In order to present a brand new way of developing a web application, our team decided to create an Angular 2 web application that will be integrated within an already existing Maven Project in Eclipse Mars which DOES NOT use NodeJS nor Angular.
We are currently using the frontend-maven-plugin belonging to com.github.eirslet and managed to download and install both node.exe and npm.
Now, here is the deal: our web application has its own package.json file with all the configuration required to run properly, BUT we would like to be able to differentiate between the web applications, as each one of them belongs to a different working directory (i.e. com.webapp.app01, com.webapp.app02, ...).
As the plugin does not let the user use the npm install command on different directories, we were wondering about how we could reach this goal... maybe using a general package.json, but generating all .js and dependency files in each project directories.
Would that be something even possible?
Could you give us some help?
Thank you.
Cheers!
What I would suggest is to have a multi-module maven project, with a common parent, and children, that would give you this kind of architecture:
parent-project
|-child-project1 (java project)
|-child-project2 (webapp1)
|-child-project3 (webapp2)
|....
|-child-projectn (webapp n-1)
This way you can have for each web-app the frontend plugin available. And you can handle the flow of the build from the parent project (for instance if webapp2 needs to be built before webapp1, you can orchestrate it from the parent)
We decided to generate all the libraries locally and upload them to SVN, due to the fact that the already existing structure cannot be changed and the maven plugin is too much limited for our purpose.
Thank you for your replies, though. :-)
Related
I currently have a React based website. I want to start on the process of converting the website to also work natively through react-native. I understand that I will need to re-build the UI for the native version.
My goal however is to leave both versions in the same node project so I dont have to update my non-view based code separately for both versions of the code base.
Is it possible to add the dependencies and files necessary for react native while not having to separate the native code out into it's own completely separate project and if so how?
Lerna is a tool that optimizes the workflow around managing multi-package repositories with git and npm.
How can I share components across multiple react projects without having to publish them on a public package manager like NPM?
Option 1: You can use npm and use private packages so they're not external facing. There are also artifactories and scoped packages that usually represent company-wide projects that can be public or private. See https://docs.npmjs.com/private-modules/intro and https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/scope.
Option 2: Essentially, you can develop projects with a flattened structure. You can then import various projects and/or components into other projects or folders. This is entirely dependent on your codebase and configuration. With this model though, a lot of times publishing to npm comes fairly naturally since each folder may be its own project with its own package.json.
Updated:
Option 3: Bit focuses on the composability of components from everything from the little things like a button to the actual view and app itself—each target is its own package. Overall, it's an opinionated, yet customizable framework that can enable quicker development, managed dependencies, and organized code.
Option 4: RushJS is a monorepo manager built by Microsoft that allows for flexibility of different kinds of apps and services utilizing pnpm underneath (as opposed to yarn and npm), which alleviates problems that stem from dependency issues.
Check out Bit:
Bit is an open-source cli tool for collaborating on isolated components across projects and repositories. Use Bit to distribute discrete components from a design library or a project into a standalone reusable package and utilize it across applications.
You could also upload them to a private git repo such a Github and then pull them in from there.
Ryanve has a nice example over here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/28729646/1592783
You could create a repo of shared components and then have your Node.js start script call a shell script to do a git pull from that repo and the move the shared components from that directory to your project's directory. That way, every time you call run 'npm start' you will have the latest version of the shared components loaded into your project
Quick background: I'm a java web developer. I deploy my apps in EARs. I'm not familiar with how the build process works for the new JS frameworks like ReactJS. I have been using WebPack as a build tool but only in dev. I'm trying to keep up with the growing tech because my company is slowly adapting to it.
Question 1
How does the build process work when deploying a React app to a prod app server (or any server at that)?
I'm guessing Node will have to be installed on the app server with WebPack as a globally installed package so when the app is ready to be built, WebPack will kick off its build script in the package.json file that will create your bundle.
