Essentially I want to have a script execute when the contents of a DIV change. Since the scripts are separate (content script in the Chrome extension & webpage script), I need a way simply observe changes in DOM state. I could set up polling but that seems sloppy.
For a long time, DOM3 mutation events were the best available solution, but they have been deprecated for performance reasons. DOM4 Mutation Observers are the replacement for deprecated DOM3 mutation events. They are currently implemented in modern browsers as MutationObserver (or as the vendor-prefixed WebKitMutationObserver in old versions of Chrome):
MutationObserver = window.MutationObserver || window.WebKitMutationObserver;
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations, observer) {
// fired when a mutation occurs
console.log(mutations, observer);
// ...
});
// define what element should be observed by the observer
// and what types of mutations trigger the callback
observer.observe(document, {
subtree: true,
attributes: true
//...
});
This example listens for DOM changes on document and its entire subtree, and it will fire on changes to element attributes as well as structural changes. The draft spec has a full list of valid mutation listener properties:
childList
Set to true if mutations to target's children are to be observed.
attributes
Set to true if mutations to target's attributes are to be observed.
characterData
Set to true if mutations to target's data are to be observed.
subtree
Set to true if mutations to not just target, but also target's descendants are to be observed.
attributeOldValue
Set to true if attributes is set to true and target's attribute value before the mutation needs to be recorded.
characterDataOldValue
Set to true if characterData is set to true and target's data before the mutation needs to be recorded.
attributeFilter
Set to a list of attribute local names (without namespace) if not all attribute mutations need to be observed.
(This list is current as of April 2014; you may check the specification for any changes.)
Edit
This answer is now deprecated. See the answer by apsillers.
Since this is for a Chrome extension, you might as well use the standard DOM event - DOMSubtreeModified. See the support for this event across browsers. It has been supported in Chrome since 1.0.
$("#someDiv").bind("DOMSubtreeModified", function() {
alert("tree changed");
});
See a working example here.
Many sites use AJAX/XHR/fetch to add, show, modify content dynamically and window.history API instead of in-site navigation so current URL is changed programmatically. Such sites are called SPA, short for Single Page Application.
Usual JS methods of detecting page changes
MutationObserver (docs) to literally detect DOM changes.
Info/examples:
How to change the HTML content as it's loading on the page
Performance of MutationObserver to detect nodes in entire DOM.
Lightweight observer to react to a change only if URL also changed:
let lastUrl = location.href;
new MutationObserver(() => {
const url = location.href;
if (url !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = url;
onUrlChange();
}
}).observe(document, {subtree: true, childList: true});
function onUrlChange() {
console.log('URL changed!', location.href);
}
Event listener for sites that signal content change by sending a DOM event:
pjax:end on document used by many pjax-based sites e.g. GitHub,
see How to run jQuery before and after a pjax load?
message on window used by e.g. Google search in Chrome browser,
see Chrome extension detect Google search refresh
yt-navigate-finish used by Youtube,
see How to detect page navigation on YouTube and modify its appearance seamlessly?
Periodic checking of DOM via setInterval:
Obviously this will work only in cases when you wait for a specific element identified by its id/selector to appear, and it won't let you universally detect new dynamically added content unless you invent some kind of fingerprinting the existing contents.
Cloaking History API:
let _pushState = History.prototype.pushState;
History.prototype.pushState = function (state, title, url) {
_pushState.call(this, state, title, url);
console.log('URL changed', url)
};
Listening to hashchange, popstate events:
window.addEventListener('hashchange', e => {
console.log('URL hash changed', e);
doSomething();
});
window.addEventListener('popstate', e => {
console.log('State changed', e);
doSomething();
});
P.S. All these methods can be used in a WebExtension's content script. It's because the case we're looking at is where the URL was changed via history.pushState or replaceState so the page itself remained the same with the same content script environment.
Another approach depending on how you are changing the div.
If you are using JQuery to change a div's contents with its html() method, you can extend that method and call a registration function each time you put html into a div.
(function( $, oldHtmlMethod ){
// Override the core html method in the jQuery object.
$.fn.html = function(){
// Execute the original HTML method using the
// augmented arguments collection.
var results = oldHtmlMethod.apply( this, arguments );
com.invisibility.elements.findAndRegisterElements(this);
return results;
};
})( jQuery, jQuery.fn.html );
We just intercept the calls to html(), call a registration function with this, which in the context refers to the target element getting new content, then we pass on the call to the original jquery.html() function. Remember to return the results of the original html() method, because JQuery expects it for method chaining.
