I am using Liferay 6.2 GA5 Community Edition.
Sample case I have 2 entities in my service.xml, let's say entity A & B.
When I run Service Builder then it will generate many JAVA files in my source code, and also generate JAR file located in
".\my-app\liferay-plugins-sdk-6.2\portlets\my-app-portlet\docroot\WEB-INF\lib\my-app-service.jar"
I open it with 7-zip, and I can see in package com.mycompany.myapp.model contains classes of entity A & B.
Then I try to remove entity A in service.xml, and I have removed the corresponding JAVA files generated in my source code, then I run Service Builder again, but inside my-app-service.jar, entity A is still exist.
How do I completely remove it from JAR file? because in my case, Service Builder will not remove it, although I have remove generated JAVA files manually.
ServiceBuilder is a code generator, thus it only generates new code.
If you want to get rid of the once generated code, there's a lot more than just the java classes to get rid of: Spring configuration, Hibernate configuration etc. are there as well for you to take care of. All of these will have to be deleted manually. And if the code still remains in the jar, good old ant clean (or whatever build environment you use) should get rid of the my-app-service.jar file (which you otherwise also can also just delete manually, so that it will be rebuilt next time a build process or ServiceBuilder runs)
I recommend searching for occurrences of A in all your project's files to see if you still find leftovers, because otherwise some component might complain at runtime that a declarated class can't be found.
Related
I have two questions about cucumber frame work.
1-My .features files are not converting into feature format and showing as plan text file even though it works fine and I can run my TestRunner.
2- I have saved my all TestRunner files into a package Runner but in TestRunner file I have to give full path of my feature file in order to run TestRunner. e.g features= "Features" not working but
features="C:\Users\FourStar1\eclipse-workspace\com.freeTourTest\src\main\java\Features2\Addusers.feature"
works.
Take a careful look at the casing of your directory and package names. It's important you are consistent with these. It makes it easier to spot mistakes. Using lowercase is recommended.
Additionally tests and test resources should be put under src/test/java and src/test/resources respectively. Feature files are resources and will not be copied over target if you put them under java.
I would suggest learning the maven project layout by heart. It makes everything easier then making up your own organization.
I am working on a NetSuite instance that had custom(contractor/SuiteScript) work installed via a bundle, but it is not a third party product but made for this system. Now there are 2 listings in the dropdown for each file. In other words, if I am adding a file as a library, it shows up twice and I don't know which reference is the correct one to choose. I used search to find the duplicate file name is in the bundle install. Can I safely remove or delete the bundle? thanks any help is appreciated.
You cannot typically remove individual files from a bundle. If you do not need the functionality of the bundle anymore than you can remove it at your discretion by going to Customization>SuiteBundler>Search & Install Bundles>List, then under the action icon click 'Uninstall'.
I wouldn't try to delete a script library from a bundle folder. Even if you are uploading an identical library there may be references in the bundle scripts to the original library that will be broken when if you delete it.
If you are wondering which one you are selecting from the drop down one thing you could do is figure out the internal id of your library file then run a search on your script file that pulls in the library file id's and make sure that they match.
I'm trying to generate NSManagedModels from my datamodel. Generation works but after I got many errors :
error: filename "Station+CoreDataProperties.swift" used twice:
'/Users/Me/MyApp/Models/CoreData/Station+CoreDataProperties.swift' and
'/Users/Me/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/MyApp-gwacspwrsnabomertjnqfbuhjvwc/Build/Intermediates/MyApp.build/Debug-iphoneos/MyApp.build/DerivedSources/CoreDataGenerated/Model/Station+CoreDataProperties.swift'
:0: note: filenames are used to distinguish private
declarations with the same name
I try clean build folder and derivedData directory hard delete. I'm using Xcode 8 BETA maybe it's a bug ?
I get this in Xcode 8.1
For me following steps solved the issue. Please note that order matters.
1) Create entity in Core Data model.
2) Under class section, make settings as on following image.
Module: Current Product Name
Codegen: Manual/None
3) Generate your NSManagedObject subclass.
This post greatly helped me solve this problem myself. Personally I look at this as an Xcode bug. Bug or not this is a huge chicken and egg situation.
