Help Main Sheet
First Data
Main Data Label
Why Hello!
I am having a hard time completing an in-depth if function. Here is my issue:
I have a list in Column A with drop down buttons. Out of those 60 items, I need 5 of them to have a running total IF they are selected. Currently my function looks like this but obviously isn't working if I am asking here. It will not keep a running total in the same cell if any combination are chosen. IE if 1 is chosen cell value = 4. If 2 are chosen cell value = 8
=IF(OR(COUNTIF(Testing!C12:E27,CharacterSkills!B4),COUNTIF(Testing!C12:E27,CharacterSkills!B6),COUNTIF(Testing!C12:E27,CharacterSkills!B16),COUNTIF(Testing!C12:E27,CharacterSkills!B25),COUNTIF(Testing!C12:E27,CharacterSkills!B28),COUNTIF(Testing!C12:E27,CharacterSkills!B31)),A18+4,0)
Specifics:
MainSheet: Cell C12:E27 are drop downs pulling from "Data Table" Photo (The selection is filtered by Cell E6 (Class). Using Data Validation =OFFSET(CharacterSkills!$A$1,MATCH($E$5,CharacterSkills!$A:$A,0)-1,1,COUNTIF(CharacterSkills!$A:$A,$E$5),1)
First Data: Cell B18 is the cell I would like to keep a running total in. For example, everytime Arcane Magic, or Divine Magic is selected I would like it to add 4 to that cell each time
Data Table: This is the main data table for the drop downs on the MainSheet.
Thanks for all your help!
In cell B18 on the sheet "First Data", input the formula below. This will work for the test case given. If you want this to be more dynamic (ie input all the things that necessitate a +4 in a range and just reference that) you will need a more complex formula. I am happy to help with that as well, but thought I would give you this, which fits the criteria above.
=(Countifs(Testing!C12:E27,"Arcane Magic") + Countifs(Testing!C12:E27,"Divine Magic"))*4
More complicated answer:
Let's say instead of stringing together Countifs() statement, you had a range Testing!XFD1:XFD2 and in XFD1 you have Arcane Magic and in XFD2 you have Divine Magic. If this were the case, you could instead use:
{=SUM(COUNTIFS(Testing!C12:E27,Testing!XFD1:XFD2))*4}
Note this must be entered using Shift + Ctrl + Enter. The curly braces will be input when you enter the formula, you do not enter those on your own.
Related
For those of us used to Microsoft Excel who switch to using Google Sheets, there are many differences which need to be taken into account.
One of the nice features in Excel that I miss is tables. If you insert a table into your Excel Spreadsheet, it does a lot of automatic things for you. You can have a single formula for one column of your table, and not have to update it whenever you add new data - whether adding a table row, or adding a row in the middle of the table.
Sometimes (though I haven't figured out why it sometimes does and why it sometimes doesn't) even without tables, Excel will suggest a formula fill as you're entering new data into a row, making copying the formula as easy as pressing "Tab".
There is no functionality in Google Sheets that matches this exactly. When you have a lot of data to enter, having to copy the formulas every single time you add a row is very tedious and time consuming and further leaves open the possibility in making a mistake when transcribing the information and copying / pasting the formulas. Any single cell could have a mistake and you won't know until it causes a problem later, then troubleshooting it will also be time consuming and difficult.
There are various questions in StackOverflow, StackExchange, Google Support and other sites that tackle this issue, but none seem to have a good solution that works for everyone. A lot of people have written an Apps Script do do just this, or use Apps Script + HTML forms as well... but it seems like that shouldn't be necessary, it adds more time & setup, and ends up with a specific solution for that sheet and that sheet only.
So, how can you replicate this behavior in Google Sheets so you don't have to keep copying & pasting your formulas over and over again and save yourself time (and your company money) and make Google Sheets act more like Excel?
BACKGROUND
There is a Google Support Thread on Inserting new Rows which suggests the use of ARRAYFORMULA to do this job. It is not an exact replacement for Excel's functionality, but it can work in most applications. There are other functions that output arrays, such as SEQUENCE which can also be applied similar to these examples depending on the situation, but I'll focus on ARRAYFORMULA here as it's the most generic and MOST functions can be wrapped in it and otherwise behave as you'd expect.
