I'm running a Spark Streaming process on a 16 CPU's 64 GB RAM host with Mesos.
When I'm running it using Mesos as a cluster manager (by setting --master mesos://leader.mesos:5050) it's running much slower than when it is run in local mode (--master local[4]).
I can't find the reason for that and I have no clue. One of the things I've noticed is that there is one specific task that is taking significantly more time on Mesos than in Local.
The weird thing (maybe that should be the questions' title) is that the task itself takes 6s and its stage (it has only one stage) takes less than a second. See attached pictures (Mesos (1) and (2)). How come? Isn't a job equal to the sum of its parts?
Local:
Mesos:
(1)
(2)
Another note: I did manage to run this exact same Spark Streaming process on another Mesos cluster, and it runs in a sensible amount of time, pretty much like in the local mode described above. The only difference that I can think of is that this cluster has more than one host, and that Spark is running with 2 executors rather than 1. (I couldn't find a way to run more than 1 executor on the same host on Mesos). Is this may be the reason?
Any clues would be much appreciated.
Spark can run over Mesos in two modes: coarse-grained (default) and fine-grained (see documentation).
In coarse-grained mode Spark launches exactly one executor on each machine it was assigned to by Mesos. Inside this task Spark launches other mini-tasks. It has the benefit of lower startup overhead (in your case you don't want to change this mode).
Could you be more specific about your streaming job? Is it CPU, disk, or network bounded? You can easily compare performance if you run some of Spark examples.
If your task is CPU intensive you might consider setting spark.mesos.extra.cores. By default Spark tries to acquire all cores that are being offered by Mesos. So, if there's no other task running on that cluster it shouldn't be a problem.
Related
We're using AWS EMR for our spark jobs. All our jobs are submitted in yarn cluster mode, so the driver will run in one of the cluster nodes. We use on-demand node for master, and spot-instances for the core nodes. Now, although we almost always choose instances with < 5% interruption rate, sometimes it so happens that a significant fraction of our cluster nodes get terminated prematurely (probably because of higher demands).
So, I was wondering, in the above situation, what happens if a node containing the driver process goes down? Is there any chance of recovery for the spark job in that case? Or is the job gone forever?
The Spark driver is a single point of failure because it holds all cluster state for the running App.
In practice non-ephemeral storage can be used for check-pointing batch Apps after expensive expensive transformations. That said, trying to re-start after such a situation can be done, but when I looked into it, it is quite difficult to say the least. I asked such a question under my name some time ago, you can find it. I am quite technical but felt: gosh what a lot of hard work.
So, the recovery means rolling your own stuff, or accepting a re-run. Since I last evaluated EMR I see that the driver can run on the Master and that can be failed-over, but that is not the same thing as far as I can see, nor what you wish.
EMR has node leveling for CORE nodes in Yarn. Your spark driver/ Application master only gets created in CORE nodes. And HDFS also resides in CORE nodes only.
So to handle your situation in a best way, you may consider to use both CORE and TASK group.
What you can do to tackle this -
MASTER: On-demand
CORE: On-demand. Minimum no of Instances can be 1.
TASK: Spot with autoscaling with minimal EBS volume. Minimum no of Instances can be 0 this case.
This will reduce your cost also ensure that node containing the driver process never goes down.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/emr/latest/ManagementGuide/emr-master-core-task-nodes.html
How to decide the --executor memory and --num-of-executors in spark submit job . What is the concept of -number-of-cores.
Also the clear difference between cluster and client deploy mode. How to choose the deploy mode
The first part of your question where you ask about --executor-memory, --num-executors and --num-executor-cores usually depends on the variety of task your Spark application is going to perform.
Executor Memory indicates the amount of physical memory you want to allocate to the JVM that runs the executor. The value will depend on your requirement. For example, if you're just going to parse a large text file you'll require much less memory than what you need for, say, Image Processing.
The number of executors variable is the number of Executor JVMs you want to spawn on your cluster. Again, it depends on a lot of factors like your cluster size, type of machines in the cluster etc.
Each executor splits the code and performs the instructions in tasks. These tasks are performed in executor cores (or processors). This helps you to achieve parallelism within a certain executor but make sure you don't allocate all the cores of a machine to its executor because some are needed for normal functioning of it.
On to your second part of the question, we have two --deploy-mode in Spark that you have already named i.e. cluster and client.
client mode is when you connect an external machine to a cluster and you run a spark job from that external machine. Like when you connect your laptop to a cluster and run spark-shell from it. The driver JVM is invoked in your laptop and the session is killed as soon as you disconnect your laptop. Similar is the case for a spark-submit job, if you run a job with --deploy-mode client, your laptop acts like the master but the job is killed as soon as it is disconnected (not sure about this one).
cluster mode: When you specify --deploy-mode cluster in your job then even if you run it using your laptop or any other machine, the job (JAR) is taken care of by the ResourceManager and ApplicationMaster, just like any other application in YARN. You won't be able to see the output on your screen but anyway most complex Spark jobs write to a FS so that's taken care of that way.