For more info on method overriding and extension, check out http://www.bennadel.com/blog/2009-Using-Self-Executing-Function-Arguments-To-Override-Core-jQuery-Methods.htm, which is where I cribbed the closure function. Also check out the plugins tutorial at JQuery's site.
In addition to the "raw" tools provided by MutationObserver API, there exist "convenience" libraries to work with DOM mutations.
Consider: MutationObserver represents each DOM change in terms of subtrees. So if you're, for instance, waiting for a certain element to be inserted, it may be deep inside the children of mutations.mutation[i].addedNodes[j].
Another problem is when your own code, in reaction to mutations, changes DOM - you often want to filter it out.
A good convenience library that solves such problems is mutation-summary (disclaimer: I'm not the author, just a satisfied user), which enables you to specify queries of what you're interested in, and get exactly that.
Basic usage example from the docs:
var observer = new MutationSummary({
callback: updateWidgets,
queries: [{
element: '[data-widget]'
}]
});
function updateWidgets(summaries) {
var widgetSummary = summaries[0];
widgetSummary.added.forEach(buildNewWidget);
widgetSummary.removed.forEach(cleanupExistingWidget);
}
Related
I'm working on a simple link sharing extension (pinboard, readability, delicious, etc), and have a question about how to properly deal with a context menu item. In my non-persistent background page I call chrome.contextMenus.create and chrome.contextMenus.onClicked.addListener to setup/respond to the context menu.
The context menu entry works as expected. But the background page is showing the following error (right after it starts and before I've used the entry) :
contextMenus.create: Cannot create item with duplicate id id_share_link at chrome-extension://.../share.js:52:30 lastError:29 set
This made me realize that at no point do I remove the item or the listener. Knowing little about javascript and extensions, I'm left wondering if I'm doing everything correctly. I'm assuming this top-level code is going to re-execute every time the background page is invoked. So there are going to be redundant calls to create and addListener (and hence the error I see being logged).
I clearly can't do cleanup in response to suspend, as these calls need to be present to wake up the background script.
Should I be handling things differently?
If you want to use an event page, ie a non-persistent background page, as you call it, you should register a context menu via contextMenus.create in the event handler of runtime.onInstalled, as these context menu registrations ”persist“ anyways.
You have to add the listener-function for the contextMenus.onClicked event every time the event page gets reloaded, though, as the registration of your wish to listen on that event persists, while the handler callback itself does not. So generally don't call contextMenus.onClicked.addListener from runtime.onInstalled, but from top level or other code, that is guaranteed to be executed each time the event page loads.[1]
You can handle it one of two ways:
You can add the context menu and the listeners on install using:
chrome.runtime.onInstalled.addListener(function() {
/* Add context menu and listener */
});
You can remove the context menu and listener, and then re-add it each time the file is called.
[solution may no longer be the case, read comment]
runtime.onInstalled is not triggered if you disable/enable your extension.
My solution is to always add menu items and swallow errors:
'use strict';
{
let seqId = 0;
const createMenuLinkEntry = (title, tab2url) => {
const id = (++seqId).toString();
chrome.contextMenus.create({
id: id,
title: title,
contexts: ['browser_action'],
}, () => {
const err = chrome.runtime.lastError;
if(err) {
console.warn('Context menu error ignored:', err);
}
});
};
createMenuLinkEntry('Go to Google', (tab) => 'https://google.com');
createMenuLinkEntry('Go to GitHub', (tab) => 'https://github.com');
} // namespace
I've written a Firefox addon for the first time and it was reviewed and accepted a few month ago. This add-on calls frequently a third-party API. Meanwhile it was reviewed again and now the way it calls setInterval is criticized:
setInterval called in potentially dangerous manner. In order to prevent vulnerabilities, the setTimeout and setInterval functions should be called only with function expressions as their first argument. Variables referencing function names are acceptable but deprecated as they are not amenable to static source validation.
Here's some background about the »architecture« of my addon. It uses a global Object which is not much more than a namespace:
if ( 'undefined' == typeof myPlugin ) {
var myPlugin = {
//settings
settings : {},
intervalID : null,
//called once on window.addEventlistener( 'load' )
init : function() {
//load settings
//load remote data from cache (file)
},
//get the data from the API
getRemoteData : function() {
// XMLHttpRequest to the API
// retreve data (application/json)
// write it to a cache file
}
}
//start
window.addEventListener(
'load',
function load( event ) {
window.removeEventListener( 'load', load, false ); needed
myPlugin.init();
},
false
);
}
So this may be not the best practice, but I keep on learning. The interval itself is called inside the init() method like so:
myPlugin.intervalID = window.setInterval(
myPlugin.getRemoteData,
myPlugin.settings.updateMinInterval * 1000 //milliseconds!