I ran into this by:
Created a new Project using Core Data
Generated my NSManagedObject subclass+extension (while codegen: ClassDefinition)
I accidentally saved the generated classes in the Wrong folder
I deleted the generated files
Re-generated in folder I wanted
đź’Ą- Xcode used twice errors
As others have posted I kept cleaning my build (and clean build folder) but that never fixed the build issue.
I finally figured out if you originally created your NSManagedObject generated classes with codegen: ClassDefinition, as I did without knowing then you are locked in for the chicken and egg issue.
I then deleted the auto generated classes thinking I had to re-generate, so I did. Once re-generated I would get the used twice build error again. I manually went into the ../DerivedSources/CoreDataGenerated/Model/.. and deleted the duplicates. Again, I re-generated thinking I'd only have 1 copy (in my project) but I was wrong. If codegen: ClassDefinition was originally set then Xcode will keep creating the auto-generated classes+extensions and put them in the buried folder ../DerivedSources/CoreDataGenerated/Model/... I repeated this chicken and egg a few times before catching on.
I later realized you do indeed need to mark codegen: Manual/None however to get things back in sync you need to delete the auto-generated files in ../DerivedSources/CoreDataGenerated/Model/.. and in your project if you have any there still.
Be careful setting codegen: Manual/None, for me it was bit tricky because codegen: Manual/None wouldn't stick. I had to click back and forth between entities multiple times to double/triple check each entity was set to codegen: Manual/None. Then auto generate the files. At this point your only copy of the auto generated files should be in your project and not in ../DerivedSources/CoreDataGenerated/Model/...
Last, I think this is a bug because if you specify codegen: Manual/None I don't expect Xcode to auto generate files at all, yet it does and puts them in your project. More confusing if your setting is codegen: ClassDefinition, who the heck knows Xcode will put the files in a buried directory yet it is available for use in your project. My beef with this is the auto generated files aren't source controlled and if I change computer I have to know to auto-generate them on the new station.
Hope this helps someone else!
Cheers!
This is indeed not a bug. As #Morrowless suggests both class definition and properties extension are created. If this is not wanted, select Manual/None under Codegen before generating the code. If the code is already generated, just delete them, and try Editor->Create NSManagedObject Subclass... again from the menu (after setting Manual/None).
Note, in the picture below, the Class Name 'Contact' is specific to my project. You will see your entity name instead.
If you generated CoreData subclasses with codegen: ClassDefinition your basically screwed. The only way to fix it is to:
Delete your CoreData subclasses.
Delete your derived data folder.
Clean your project (CMD+K).
Generate new CoreData subclasses, this time select Codegen: Manual/None and Module: Current Product Module
This is not a bug. Codegen generates these files in the DerivedData folder, so you don't need to create them again in your project, hence the compile error.
From Xcode 8.0 Release notes:
Xcode automatically generates classes or class extensions for the entities and properties in a Core Data data model. Automatic code generation is enabled and disabled on an entity by entity basis, and is enabled for all entities in new models that use the Xcode 8 file format. This feature is available for any data model that has been upgraded to the Xcode 8 format. You specify whether Xcode generates Swift or Objective-C code for a data model using the data model’s file inspector.
When automatic code generation is enabled for an entity, Xcode creates
either a class or class extension for the entity as specified in the
entity's inspector: the specified class name is used and the sources
are placed in the project’s Derived Data. For both Swift and
Objective-C, these classes are directly usable from the project’s
code. For Objective-C, an additional header file is created for all
generated entities in your model. The header file name conforms to the
naming convention “DataModelName+CoreDataModel.h”.
However, if you selected Category/Extension under the codegen pulldown menu in the data model inspector (because you want to add logic to your model): codegen will wrongly generate both the class definition and properties extension.
The solution is to simply delete the properties extension (ClassName+CoreDataProperties.swift). Your project should now compile.
After following the guidance from oyalhi and Vladimir Shutyuk, (deleting the NSManagedObject files, changing the entity codegen to Manual/None), I had to restart Xcode to allow it to index again before I could re-generate the NSManagedObject files and get a successful compile.
For the sake of completeness..:
I just ran into the same error, but none of the proposed solutions worked. What puzzled me was that even switching from automated code generation to manual for the one (as I thought) problematic entity didn't do anything.
