I can only figure out how to color 1 column - I'm trying to color the whole row based on the Wellname.
You can color alternate rows by adding a rule in Properties --> colors
1. Click Add Rule
2. select Rule Type = Boolean Expression
2. Value = Mod(RowId(),2)=0
unfortunately Spotfire doesn't support row-based coloring.
if you're creating an analysis with multiple visualizations, you could potentially use a details visualization to limit the rows displayed in the table to a selected well.
This is an answer I found on Tibco Community:
You can put your expression instead of the one from an example.
Related
I have a huge table with data structured like this:
And I would like to display them in Spotfire Analyst 7.11 as follows:
Basically I need to display the columns that contain "ANTE" below the others in order to make a comparison. Values that have variations for the same ID must be highlighted.
I also have the fields "START_DATE_ANTE" and "END_DATE_ANTE" which have been omitted in the example image.
Amusingly, if you were limited to just what the title asks, this would be a very simple answer.
If you wanted this in a table where the rows are displayed as usual, and the cells are highlighted, you can do this by going to properties, adding a newGrouping where you select VAL_1 and VAL_1_ANTE and add a Rule, Rule type "Boolean expression", where the value is:
[VAL_1] - [VAL_1_ANTE] <> 0
This will highlight the affected cells, which you can place next to each other. You can even throw in a calculated column showing the difference between the two columns, and slap it on right next to it. This gives you the further option to filter down to only showing rows with discrepancies, or sorting by these values.
However, if you actually need it to display the POSTs on different lines from the ANTEs, as formatted above, things get a little tricky.
My personal preference would be to pivot (split/union/etc) the data before pulling it in to Spotfire, with an indicator flag on "is this different", yes/no. However, I know a lot of Spotfire users either aren't using a database or don't have leeway to perform the SQL themselves.
In fact, if you try to do it in Spotfire using custom expressions alone, it becomes so tricky, I'm not sure how to answer it right off. I'm inclined to think you should be able to do it in a cross table, using Subsets, but I haven't figured out a way to identify which subset you're in while inside the custom expressions.
Other options include generating a table using IronPython, if you're up to that.
Lets say I have the data about some kind of requests.
I have column determining request's creation date.
I wish to show the requestes Trellis'ed by this date but not the standard way.
I wish all the requests with creation date older than 2013-01-01 to be grouppped in one trellis graph.
I also would like to retain the possibility to have information on both year and quarter level as it is available for typical date column.
The image below show sth similar to what I need but the Empty section comes as the last one and I need it with different label and on the left hand side rather than as it is now on the right hand side.
Any ideas ?
my suggestion is to make two visualizations. you can duplicate the one you've already created and then limit its data by editing the properties for that vis, viewing the Data page, and using the Limit data using expression field, giving an expression like [Date Column] < "2013-01-01". you'd do the same on the second vis except use an expression like [Date Column] >= "2013-01-01".
the easiest way to change (Empty) to "something" is to not leave it empty :) you can create a calculated column with the expression If([Column] is null, "Custom Empty", [Column]) and then use that on the horizontal axis. alternatively you can hide (Empty) values from a visualization by limiting the visualization by an expression like [Column] is not null.
you can adjust the order which values are shown by going to the Edit menu and choosing Column Properties. choose the column, click the Sort Order tab, select Custom Sort Order, and click Configure.
The source data for my Excel PivotTable looks like the following (this is a simplification):
id name score
1 john 15
2 james 2
3 pat 14
4 jake 12
...
I have a PivotTable that uses this as a data source. Now, what I want to do is have the PivotTable only consider entries if their id is less than 100. This is theoretically achievable by having a Report Filter on id, and de-selecting any number greater than 100. But that's rather absurd.
How can I filter out data using a Boolean constraint? I've tried various methods, none of which worked. It seems like calculated fields are the key, but it doesn't seem possible to create a filter on calculated fields.
I'm using Excel 2011 for Mac, if that makes a difference. I'm a programmer, but I've never programmed in Excel, so if that's the solution, I'd request baby steps. :) Thank you!
AFAIK, In Excel 2011, you cannot use a report filter to apply any kind of filter. You have to manually check/uncheck the values that you want or don't want.
The alternative that I can think of is to insert a column before your data and enter the formula
=If(B2<100,TRUE,FALSE)
and copy it down using Autofill. (See screenshot below)
Now create a pivot and put the field "Less Than 100" in the report filter and simply select TRUE (See screenshot below)
If you don't want to go down that path then move the ID field to ROW LABEL from REPORT FILTER where you can use a filter.
A Report Filter is exactly what I would do, but rather than manually de-selecting the fields as you suggest you would do I would apply a Label filter to be less than the cut-off point, which in your example is 100.