);
There's another point setting the interval: an observer to the settings (preferences) clears the current interval and set it exactly the same way like mentioned above when a change to the updateMinInterval setting occures.
As I get this right, a solution using »function expressions« should look like:
myPlugin.intervalID = window.setInterval(
function() {
myPlugin.getRemoteData();
},
myPlugin.settings.updateMinInterval * 1000 //milliseconds!
);
Am I right?
What is a possible scenario of »attacking« this code, I've overlooked so far?
Should setInterval and setTimeout basically used in another way in Firefox addons then in »normal« frontend javascripts? Because the documentation of setInterval exactly shows the way using declared functions in some examples.
Am I right?
Yes, although I imagine by now you've tried it and found it works.
As for why you are asked to change the code, it's because of the part of the warning message saying "Variables referencing function names are acceptable but deprecated as they are not amenable to static source validation".
This means that unless you follow the recommended pattern for the first parameter it is impossible to automatically calculate the outcome of executing the setInterval call.
Since setInterval is susceptible to the same kind of security risks as eval() it is important to check that the call is safe, even more so in privileged code such as an add-on so this warning serves as a red flag to the add-on reviewer to ensure that they carefully evaluate the safety of this line of code.
Your initial code should be accepted and cause no security issues but the add-on reviewer will appreciate having one less red flag to consider.
Given that the ability to automatically determine the outcome of executing JavaScript is useful for performance optimisation as well as automatic security checks I would wager that a function expression is also going to execute more quickly.
Is there a simple way to modify a dashlet to automatically re-load itself periodically?
I am particularly thinking of the "My Tasks" dashlet - we are using pooled review workflows, so tasks may come and go all the time as they are created and then are claimed.
It may be frustrating for users to keep clicking on tasks that turn out to have already been claimed - or having to remember to keep re-loading their Dashboard page. I'd prefer the dashlet to refresh on a timed interval so it's always reasonably up to date.
In order to do this you will need to add a new capability to the client-side class Alfresco.dashlet.MyTasks (docs, source) found in the file components/dashlets/my-tasks.get.js. First you will need to add a new method to the prototype extension specified as the second parameter in the YAHOO.lang.augmentObject() call, e.g.
...
}, // end of last OOTB function - add a comment here
// begin changes
reloadData: function MyTasks_onReady()
{
this.widgets.alfrescoDataTable.loadDataTable(
this.options.filters[this.widgets.filterMenuButton.value]
);
}
// end changes
});
})();
It's not the ideal development environment, you can modify the JS file directly in the Share webapp, although you will also need to update the corresponding -min.js file.
Once you've done this, check that it works by running the following line in your browser's JavaScript console
Alfresco.util.ComponentManager.findFirst("Alfresco.dashlet.MyTasks").reloadData();
If that works, then you can wire up your new method to a title bar action (see my DevCon presentation for more background info), in the dashlet web script. The method depends on whether you are using v4.2 or a previous version, but if it is the latter then you need to add some code to the dashlet's Freemarker file my-tasks.get.html.ftl (under WEB-INF/classes/alfresco/site-webscripts/org/alfresco/components/dashlets).
In that file you should see some JavaScript code inside a <script> tag, this sets up an instance of the client-side class and some utility classes, the contents of which you can replace with the following, to add your custom title bar action.
(function()
{
var dashlet = new Alfresco.dashlet.MyTasks("${jsid}").setOptions(
{
hiddenTaskTypes: [<#list hiddenTaskTypes as type>"${type}"<#if type_has_next>, </#if></#list>],
maxItems: ${maxItems!"50"},
filters:
{<#list filters as filter>
"${filter.type?js_string}": "${filter.parameters?js_string}"<#if filter_has_next>,</#if>
</#list>}
}).setMessages(${messages});
new Alfresco.widget.DashletResizer("${id}", "${instance.object.id}");
var refreshDashletEvent = new YAHOO.util.CustomEvent("onDashletRefresh");
refreshDashletEvent.subscribe(dashlet.reloadData, dashlet, true);
new Alfresco.widget.DashletTitleBarActions("${args.htmlid}").setOptions(
{
actions:
[
{
cssClass: "refresh",
eventOnClick: refreshDashletEvent,
tooltip: "${msg("dashlet.refresh.tooltip")?js_string}"
},
{
cssClass: "help",
bubbleOnClick:
{
message: "${msg("dashlet.help")?js_string}"
},
tooltip: "${msg("dashlet.help.tooltip")?js_string}"
}
]
});
})();
You will need to add some styles for the class name specified, in the dashlet's CSS file my-tasks.css, such as the following
.my-tasks .titleBarActions .refresh
{
display: none;
background-image: url('refresh-icon.png');
}
The icon file (here is one you could re-use) must be in the same directory as the CSS file.
