We can have 4-5 people signing contracts at once, and are currently using the 'setShared' function to share text across all signing experiences for each client. However, when we use this, the text on the final contract comes out very blurry because the text layers get stacked on top of each other.
Sample text here:
I don't think setting Shared property is causing the problem. If you are setting the bold property on the tab then I suggest removing it. Also trying changing the font/fontSize properties to get the result you are expecting.
Related
Total newbi here. I have played with studio for a few h but can not get over the next hurdle.
I would like to draw wine growing areas on the map.
Managed to draw areas. Tick.
I would like to give these areas a unique name.
Managed to create labels.
But I don't understand how the text is associated with the area.
I then want to search for this label, so that the map zooms in on that area.
Just like when I search for "Coburg, Victoria, Australia".
I have managed to publish my maps including the areas in my WordPress website.
So my access token and my style does the right thing.
Need some hints how to get the labelling and searching happening.
Thank you for any help.
Regards
Romano
and welcome to using Mapbox.
I would like to give these areas a unique name. Managed to create labels. But I don't understand how the text is associated with the area.
Have you tried creating a Symbol layer, and setting the Text field to the appropriate field in your data source?
I then want to search for this label, so that the map zooms in on that area. Just like when I search for "Coburg, Victoria, Australia".
This goes beyond using Studio, and into building web maps with mapbox-gl-js. One starting point would be to use the Finder Impact Tool.
This might involve processing the data twice -- once for your base map, and another time in a spreadsheet to make available to the Finder template. It's possible to just do once, but would involve some modifying the Finder template.
https://labs.mapbox.com/education/impact-tools/finder-with-filters/
I am working on designing webpage UI where some experimental data is stored. This data could be inaccurate sometimes so I'm providing a button at the bottom of the page which redirects the user to the new issue webpage in GitLab. Look at the sample below.
And this button will take the user to somewhere like this:
The URL behind the button is simply
<full-path-to-some-gitlab-repo>/issues/new?issue[title]=Issue%20with%20experiment%20%201
which was taken from GitLab official documentation.
As you can see here, there's an option to automatically fill the Title section directly from URL but I couldn't figure out how to do the same for Labels. Is there any way to do it this way?
For internal requirements, there must be a label automatically selected and the users can't be relied on to select it by themselves. For each webpage, a new label is assigned which makes it possible to extract all the issues related to that webpage later just by extracting all issues with that label. This might not be an optimal way to do this so if you have any other suggestions, please put them in comments. Thanks.
This does not seem yet supported, regarding pre-filling labels on issues.
That was requested in issue 63392, but without solution for now.
I'm inputting text in a texbox which is working fine. But there is an existing watermark in the textbox. The entered text in the textbox is inputted as a watermark, hence clicking on 'Next' button results in an error.
Can somebody help on how to enable textfield before entering text using Blue Prism tool?
Can you sandkey event(like SAPCE key) into that field it may cause the watermark to clear it self?
How do you clear that filed in the first palce?
quoting directly from the browser automation guide which you should've read and consumed before being a developer:
Using a Write stage to write to an HTML element such as a text field
does not always work properly. For example, you might try writing to a
username field, only to see a message appear on the web site saying
something like “Please enter a username”, even though you can see that
the value has been correctly written to the field. This can happen
because the data validation functions used by the web form might be
expecting keystrokes, and the write stage has “fooled” it. To get
around this, you will need to use a Navigate stage to call the Send
Keys Action instead of using a Write stage. Some websites have maximum
character limits imposed on some text fields. Using a Write stage can
sometimes fool the website into allowing too many characters into the
field, because the Write stage “sets” the field value rather than
keying characters into it. This is important to bear in mind because
if a field has been filled with more characters than the website would
usually allow, the website could produce an error when you try to
submit or post the data.
to get around this go ahead and use sendkeys, those are likely the best option to push past this validation tool issue on the website.
We want to "Categorize" our work orders more systematically. So far, we've been using Description, but we feel it is not a reliable way. We were hoping to use Failure Class as a starting point, but we find that having on a different tab discourages technicians and the help desk from classifying the work order.
Is it possible to add/duplicate the Failure Class field to Work Order Tracking screen?
Normally, I wouldn't ask, but was not clear if this was possible because Failure Class, Codes, and Tracking are different tables in Maximo. So, I wasn't sure how this would work exactly...
The simple answer is to use Application Designer's copy / paste functionality to duplicate the field. The specific field in question is on the top level of the Work Order Tracking application and facilitates interaction with the FAILURECODE attribute of the Main Object of the application, which is WORKORDER. Therefore, a copy / paste operation should be all you need. (Note: Application Designer's copy / paste functionality is used via that application's toolbar buttons, not Ctrl+C / Ctrl+V.) And if using Application Designer's copy / paste functionality doesn't work to your satisfaction, I would recommend exporting the XML for the application, copying the line of XML as desired and giving it a unique id, and importing the updated XML back in to Maximo. (Application Designer has toolbar buttons for exporting and importing an application's XML.)
