What's wrong with this use of async await? - node.js

I am trying to download tracks via the soundcloud API, and then launch a callback once an indeterminant amount of tracks is downloaded. When I run the below code, I see "All done" being console logged before anything else, even though I intend for it to be the last thing... What am I doing wrong?
// Deps
import fs from 'fs'
import SC from 'node-soundcloud'
import request from 'request'
// Write mp3 function
function writeMP3(track) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
console.log('Starting download: ', track.title)
request.get(track.download_url)
.on('error', err => {
// reject('Download error: ', err)
})
.on('finish', () => {
() => resolve('Download complete')
})
.pipe(fs.createWriteStream(`./data/temp/${track.title}_${track.user.username}.mp3`))
})
}
async function asyncTrackFetch(track) {
return await writeMP3(track)
}
// Array of promises to callback upon
const trackActions = []
SC.init({
id: 'MY_ID',
secret: 'MY_SECRET'
})
SC.get('/tracks', (err, tracks) => {
if (err) {
throw new Error(err)
} else {
console.log('Tracks fetched: ', tracks.length)
tracks.map(track => {
if (track.downloadable) {
console.log('downloadable')
trackActions.push(asyncTrackFetch(track))
}
})
}
})
// Perform requests async
Promise.all(trackActions).then(() => {
console.log('All done')
console.log(fs.readdirSync('./data/temp'))
})

Promise.all(trackActions) waits on whatever promises are in trackActions, but trackActions is empty at the time you make the call. You're only adding promises to the array after your SC.get callback gets called.
Try putting your Promise.all... block inside the SC.get callback like this:
SC.get('/tracks', (err, tracks) => {
if (err) {
throw new Error(err)
} else {
console.log('Tracks fetched: ', tracks.length)
tracks.map(track => {
if (track.downloadable) {
console.log('downloadable')
trackActions.push(asyncTrackFetch(track))
}
})
Promise.all(trackActions).then(() => {
console.log('All done')
console.log(fs.readdirSync('./data/temp'))
})
}
})
It's worth mentioning as well that your line throw new Error(err) will crash the program since there's nowhere for that error to be caught.
As Antonio Val mentioned, there are better ways to do this. If you promisify the node-soundcloud library then the last part of your code could look like this:
SC.get('/tracks').then(tracks => {
// No need for trackedActions array.
return Promise.all(tracks.filter(track => track.downloadable)
.map(track => asyncTrackFetch(track)))
}).then(fetchedTracks => {
console.log('All done fetching tracks', fetchedTracks)
}).catch(err => {
// Handle error.
})
Or inside an async function,
try {
const tracks = await SC.get('/tracks')
const fetchPromises = tracks
.filter(track => track.downloadable)
.map(track => asyncTrackFetch(track))
const fetchedTracks = await Promise.all(fetchPromises)
console('All done fetching tracks.', fetchedTracks)
} catch (err) {
// Handle error
}

I think the easiest way would be to move Promise.all after tracks.map loop finished.
A more elegant solution would be to promisify SC.get as well and use async await along all your code.
UPDATE:
Couldn't test it so not sure if it works, but it would be something like this:
import fs from 'fs'
import SC from 'node-soundcloud'
import request from 'request'
function writeMP3(track) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
console.log('Starting download: ', track.title)
request.get(track.download_url)
.on('error', err => {
// reject('Download error: ', err)
})
.on('finish', () => {
() => resolve('Download complete')
})
.pipe(fs.createWriteStream(`./data/temp/${track.title}_${track.user.username}.mp3`))
})
}
function getTracks() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
SC.get('/tracks', (err, tracks) => {
if (err) {
return reject(err)
}
console.log('Tracks fetched: ', tracks.length)
resolve(tracks)
})
})
}
SC.init({
id: 'MY_ID',
secret: 'MY_SECRET'
})
With async await:
async function start() {
const tracks = await getTracks();
for (let track of tracks) {
await writeMP3(track)
}
}
start()
.then(() => {
console.log('All done')
console.log(fs.readdirSync('./data/temp'))
})
.catch((err) => {
// insert error handler here
})
If you just want to use Promises:
getTracks
.then((tracks) => {
const promiseArray = tracks.map((track) => {
return writeMP3(track)
})
return Promise.all(promiseArray)
})
.then(() => {
console.log('All done')
console.log(fs.readdirSync('./data/temp'))
})
.catch((err) => {
// insert error handler here
})