Here is also a link to an ARRAYFORMULA & MMULT Example Provided by Google (Note that this link will make a copy of the sheet, not let you directly access the example). The first tab is all about matrix multiplication, the second and later tabs have examples using ARRAYFORMULA.
The examples above are pretty limited in scope, so let's expand on those. To illustrate, I will use a basic formula involving 4 columns as an example. Let's say we have data in columns A, B, and C, and we want to do a relatively simple formula between them. Let's assume row 1 is being used as a header row, and your data is from row 2 down, as most people would do. Let's make the formula simple, but a little interesting, by having column D equal to the PREVIOUS value of A plus the product of B and C. Let's also assume we currently have 12 rows of data, but we know we will have data we need to enter in the future. Most of that data will get entered at the end, but sometimes we may need to add data in the middle of the range.
You can follow along with my Publicly Posted Example Sheet Here if you want (this will also create a copy on your drive so you can make changes and follow along). Each example below corresponds to a tab in the Example Sheet.
EXAMPLE: FORMULA ON EVERY ROW
In it's simplest form, the formula in D2 would be = A1 + B2 * C2. Except, of course, we know A1 is a text header and if we include that we'll get an error. It's also commonly understood that absolute references (with $) execute faster in Google sheets, and we don't need relative references on the columns (but rows are necessary to fill), so let's modify cell D2 as follows:
=IF( ISNUMBER($A1), $A1, 0 ) + $B2 * $C2
Then fill down to cell D13 (this is already done in the example).
So now you have your current data... but what if you need to add data?
If you add data to row 14, in columns A, B, and C, you then also have to copy the formula to D14. Easy peazy for this example, but what if you have 30 columns, 5 of them with formulas and you add another 10 entries to the list every day? This becomes very tedious. You can avoid entering it for every row, but filling down the number of rows you need today and save a little time, but it breaks your flow of data entry.
Even worse, what if the entries are in some sort of order (e.g. order of date data was captured) and you get old data that needs to be entered in the middle of the range? You can add at the end and copy, then sort.
Some sheets won't let you sort, or won't sort correctly if you have certain data, so you may need to insert in the middle... let's say between rows 8 and 9. If you did this in an Excel table, and used "insert row" it would automatically populate cell D9 with your formula.
But here, when you add this new row 9 not only is D9 blank and need you to enter the formula, but now the A column reference in cell D10 is pointing to A8 instead of A9 where it should! So you have to recopy / refill your equation to cell D10 as well - and this is easy to miss - you may not know to do it, or forget to do it, and now your formulas are broken.
... Now, to be honest, Excel didn't get this part right, either.
Somehow, it properly fills D9 in with the correct formula but botches
D10 with a reference to A8, but then continues with a correct reference to A10 in D11. Which is almost worse because since D9 was filled and all the other rows are correct, you may not realize you have a problem in D10...
This is basic spreadsheet use and is roughly the same behavior as using Excel WITHOUT Tables (except those instances where it decides to make suggestions for you) - so par for the course here if Excel didn't have the Table or suggestion ability.
Pros:
Simplest formula to implement
Works fine in fixed size sheets or sheets that don't change often
Tried and true, Will always work
Cons:
Have to copy formula to every new row you make
Very tedious for "living documents" that change often
If any formulas cross between rows, the pattern breaks when you insert a row
in between and you have to copy your formula to the row below as
well as your new one
With all the additional required repeated actions, it's very easy to make a mistake
Since the mistake could be in a single cell, finding the mistake after the fact can be difficult
EXAMPLE: CLOSED RANGE ARRAYFORMULA
Google support touts this as the best method. Indeed, if you want your formulas to update automatically when you add data in between and you want the least amount of computation time, then an ARRAYFORMULA with a limited (or "closed") range is the best solution.
To use ARRAYFORMULA, you put the formulas only in your top row of data (in this example, row 2). What makes this example closed range is that we will set it to cover exactly the data we have. So, the formula in D2 would be:
=ARRAYFORMULA( IF( ISNUMBER( $A$1:$A$12 ), $A$1:$A$12, 0 ) + $B$2:$B$13 * $C$2:$C$13 )
Here, we can (and I recommend) use all absolute references as the range we're using doesn't change as the cell row it's calculating changes. When you enter this formula, you will see it automatically populate D3 through D13 with the correct data as well.
