I want to execute a file in bash without the .sh extension.
Example: I have file "abc.sh" which I can execute directly (as I have added #!/bin/bash as the first line) but I want the filename to be just "abc"
If the file is already executable as abc.sh, then all you need to do is
mv abc.sh abc
(assuming you are in the directory where the file lives)
In a Linux or Unix shell, file extension doesn't affect whether it will execute or not.
In Linux you use ./filename too run a script. And you need execute permission:
chmod 755 filename
But you still need the "Shebang":
#!/bin/bash
From here I got this:
If you did not put the scripts directory in your PATH, and . (the
current directory) is not in the PATH either, you can activate the
script like this:
./script_name.sh
A script can also explicitly be executed by a given shell, but
generally we only do this if we want to obtain special behavior, such
as checking if the script works with another shell or printing traces
for debugging:
rbash script_name.sh
sh script_name.sh
bash -x script_name.sh
What are the permissions on the file? To make it executable with doing something like ./abc.sh it needs to have EXECUTABLE rights.
You can always do bash abc.sh
Linux permissions overview
Filename in Linux doesn't mean anything in terms of execution capabilities, you can call the file myfile.something.something and it can still be executable. You can name it abc but it has to have EXECUTABLE rights for the user,group,other.
To add that permission you can do chmod +x <filename> but you should look at the link above for a better understanding.
Related
They handle executable elfs, scripts and symbolic links from PATH, however what the algorithm of this doing? I'm afraid of I cannot find a source code of this part of a shell.
UDP: Oh, I'm stupid. It looks for EACH executable file in PATH, either directory or ordinary file.
Well, the actual search is performed by find_user_command_in_path() in findcmd.c:553.
The algorithm to search for a command ${foo} is basically:
check if ${foo} is absolute: if it is return this path and stop searching
iterate over all elements in PATH: for p in ${PATH}
construct a path ${p}/${foo} and see if it exists
if it exists and is executable return this path and stop searching
I'm no expert in this area, but I'm almost perfectly sure that on Linux the executable bit in file permissions is all that matters. No sophisticated algorithm needed.
Let's say that we have a file called hello in the current directory, and that the file contains just one line: echo "hello"
If you ran chmod 755 on the file and and you subsequently execute the file, then the bash shell will look through every path that you have listed in the PATH variable of say .bashrc, starting with the first path, until it locates the first path that contains your hello executable. Think of PATH as a linked list and think of the bash shell as going through the linked list of paths, path by path. If the bash shell is not running the hello executable that you want it to run, you have one option: put your hello executable in any one of the preceeding paths.
I am lazy. I don't bother to turn hello into an executable i.e. I am not running the chmod command and I just run
bash hello
where the bash shell is going to look for the hello file in the current directory, fork a bash process and the forked bash process is going to run the hello file before the forked bash process dies.
I am using the bash shell as an example but any other shell will behave the same way.
I have a .sh file and I want to execute it from shell without writing the extension.
What I did:
I created a directory and added it to $PATH
I gave to the file.sh chmod 711
and the file contain #!/bin/sh (I tried also bash).
However when I try to execute myscript without sh I get command not found
while if I try with myscript.sh I get the right result.
How could I do?
I read also: How to run a shell script on a Unix console or Mac terminal? and executing shell script without calling sh implicitly but no solution
Result of ls -l
ls -l /Users/Mitro/scripts
total 8
-rwx--x--x 1 Mitro staff 22 Nov 26 10:25 myscript.sh
echo $PATH
/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/opt/X11/bin:/Users/Mitro/scripts
Two problems...
Firstly, file is already an executable program in /usr/bin that tells you the type of a file - i.e. whether it is an image, or a song or a database. Quick example:
file a.png
a.png: PNG image data, 1 x 1, 1-bit colormap, non-interlaced
So, file is a bad name for a shell script - likewise is test.
Secondly, if you want to execute a script or program in your current directory, also known as dot (.), you either need to have dot in your PATH, or you need to explicitly tell your shell that the file you want to run is in the current directory. The easier option is the second, which means if your script is called fred, you run it with
./fred
which tells the shell it is in your current directory.
The longer option, if you want to always be able to run scripts in the current directory, is to add dot to your PATH. So, you locate your login script (probably $HOME/.profile) and you find the line that sets your PATH and you add the current directory to it.
export PATH=$PATH:.
Once you have set that, you are best off logging out and back in to have it take effect.
Some folks disapprove of the idea of adding dot to their PATH - I don't. YMMV.