I haven't used Excel on Mac, but on Windows on the PivotTable Field List, to the right of the id field click the little black arrow, and select Label Filters -> Less Than and then enter 100 in the dialogue that pops up.
Given the inherent value of PivotTables is the ability to apply filters exactly for this sort of scenario I don't think I'd do anything more complicated.
I have a view that displays data from several categories, where the category (bug severity in my case) is color-coded into the background color of individual entries. Now I'd like to apply the same background color to the category line itself.
As the column setting the background color for the rest of the line isn't displayed in category rows, the setting isn't applied. Is there a workaround for that?
Taken from: http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/nd6forum.nsf/0/2765b9380021c666852572d800589f9d?OpenDocument
Here is an awkward method that works to color your category rows
differently.
Put a column before all the categorized columns. This will be your color column. Check the Use Value as Color property of the column
properties.
Use one of the functions below:
#If(#IsCategory("any")="any";any;1:1:1)
#If(#IsCategory("x")="y";z;1:1:1)
Note: in the function above, where the word "any" appears, or "x" "y"
and "z", it can be anything, matching or not. It will always evaluate
to false. If you try just #IsCategory, it will error out because that
doesn't return true. And no match you try will ever cause a true
comparison.
That said, the result is that all rows will be colored black if they
are not categories. This overrides the default text color. If you want
another color than black, then adjust the 1:1:1 accordingly
(red:green:blue up to 255 for each position, red= 255:0:0)
Now go to any column and set the text color to the row you want your
categorized rows to appear in, and click Apply to All. Voila!
I was trying to figure out how to do this programmatically and then I wondered, why not just borrow from the mail template? I'd like to suggest you check into how the ColorProfile is used there to allow users to change their color preferences based on a field value (sender name) and see if it can be done for your case.
Or, have them either access the view via a browser client or XPages in the Notes client and assign a class to that dependent on the severity.
You could build the category column formula with HTML such that when it is severe the value is "<tr class='severe'><td>CategoryNameValueHere</td></tr>" or something along those lines, right?
I have a sheet (let's go with wines as an example) that lists every bottle of wine in my cellar, when I bought it, how much I paid etc.
There's a column that describes the wine in comma-separated tags such as "Fruity, White".
I've created a pivot table from that data, with the description as a filter column. However I can't filter it by "White". I have to find every description that contains "White" such as "Dry, White", "White, Crisp" etc.
Being from an RDBMS background, my natural inclination is to put the tags in their own table keyed against the wine row so there's zero-or-more tag rows per wine row.
How, how on earth can I use that to filter the wine rows?
Yes you can do it within Excel and the description fields can remain as "Dry, White" etc as you do not need to split the comma separated values.
Lets say the Table source comprises a text column for Description, a number column for Value and a number column for Year Bought.
Your pivot is setup with the the following
Fields: Description, Value and Year Bought.
Column labels: Year Bought
Row Labels: Description
Sum of values: Sum of Value
There is a drop down label filter on the row labels - click on this and there should be an option to select Label Filters. Select this and then select Contains. You can enter say "White" which will select all your descriptions that contain white e.g. "Dry, White", "White, Crisp". The filter includes ? to represent a single character and * to represent any series of characters.
There are similar label filters for "begins with" and "ends with" as well as there negation.
I tried this in Excel 2007 and it should also work in 2003. I think in Excel 2003 you could even combine the filters e.g. contains "White" and does not contain "Dry" but in 2007 I could not find a way of doing this.
Forgive me if I'm stating the obvious, but the reason you're having problems here is that the description column is not in 1NF, and the Excel pivot interface isn't flexible enough to allow pattern-based searching.
The simplest option will be to normalise the CSV into a series of columns, each of which represents a single attribute - one column for wine colour, one for sweetness, one for country of origin and so on - and apply the filter across multiple columns. However, if (as your comment on the question suggests) wine is a metaphor for your real problem, you may not have the luxury of revisiting the design of the source data.
Another possibility might be to use a macro (or a database query - I'm not clear from your question whether you have implemented the tag system already) to pre-filter the input data on the pivot table's source sheet based on the tag values you want to search for, then re-refresh the pivot table based on that data.
A third possibility is the VBA used in this question, which looks like it will custom-filter the pivot table's visible rows.
=IF(ISERR(FIND("WHITE",UPPER(B5))),0,1)
create an extra column and add a formula. There are 2 tricks to this. One is to search for WHITE in the description column using upper - to beat the fact that excel find is case sensitive. Two is that it returns a value error if the string does not exist - so iserr will allow you to trap that and return in this example 0 if it doesn't or 1 if it does. You could substitute white and blank for 1 and 0.
you could write a script that loops through the data and adds new lines for each comma separated item in the description column. This would allow the pivot table to filter better.