If we want to add another row in the middle, it's easy. Taking the previous example, if we add a row between rows 8 and 9, you will see the formula in D2 has changed all the last rows - 12 is now 13, and 13 is now 14. When you enter data into columns A, B, and C in the new row 9, it automatically calculates correctly in D9.
When you look at the data in rows in column D (except D2), however, it shows the number itself in the formula bar - so someone looking at this sheet unaware there is an ARRAYFORMULA in use has no indication that it's an ARRAYFORMULA and overwriting ANY cell that was populated by ARRAYFORMULA will break the formula, give you an error in D2 and leave the rest of the values in the column blank. This is true for all methods using ARRAYFORMULA So, for that reason, I recommend you make your column a protected range!
Alternate: You could name all of your ranges. For example, $A$1:$A$12 could be col_A_prev, $B$2:$B$12 could be col_B, and $C$2:$C$12 could be col_C. Which gives the formula:
=ARRAYFORMULA( IF( ISNUMBER( col_A_prev ), col_A_prev, 0 ) + col_B * col_C )
The behavior would be identical. When you add a row in between, the named ranges will automatically expand to include it. You could also use the same ranges for your column protection to ensure no data is written over.
Note: I do want to give kudos where it is due. Google Sheets handles named ranges WAY better than Excel. When you add or remove rows / columns inside your named range in Google it automatically expands the range - and Google actually allows you to use the named ranges as references in any of the settings (conditional formatting, protection, etc.). While you can enter a named range in Excel for some of these, it will convert it to R/C references which won't change even if your range changes later. If you want to add to the ends or you move rows / columns in your named range - well, they're both still terrible at that
However, if we want to add new data to the end, in row 14 or after, this arrayformula will not automatically update.
Even worse, if you add a row between rows 12 and 13, it breaks the formula - as the references to columns B and C will update, but the references to column A will not - because A only went to row 12. In row 14 you now get the error:
Array arguments to ADD are of different size.
Because you're trying to add an array with 12 elements to an array with 13 elements. Admittedly, this is only a problem if you're referencing other rows which isn't that common across all useful spreadsheets. However, there are many practical reasons to do so, like cumulative sums.
So, either you have to deal with updating your ARRAYFORMULA columns each time you add data to the end (which doesn't make it much better than just copying your formulas to each row) or, you could basically make the last two rows "dummy rows" that you don't care about and add protection to those rows so they can't be edited or a row added between them, with perhaps a note saying "To add new data, insert a row above this line" so other people using it know what they have to do.
Pros:
Relatively simple formula to implement
Fastest Execution time
Will automatically adjust formula to any rows added in the middle
Can manage your ranges as named ranges
Cons:
Have to change the formula if you add any new data to the bottom (which is where you usually add new data) -OR- you have to implement one or more blank rows included in range with protection & reminders to ensure no one adds data to the bottom
Data below ARRAYFORMULA looks like just number entries and could easily confuse people into thinking it's not a formula entry and overwrite it without thinking.
EXAMPLE: OPEN RANGE ARRAYFORMULA
If you're following along in the example sheet, the first thing you'll note is this sheet doesn't do the same thing. It is simply using the CURRENT value in column A, rather than the previous row. This is because you CAN'T reference a previous row with this method (see a couple paragraphs down for why). To compensate, I forced A, B, and C to 0 in the first row and added another row to the bottom.
This is similar to the closed range example in its application of ARRAYFORMULA the difference here, is instead of having a fixed end to the ranges (rows 12 & 13 above), you leave the range open by using just the column letter at the end of the range, which references the last row of the column. So the equation in D2 now looks like this:
=ARRAYFORMULA( IF( ISNUMBER( $A$2:$A ), $A$2:$A, 0 ) + $B$2:$B * $C$2:$C )
The reason you can't reference a previous row's cell is if we used $A$1:$A here, that array would always have one more element than either $B$2:B or $C$2:$C and thus won't be able to add and will result in the error:
Result was not automatically expanded, please insert more rows (1).
Except inserting more rows won't work because the ranges will all expand by 1 also. Again, this is only a problem if you need to reference other rows which isn't common but is useful for things like cumulative sums.
