Related
Working in Excel 2019. In the same realm as one of my previous questions, I'm working with a database that I'm trying to look through via functions to get my values. The VLOOKUP tool worked well for going through the time-table to find the value I need, but it's not working when I'm trying to find RPM as the look-up value. Here's the gist of the data.
We have Time(sec, A:A in "PPT_156Data" sheet), RPM (B:B in same sheet), and Pressure (Bar, C:C in same sheet).
From the graph, you can see that we ramp to 8000RPM over the course of around 60 seconds, and then ramp down to 0RPM over the next 30. Test times WILL vary and rates WILL vary from pump-to-pump, as each one will give different data values based on the pump. That's why, say, 1000RPM will not be in the same spot every time.
I'm trying to find the RPM at 1000 intervals up to 8000 and report out the pressure at said intervals.
Here's what I tried so far, with imagery as well.
'Disregard if you see W25 for S25, I had just been trying multiple things
First, I attempted the same VLOOKUP code I had done for the time-table prior
=VLOOKUP(S25,PPT156_Data!B:C,2,TRUE) 'S25 being lookup value
This worked fine, UP UNTIL it hit a particular spot. For some reason, as soon as it tries to find an approximate match for 6663RPM, it faults out and gives incorrect data. From then on, all the way to 8000RPM, it will ONLY give the result of 0.139BAR. I have no clue why. Trying to find that value in the return array gives multiple results, but it's not like it's the ONLY value left.
So, I tried to do a wildcard for it with the following code
=VLOOKUP("*"&S25&"*",PPT156_Data!B:C,2,FALSE) 'Attempted both False and True states
Gave N/A for both of the values. Not sure if I'm entering in the wildcard incorrectly here. The decimal places that the RPM can go to ranges between 2-5 (hundredths to hundred-thousandths, IE 7000.00750)
I then thought maybe an Index Match would work.
=INDEX(PPT156_Data!B:C,MATCH(S25,PPT156_Data!B:B,-1),2)
Tried that in wildcard format too, returned nothing. So, I decided to see if I could even match a value for RPM with the following attempts
=MATCH(S25,PPT_Data156!B:B,-1)
This gave nothing. HOWEVER, when setting the match specification to 1, it gives the very last row in the data set. So, I decided to find a value in column B, and attempt to match with it exactly.
=MATCH(7000.07,PPT_Data156!B:B,0)
This also returned nothing. Even though, you can see in my images, that the value is ABSOLUTELY there. SIGFIG shows it's 7000.1 but trust me, it's 7000.07. So that sort of threw me for a loop. Figuring maybe there was a different error and grasping at straws, tried another Index Match formula, this time subtracting the lookup value in an attempt to get it extremely close and absolute value/min it
=INDEX(PPT156_Data!C:C,MATCH(MIN(ABS(PPT156_Data!B:B-S25)),ABS(PPT156_Data!B:B-S25),1))
I'm at a loss. I'm not sure if because the rate ramps up and down, thus not being in ascending order, is causing a problem? I can't change that. I am thinking I may need to create a macro for this in some way? Maybe a helper table? But I can't even FIND the match value to create a helper table. Any help at all would be VERY appreciative.
Thank you for your time looking at my post.
I am presuming that you want the first pressure reading when the RPM hits above each 1000 interval. I got to a solution but feels a bit complex.
=index(C:C,1/max(iferror(1/(row(B:B)*(B:B>E12)),Null)))
Breaking this down, we create a boolean array where the RPM hits above the interval
=B:B>E12
and then we multiple this by the array of the rows of column B
row(B:B)*(B:B>E12)
which gives us an array of the row numbers when the RPM is above E12 but also zero for all the ones that do not.
=iferror(1/(row(B:B)*(B:B>E12)),Null)
We then force an error with the zeros by dividing and replace with null. We get the max since we inverse the row numbers and then inverse again to get the row number back.