Question 2
If the above ^^ is somewhat correct, how do you kick off the WebPack build script?
My company uses IBM's Rational Team Concert as version control. RTC uses Ant scripts as their build so I'm guessing since we have a Spring Boot API that uses Gradle, we can tell the Ant script in RTC to run the Gradle script so the Spring API will build. Right before the Gradle build ends, Gradle can kick off the WebPack build script that will create the bundle.js. And from there you should have a full functioning frontend service just like you would when developing it.
This whole process has a been a headache to wrap my mind around and would like to get some clarification because there's only so much I can research without pulling all of my hair out. I hope I'm somewhat close to the correct way this process works.
In new version webpack (>=4) added new options mode for set environment. For get more information read this tutorial
webpack conf for production
and about deploy (ci,cd), webpack required before build, after build you don't need any js tools (SSR other case). Just create archive (project_${branch_name}.zip) and upload some store like gitlab, awsS3, etc and download when deploy.
I'm recommend don't mixing ui with backend if it possible split project other repository.
Note that RTC has multiple build definition templates. ANT is just one of them. You can also use the Maven build template, the Command Line as well if using the Jazz build engine. If its connected to Hudson/Jenkins for its build functions, you can use those as well.
I'm working on a web application that currently uses vuejs for part of its interface. The back-end is NOT in Node, so there is currently no package.json file or any tool from the typical npm stack in this repository.
We already have a bunch of non-npm dependencies that need to be installed in order to use the repository, so my coworkers aren't too open about the idea of adding another layer of complexity. I can't blame them for that, it's the reason why I use npm scripts and not even gulp in my other projects. I'm tired of spending hours learning and configuring build tools that never end up doing what I want anyway.
But since the vue-cli tool no longer includes the build command, I'm a bit stuck. Is there really no more CLI app to build vue files at all? And if so, what would be the smart way to use vue without webpack? Template strings are not maintainable at all, and <script type="text/x-template"> don't work when you want to use multiple components from multiple files in the same page.
I realize your question says 'without webpack' but you may be interested in backpack - a CLI app i came across for building Vue.js without requiring you to write any configuration code. It is basically webpack preconfigured as a minimalistic build system for Node.js. It provides two commands, dev for live reload enabled development and build for building you project.
I've got a VS2013 solution with a mix of NodeJS (using TypeScript) and C# class library projects (they're bound together by EdgeJS). Where the NodeJS projects are concerned, one can be considered a library (for a RabbitMQ bus implementation), two are applications which are meant to be hosted as part of a fourth project with both using the bus.
So, one project (host) which will depend on three projects (bus, app1 and app2) (it starts the bus, and passes it to app1 and app2).
Of course, I could just lump all these projects together and be done with it - but that's a horrible idea.
How do I package these projects up for proper reuse and referencing (like assemblies in traditional .NET)?
Is that best done with NPM? If so, does VS provide anything in this area? If not, then what?
Note that, aside from the Bus project, I'm not looking to release these publicly - I'm not sure if that changes anything.
In general, if something can be bundled together as an independent library, then it's best to consider this a Node package and thus, refactor that logic out to it's own project. It sounds like you've already done this to some extent, separating out your bus, app1, and app2 projects. I would recommend they each have their own Git repositories if they are separate packages.
Here's some documentation to get you started with Node packages:
https://www.npmjs.org/doc/misc/npm-developers.html
The host project, if it's not something you would package but instead deploy, probably does not need to be bundled as a Node package. I would instead just consider this something that would be pulled down from Git and started on some server machine.
With all that said, your last line is important:
I'm not looking to release these publicly
GitHub does have private repositories, but as of now npmjs.org does not have private repositories. There are options to create your own private repository (Sinopia and Kappa offer different ways of accomplishing this), but if you don't want this code available for everyone do not deploy it do npmjs.org. You can still package it up in the way I've outlined it above, just not deploy it as of yet.