When it comes to adding rows, though, this method is the best. Whether you are adding to the middle or the end of your data, it will automatically update the values in your ARRAYFORMULA columns.
Alternate: Same as with closed ranges, you could name all of your ranges. For example, $A$1:$A could be col_A_prev, $B$2:$B could be col_B, and $C2:$C could be col_C. Which gives the same formula as with closed range:
=ARRAYFORMULA( IF( ISNUMBER( col_A_prev ), col_A_prev, 0 ) + col_B * col_C )
So if you're not referencing previous rows, or if you just add a top "dummy" row like I did in the example, it's all good... easy peazy lemon squeezy, right?
Yes, at least at first. The other problem here is that open ranges are computationally intense for Google Sheets algorithms. As you add more and more rows, especially if you have multiple open range ARRAYFORMULA columns, the sheet calculations get slower and slower and slower. The sheet I was working on that prompted this had 21 columns, 8 of which had ARRAYFORMULA formulas in row 2. At around 200 rows of data (not that much in the world of spreadsheets) it was taking MINUTES to calculate with each and every change I was making. That's simply not useable - I almost went back to copying the formula to each row. (It's possible using named ranges may improve the speed some - I didn't try it on that sheet)
So this solution doesn't really work for big (but not even that big) spreadsheets where you have lots of formulas.
Also, a more minor gripe - you'll notice in the example that every row on the spreadsheet was now populated in column D, even where no data was entered. That's annoying, but not a sheet killer by any means - and you could add an IF statement to the ARRAYFORMULA to just output "" whenever you have no data in one or more data columns.
Pros:
Relatively simple and straight forward formula to implement
"Works" with any number of rows
Automatically includes any rows that are added - on the end or in between
Can manage with named ranges
Cons:
Cannot reference data from previous rows
Extremely slow - computation time goes up with every added row (& every added column with an open reference)
Data below ARRAYFORMULA looks like just number entries and could easily confuse people into thinking it's not a formula entry and overwrite it without thinking.
EXAMPLE: HYBRID ARRAYFORMULA
Are you ready to give up on Google Sheets yet?
Well, there is one more option. It gets complicated and involved, but IMO works better in most situations than any of the above examples.
What I do here is add a cell with a formula for the number of rows in the sheet that have data in a certain column. Let's just say column A for this example. That formula looks like this:
= ARRAYFORMULA( MAX( IF( LEN($A:$A), ROW($A:$A), ) ) )
This, in and of itself, is an open ranged formula. It scans everything in column A and returns the last row that has SOMETHING in it. But it's one single formula in one cell reporting 1 value - no other cells get populated from it. It's relatively computationally intense for this one cell, but it's just one cell in the entire sheet.
Then, to make sure that any changes you make (adding / removing rows or columns) do not affect any references to that cell, name it. In the example provided, this is named last_example_row.
I also strongly recommend that you add protection to last_example_row so it's not accidentally changed. Extra tip: you can actually set both sets of permissions: "Only You can edit" and "show a warning when editing" so even if you try to edit it accidentally it will give you the chance to cancel the edit.
Since it's not a piece of data you need visually, hiding it is also a good idea (I left it unhid in the example so you can easily see the formula)
Now, in order to use the value in last_example_row as part of our ranges, we have to use the INDIRECT function. We replace every open-ended instance in the previous example with a specific INDIRECT call.
For calls to the same row, for example, we replace with a pattern like this:
$B$2:$B is replaced with $B$2:INDIRECT( "$B$" & last_example_row )
so it ends on the last used row.
For calls to the previous row, we replace with a pattern like this:
$A$1:$A is replaced with $A$1:INDIRECT( "$B$" & ( last_example_row - 1 ) )
so it ends 1 row before the last used row.
So the final equation becomes this monstrosity:
=ARRAYFORMULA( IF( ISNUMBER( $A$1:INDIRECT( "$A$" & ( last_example_row - 1 ) ) ), $A$1:INDIRECT( "$A$" & ( last_example_row - 1 ) ), 0 ) + $B2:INDIRECT( "$B$" & last_example_row ) * $C2:INDIRECT( "$C$" & last_example_row ) )
So it's a closed range reference that points to a single open range calculation, and it works. Whether you add data in the middle or to the end, it automatically calculates your column for you - and it only populates rows where your data is also populated.
