Paging in MS Graph API - pagination

Graph API Paging explains that the response would contain a field #odata.nextLink which would contain a skiptoken pointing to the next page of contents.
When I test the API, I'm getting a fully-qualified MS Graph URL which contains the skiptoken as a query param. E.g. Below is the value I got for the field #odata.nextLink in the response JSON.
https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users?$top=25&$skiptoken=X%27445370740200001E3A757365723134406F33363561702E6F6E6D6963726F736F66742E636F6D29557365725F31363064343831382D343162382D343961372D383063642D653136636561303437343437001E3A7573657235407368616C696E692D746573742E31626F74322E696E666F29557365725F62666639356437612D333764632D343266652D386335632D373639616534303233396166B900000000000000000000%27
Is it safe to assume we'll always get the full URL and not just the skiptoken? Because if it's true, it helps avoid parsing the skiptoken and then concatenating it to the existing URL to form the full URL ourselves.
EDIT - Compared to MS Graph API, response obtained from Azure AD Graph API differs in that the JSON field #odata.nextLink contains only the skipToken and not the fully-qualified URL.

if you would like to have all users in single list, you can achieve that using the code that follows:
public static async Task<IEnumerable<User>> GetUsersAsync()
{
var graphClient = GetAuthenticatedClient();
List<User> allUsers = new List<User>();
var users = await graphClient.Users.Request().Top(998)
.Select("displayName,mail,givenName,surname,id")
.GetAsync();
while (users.Count > 0)
{
allUsers.AddRange(users);
if (users.NextPageRequest != null)
{
users = await users.NextPageRequest
.GetAsync();
}
else
{
break;
}
}
return allUsers;
}
I am using graph client library

Yes. In Microsoft Graph you can assume that you'll always get the fully qualified URL for the #odata.nextLink. You can simply use the next link to get the next page of results, and clients should treat the nextLink as opaque (which is described in both OData v4 and in the Microsoft REST API guidelines here: https://github.com/Microsoft/api-guidelines/blob/master/Guidelines.md#98-pagination.
This is different from AAD Graph API (which is not OData v4), which doesn't return the fully qualified next link, and means you need to do some more complicated manipulations to get the next page of results.
Hence Microsoft Graph should make this simpler for you.
Hope this helps,

The above code did not work for me without adding a call to 'CurrentPage' on the last line.
Sample taken from here.
var driveItems = new List<DriveItem>();
var driveItemsPage = await graphClient.Me.Drive.Root.Children.Request().GetAsync();
driveItems.AddRange(driveItemsPage.CurrentPage);
while (driveItemsPage.NextPageRequest != null)
{
driveItemsPage = await driveItemsPage.NextPageRequest.GetAsync();
driveItems.AddRange(driveItemsPage.CurrentPage);
}

I followed Tracy's answer and I was able to fetch all the messages at one go.
public List<Message> GetMessages()
{
var messages = new List<Message>();
var pages = Client.Users[_email]
.Messages
.Request(QueryOptions)
// Fetch the emails with attachments directly instead of downloading them later.
.Expand("attachments")
.GetAsync()
.Result;
messages.AddRange(pages.CurrentPage);
while (pages.NextPageRequest != null)
{
pages = pages.NextPageRequest.GetAsync().Result;
messages.AddRange(pages.CurrentPage);
}
return messages;
}

Related

Document Controller search handling of non file: URLs

Global documents with a custom URL scheme?
I have a need to cache info via a URL, with a custom scheme - non file:; to allow user access, and otherwise treat such URLs as global so any access via its URL sees the same data. It's just a fancy way to access user defaults.
I'm relying on a document controller's document(url:) to find such URL if its document exits - previously opened.
And yet it doesn't?
Consider this in app's did finish launching:
do {
let ibm = URL.init(string: "https://www.ibm.com")!
let doc = try docController.makeDocument(withContentsOf: ibm, ofType: "myType")
assert((doc == docController.document(for: ibm)), "created document is not found?")
} catch let error {
NSApp.presentError(error)
}
The assert fires!
So I pause and try to figure what I'm doing wrong.
Essentially I'm trying to support non-file: info, in a flat namespace, to provide consistent access and content.
Probably not an answer - why such URL schemes aren't being found but a working solution is to cache anything, front the search method with such a cache, but doing so creates a maintenance issue:
#objc dynamic var docCache = [URL:NSDocument]()
override var documents: [NSDocument] {
let appDocuments = Array(Set([Array(docCache.values),super.documents].reduce([], +)))
return appDocuments
}
override func document(for url: URL) -> NSDocument? {
if let document = super.document(for: url) {
docCache[url] = document
return document
}
else
if let document = docCache[url] {
return document
}
else
{
return nil
}
}
Enjoy.

