublime text try the following:
Find out what version you are running and try switching to the latest stable version.
See if the freezing could be an operating system issue. This could be indicated by not only sublime text but at the same time all other applications freezing.
If you have a different solution or explanation why not add it here for reference.
I still believe the underlying reason could have been a garbage colletion (read at wikipedia about garbage collection) within the application.
The program I am developing uses threads to deal with long running processes. I want to be able to use Gauge Pulse to show the user that whilst a long running thread is in progress, something is actually taking place. Otherwise visually nothing will happen for quite some time when processing large files & the user might think that the program is doing nothing.
I have placed a guage within the status bar of the program. My problem is this. I am having problems when trying to call gauge pulse, no matter where I place the code it either runs to fast then halts, or runs at the correct speed for a few seconds then halts.
I've tried placing the one line of code below into the thread itself. I have also tried create another thread from within the long running process thread to call the code below. I still get the same sort of problems.
I do not think that I could use wx.CallAfter as this would defeat the point. Pulse needs to be called whilst process is running, not after the fact. Also tried usin time.sleep(2) which is also not good as it slows the process down, which is something I want to avoid. Even when using time.sleep(2) I still had the same problems.
Any help would be massively appreciated!
progress_bar.Pulse()
You will need to find someway to send update requests to the main GUI from your thread during the long running process. For example, if you were downloading a very large file using a thread, you would download it in chunks and after each chunk is complete, you would send an update to the GUI.
If you are running something that doesn't really allow chunks, such as creating a large PDF with fop, then I suppose you could use a wx.Timer() that just tells the gauge to pulse every so often. Then when the thread finishes, it would send a message to stop the timer object from updating the gauge.
The former is best for showing progress while the latter works if you just want to show the user that your app is doing something. See also
http://wiki.wxpython.org/LongRunningTasks
http://www.blog.pythonlibrary.org/2010/05/22/wxpython-and-threads/
http://www.blog.pythonlibrary.org/2013/09/04/wxpython-how-to-update-a-progress-bar-from-a-thread/
I have a Qt application which gets serial data and displays is in a dashboard type GUI. The basic structure of the program is as follows:
EDIT
SerialPort (Inherits from QIODevice) object get created and have their readyRead signals connected to a slot.
When new data comes in, it's interpreted and sent through the program via a message handler. Eventually the data makes its way to a GUI layer, where it is displayed to the user.
The program runs fine in windows 7, however when I run it on a Panasonic toughbook, running windows XP, the program starts off fine, but after a few moments the GUI stops updating. What I mean by this is that when new data comes in, the gui won't redraw until a user clicks a button or resizes. I'm wondering what are some possible reasons for this type of behavior. I thought it could be that the Main thread was getting overwhelmed by all the serial data coming in, but I think that the GUI runs in a separate thread anyways. Am I wrong? Does anyone have any ideas as to what could be happening?
If SerialPortIO isn't in its own thread, then it might be blocking when it is waiting for new data. I haven't used that particular Serial class, but in general a stream of data probably should be in its own thread.
You can force the program to update the GUI more, by calling qApp->processEvents() periodically, and the GUI should update.
Also, put some qDebug statements in your code, especially at the top of your functions that you suspect that are getting called too frequently or not enough.
Use the following line, and it makes it really easy to follow what is happening in a multithreaded application:
qDebug() << Q_FUNC_INFO;
Hope that helps.