I am using GATE for annotating a document with ANNIE. I followed the procedure (given in 13.2.2 of GATE user guide https://gate.ac.uk/sale/tao/splitch13.html ) of adding new entry "wasim" in person_male.lst through the gazeteer editor available in GATE. It adds thsi entry but do not create lookup annotation for that word in the text document being processed by ANNIE.
Moreover i also tried to make a separate .lst file and even tried to edit the existing .lst file in GATE/ANNIE/resources/gazetteer but it says permission is denied to save in this position.
please help
From your description "permission denied" is not related to GATE somehow. I think this is issue with your local system. Please make sure that you really have enough of rights to edit plain text file.
Also, as far as I remember ANNIE gazetteers are case sensitive. If you added a "wasim" value then only this value will be matched but not Wasim or WASIM.
Related
I've created a version tracking that will show all the edited document inside view. What if I want to make all document be draft at the same time, and during that, document can't be edit. And after I click save, all draft document will be saved at the same time.
Edit 1
I have one more question when I do version tracking, how can I make all response document cannot be edit? only current document can be edit?
UPDATE QUESTION
Currently, I am using version tracking to show all list with all edit document. So for now, every time I click EDIT, it will show all history of updated.
So I want create a situation where I have 2 edit option which is EDIT and PC Specification. I want to set PC Specification after edit document, it updated all history under version tracking, but for EDIT I don't want it update under version tracking. Because, for EDIT function, it only for edit one or two information BUT for PC Specification, it is to update all information. For example, I have 3 documents inside the "Computer" view.
When I open one document, it will show document details. On top menu, I have two buttons which are Edit and Close Windows. So can I add one more toolbar? Which is PC Spec as below?
So I will click the PC Spec button on the toolbar then the documents will open as a new document with same document information. Same as edit function. After I click save, it overwrite document + show edit history
For another situation where I click EDIT, same as PC Spec but after I click save, it overwrite document only.
As shown below, the history is when document edit using PC Spec only.
Another question, I have "Archived" view. How can I show only history of document inside "Archived" view?
Hope you guys can understand this. Please ask me anything if you not understand. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks! :)
Regarding your second question, to make all response documents non-editable, you will have to
Give your regular users Author access instead of Editor access in the database's Access Control List and assign them a role, which I'll call "AppUsers".
Give yourself and anyone else who will be responsible for managing the app a role which I'll call "AppAdmins".
Add a hidden computed field with type "Authors" to the form and set the initial value formula to
#If(#IsResponseDoc;"[AppAdmins]";"[AppUsers]":"[AppAdmins]")
Note that this will not have any effect on existing documents until you refresh and re-save them.
Then, you're going to have to hope that automatic versioning refreshes the documents. I'm not sure if it does or does not. If it does not, then you're probably going to have to give up on using the native versioning and write your own version using LotusScript. As I recall, that's what was done in the standard Lotus document library template, because the native versioning is pretty limited in what it can do.
As for your first question, I'm sorry but I really don't understand what you're asking. I can't tell in some parts whether you are telling us what you have already done, or what you want to do. Here on StackOverflow, the best way to get useful answers is to show us very clearly what you have tried, tell us what happens, and tell us what you thought should have happened instead. This is a place for helping you fix your code, not a place to get tutorials that amount to explicit instructions on how to write your code in the first place.
When I follow instructions to find a shelveset, I'm given a list of all my personal shelvesets. But what I want is to view and unshelve from another user's selection. Other developers can simply change the user to whoever they want. No such option exists for me.
I've told my TFS admin about this issue. The response I got was that "We haven’t locked anything down, you should be able to view others' shelvesets." Nevertheless, I can't see others' shelvesets.
What could be causing this? What specific issue or permission(s) should the TFS admin check to confirm "we havn't locked anything down?"
I also had this issue, and typing in other names didn't yield any results.
Instead I found that if I search for * then I can see all shelfsets and their name, and I can hover over the name to see the owner.
You should be able to simply type in a different user name in the Find Shelvesets window and hit Enter (if that's not working whats the error message):
There is a UserVoice idea for improvements to the Visual Studio Find Shelvesets Search box UI. Suggest you up vote that idea and add a comment regarding your specific issue. That might get some action from Microsoft.
In my current project environment (VS2015/TFS2013) you have to provide an exact user/AD account name. If you try a partial name you get an error msg
Could not retrieve shelvesets: TF14045: The identity calvert is not a recognized identity.
A wildcard character * works but generates too many results and you can't filter them.