You mentioned difficulty getting users to fill it in as a driver for asking the question. Another solution, which you can do as well as or instead of copying the field, is to specify the Failure Class on each Asset. Then, when an Asset is put on a Work Order, its Failure Class will be copied over, saving the users work and risk of not choosing correctly. And another idea is to highlight the Failure tab until a Failure Class is supplied.
And you also mentioned that the driver behind getting them to fill in the Failure Class, and etc, was to help categorize work. To that point, you should know that Failure Classes, in specific, and Failure Codes, in general, are intended to be used to help you determine what's going wrong with your assets, how often, and how the problems are being fixed. So, using them to categorize work is a bad idea. Instead, you should be using the Work Type field and Classifications, because categorizing work is what these are meant to be used for. The Work Type field is already on the Work Order tab, and Classifications fields are on the Specifications tab. You could copy the Classifications fields the same as I directed above for the Failure Class field.
I'm relatively new to Expression Engine, and as I'm learning it I am seeing some stuff missing that WordPress has had for a while. A big one for me is shortcodes, since I will use these to allow CMS users to place more complex content in place with their other content.
I'm not seeing any real equivalent to this in EE, apart from a forthcoming plugin that's in private beta.
As an initial test I'm attempting to fake shortcodes by using delimited strings (e.g. #foo#) in the content field, then using a regex to pull those out and pass them to a function that can retrieve the content out of EE's database.
This brings me to a second question, which is that in looking at EE's API docs, there doesn't appear to be a simple means of retrieving the channel entries programmatically (thinking of something akin to WP's built-in get_posts function).
So my questions are:
a) Can this be done?
b) If so, is my method of approaching it reasonable? Or is there something stupidly obvious I'm missing in my approach?
To reiterate, my main objective here is to have some means of allowing people managing content to drop a code in place in their content that will be replaced with channel content.
Thanks for any advice or help you can give me.
Here's a simple example of the functionality you're looking for.
1) Start by installing Low Replace.
2) Create two Global Variables called gv_hello and gv_goodbye with the values "Hello" and "Goodbye" respectively.
3) Put this text into the body of an entry:
[say_hello]
Nice to see you.
[say_goodbye]
4) Put this into your template, wrapping the Low Replace tag around your body field.
{exp:low_replace
find="[say_hello]|[say_goodbye]"
replace="{gv_hello}|{gv_goodbye}"
multiple="yes"
}
{body}
{/exp:low_replace}
5) It should output this into your browser:
Hello
Nice to see you.
Goodbye
Obviously, this is a really simple example. You can put full blown HTML into your global variable. For example, we've used that to render a complex, interactive graphic that isn't editable but can be easily dropped into a page by any editor.
Unfortunately, due to parse order issues, EE tags won't work inside Global Variables. If you need EE tags in your short code output, you'll need to use Low Variables addon instead of Global Variables.
Continued from the comment:
Do you have examples of the kind of shortcodes you want to support/include? Because i have doubts if controlling the page-layout from a text-field or wysiwyg-field is the way to go.
If you want editors to be able to adjust layout or show/hide extra parts on the page, giving them access to some extra fields in the channel, is (imo) much more manageable and future-proof. For instance some selectfields, a relationship (or playa) field, or a matrix, to let them choose which parts to include/exclude on a page, or which entry from another channel to pull content from.
As said in the comment: i totally understand if you want to replace some #foo# tags with images or data from another field (see other answers: nsm-transplant, low_replace). But, giving an editor access to shortcodes and picking them out, is like writing a template-engine to generate ee-template code for the ee-template-engine.
Using some custom fields to let editors pick and choose parts to embed is, i think, much more manageable.
That being said, you could make a plugin to parse the shortcodes from a textareas content, and then program a lot, to fetch data from other modules you want to support. For channel entries you could build out of the channel data library by objectiveHTML. https://github.com/objectivehtml/Channel-Data
I hear you, I too miss shortcodes from WP -- though the reason they work so easily there is the ubiquity of the_content(). With the great flexibility of EE comes fewer blanket solutions.
I'd suggest looking at NSM Transplant. It should fit the bill for you.
There is also a plugin called Shortcode, which you can find here at
Devot-ee
A quote from the page:
Shortcode aims to allow for more dynamic use of content by authors and
editors, allowing for injection of reusable bits of content or even
whole pieces of functionality into any field in EE