The spark docs have the following paragraph that describes the difference between yarn client and yarn cluster:
There are two deploy modes that can be used to launch Spark applications on YARN. In cluster mode, the Spark driver runs inside an application master process which is managed by YARN on the cluster, and the client can go away after initiating the application. In client mode, the driver runs in the client process, and the application master is only used for requesting resources from YARN.
I'm assuming there are two choices for a reason. If so, how do you choose which one to use?
Please use facts to justify your response so that this question and answer(s) meet stackoverflow's requirements.
There are a few similar questions on stackoverflow, however those questions focus on the difference between the two approaches, but don't focus on when one approach is more suitable than the other.
A common deployment strategy is to submit your application from a gateway machine that is physically co-located with your worker machines (e.g. Master node in a standalone EC2 cluster). In this setup, client mode is appropriate. In client mode, the driver is launched directly within the spark-submit process which acts as a client to the cluster. The input and output of the application is attached to the console. Thus, this mode is especially suitable for applications that involve the REPL (e.g. Spark shell).
Alternatively, if your application is submitted from a machine far from the worker machines (e.g. locally on your laptop), it is common to use cluster mode to minimize network latency between the drivers and the executors. Note that cluster mode is currently not supported for Mesos clusters. Currently only YARN supports cluster mode for Python applications." -- Submitting Applications
What I understand from this is that both strategies use the cluster to distribute tasks; the difference is where the "driver program" runs: locally with spark-submit, or, also in the cluster.
When you should use either of them is detailed in the quote above, but I also did another thing: for big jars, I used rsync to copy them to the cluster (or even to master node) with 100 times the network speed, and then submitted from the cluster. This can be better than "cluster mode" for big jars. Note that client mode does not probably transfer the jar to the master. At that point the difference between the 2 is minimal. Probably client mode is better when the driver program is idle most of the time, to make full use of cores on the local machine and perhaps avoid transferring the jar to the master (even on loopback interface a big jar takes quite a bit of seconds). And with client mode you can transfer (rsync) the jar on any cluster node.
On the other hand, if the driver is very intensive, in cpu or I/O, cluster mode may be more appropriate, to better balance the cluster (in client mode, the local machine would run both the driver and as many workers as possible, making it over loaded and making it that local tasks will be slower, making it such that the whole job may end up waiting for a couple of tasks from the local machine).
Conclusion :
To sum up, if I am in the same local network with the cluster, I would
use the client mode and submit it from my laptop. If the cluster is
far away, I would either submit locally with cluster mode, or rsync
the jar to the remote cluster and submit it there, in client or
cluster mode, depending on how heavy the driver program is on
resources.*
AFAIK With the driver program running in the cluster, it is less vulnerable to remote disconnects crashing the driver and the entire spark job.This is especially useful for long running jobs such as stream processing type workloads.
Spark Jobs Running on YARN
When running Spark on YARN, each Spark executor runs as a YARN container. Where MapReduce schedules a container and fires up a JVM for each task, Spark hosts multiple tasks within the same container. This approach enables several orders of magnitude faster task startup time.
Spark supports two modes for running on YARN, “yarn-cluster” mode and “yarn-client” mode. Broadly, yarn-cluster mode makes sense for production jobs, while yarn-client mode makes sense for interactive and debugging uses where you want to see your application’s output immediately.
Understanding the difference requires an understanding of YARN’s Application Master concept. In YARN, each application instance has an Application Master process, which is the first container started for that application. The application is responsible for requesting resources from the ResourceManager, and, when allocated them, telling NodeManagers to start containers on its behalf. Application Masters obviate the need for an active client — the process starting the application can go away and coordination continues from a process managed by YARN running on the cluster.
In yarn-cluster mode, the driver runs in the Application Master. This means that the same process is responsible for both driving the application and requesting resources from YARN, and this process runs inside a YARN container. The client that starts the app doesn’t need to stick around for its entire lifetime.
yarn-cluster mode
The yarn-cluster mode is not well suited to using Spark interactively, but the yarn-client mode is. Spark applications that require user input, like spark-shell and PySpark, need the Spark driver to run inside the client process that initiates the Spark application. In yarn-client mode, the Application Master is merely present to request executor containers from YARN. The client communicates with those containers to schedule work after they start:
yarn-client mode
This table offers a concise list of differences between these modes:
Reference: https://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2014/05/apache-spark-resource-management-and-yarn-app-models/ - Apache Spark Resource Management and YARN App Models (web.archive.com mirror)
In yarn-cluster mode, the driver program will run on the node where application master is running where as in yarn-client mode the driver program will run on the node on which job is submitted on centralized gateway node.