The wildcard does not work when ot combined with a fragment; "calvert*" gives an error msg
Could not retrieve shelvesets: TF10131: The shelveset name calvert* contains more than 64 characters, contains one of the following characters: "/:<>\|*?; or ends with a space. Type a valid name and try again.
All in all a poor experience.
I have the following Message-level entry in my Error List from CodeContracts:
CodeContracts: Checked 410 assertions: 404 correct (6 masked)
I can't figure out:
What masked assertions are
How to locate the 6 that it mentions
Whether or not I should be concerned about them
Sorry for not posting code... I have no idea how to recreate this in a small sample :)
Many thanks
It's simple, in your project properties>Code Contracts>Static Checking> put the warning at "hi".
Now ccCheck made more warning.
Bye.
These seem to be assertions that are masked by virtue of their inclusion in the "baseline" file. From the documentation (emphasis mine):
6.6.8 Baseline
Bringing an existing code base to a point where the verier emits only a few warnings is dicult and time consuming, as it requires adding numerous contracts. To make it easier to use contracts on existing code bases, and to focus warnings introduced by new code or code changes, the Baseline functionality can be used.
To use the baseline functionality, check the box labelled Baseline and provide a file name to store the baseline in. The path is relative to the project output directory. When the analysis is run and the baseline file does not exist, the baseline is created. During this run, all warnings are shown in the output and stored in the baseline file as XML.
When the analysis is run and the baseline file exists, then the baseline acts as a filter and warnings already found in the baseline are not shown again. New warnings are shown and stored in a file called <baseline>.new, where <baseline> is the file name of the baseline file. Since the files are stored as textual XML, it is possible to edit them and to add additional failures to the baseline. The format does not depend on method ordering and additional XML tags for grouping can be introduced freely.
I was wondering about the "masked" messages, too; I turned off the "baseline" option, and they no longer appeared. The answer to your second question therefore seems to be "clear the 'baseline' check box."
As to whether you should be concerned about them, I would say, yes, you should.
I have a custom list which has customized edit and new forms which were required by the user.
I then tried to add a new item to a folder (folders have the text of the year e.g. 2010) and when I click save on the customized new form it saves correctly but always to the root of the list.
I am wondering if there is a fix or a work around for this as it is highly annoying.
Alternatively can anyone recommend a way to implement a field which will auto calculate + 1 year from creation date, which might be a possible alternative however it will have to take into account the following.
Where the current year runs october to september.
Thanks for any help this has been driving me mad trying to find a solution.
Can't help much without knowing what you based the custom form on, but for a new form the folder to save to usually shows up in the query string.
The form is a basic custom form list which I have then just modified parts to remove fields that are not required or need to be read only.
The original form worked perfectly and allowed items to be added to the list subfolders.
The new one has no additional code and is using the standard sharepoint DataFormWebPart to create the custom list form and so I have no back end code to insert the item etc, although I may have to resort to this...will I?
You need to be careful when modifying standard forms. I recommend you go back to a copy of the standard form and verify that that saves correctly. Remove the "unneeded" fields until it stops working.
Sometimes with this sort of customisation you need to use css rather than server side changes to modify the form so that the functionality remains in place after the component is hidden.
It is definitely not an issue with the removal of fields as I created a new copy of the original and then changed it to a custom field saved it and tried to add an item.
It went straight into the root.
I tried the original form and it saves to the sub folder correctly.
Okay only work around I have for this at moment (I am currently in discussion with MS) is this.
http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepointdesigner/archive/2007/06/13/using-javascript-to-manipulate-a-list-form-field.aspx
I used the method getTagFromIdentifierAndTitle(tagName, identifier, title)
This returned the element I was after and then I basically went to the row dom node and deleted it.
I am hoping to have a nicer method but at least it is a work around for now.
Not having much luck with this query in the ExpressionEngine forums and it's time-sensitive, so I figured I'd see if there's any EE-junkies hanging around Stack Overflow.
I'm working on an EE extension and I need to know what hooks to use to parse a custom field's contents when it's first saved, parse it before being displayed to be edited, and parse it when the edited contents are saved once more. My problem is I'm new to EE extension development, and I'm having trouble figuring out which in the long list of hooks I need to use. Best I can tell:
submit_new_entry_end is what I need to tie into when the entry is first created
publish_form_entry_data is what I need to tie into for parsing before the user edits the entry
And I must be overlooking the hook that will let me edit the entry data before it is saved back to the database. Anyone have some advice?
Thanks!
With trial and error, I finally answered my own question. The hooks that you want in order to parse a custom field's contents on save and reparse them before the entry is displayed are:
submit_new_entry_start (called whenever an entry is submitted; "new" appears to be meaningless)
publish_form_entry_data (I had this one right)