Since it only does the open range calculation ONCE, then uses that value in all remaining closed range calculations, this is much, much faster than the open range example above. It IS slower calculating than the first two examples, however - but I haven't yet hit the point in my real sheets where the delay has made it unusable (stay tuned as I add more data to my sheets over time). If anyone reading this has hit that point with this method, please let me know how many columns & rows you got to, including how many of the columns used an ARRAYFORMULA like this.
Unfortunately, however, since this method requires an INDIRECT call, you cannot use named ranges to accomplish this.
Pros:
Most flexible option
"Works" with any number of rows
Automatically includes any rows that are added - on the end or in between
Much Faster than completely open references
Cons:
Formulas are complex, hard-to-follow, and easy to make a mistake while entering
Slower than closed references - computation still time goes up with every added row and every added column with these "hybrid" references
Data below ARRAYFORMULA looks like just number entries and could easily confuse people into thinking it's not a formula entry and overwrite it without thinking.
Cannot manage with named ranges
Epilogue
Maybe (hopefully) someday Google will add a feature that will keep track of your formulas and execute them in a speedy way and this post will be obsolete. Until then, I hope this post helps someone out there.
Additional Note
Using any of the ARRAYFORMULA methods above can break sorting. If you add filters, and the sort by A->Z or Z->A on a particular column and row 2 is no longer row 2 - then your ARRAYFORMULA gets moved to whatever row it gets sorted to - and then only applies from that row down. Rows above it will be blank in all your ARRAYFORMULA columns. This is very disappointing to me. One way around it (that I don't like) is you can make row 2 a "dummy" row where whatever columns you may sort by have values that will always make it the top row. That's a pretty ugly solution, though.
You can make it less "ugly" by hiding row 2. Then columns will sort fine and you won't see any of the dummy data ("dummy" data may not even be necessary as the hidden row shouldn't sort with the rest). The caveat here is if you share it with multiple users - they won't even see there is a formula being used, it looks like all manual entries - and if one gets overwritten, it will break the ARRAYFORMULA. So, I would recommended protecting the ARRAYFORMULA columns, as well.
Would anyone have advise on how to add running count to excel cells, which already have text in them, and without removing the said text.
Few screenshots will follow to clarify my issue.
I have received a ton of sheets which have a test case name as a text/string in the C column and they are missing a running count from the beginning of the cell (not sure if the "running count" is the correct term).
In the first screenshot you can see how I need them to be, as well as in the couple first rows of the second screenshot (column C). So the original text could be for example "Purchase order" and I want it to be "1. Purchase order" and the next cell would be "2. Purchase order" etc.
Screenshot 1.
Screenshot 2.
I imagine there isn't an already existing function in excel which would solve my problem. I have played around with macros and VBA some years ago, but don't have any clue from on top of my head how to solve this.
Perhaps a macro that would go through each cell from the selected column one by one, cut the existing text, add a variable number to the cell and then copy the cut text back there after the variable, then add +1 to the variable before moving to the next cell?
So I somewhat understand the logic how it could be done, but don't have any memory how the syntax and the operators etc. work in VBA.
Thank you in advance.
Not exactly sure what you want from the images, but you can do things like this:
If cell A1 has 942
and cell B1 has "slices of bread"
Then C1 can have the result "942 slices of bread":
=A1&" "&B1
Not sure neither if running count is the right term, but you can do it with a helper column and an easy formula:
=COUNTIF($C$2:C2;C2)&". "&C2
Then you can copy/paste as values and delete helper column
I have a spreadsheet that shows the actual dollars produced and the expected dollars produced for each employee, where each row is one day and each employee has two columns. I would like to count the number of times an employee came within 10% of their production goal without referencing specific columns. Please look at the example spreadsheet.
I want for the formulas in cells Sheet2!E4:E7 to do what the formulas in Sheet2!E10:E13 do.
I am trying to avoid using direct column references because it causes me to have to go in and update the columns in the formulas every time a new employee is added to the sheet.
I'm no stranger to using INDEX+MATCH, or to converting SUMPRODUCT formulas to INDEX+MATCH. What I can't get past are the formulas in cells Sheet2!E4:E7. If you evaluate the formula you can watch the INDEX+MATCH section on the left side of the formula work correctly, and then a nearly identical INDEX+MATCH section on the right side evaluate to 0 for no apparent reason.