You can add alias. If you have /some/path/to/script.py, do:
alias my_script='/some/path/to/my_script.py'
Now when you enter my_script, your script would be executed.
For mac the profile file is ~/.bash_profile as opposed to ~/.profile which did not work.
I'm new to Linux and I wonder there are many programs we can use only program name to start it in Linux terminal, like gedit,vi,firefox instead of providing the all program's path,I like to run my own programs like this in terminal only typing program name, programs I like to run are written in Java and Python (.jar, .pyc, .py and .class)
I like to know how to do it with step by step
You can write whatever program/script you have to behave as a command. Let's say your executable script/program is named as my_script and is placed in /path/to/my_script.
Be sure that the script is executable. If not,then please do
chmod +x /path/to/my_script
Then, place a symlink to this location in /usr/local/bin as
sudo ln -s /path/to/my_script /usr/local/bin
You can add the symlink to any of the paths mentioned in $PATH.
That's it and enjoy your program.
The other answers all involve creating a symlink in a directory that is already listed in the system PATH, but I think it is more unixy to add needed directories to your PATH.
If your script is located at $HOME/bin/myscript and you have already made sure that it is executable then you can run
export PATH=$HOME/bin:$PATH
to run it without giving the full path. And you can add that same line to your .bashrc file in your home directory to have it preloaded whenever you start your shell. This approach does not require that the user has permission to create symlinks in system directories.
If you have an executable binary file in your home folder (let's say for example sublime_text) you must give it execute permision and call it with its relative path
chmod +x sublime_text
./sublime_text
If you made a symlink to it in /usr/bin (or other folders included in your PATH), you would be able to call it by its name
sudo ln -s ~/sublime_text /usr/bin/sublime_text
sublime_text
In your case, you aren't dealing with binary files, but with scripts meant to be interpreted. For this you must prepend a shebang telling linux what's the binary meant to execute the script. If it was, for example, a python script ~/hello.py, these could be the contents of the script:
#!/usr/bin/python
print "Hello, World!"
Where the first line tells linux to use the python binary to execute the script.
From then on, you can do:
chmod +x hello.py
sudo ln -s ~/hello.py /usr/bin/hello
hello
And it will echo "Hello World" to the console.
I am creating a terminal program and cannot find out what the ending is for Linux. I know in windows it is .cmd. Any help would be great.
Thank you.
Yes, you can remove the .sh at the end and it should work, generally using ./cmd will get it to run. this goes for C programs as well. You do not need to give an extension for the object file, You could then add a path to your bash file and then you can execute it as a normal command.
Look here.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/8779980/2720497
You don't need a file extension on Linux, though typically, people use .sh (sh being short for 'shell').
You can run it one of two ways:
bash myscript.sh
or you can make the script itself executable and run it directly:
chmod a+x myscript.sh # make it executable
./myscript.sh # run it
Linux scripts' first line is typically #!/bin/bash which is the path to the specific shell used to run the script with the second method.
I have read other threads enter link description herethat discuss .bat to L/unix conversions, but none has been satisfactory. I have also tried a lot of hack type approach in writing my own scripts.
I have the following example.bat script that is representative of the kind of script I want to run on unix.
Code:
echo "Example.bat"
perl script1 param.in newParam.in
perl script2 newParam.in stuff.D2D stuff.D2C
program.exe stuff.D2C
perl script3 stuff.DIS results.out
My problem is I don't know how to handle the perl and program.exe in the unix bash shell. I have tried putting them in a system(), but that did not work. Can someone please help me?
Thank you!
Provided that you have an executable file named program.exe somewhere in your $PATH (which you well might — Unix executables don't have to end in .exe, but nothing says they can't), the code you've pasted is a valid shell script. If you save it in a file named, say, example.bat, you can run it by typing
sh example.bat
into the shell prompt.
Of course, Unix shell scripts are usually given the suffix .sh — or no suffix at all — rather than .bat. Also, if you want your script to be executable directly, by typing just
example.sh
rather than sh example.sh, you need to do three things:
Start the script with a "shebang" line: a line that begins with #! and the full path to the shell interpreter you want to use to run it (e.g. /bin/sh for the basic Bourne shell), like this:
#!/bin/sh
echo "This is a shell script."
# ... more commands here ...
Mark your script as executable using the chmod command, e.g.
chmod a+rx example.sh
Put your script somewhere along your $PATH. On Unix, the default path will not normally contain the current directory ., so you can't execute programs from the current directory just by typing their name. You can, however, run them by specifying an explicit path, e.g.
./example.sh # runs example.sh from the current directory
To find out what your $PATH is, just type echo $PATH into the shell.