Both answers by Ram and Chavati/Wai Lee are useful and helpful, but here I just want to added a couple of other points:
Much has been written about the proximity of driver to the executors, and that is a big factor. The other factors are:
Will the driver process be around until execution of job is finished?
How's returned data being handled?
#1. In spark client mode, the driver process must be up and running the whole time when the spark job is in execution. So if you have a truly long job that say take many hours to run, you need to make sure the driver process is still up and running, and that the driver session is not auto-logout.
On the other hand, after submitting a job to run in cluster mode, the process can go away. The cluster mode will keep running. So this is typically how a production job will run: the job can be triggered by a timer, or by an external event and then the job will run to its completion without worrying about the lifetime of the process submitting the spark job.
#2. In client mode, you can call sc.collect() to gather all the data back from all executors, and then write/save the returned data to a local Linux file on local disk. Now this may not work for cluster mode, as the 'driver' typically run in a different remote host. The data written up therefore need to be persisted in a common mounted volume (such as GPFS, NFS) or in distributed file system like HDFS. If the job is running under Hadoop/YARN, the more common way for cluster mode is simply ask each executor to persist the data to HDFS, and not to run collect( ) at all. Collect() actually have scalability issue when there are a large number of executors returning large amount of data - it can overwhelm the driver process.
I have 2 spark streaming jobs that I want to run, as well as keeping some available resources for batch jobs and other operations.
I evaluated Spark Standalone cluster manager, but I realized that I would have to fix the resources for two jobs, which would leave almost no computing power to batch jobs.
I started evaluating Mesos, because it has "fine grained" execution model, where resources are shifted between Spark applications.
1) Does it mean that a single core can be shifted between 2 streaming applications?
2) Although I have spark & cassandra, in order to exploit data locality, do I need to have dedicated core on each of the slave machines to avoid shuffling?
3) Would you recommend running Streaming jobs in "fine grained" or "course grained" mode. I know that logical answer is course grained (in order to minimize the latency of streaming apps) but what when resource in total cluster are limited (cluster of 3 nodes, 4 cores each - there are 2 streaming applications to run and multiple time to time batch jobs)
4) In Mesos, when I run spark streaming job in cluster mode, will it occupy 1 core permanently (like Standalone cluster manager is doing), or will that core execute driver process and sometimes act as executor?
Thank you
Fine grained mode is actually deprecated now. Even with it, each core is allocated to task until completion, but in Spark Streaming, each processing interval is a new job, so tasks only last as long the time it takes to process each interval's data. Hopefully that time is less than the interval time or your processing will back up, eventually running out of memory to store all those RDDs waiting for processing.
Note also that you'll need to have one core dedicated to each stream's Reader. Each will be pinned for the life of the stream! You'll need extra cores in case the stream ingestion needs to be restarted; Spark will try to use a different core. Plus you'll have a core tied up by your driver, if it's also running on the cluster (as opposed to on your laptop or something).
Still, Mesos is a good choice, because it will allocate the tasks to nodes that have capacity to run them. Your cluster sounds pretty small for what you're trying to do, unless the data streams are small themselves.
If you use the Datastax connector for Spark, it will try to keep input partitions local to the Spark tasks. However, I believe that connector assumes it will manage Spark itself, using Standalone mode. So, before you adopt Mesos, check to see if that's really all you need.
I have 2 cores on my vagrant development machine, and want to run 2 streaming applications.
If:
both of them take both available cores ( I didn't specify "spark.cores.max")
they have streaming interval of 15 seconds
5 seconds is enough to perform computation
Is expected behaviour of Mesos to shift these 2 available cores between 2 applications? I would expect that behaviour, because "Mesos locks the resources until job is executed", and in Spark Streaming one job is what is executed within batch interval.
Otherwise, If resources are locked for the life of application (in spark streaming it is forever), what is the benefit of using Mesos instead of Standalone cluster manager?
Spark Streaming locks each stream Reader to a core, plus you'll need at least one other core for the rest of the processing. So you can't run two jobs simultaneously on a 2-core machine.
Mesos gives you much better resource utilization in a cluster. Standalone is more static. It might fine, though, for a fixed number of long-running streams, as long as you have enough resources and you use the recommendations for capping the allowed resources each job can grab (default is to grab everything).
If you're really just running on a single machine, use local[*] to avoid the overhead of master and slave daemons, etc.