Finally, I figured out that I had several entities with the same name, but they all shared the same classname. The reason for this was that I copy&pasted one entity several times to save me some work, because they also have a few attributes in common.
Turns out XCode renames the duplicates by adding 1, 2,... to the entity name, but leaves the class name as before. And since now entity name and class name are "unrelated", renaming the entity won't change the class name either.
Hope it helps someone - I have also filed a bug report for this.
Consider a solution has 2 projects: ProjectA and ProjectB (both are MonoTouch apps) and ProjectBase. ProjectBase contains the whole application, but Main.cs file (with the entry point) is located in ProjectA and ProjectB (which reference ProjectBase). This way, running any of A/B projects will boot up the application from ProjectBase.
Now, I want to override something for ProjectA only (it might be XIB file, image or a .NET class). Is there any way I can setup the solution so that the code and resources, produced by ProjectBase, are merged with the ones from ProjectA/ProjectB and the latter wins?
I found (probably a quirky and kinda-undefined-behavior-driven way) of overriding XIBs: I just put a XIB into ProjectA and ProjectB, name it the same as it was named in ProjectBase and them exclude it from ProjectBase. Although MonoDevelop compiles all items, it seems that the startup project's XIBs get priority, so that I see ProjectA-specific XIBs when I launch ProjectA and ProjectB-specific XIBs when I launch ProjectB. However, I am not sure it is the way it should behave, plus, from what I can see from build log, ALL projects get built yielding resources at the end.
P.S. I'm sorry if this has been asked previously, but I was not able to find the similar question on SO.
I was once trying to do this for a bunch of apps. I would have thought build order would be ProjectBase and then ProjectA, and the content copy system would be the same... Guess this means we are wrong.
You could do a few things.
A) Build your own program to copy resources which are marked for content. Would not be very hard, just need to read the .csproj files. XML parsing is easy enough in .NET. Run this program on post build. Would just have to be careful when doing builds such as to zip or to the device as I am not sure how it handles post-build events.
B) [This is what I did instead] If I expect to also make ProjectC, ProjectD ... ProjectN I instead made a program to generate my program... (Programception).
What it does, has ProjectBase, and ProjectTempalte. You enter your new project name into this program, say, "MyNewProject" and it will create the correct folder structure, write the correct csproj files, and update SLN file. ProjectTemplate has various placeholders in .csproj files like {PLACEHOLDER} which Programception would just go through and find/replace with my project name. Image files (and in your case XIB) are then only kept within ProjectA (B..C..N) unless I do not expect to try and override them in which case they would stay in ProjectBase. This is a lot easier with a XIBless application I would assume. I never use XIB's anyway.
Hope that helps!
I am using a UI component from J2ME Polish. I found a simple bug in the code, and want to quickly fix it but cannot find any build scripts in the download package, although source-code is included.
The problem cannot be solved by extending the class as it involves members with private access.
How should I go about fixing it? Should I simply compile the class in question with Javac or should try to locate build script in their repository?
There is no binary code for J2MEPolish UI library, because these classes are also preprocessed during your application compilation. This is why there is also no build script for J2MEPolish UI part - the resulting binary, if it compiles, would not make any sense :)
If you are using this UI class directly (there is no Polish magic involved) I would suggest to copy it into your own project, make the changes there and you should be just fine.
But there is a small issue. I'm not 100% sure, but Polish build process should be as follows: first your classes are preprocessed and then Polish classes will be preprocessed. If the UI component, that you copied into your project, will stay in the same java package, it could happen that your changes will be overwritten by buggy Polish implementation. You can check it by running the application or looking at the final java code in build directory.
If the overwriting problem happens, then you have two options - move UI class in your project into different package (I'm 99% sure this should be fine if you use it directly) or you need to modify Polish build process, so that it would preprocess Polish classes first and you could overwrite changes done by it.
/JaanusSiim
I know this question has been answered and accepted but an easier method would be to used their built in property (for any one coming here via the magic search engines)
polish.client.source=/projecthome/j2me-polish-source
which is simply a copy of their sources packaged with the installer. You can copy this into your own source tree and thus have version history of your changes.
While JaanusSiim's method might work I would not recommend it as it becomes confusing having de.enough.** packages in your own source tree I normally create a src for my personal source and a src-j2mepolish for their source files this was it is VERY explicit what I have added to the standard versions.