=index(C:C,1/max(iferror(1/(row(B:B)*(B:B>E12)),Null)))
[Excel working screenshot][1]
[1]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/uhcaX.png
I have an excel file that is populated with a lot of formulas. I am trying to populate the result by subtructing the latest value to the previous value and dividing the result given in the cell. Please see the photo below. As you can see, starting in row 6 i used the formula of:
"=ABS(IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),10),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),9))/E7,IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),9),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),8))/E7,IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),8),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),7))/E7,IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),7),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),6))/E7,IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),6),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),5))/E7,IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),5),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),4))/E7,IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),4),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),3))/E7,IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),3),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),2))/E7,IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),2),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),1))/E7,IF(F7<=LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),1),(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),1))/E7*(F7-LARGE(IF(find3=$H7,$F$6:$F$196),2))/E7)))))))))))"
In order to get the result of =(f7-f6)/e7. I added if functions cause there are some values that the lookup value is mentioned ($H7) below the table. When the lookup function was changed (please see the second photo), the formula was changed also into this:
"=ABS(IF(F15<=LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),10),(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),9))/E15,IF(F15<=LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),9),(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),8))/E15,IF(F15<=LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),8),(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),7))/E15,IF(F15<=LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),7),(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),6))/E15,IF(F15<=LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),6),(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),5))/E15,IF(F15<=LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),5),(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),4))/E15,IF(F15<=LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),4),(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),3))/E15,IF(F15<=LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),3),(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),2))/E15,IF(F15<=LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),2),(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),1))/E15,(F15-LARGE(IF(find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196),2))/E15))))))))))"
But I've got a result of a #num! error. It's the same statement, the only difference is the looked up value. And when I try to show the calculation steps (Please see the third photo attached below), it says I've got an error in the first statement but why it was working on the first lookup value?
I am noob in excel. Please help me!!!
The reason for this error is that the LARGE function returns #NUM because the underlying array is empty / contains the FALSE result from your IF function (see here for details https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/large-function-3af0af19-1190-42bb-bb8b-01672ec00a64).
The reason here likely is that your find3=$C15,$F$6:$F$196 does not find a match.
Since we do not know what find3 is, you will need to look into the reason for that on your end (i.e., is there value of 5725 EGJ in your find3 data range? If not, why not? If yes, are you sure it spelled the same way (no leading spaces)?).
Once that is fixed you should be good to go.
I have been continually adding in complexity to my formulas to accomodate the large amount of data. I have been trying to simplify this excel formula but cannot seem to find a way that works well. I would appreciate any advice!
