I've recently been asked to create a spreadsheet for work that will return the lowest bid price from any of our suppliers. I got the basic spreadsheet from management and they want me to get it working. It looks like this
I've found the minimum value from the four pricing columns easily enough, but I need to get the vendor id and the deal number and display them on the right side as well, as this spreadsheet could have tens of thousands of entries.
Does anyone know of any method I could use to get the Vendor ID and Deal Number values from their relative position to the smallest price value?
This will give you the lowest price vendor.
=INDEX(B2:Q2,MATCH(R2,B2:Q2,0)-3)
Since Vendor appears three columns to the left of price, you are offsetting match by -3. For bid number you will offset by -2.
However, there is more than one vendor with the lowest price, you will get the one who appears first.
Related
I have excel table in csv with data from monitoring smart shelf. The shelf status is monitored every 2 mins. The data is the table with time status of products at given time during the day. Each column consists of numbers e.g. 1,4,3,2,2,2,0,0 etc. When the number is bigger than previous one (e.g. was 2 and now is 3) it means that someone added the product to the shelf, and when the number is less than previous one, it means that the product unit/s was sold.
Te problem is to construct the formula that will be count quantity sold and quantity added. I think that it should monitor the change of quantity whether is positive or negative and sum each positive and negative change.
I just started learning excel more complex formulas and I don't have any idea how to solve this problem. I count on your help
Sold
=SUMPRODUCT(A1:A7-A2:A8,--(A1:A7>A2:A8))
Stocked
=SUMPRODUCT(A2:A8-A1:A7,--(A2:A8>A1:A7))
I am new to Spotfire and need help in getting the right expression for a calculated column.
My Data contains different subjects grouped in column ID. For every ID, Bodyweight was measured on different days. Days are given in column Day and stated as 1,2,3...
The last day is denoted by Last and Bodyweight measurements given in another column. Another column is present which is called Baseline. The Body weight measured is considered as baseline if the column contains a Y for that row.
I need to insert a calculated column, which will contain the difference between Body measurement measured on Day denoted Last and Body measurement marked by Y in column Baseline.
This should be done for every new ID. I am not able to figure this out. Could someone advise me on how to go about it?
Here is an example attached
So, the calculated column for Rita will give -4 (body weight at Last=56 and BodyWeight at baseline=56, so 52-56 =-4)
the sample data you provided is a little weird, particularly the [Day] column. if it's within your control, I suggest to use actual dates rather than a number/string here.
barring that, I was able to get your desired results, but it required two calculated columns: the first one will consolidate the [Day] and [Baseline] columns into a single column, and the second one contains your desired info.
column 1, which I called Day (int):
CASE
WHEN [Day]="Last" THEN 1000000
WHEN [Baseline]="Y" THEN -1000000
WHEN [Day]!="Last" THEN Integer([Day])
END
I picked a random high and low max to establish a chronological order. this will put 1000000 in place of "Last" (if you have any programs that are longer than one million days, you'll need to increase this number). the same for the [Baseline] column, but that value will be -1000000, which is presumably the lowest value you will ever see in this column. both of these are assumptions and may not work for your implementation. finally, in all other cases, the day number will be used.
column 2, which I called Diff:
Last([Weight]) OVER (Intersect([Name],LastNode([Day (int)]))) -
First([Weight]) OVER (Intersect([Name],FirstNode([Day (int)])))
the first line uses what's called an OVER expression to retrieve the first value for [Weight], ordered by [Day (int)], per [Name]. the second line gives the reverse of that, and so the difference is calculated as -4 (or whatever is appropriate).
I am working on a data set and I need to calculate the daily revenue of fake AirBnb listings using nested IF statements. This is for a bootcamp I am attending, and I am stuck.
My instructions are as follows:
Estimate revenue per listing
Assume each booking always has 2 guests, unless the listing accommodates only one;
The booking is always for the minimum number of days allowed;
Only half of the bookings generate a review;
The extra person charge is per night (column name ‘extra_people’)
○ Format: have a column that calculates daily revenue (account for number of guests accommodated, number of guests included in the price, extra charge for additional people - using nested IF statements); another column would then calculates revenue per booking; finally, multiply that by the number of total stays the listings has had.
Using the data in my dataset, I am attempting to fill out column AA. So far this is what I have for my formula,
However, I get an error. I know the first part of this formula would work for the scenario in row 4. However, I need to make sure that the formula takes into account scenarios where the "guests included" is less than the "accommodates", because I must assume that each booking always has two guests except for when the listing only accommodates one person.