Related

SyntaxError: Unexpected reserved word "await", node.js is correct version

I am trying to run a function asynchronously 20 times.
I have the function definition:
import axios from 'axios';
async function updateUser (url, user) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
axios.put(url, JSON.stringify(user))
.then(response => {
//Folio returned code 204
console.log('The user has been updated');
resolve(response.data);
}).catch((err) => {
//Folio returned error
console.error(`Error Text: ${err.response.data}`);
console.error(`Error Code: ${err}`);
});
});
};
export {updateUser};
Then I am trying to loop through users in an external JSON, and update them to my system 20 at a time:
import {updateUser} from './updateUser.js';
import usersjson from './jsons/users.json';
let promises=[];
if (usersjson.users.length) {
try {
for (const user of usersjson.users) {
update = new promise ((resolve,reject) => {
updateUser(url, user)
.then((list) => {resolve(list)})
.catch((error)=>{reject(error)})
});
promises.push(update);
if (promises.length = 20) {
await Promise.all(promises)
.then((responses)=> {
console.log(responses);
promises=[];
}).catch((err)=> {
console.log(err);
});
}
}
} catch(err)=> {
console.log(err);
}
}
However, I am getting an error message in the console:
await Promise.all(promises)
^^^^^
SyntaxError: Unexpected reserved word
My node version is 12.19.0 (based on previous questions, it seems it has to be at least 10, so that shouldn't be the issue).
When I run the function without await, they work correctly (i.e. the users are updated on my system).
It also seems that the for loop is asynchronous by itself, but I'm afraid that if there will be too many calls simultaneously my system will block the API, so I want to make 20-50 calls at a time, tops.
In order to use await you need to declare the function in which you are putting the await as async
For example:
const functionReturningPromise = (input) => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
if (!input) {
return reject();
}
return resolve();
});
}
const functionAwaitingPromise = async () => {
for (let i = 0; i < 20; i +=1) {
try {
await functionReturningPromise(i);
console.log(i);
} catch (error) {
console.log(error);
}
}
}

Store data in an array using for each in node js sequelize

I am trying to push the fetched data in an array using foreach but it only returns the first data in the loop. Here is my code.
exports.getAllTrial = async function (req, res, next) {
try {
new Promise( async (resolve, reject) => {
var reservations = [];
await Schedule.getSchedule()
.then(data => {
data.forEach(async (element) => {
await saveReserve.getAllTrial({where: {scheduleID: element.id, date: "8/18/2020"}})
.then(trial => {
trial.forEach(response => {
reservations.push(response.scheduleID)
})
})
console.log(reservations);
resolve(reservations);
})
});
})
.then(value=>{
res.status(200).json(value);
})
.catch(err => {
console.log(err);
});
} catch (e) {
return res.status(400).json({ status: 400, message: e.message });
}
}
My expected output should be: [ 9, 10, 10 ] But it only returns [9].
Async code in a foreach loop is a bad idea, as it won't be executed one after the other. I suggest reading a bit more async/await and the concept of promise, as you are mixing things here (such as mixing await and .then). Also worth looking into Promise.all which will resolve a list of promises and array.map.
While I have no idea of what some variables such as saveReserve are supposed to be or do, your code might be simplified into:
exports.getAllTrial = async (req, res, next) => {
try {
const data = await Schedule.getSchedule()
const reservations = await Promise.all(
data.map(element => {
return saveReserve.getAllTrial({ where: { scheduleID: element.id, date: '8/18/2020' } })
})
)
return res.status(200).json(reservations)
} catch (e) {
return res.status(400).json({ status: 400, message: e.message })
}
}

use answer .then () outside and use in another part of the code in node js

How can I use the answer of a promise outside of. Then what should I do?
arreglo.forEach((item) => {
if (item.tipoCampo == 3) {
self.campoSelects(item.tablaCampo)
.then(resp => {
console.log(resp)
})
.catch(e => console.log(e))
}
});
console.log (resp) inside the .then () knows it and prints correctly, but when I want to know resp out of the forEach to use below, it says undefined
Thanks.
arreglo.forEach((item) => {
if (item.tipoCampo == 3) {
self.campoSelects(item.tablaCampo)
.then(resp => {
logMyData(resp);
})
.catch(e => console.log(e))
}
});
logMyData=(x)=>{
console.log(x);
}
This is just as simple as adding a helper function which executes inside your .then
Guessing that you want to be able to access the value within the forloop. Since self.campoSelects is a promise we can use async await.
// Call campo selects
function getCampoSelects(_self, tablaCampo) {
return new Promise(async (resolve, reject) => {
let campoData;
try {
campoData = await _self.campoSelects(tablaCampo);
} catch (err) {
reject(err);
}
resolve(campoData);
});
}
function happyLittleFunc() {
const arreglo = [];
arreglo.forEach(async (item) => {
if (item.tipoCampo === 3) {
let campoSelect;
// Unsure if you are setting self somewhere but it can be passed in here.
try {
campoSelect = await getCampoSelects(self, item.tipoCampo);
} catch (err) {
console.log(err);
return;
}
console.log(campoSelect);
}
});
}
happyLittleFunc();