Lastly you'll need to define the label dashlet.refresh.tooltop used for the title bar action's tooltip. You can do this in the dashlet web script's .properties file.
For a similar example, check out the source of my Train Times dashlet, which features a refresh title bar action.
In some ways it's actually easier to define your own dashlets than it is to extend the Alfresco-supplied ones, but if you have the option of using 4.2.x, the new method allows you to extend the existing components without duplicating any code, which obviously makes upgrades much easier.
am a newbie, trying to write some basics extension. For my extension to work i need to initialize some data, so what I did is inside my background.js i declared something like this.
localStorage["frequency"] = 1; //I want one as Default value. This line is not inside any method, its just the first line of the file background.js
Users can goto Options page and change this above variable to any value using the GUI. As soon as the user changes it in UI am updating that value.
Now the problem is to my understanding background.js reloads everytime the machine is restarted. So every time I restart my machine and open Chrome the frequency value is changed back to 1. In order to avoid this where I need to initialize this value?
You could just use a specific default key. So if frequency is not set you would try default-frequency. The default keys are then still set or defined in the background.js.
I like to do that in one step, in a function like this
function storageGet(key,defaultValue){
var item = localstorage.getItem(key);
if(item === null)return defaultValue;
else return item;
}
(According to the specification localstorage must return null if no value has been set.)
So for your case it would look something like
var f = storageGet("frequency",1);
Furthermore you might be interested in checking out the chrome.storage API. It's used similar to localstorage but provides additional functionalities which might be useful for your extension. In particular it supports to synchronize the user data across different chrome browsers.
edit I changed the if statement in regard to apsillers objection. But since the specification says it's ought to be null, I think it makes sense to check for that instead of undefined.
This is another solution:
// background.js
initializeDefaultValues();
function initializeDefaultValues() {
if (localStorage.getItem('default_values_initialized')) {
return;
}
// set default values for your variable here
localStorage.setItem('frequency', 1);
localStorage.setItem('default_values_initialized', true);
}
I think the problem lies with your syntax. To get and set your localStorage values try using this:
// to set
localStorage.setItem("frequency", 1);
// to get
localStorage.getItem("frequency");
I've been searching for examples and reference and have come up with nothing. I found a note in offscreenTab source code mentioning it cannot be instantiated from a background page (it doesn't have a tab for the offscreenTab to relate to). Elsewhere I found mention that popup also has no tie to a tab.
How do you successfully create an offscreenTab in a Chrome extension?
According to the documentation, offscreenTabs.create won't function in a background page. Although not explicitly mentioned, the API cannot be used in a Content script either. Through a simple test, it seems that the popup has the same limitation as a background page.
The only leftover option is a tab which runs in the context of a Chrome extension. The easiest way to do that is by using the following code in the background/popup:
chrome.tabs.create({url: chrome.extension.getURL('ost.htm'), active:false});
// active:false, so that the window do not jump to the front
ost.htm is a helper page, which creates the tab:
chrome.experimental.offscreenTabs.create({url: '...'}, function(offscreenTab) {
// Do something with offscreenTab.id !
});
To change the URL, use chrome.experimental.offscreenTabs.update.
offscreenTab.id is a tabId, which ought to be used with the chrome.tabs API. However, at least in Chrome 20.0.1130.1, this is not the case. All methods of the tabs API do not recognise the returned tabID.
A work-around is to inject a content script using a manifest file, eg:
{"content_scripts": {"js":["contentscript.js"], "matches":["<all_urls>"]}}
// contentscript.js:
chrome.extension.sendMessage({ .. any request .. }, function(response) {
// Do something with response.
});
Appendum to the background page:
chrome.extension.onMessage.addListener(function(message, sender, sendResponse) {
// Instead of checking for index == -1, you can also see if the ID matches
// the ID of a previously created offscreenTab
if (sender.tab && sender.tab.index === -1) {
// index is negative if the tab is invisible
// ... do something (logic) ...
sendResponse( /* .. some response .. */ );
}
});
With content scripts, you've got full access to a page's DOM. But not to the global object. You'll have to inject scripts (see this answer) if you want to run code in the context of the page.
Another API which might be useful is the chrome.webRequest API. It can be used to modify headers/abort/redirect requests. Note: It cannot be used to read or modify the response.
Currently, the offscreenTabs API is experimental. To play with it, you have to enable the experimental APIs via chrome://flags, and add "permissions":["experimental"] to your manifest file. Once it's not experimental any more, use "permissions":["offscreenTabs"].