How should this formula be written? Can I not create equations within nested if formulas if it includes adding, subtracting, dividing, or multiplying columns together?
To clarify the previous response a bit more, the structuring of IFstatements is important. Keep in mind the structure of the function: =IF(logical test, value if true, value if false). So, the second IF function (the first nested) needs to be placed where the first "value if false" comes in - each additional IF needs to be within the previous IF function. Using your example, the corrected form would be =IF(W4=Q4,V4,IF(W4<Q4,Q4*V4...)). I'm not sure what the "+X4" is supposed to be adding to, but this hopefully makes the structure clearer for you to work with. Good luck!
I am looking for some help regarding ranking. My spreadsheet has columns labeled as follows:
Tickers
P/E Rate of Change
P/B Rate of Change
Dividend Yield Rate of Change
P/Sales Rate of Change
I am looking to come up with a composite ranking that takes into account a tickers relative rank within each rate of change category. I tried this first by creating an additional 4 columns and using the formula as follows:
IFERROR(RANK(D4,$D:$D,1),"")
I believe this gives me a rank for the corresponding rate of change. However, for those cells that have either a blank or an error I want to use a median in calculating the tickers rank. I was then going to sum the ranks in another column to come up with my final ranking but that doesn't seem to be calculating correctly as I have blank rows returning rankings that don't make sense.
I think you are almost there.
For one column I would change what you have to
=IFERROR(RANK(D4,$D:$D,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
Then simply expand to add all ranks together
=IFERROR(RANK(A4,$A:$A,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
+IFERROR(RANK(B4,$B:$B,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
+IFERROR(RANK(C4,$C:$C,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
+IFERROR(RANK(D4,$D:$D,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
+IFERROR(RANK(E4,$E:$E,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
To avoid potentially large numbers you could use an average (same resulting rank, but potentially easier to understand) by slightly changing the formula to:
=(IFERROR(RANK(A4,$A:$A,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
+IFERROR(RANK(B4,$B:$B,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
+IFERROR(RANK(C4,$C:$C,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
+IFERROR(RANK(D4,$D:$D,1),MEDIAN($D:$D))
+IFERROR(RANK(E4,$E:$E,1),MEDIAN($D:$D)))/5
I run a small golf eclectic with excel. One of the things we have is a points system. I would like to get the 5 highest points scored over the season and have them ranked from 1 (being the highest points scored) to 5.
My knowledge of excel "sums" goes only a wee bit further than add and subtract.
Thanks!
If you don't want to change the order that they are presently in you can use the LARGE function. It returns the kth largest value.
Below is a great formula, if you drag it down it will automatically get the second, third and nth largest value from a table of data (in this example the data is between A1 to A10).
=LARGE(A1:A10,ROW(A1)-ROW($A$1)+1)
You can then match the values with names or corresponding data from the tables using the MATCH and INDEX functions. The example below would fetch the name for each value from the second column.
=INDEX($A$1:$B$10,MATCH(cell reference with score or value,$A$1:$B$10,2))
Play around with these formulas, they are very convenient for data m
If you have a column containing the scores, you could add a filter (Data->Filter I think) and sort descending.
Though, if you just have rows that are something like [Date][Person][Score] you'll need to go to another sheet and SUM the scores for each person then sort that... Unfortunately my Excel skills aren't up to par to pull a score for each person like that.
Given a list of numbers in A1 to A10, you can work out their 'Rank' relative to each other by using 'RANK'.
e.g.
RANK(A1,A1:A6,0)
RANK(cell, list of cells to check against, order)
For order, 0 = descending.
From there you can work out which one is first pragmatically.
If you have Excel 2007,
Check that your data is continuous, with no blank rows or columns. Click on your scores and then select 'Data - Filter'
Using the dropdown that the filter creates at the top of your scores column and select 'Number filters - Top ten'
A 'Top ten Autofilter' dialog will be displayed, reduce the show 10 to 5 and then click on OK.
For earlier versions of Excel add a RANK formula in a new column. Be careful as the scores need to be sorted, usually into descending order. If there are any ties, they will be given the same ranking number and the subsequent rank number will be incremented by the number of ties. (E.g. If there are two scores of 2, ranked as 5. The next score will be ranked as 7, not 6)
If you want to use the LARGE Function as described above, make sure you put the same range in the list for each of the LARGE functions. That is, change =LARGE(A1:A10,ROW(A1)-ROW($A$1)+1) to =LARGE(A$1:A$10,ROW(A1)-ROW($A$1)+1) or you will get some strange incorrect results