Completely lost with promise async/await

I'm trying to develop a relative simple test on NodeJS 11.6.x. I'm not really a developer, but sometimes try to do some coding.
My objective is to create a SQLite database and repeat some steps every time a run the code:
1. Drop a table if it exists
2. Create a table
3. Insert N lines
4. Count how many lines is in the database
5. Close the database
I tried first with a basic approach using callback, but couldn't figure out a way to make the step 3 (insert N lines) and looking for a solution, the promise async/await 'pattern' sounded the way to accomplish everything.
But, after refactoring the code, the step 1 (drop table) isn't running and I still not being able to execute step 3 (insert N lines) and have no idea what is happening. I also tried to use a promise package with no luck.
Could someone please have a look and help on this and if possible, explain and or give some advice?
Thanks in advance
Edited: Well, I'not used to post here at SO and don't know the 'right' way to update things here. I beleave I should had left the first code as reference, buy I don't have anymore.
Now I think I'm almoust there. All steps are executing in order. Just the step 3 (insert N lines) that I'm not able to make it work. Or it inserts and stops not going to the next '.then' or it just insert 1 line and I'm cannot visualize what is happening.
In the code, I commented in two lines with 'BUG 1:' and 'BUG 2:'.
If I both are commented, I get what is happening, it inserts only 1 line and don't continue the promise chain
If I comment BUG 1 and let BUG 2 active, it inserts just one line and continues. I think I understand why
If I comment BUG 2 and let BUG 1 active, it inserts all lines but don't continue and again, I think I understand why
If I uncomment both (the way I think should work. Don't work, and return an aditional error "Segmentation fault"
Bellow the code:
const sqlite3 = require('sqlite3')
let db = new sqlite3.Database('./test.db');
waitTime = 1
process.stdout.write('Starting...\n')
var test = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
process.stdout.write('Drop Table... ');
db.run(`DROP TABLE IF EXISTS test`, (err) => {
if (err) {
process.stdout.write(`Dropping Error ${err.message}\n`)
reject()
} else {
setTimeout(() => {
process.stdout.write(`Dropped!\n`)
resolve()
}, waitTime)
}
})
})
test.then(() => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
process.stdout.write('Create Table... ')
db.run(`CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS test (data TEXT)`, (err) => {
if (err) {
process.stdout.write(`Creating Error ${err.message}\n`)
reject()
} else {
setTimeout(() => {
process.stdout.write(`Created!\n`)
resolve()
}, waitTime)
}
})
})
}).then(() => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
process.stdout.write('Insert Line... ')
lines = 10
let loop = (async () => {
for (let i = 0; i < lines; i++) {
await new Promise(resolve =>
db.run(`INSERT INTO test (data) VALUES ('a')`, (err) => {
if (err) {
process.stdout.write(`Inserting Error ${err.message}\n`)
throw (err)
} else {
setTimeout(() => {
// process.stdout.write(`Line ${i} Inserted!\n`)
process.stdout.write(`, ${i+1}`)
resolve() // BUG 1: if this line is commented, comment it, it will insert only 1 line
}, waitTime)
}
})
)
}
})()
process.stdout.write(`, IDone\n`)
resolve() // BUG 2: If this line is commented, the promise chain stops here
})
}).then(() => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
process.stdout.write('Count Line(s)... ')
db.all(`SELECT COUNT(*) AS totalLines FROM test`, [], (err, rows) => {
if (err) {
process.stdout.write(`Count Error ${err.message}\n`)
reject()
} else {
setTimeout(() => {
process.stdout.write(` ${rows[0].totalLines} Count!\n`)
resolve()
}, waitTime)
}
})
})
}).then(() => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
process.stdout.write('Select Line(s)... ')
db.all('SELECT data FROM test', [], (err, rows) => {
if (err) {
process.stdout.write(`Select Error ${err.message}\n`)
reject()
} else {
rows.forEach((row) => {
console.log(row.data);
})
setTimeout(() => {
process.stdout.write(`${rows[0].totalLines} Select!\n`)
resolve()
}, waitTime)
}
})
})
}).then(() => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
process.stdout.write('Close DB... ')
db.close((err) => {
if (err) {
process.stdout.write(`Closing Error ${err.message}\n`)
reject()
} else {
setTimeout(() => {
process.stdout.write(`Closed!\n`)
resolve()
}, waitTime)
}
})
})
}).then(() => {
console.log('Finished')
})
After the great explanation from #CertainPerformance (Thanks a lot), I was able to get it running. I believe it is now "the right" way to do it. May be there are some better ways, but for now, it is ok for me, bellow the final code:
const sqlite3 = require('sqlite3')
let db = new sqlite3.Database('./test.db');
lines = 10
process.stdout.write('Starting... ')
var test = new Promise((resolve, reject) => { process.stdout.write(`Promise Created...!\n`)
resolve()
})
test.then(() => { process.stdout.write('Drop Table... ')
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
db.run(`DROP TABLE IF EXISTS test`, (err) => {
if (err) {
reject(err)
} else { process.stdout.write(`Dropped!\n`)
resolve() }
})
})
}).then(() => { process.stdout.write('Create Table... ')
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
db.run(`CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS test (data TEXT)`, (err) => {
if (err) {
reject(err)
} else {
process.stdout.write(`Created!\n`)
resolve() }
})
})
}).then(() => { process.stdout.write('Insert Line... ')
let insertLoop = (async () => {
for (let i = 0; i < lines; i++) {
await new Promise(resolve =>
db.run(`INSERT INTO test (data) VALUES ('a')`, (err) => {
if (err) {
reject(err)
} else { ( i == 0 ) ? process.stdout.write(`${i + 1}`) : process.stdout.write(`, ${i + 1}`)
resolve() }
})
)
}
process.stdout.write(`, Inserted!\n`)
})()
return insertLoop
}).then(() => { process.stdout.write('Count Line(s)... ')