{=IFERROR(IF(INDEX(FullFlow_2,SMALL(IF(FullFlow_2[SN]=[#SN],ROW(FullFlow_2[SN])-ROW(INDEX(FullFlow_2[SN],1,1))+1),COLUMN(M$2)-COLUMN($L$2)),4)="Complete",INDEX(FullFlow_2,SMALL(IF(FullFlow_2[SN]=[#SN],ROW(FullFlow_2[SN])-ROW(INDEX(FullFlow_2[SN],1,1))+1),COLUMN(M$2)-COLUMN($L$2)),2),IF(VLOOKUP([#SN],FullSNList_2,8,FALSE)="None",IF(ISNUMBER(MATCH(SUBSTITUTE(TRIM(M4),"`",""),TRIM($L4:L4),0)),INDEX(FullFlow_2,SMALL(IF(FullFlow_2[SN]=[#SN],ROW(FullFlow_2[SN])-ROW(INDEX(FullFlow_2[SN],1,1))+1),COLUMN(M$2)-COLUMN($L$2)),2)&"` ",INDEX(FullFlow_2,SMALL(IF(FullFlow_2[SN]=[#SN],ROW(FullFlow_2[SN])-ROW(INDEX(FullFlow_2[SN],1,1))+1),COLUMN(M$2)-COLUMN($L$2)),2)&" "),IF(OR(VLOOKUP([#SN],FullSNList_2,8,FALSE)="Dev",VLOOKUP([#SN],FullSNList_2,8,FALSE)="ECO",VLOOKUP([#SN],FullSNList_2,8,FALSE)="Rework"),IF(ISNUMBER(MATCH(SUBSTITUTE(TRIM(M4),"`",""),TRIM($L4:L4),0)),INDEX(FullFlow_2,SMALL(IF(FullFlow_2[SN]=[#SN],ROW(FullFlow_2[SN])-ROW(INDEX(FullFlow_2[SN],1,1))+1),COLUMN(M$2)-COLUMN($L$2)),2)&"` ",INDEX(FullFlow_2,SMALL(IF(FullFlow_2[SN]=[#SN],ROW(FullFlow_2[SN])-ROW(INDEX(FullFlow_2[SN],1,1))+1),COLUMN(M$2)-COLUMN($L$2)),2)&" "),IF(ISNUMBER(MATCH(SUBSTITUTE(TRIM(M4),"`",""),TRIM($L4:L4),0)),INDEX(FullFlow_2,SMALL(IF(FullFlow_2[SN]=[#SN],ROW(FullFlow_2[SN])-ROW(INDEX(FullFlow_2[SN],1,1))+1),COLUMN(M$2)-COLUMN($L$2)),2)&"` ",INDEX(FullFlow_2,SMALL(IF(FullFlow_2[SN]=[#SN],ROW(FullFlow_2[SN])-ROW(INDEX(FullFlow_2[SN],1,1))+1),COLUMN(M$2)-COLUMN($L$2)),2)&" ")))),"_")}
A little more info on the code. It is meant to scan a table and search for a step name (DOC###). Depending on other criteria's (if one column has none, rework, or broke, in it) spaces are added to the end to differentiate between them while being able to still be counted at a later step. Also, if a step is being done for the 2nd time, a period will be added afterwards.
I have been putting the formula in http://excelformulabeautifier.com/ to help read it a bit easier!
UPDATE: I have Modified the formula a bit and added explanations. The new code has replaced the old one in the body. I have attached pictures to show my explanation.
Formula Explanation PG 1
Formula Explanation PG 2
Example Data output
NOTES: In order for this to work for me, due to the circular references, I turned on Iterative Calculations and set the Max iterations to 2.
Removing the VLookups from the formula made the calculation time a lot shorter! Thank you all for your ideas! Any other suggestions are greatly appreciated!
Hello i'm having problems with getting this to work. What i'm trying to do is when you insert a set of measurements i want excel to show the ( In this case products) which are closest to those measurements.
here is a picture:
The result i'm trying to reach is when you type in the measurements you get product(s) and the manufacturer which are closest to those measurements.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
In essence, what you are after is an index+match function. It will allow you to find a value in one list, given a corresponding variable. In this case, given a measurement, it will find a manufacturer and product combo in your list.
Your problem is that you will need to adapt your data to allow for this. For example, you need to decide whether you only want the closest match for measurements or if you need the closest match that is greater than the measurement you provide.
It is also possible that you'll need to split your measurement column into two different columns (unless all you need is the total area irrespective of individual lengths).
You could potentially avoid the index+match by using conditional formatting, but that would still require the data manipulation.
Given the information you provided, the answer will never be much more informative than this. But this should get you started and the following steps can be made easier with help from google.
I have been searching all over for that but all i can find is the opposite of what i am looking for. If i save twice the value 10 for example, core data only save it once ! i am fetching all of the entries of an attributes array in order to add them but if there is the same number twice in that array its adding it only once ! when the array is suppose to be 10,10,10,5,5,1,1 the total would be 42 but what i get is an array with 10,5,1 for a total of 16. all i keep getting when i search for it is how to make sure to not get duplicate. I would like to show some code but since i have no idea where is that issue happening it would be a lot of code to put in here. if anyone as a clue of what is happening i would appreciate a quick help.
Thank you