I am trying to figure out how to add a GitHub project to my simple, working Launchpad PPA package. The GitHub project that I am try to add is https://github.com/compiz-reloaded/compiz-boxmenu. I couldn't find much help online and I'm hoping that someone can help point me in the right direction on how to accomplish this. Thanks!
You need to 'debianize' your package first. The debianization depends on the package type, and the manual for a package debianization is called Debian Policy.
This wiki is also very useful. Once you have your package debianized, you should compile it using the source option (I usually do it using dpkg-buildpackage -S. Pass your key using -k<Key> also. The same one you uploaded to your launchpad account.
Once you built your source, you will find a file called package_version.changes. You basically upload it as described in your PPA information. The package will be compiled, and, if no errors are found, it will be available in the PPA. If you want to enable the build for other architectures, as IBM POWER (ppc64el) or ARM (aarch64) , you should opt in.
Related
Many Cygwin's packages have no maintainer, is it still revelant to use Cygwin ?
I would like to update ruby or ansible package to the last version, how can I do that ?
Thanks
Package maintainers are volunteers.
Anyone can offer him/herself for the job.
Documentation
https://cygwin.com/packaging-contributors-guide.html
Mailing list for discussion about Maintainers
https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin-apps
If you want to be a maintainer you must subscribe to the Cygwin mailing lists. All discussions about maintaining packages are there, and you will be required to post your credentials (i.e. public key) there in order to upload updated packages. Note that some orphan packages became so because the previous maintainer needed to reduce their workload.
Once you are subscribed, just ask to take over an orphaned package, upload your credentials, install the source package, make necessary changes, and upload the new package. It sounds easy, but you might want to build the package and make sure it runs all tests before asking to be the new maintainer.
Note that there may be others who have tried to update a package, and encountered blocking problems. Those will be discussed in the mailing lists, which you can search.
I've created a nimble library package as per the documentation. When I try to build it using nimble build I get the following error.
Error: Nothing to build. Did you specify a module to build using the bin key in your .nimble file?
I can do this and it does fix the error but according to the documentation adding the bin key to the .nimble file turns my package into a binary package.
Other things I have tried:
Use nimble install: This does not appear to verify that my code will actually compile and will happily install anything to the local package directory (I added a C# class to my .nim file, for example, and it was successfully installed).
Use nimble c: This works but I have to pass in the path to the nim file I want to compile and the binDir entry in the .nimble file is ignored resulting in the output being placed in the same directory as the file being built. This complicates the development cycle because I have to manually clean up after the compiler.
Use the compiler directly. This is pretty much the same as the previous option with the same flaws.
I guess I could also create a separate .nim file and import my library after it is installed but this is a big overhead for just wanting to verify that a package in the early stages of development will actually compile.
I just want to be able to verify that the source code in my library package is syntactically correct and will compile. How is this meant to be done for library packages?
From your provided link to the nimble package manager documentation I have the feeling that
https://github.com/nim-lang/nimble#tests
is what you are looking for. But I have never used the test command, so I am not sure. I do my test manually still, I read the nimble docs maybe 4 years ago and can not really remember. And currently there is much package manager related work going on, I heard there is a new, alternative package manager called nimph, and from a forum thread I think I read something that nimble is going to change and improve also. Maybe you should consider subscribing to the Nim forum, that is the place where the bright Nim devs are. Well, at least a few of them.
I am getting into a position where I have to use other people code for projects, for example openTLD. I want to change some of the code to give it more functionality and use it in a diffrent way. What I have found is that many people have packaged their files in such a way that you are supposed to use
cmake
and then
make
and sometimes after that
make install
I don't want to install the software on my system. What I am looking to do is get these peoples code to a point where I can add to it in Eclipse or even just using Nano and then compile it.
At what point is the code in a workable/usable state. Can I use it after doing cmake or do I need to also call make? Is my thinking correct that it would be better to edit the code after calling cmake as opposed to before? I am not going to want my finished code to be cross platform supported, it will only be on Linux. Is it easer to learn cmake and edit the code befor running cmake as opposed to not learning cmake and using the code afterwards, if that is possible?
You question is a little open ended.
Looking at the opentld project, there is a binary and a library available for use. If you are interested in using the binary in your code, you need to download the executables(Linux executables are not posted). If you are planning to use the library, you have two options. Either you use the pre-built library or build it during your build process. You would include the header files in your custom application and link with the library.
If you add more details, probably others can pitch in with new answers or refine the older ones.
I'm facing a problem with connection to the default NuGet source (https://www.nuget.org/api/v2/). It's an issue independent from me and I can't mend it, it's some kind of network related problem.
Does anyone know alternate source(s) I can use?
There's a "..." button in source dialog - can I use some kind of HDD based package source?
If you want to create your own nuget package source. The following article could be useful.
http://docs.nuget.org/create/hosting-your-own-nuget-feeds
At Latest API documentation NodaTime.Serialization.JsonNet is shown as a part of NodaTime library.
But I can't find it anywhere. Here's the NodeTime in ObjectBrowser in my VisualStudio.
I even looked into NodeTime.Testing and haven't found it.
I don't know where to look for it anymore. These two (NodeTime and NodeTime.Testing) are only packages available over NuGet.
From the page you linked to:
Code in this namespace is not currently included in Noda Time NuGet packages; it is still deemed "experimental". To use these serializers, please download and build the Noda Time source code from the project home page.
For 1.2, we'll be distributing a separate pre-built assembly and NuGet package, but that's not quite ready yet, so for now you'll have to build your own.