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
db.all(`SELECT COUNT(*) AS totalLines FROM test`, [], (err, rows) => {
if (err) {
reject(err)
} else { process.stdout.write(` ${rows[0].totalLines} Counted!\n`)
resolve()
}
})
})
}).then(() => { process.stdout.write('Close DB... ')
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
db.close((err) => {
if (err) {
reject(err)
} else { process.stdout.write(`Closed!\n`)
resolve()
}
})
})
}).then(() => {
console.log('Finished')
}).catch((err) => {
process.stdout.write(`The process did not finish successfully: ${err}`)
})
There are two main issues. First, in the second .then, you declare loop as an async function that is immediately invoked: this means that loop will resolve to a Promise. The trimmed code looks like:
}).then(() => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let loop = (async () => {
// do some asynchronus stuff
})()
resolve() // BUG 2
})
}).then(() => {
Declaring a Promise alone will not cause the current thread to wait for it. The above code doesn't work as expected for the same reason that this code prints after immediately:
console.log('start');
const prom = new Promise((resolve) => {
setTimeout(resolve, 500);
});
console.log('after');
You must call .then on a Promise (or await the Promise) in order to schedule additional operations after the Promise completes. Or, if you're currently inside a .then, you can return the Promise, which will mean that the next .then will run as soon as the returned Promise resolves:
}).then(() => {
let loop = (async () => {
// do some asynchronus stuff
})();
return loop;
}).then(() => {
// this block will run once `loop` resolves
Note the lack of a new Promise((resolve... constructor above - inside a .then, just returning the next Promise is often the preferred way to go, since it means a lot less code and avoids an antipattern.
The other issue with the current code is that errors will not be caught. For example, if your
db.run(`INSERT INTO test (data) VALUES ('a')`, (err) => {
if (err) {
process.stdout.write(`Inserting Error ${err.message}\n`)
throw (err)
// else call resolve()
throws an error, the Promise that's currently being awaited at that point will never resolve, nor will it reject - it will remain pending and unfulfilled forever. You should pass reject as the second argument to the Promise constructor, and call it when there's an error (instead of throw), for example:
await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
db.run(`INSERT INTO test (data) VALUES ('a')`, (err) => {
if (err) {
process.stdout.write(`Inserting Error ${err.message}\n`)
reject(err)
} else {
// ...
This way, the awaited Promise will get rejected, which means that the whole loop will reject, and if the loop is returned, it'll allow a .catch to catch the error, for example:
var test = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
// ...
});
test.then(() => {
return new Promise(...
// ...
})
.then(() => {
return new Promise(...
// ..
})
.then(() => {
return new Promise(...
// ..
})
.catch((err) => {
process.stdout.write(`The process did not finish successfully:`, err)
// handle errors
});
Note that, unless each db. function call needs to execute serially, it would be better to make all the requests at once, and resolve once each request has finished - this can significantly reduce the time required for the script to run. Create an array of Promises for each asynchronous call, then call Promise.all on that array to get a Promise that resolves when all of those Promises are done (or, rejects as soon as one of those Promises rejects). For example, for the second .then:
}).then(() => {
process.stdout.write('Insert Line... ')
const proms = Array.from(
{ length: lines },
(_, i) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
db.run(`INSERT INTO test (data) VALUES ('a')`, (err) => {
if (err) {
process.stdout.write(`Inserting Error ${err.message}\n`)
reject(err)
} else {
setTimeout(() => {
// process.stdout.write(`Line ${i} Inserted!\n`)
process.stdout.write(`, ${i+1}`)
resolve()
}, waitTime);
}
});
})
);
return Promise.all(proms);
}).then(() => {
Nothing else in your code looks to deal with asynchronous loops, luckily.
You may also consider a utility function like Promisify which will turn callback-based functions to Promises without all the extra new Promise(... boilerplate every time there's an asynchronous call.
Further improvements can be made by promisifying db into reusable functions, and leveraging the full power of async/await instead of mixing it with then:
const sqlite3 = require('sqlite3')
let db = new sqlite3.Database('./test.db');
function runDbAsync(sql) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
db.run(sql, (err) => {
if (err) reject(err);
else resolve();
});
});
}
function getDbAsync(sql, val) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
db.all(`SELECT COUNT(*) AS totalLines FROM test`, [], (err, rows) => {
if (err) reject(err);
else resolve(rows);
});
});
}
function closeDbAsync() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
db.close((err) => {
if (err) reject(err);
else resolve();
});
});
}
function write(text) {
process.stdout.write(text);
}
function writeLn(text) {
write(text + "\n");
}
async function main() {
const lines = 10
writeLn('Starting... ')
write('Drop Table... ');
await runDbAsync(`DROP TABLE IF EXISTS test`);
writeLn(`Dropped!`);
write('Create Table... ');
await runDbAsync(`CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS test (data TEXT)`);
writeLn(`Created!`);
write('Insert Line... ');
for (let i = 0; i < lines; i++) {
await runDbAsync(`INSERT INTO test (data) VALUES ('a')`);
write( i == 0 `${i + 1}` : `, ${i + 1}`);
}
writeLn(`, Inserted!`);
write('Count Line(s)... ')
const rows = getDbAsync(`SELECT COUNT(*) AS totalLines FROM test`, []);
writeLn(` ${rows[0].totalLines} Counted!`)
write('Close DB... ');
await closeDbAsync();
writeLn(`Closed!`);
}
main().then(() => {
console.log('Finished')
}, err => {
writeLn(`The process did not finish successfully: ${err}`)
});