Get a list of users who have full control to a sub site using j query or rest api in SharePoint 2013

Is there a way you can have a list of users who have full control to a web.
There is a function called owner which gives the owner of current site collection but is there anything similar for a sub site or web.
I use a function that gives you all the permission for the user when you provide a username and web URL
function getUserRoles(webUrl,accountName)
{
return getUserEffectivePermissions(webUrl,accountName).then(function(data){
var permissions = new SP.BasePermissions();
permissions.initPropertiesFromJson(data);
var permLevels = [];
for(var permLevelName in SP.PermissionKind.prototype) {
if (SP.PermissionKind.hasOwnProperty(permLevelName)) {
var permLevel = SP.PermissionKind.parse(permLevelName);
if(permissions.has(permLevel)){
permLevels.push(permLevelName);
}
}
}
return permLevels;
});
}
use this rest api to get all users and filter the login name
_api/web/siteusers
to get the subsite use this
/_api/web/webinfos

Orchard CMS ask for an invite token to link to backend data during registration using workflows only

I am using Orchard CMS v1.9 and want to display a custom registration page to accept the usual username/password/email and an additional token (invite token). The token will be used to match the user to some to custom data on the server.
I have walked through this blog Customizing User Registation With Dynamic Forms And Workflows. But in addition to what is achieved in this blog I want to force a registering user to enter a token. The token is used to lookup data on the server and create a link to the userpart.
Adding the token to the form is not the issue - its the querying and linking the entered token to the backend data and storing it in the userpart that im finding awkward.
Is this possible using just workflows - or do i need a custom module? I did not see a custom action that allowed me to match the token and link.
Is there a custom module already available that does something
similar?
Disclaimer: This approach is currently based on Orchard 1.10 but was initially developed on the 1.9.x branch. It does not rely on Dynamic Forms and Workflows, but I think you could achieve something similar with those modules.
Okay so I ended up building an example module with our approach to extended users / activation system. I stripped out a lot of code, but also let some juicy parts, which aren't directly related to your answer, in it.
First you should check out the UsersController it has the activate actions you are searching for. You may need to extend the orchard LogOn-View and include some GET & POST Actions accordingly.
[AllowAnonymous]
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult Activate(string activationCode)
{
// validation stuff....
var viewModel = new CustomUserActivate
{
// This is the activationCode you're looking for
ActivationCode = userFromActivationCode.ActivationCode,
UserName = userFromActivationCode.User.UserName,
WelcomeText = userFromActivationCode.WelcomeText,
Email = userFromActivationCode.User.Email
};
return this.View(viewModel);
}
[AllowAnonymous]
[HttpPost]
[ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
public ActionResult Activate(CustomUserActivate input)
{
if ( input == null )
{
this.ModelState.AddModelError("_form", this.T("The argument cannot be null").Text);
}
CustomUserPart customUserPart = null;
if ( this.ModelState.IsValid )
{
customUserPart = this.myService.GetCustomUserByActivationCode(input.ActivationCode);
if ( customUserPart == null || customUserPart.User == null || customUserPart.User.UserName != input.UserName )
{
this.notifier.Add(NotifyType.Error, this.T("The activation failed"));
}
if ( string.IsNullOrEmpty(input.Email) )
{
this.ModelState.AddModelError("Email", this.T("You must specify an email address.").Text);
}
else if ( input.Email.Length >= 255 )
{
this.ModelState.AddModelError("Email", this.T("The email address you provided is too long.").Text);
}
else if ( !Regex.IsMatch(input.Email, UserPart.EmailPattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase) )
{
// http://haacked.com/archive/2007/08/21/i-knew-how-to-validate-an-email-address-until-i.aspx
this.ModelState.AddModelError("Email", this.T("You must specify a valid email address.").Text);
}
else if ( !this.myService.VerifyEmailUnicity(customUserPart.User.Id, input.Email) )
{
this.ModelState.AddModelError("Email", this.T("This email address is already in use.").Text);
}
}
if ( !this.ModelState.IsValid )
{
return this.View(input);
}
Debug.Assert(customUserPart != null, "customUserPart != null");
var user = customUserPart.User;
var userParams = new CreateUserParams(user.UserName, input.Password, input.Email, passwordQuestion: null, passwordAnswer: null, isApproved: true);
this.myService.ActivateCustomUser(customUserPart.Id, userParams);
this.notifier.Add(NotifyType.Information, this.T("Your account was activated. You can now log in."));
return this.RedirectToAction("LogOn", "Account", new { area = "Orchard.Users" });
}
The interesting stuff happens in MyService.cs.
We designed the activation system so that you can still leverage all the features of the Orchard.User Module like Email-Verifcation.
For this we've implemented some CustomSettings, where you can decide if your user get's completely activated when an ActivationCode is used or if you trigger the normal Orchard mechanism.
I guess it's best to checkout the module and step through the code in Visual Studio.
Here a two screenshots of our activation views.
Step 1 - Enter your activation code
Step 2 - Fill in the remaining fields
Profit!
All the additional source is to make use of the CustomUser / ActivationCode in Workflows, Events, Tokens, etc. But I leave this for you to discover.
If you want more detailed descriptions of the source on GitHub let me know.
Hope this helps!