The formula I'm having trouble with is in cell Sheet2!E4:
COUNTIF(INDEX(Sheet1!$A$2:$AZ$314,,MATCH($B4,Sheet1!$A$1:$AZ$1,0)),">"&(INDEX(Sheet1!$A$2:$AZ$314,,MATCH($B4,Sheet1!$A$1:$AZ$1,0)+1)))
The section to the left of the ">" will match with the correct range (Sheet1!B2:B314), however the section to the right of the ">" will evaluate to 0 instead of Sheet1!C2:C314.
This is strange to me because the only real difference between the two sections is the '+1' on the end of the MATCH function, and adding the '+1' to the section to the left of the ">" produces the expected result for the MATCH function (Sheet1!C2:C314) as seen by evaluating the formula in cell Sheet2!E5.
The formula that produces the correct result is in cell Sheet2!E10:
SUMPRODUCT(--(ISNUMBER(Sheet1!$B$2:$B$313)),--(Sheet1!$B$2:$B$313<Sheet1!$C$2:$C$313),--(Sheet1!$B$2:$B$313>=Sheet1!$C$2:$C$313*0.9))
I understand that if I exclude the '$' before the column references, any future additions/subtractions to the columns on Sheet1 will adjust the references accordingly. This solution is not ideal, because there are multiple data sheets (one for each year) where the columns are all different (Dan is column F for 2019, G for 2018, M for 2017, etc.), and the tables using these sheets are laid out in a way that would prevent me from easily being able to auto-update the formulas, so a solution that locates the correct column using the employee's name is preferred.
The correct result should be 2 for Allen and 3 for Torres, but I can only seem to get the INDEX+MATCH formulas to return 0, 12, 15, 16, or 17 (depending on what tweaks I make to the formula).
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.
You can try this: ARRAY FORMULA CTRL + SHIFT + ENTER
=SUM(IF(ISNUMBER(INDEX($A$1:$E$30,2,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0)):INDEX($A$1:$E$30,30,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0))),INDEX($A$1:$E$30,2,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0)):INDEX($A$1:$E$30,30,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0))<INDEX($A$1:$E$30,2,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0)+1):INDEX($A$1:$E$30,30,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0)+1)*(INDEX($A$1:$E$30,2,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0)):INDEX($A$1:$E$30,30,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0))>=INDEX($A$1:$E$30,2,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0)+1):INDEX($A$1:$E$30,30,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0)+1)*0.9))*1)
and adapt the ranges to your needs. It is entered on the same sheet as the data.
Basically this approach uses ARRAY FORMULA CTRL + SHIFT + ENTER
INDEX($A$1:$E$30,2,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0)):INDEX($A$1:$E$30,30,MATCH(G9,$A$1:$E$1,0)))
to get the needed ranges. MATCH looks for the right column. the row number can be set as needed, here its is from 2 to30 adapted to your provided data. My search term in this case is in G9 with Allen as content. The result of the formula is $B$2:$B$30. A +1 after Match gives the other range $C$2:$C$30. Both ranges can then be evaluated with the needed conditions
Pull it down and provide Torres in G10. Then the ranges will be adapted to $D$2:$D$30 and $E$2:$E$30.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zag18z5f13fugn3/Coverlog%20Rota.xlsm?dl=0
Hi
Just need a bit of assistance. Tried a few ways of doing this but can't seem to get it to work.
Below is the Forumlae I used:
Fair enough. Below is my Formulae that I've used.
=INDEX('Cover LOG'!$E$1:$AR$89,MATCH(A3,'Cover LOG'!$C:$C,0),MATCH($B$1,'Cover LOG'!$E$1:$AR$1,0)*2)
It works with the first date, but when it gets to the second date the last four columns give back #REF!.
When it goes to the third date the last six columns this time bring back #XREF!.
I've uploaded the file on the link as this was the only way I could explain it fully.
Essentially when the date changes at the top on the FC Dash I want the relevant columns from Cover LOG to pull through.
Can anyone help?
Jay
The issue is probably that one of the Match functions don't match and therefore the Index function fails. Or that the column/row exceeds the given range in the Index function.