Request promises with actions-on-google node v2

I have a similar problem like Use Async Functions in DialogFlow WebHook but that solution, changing request-promises for request-promises-native, didn't work for me, the difference it's that I'm using actions-on-google lib with ActionsSDK instead DialogFlow one, here is my code:
function call() {
var options = {
url: "https://google.es"
};
return request(options)
.then((res) => {
console.log("Success", res);
Promise.resolve();
})
.catch((err) => {
console.log("Error", err);
Promise.resolve();
});
}
const handleAction = (conv) => {
call()
.then(() => {
console.log("Going to ASK");
conv.ask('Hi, how is it going?');
return Promise.resolve();
})
.catch(error => {
console.log("Ask ERROR");
conv.ask('Hi, how is it going?');
return Promise.resolve();
});
}
app.intent('actions.intent.MAIN', (conv) => {
handleAction(conv);
});
If I change the call function for this one:
function call() {
let prom = new Promise((resolve,reject) =>{
resolve();
});
return prom;
}
It works like a charm. I don't understand where I'm wrong, I'm returning promises until the intent. Any idea?
Thanks!
you can resolve this problem using async/await. It will look like this. It might help you.
(async () => {
async function call() {
var options = {
url: "https://google.es"
};
return await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
request(options)
.then((res) => {
resolve(res);
})
.catch((err) => {
console.log("Error", err);
reject(err)
});
}
}
const handleAction = await call(); //you will get result on handle Action varaible
})();

Resources