Accessing current user information for a netsuite html form using suitescript

I've been trying to figure auto-complete some values from netsuite onto our custom html form.
After a bit of researching, I found this gem: nlapiGetContext (http://www.netsuite.com/portal/developers/resources/APIs/Dynamic%20HTML/SuiteScriptAPI/MS_SuiteScriptAPI_WebWorks.1.1.html)
which should do exactly what it says,
However, when doing a console.log dump of nlapigetcontext()
the following information is displayed, not my current logged in user information
Here is my current test script:
if (window.addEventListener) { // Mozilla, Netscape, Firefox
window.addEventListener('load', WindowLoad, false);
} else if (window.attachEvent) { // IE
window.attachEvent('onload', WindowLoad);
}
function WindowLoad(event) {
alert(nlapiGetContext().getCompany());
console.log(nlapiGetContext());
}
Any help or guidance is appreciated!
Thank you!
Where is this form located? Context will only work if you are logged into the system, so this won't apply for online customer forms, those are considered to be "outside the system".
You can write a Suitelet to retrieve data from an external form if you are only retrieving values.
I use this to get campaign information on an external landing page.
function getCamData(request, response){
if ( request.getMethod() == 'GET' ){
response.setHeader('Custom-Header-CamID', 'CamID');
var camid = request.getParameter('camid');
var rec = nlapiLoadRecord('campaign', camid);
var o = new Object();
o.thisid = camid;
o.promocode = rec.getFieldValue('campaignid');
o.phone = rec.getFieldValue('custevent_cam_1300num');
o.family = rec.getFieldValue('family');
var myString = JSON.stringify(o);
response.write (myString);
}}
You request something like this:
https://forms.netsuite.com/app/site/hosting/scriptlet.nl?script=188&deploy=1&compid=xxxxxx&h=fb8224b74b24907a79e6&camid=8020
And returns something like this:
{"thisid":"8020","promocode":"CAM999","phone":"1800 111 222","family":"12"}
Also you can do server-side posting from an external site to a NetSuite customer online form, it will capture and validate the data as far as it has the entry fields set in NS, this is a great way to avoid using those horrible iframes.
Use these functions
nlapiGetContext().getName()
nlapiGetContext().getUser()
nlapiGetContext().getRole()
nlapiGetContext().getRoleId()
nlapiGetContext().getRoleCenter()
nlapiGetContext().getEmail()
nlapiGetContext().getContact()
nlapiGetContext().getCompany()
nlapiGetContext().getContact()
nlapiGetUser()
nlapiGetDepartment()
For details check http://suitecoder.appspot.com/static/api.html

Google Apps Application APIs: Is there a better way to find correspondance between a Documents List API Document and a Spreadsheets API Spreadsheet?

There is a task, using the .NET library for the Google Data API, to traverse across Google Drive folders, find required spreadsheets and change data of the selected spreadsheets.
Folders traversing is performed using the Google.GData.Documents.FolderQuery and other classes of the Google.GData.Documents namespace. After a correct document is found is necessary to manage it using the Google.GData.Spreadsheets.Spreadsheet class. Now I find a correspondence between the Google.GData.Documents.DocumentEntry class and the Google.GData.Spreadsheets.Spreadsheet class instances by extracting the document key from the document URL, iterating all spreadsheets, extracting a spreadsheet URL and comparing the two keys. The code looks like
private string GetKey(string url) {
string res = null;
Match match = Regex.Match(url, #"\?key=([A-Za-z0-9]+)");
if (match.Success) {
res = match.Groups[1].Value;
}
return res;
}
private SpreadsheetEntry GetSpreadSheetForDocument(SpreadsheetsService serviceSS, DocumentEntry entrySS) {
SpreadsheetEntry res = null;
string strSSKey = GetKey(entrySS.AlternateUri.Content);
Google.GData.Spreadsheets.SpreadsheetQuery query = new Google.GData.Spreadsheets.SpreadsheetQuery();
SpreadsheetFeed feed = serviceSS.Query(query);
foreach (SpreadsheetEntry entry in feed.Entries) {
if (GetKey(entry.AlternateUri.Content) == strSSKey) {
res = entry;
break;
}
}
return res;
}
Is there another, more elegant and correct, way to do this?
As best I can tell, not only is there no better way to do this, but even this technique will fail. As of recent(?) changes to Google Drive API, the keys for the SAME DOCUMENT retrieved by Document List versus Spreadsheets APIs are incompatible. Though using a spreadsheet URL constructed from a key returned by Document List API WILL get you a SpreadsheetEntry, spreadsheet operations on that entry are likely to produce "Invalid Token" Authentication Exceptions.
Your mileage may vary, depending on the authentication style you use. I am using the least recommended User Credentials method.

Resources