So you need to evaluate your formula step-by-step:
Select the cell that you want to evaluate. Only one cell can be evaluated at a time.
On the Formulas tab, in the Formula Auditing group, click Evaluate Formula.
Click Evaluate to examine the value of the underlined reference. The result of the evaluation is shown in italics.
If the underlined part of the formula is a reference to another formula, click Step In to display the other formula in the Evaluation box. Click Step Out to go back to the previous cell and formula.
Continue until each part of the formula has been evaluated.
More Info: Evaluate a nested formula one step at a time.
With a evaluation you see which part of your function returns which value. So you can easily see which Match function returns a value and which one fails because of no match.
Explanation of your debug result:
=INDEX('CoverLOG'!$e$1:$AR$89,3,68)
The above Index formula means get row 3 and column 68 of range $e$1:$AR$89 in sheet CoverLOG.
If we now analyze the range $e$1:$AR$89 it has 89 rows and 40 columns. You can test this with the following formulas:
=ROWS($E$1:$AR$89) '=89
=COLUMNS($E$1:$AR$89) '=40
but you try to access column 68 which exceeds the range total columns that is only 40 columns.
I have a spreadsheet that I am using as a questionnaire.
One of the questions is Who are your wheel suppliers (mark all that apply)? and there are 6 check boxes in column C to select 5 different wheel suppliers and an Other option. I have these check boxes linked to return whatever suppliers name is selected in the cell adjacent to the cell the check box is in in column I.
So depending on what wheel suppliers the customer selects there could be anywhere from 1-6 different suppliers selected. So once the customer has selected the wheel suppliers whatever suppliers are selected will show up in the correct cell in range I45:50.
What I am having a problem with is that I need these to pull into a data tab into one cell. I am having a problem coming up with a formula to put all the suppliers together as a list in one cell with commas separating each. Remember, it could be 1 supplier, could be 3, could be 6.
Any advice is much appreciated. I have tried using If formulas and Concatenate but I can't seem to figure out how to get it to work like I want it to.
=CONCATENATE(Questionnaire!I45," ",Questionnaire!I46," ",Questionnaire!I47," ",Questionnaire!I48," ",Questionnaire!I49," ",Questionnaire!I50)
That is the best I've come up with but the problem with it is if the first supplier isn't selected then it will enter that space anyways and if the first supplier and the last supplier are selected it will have all those spaces in between.
Another method, this one using helper cells.
Say you have the data in A1:A6. In B1, input this formula: =IF(LEN(A1)>0,A1&",",""). Drag down to B5.
In B6, slight variation: =IF(LEN(A6)>0,A6,",""").
In C1: =CONCATENATE(B1,B2,B3,B4,B5,B6).
What happens is the cells in the B column checks if their respective values in the A column are not blanks. If not, they will append , to it. Otherwise, they will return blanks (not spaces). The only variation is B6--since it's the end of the list, there's no , appended to it.
It's only a matter of concatenating them at this point. Removing any of the values in A, maybe by unchecking their checkbox, will reflect the change in C1 properly.
Let us know if this helps.
EDIT:
To accommodate your formula, change your CONCATENATE formula to something like below:
=LEFT(CONCATENATE(...),LEN(CONCATENATE(...)-1)
What is does is it removes the rightmost character by getting, from the left, all the characters up until one less than the length of the result. Obviously, fill in the ... with the ranges you want to concatenate.
Let us know if this is what you need.
FURTHER EDIT:
=LEFT(CONCATENATE(Questionnaire!F45,Questionnaire!F46,Questionnaire!F47,Questionnaire!F48,Questionnaire!F49,Questionnaire!F50),LEN(CONCATENATE(Questionnaire!F45,Questionnaire!F46,Questionnaire!F47,Questionnaire!F48,Questionnaire!F49,Questionnaire!F50))-1)
Looks ugly, right? But does the job. Better if you use a named range, though, like below:
Now it's much shorter. Error on my end is because I don't have Questionnaire sheet, obviously.
If J44 is blank and you are prepared to add something like =IF(ISBLANK(I45),J44,J44&I45&", ") in J45 (copied down) then perhaps:
=SUBSTITUTE(LEFT(wheelC,LEN(wheelC)-2),0,"")
might suit, where wheelC is a named range of workbook scope for Questionnaire!J50.