This question already has an answer here:
Installing gfortran in Linux as a user
(1 answer)
Closed 6 years ago.
Here is my question.
The linux cluster which I can use(not a sudo-user) has installed gcc 4.2.1.
>which gcc
>/usr/bin/gcc
For some reason, I need a newer version of gcc. So, I have install gcc 5.1.0 on /disk3/lly/lib/gcc-5.1.0(I can't install it in /usr/bin due to the limits of authority)
I still want the older version gcc 4.2.1, and sometimes I want to use gcc 5.1.0. So, I want to find a safe way switching them easily.
I have read some post, and summarized one simple method here:
## Overlay the older one
## Newer gcc at /disk3/lly/lib/gcc-5.1.0--> For simplification, take $NEW for insted
cd /usr/bin
sudo rm gcc
sudo ln -s $NEW/bin/gcc gcc
## Change back to gcc 4.2.1
sudo ln -sf /usr/bin/gcc gcc
But I don't have enough permission, are there some alternative way to achieve my target?
Short answer: gcc is built against a hard-coded installation path. Just copying somewhere else will not make it work. You will need to re-compile gcc (and, possibly binutils and maybe even the matching libc if it's not the same as the installed version) from scratch.
Your main problem at the moment is that $NEW/bin/gccis not in your PATH. once you add it like
export PATH=${NEW}/bin/gcc:${PATH}
it will start your version of the compiler frontend, but you will soon run into a bunch of other problems that are not that easy to solve.
Related
I work on CentOS 5.5 and my computer used gcc-4.1.2 until now, and under /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/ there were 2 indexes: 4.1.1 and 4.1.2. For using some softwares I must update the gcc.
But after I installed gcc-4.7.0 from the downloaded gcc-4.7.0.tar.gz (I did not use yum because when I tried it all servers told me that I had the latest version which was certainly not true, and perhaps this was also caused by the problem I now face with), the /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/ was created just like the 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 index, so under /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/ there were 3 indexes: 4.1.1, 4.1.2 and 4.7.0. And under /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/ there were 6 indexes:
bin include lib lib64 libexex share
It looked like that 4.7.0 was successfully installed but when I ran
gcc --version
the result was still
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
I also ran
update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0 40
to raise the priority of 4.7.0, and when I ran
update-alternatives --config gcc
it said
There is 1 program that provides 'gcc'.
Selection Command
-----------------------------------------------
*+ 1 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0
Enter to keep the current selection[+], or type selection number:
And I printed 1, all it looked like that 4.7.0 was selected as the default gcc, but when I ran gcc --version, the result was not changed! Still 4.1.2.
After that I even removed all 4.1.2 gcc and its related programs by rpm -e and deleted the index, but the result of gcc --version became
-bash: gcc: command not found.
It didn’t change when I reinstalled the 4.7.0.
After all, when I looked for the links of /usr/bin/gcc/ I found
/usr/bin/gcc -> /etc/alternatives/gcc
and link of /etc/alternatives/gcc was
/etc/alternatives/gcc -> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0
this should be the result of my running the update-alternatives line, so it has worked. It did make the link to 4.7.0. So why didn’t this link call 4.7.0 in the end? I can’t find out.
I even made the direct link to 4.7.0 then:
ln -s /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0 /usr/bin/gcc
however this still didn’t work.
I am very confused with it. I will be grateful for your help. Thank you very much!
p.s. Thank Basile Starynkevitch very much for noticing me to make these explanations:
I have /usr/bin/ in my PATH, so this should be OK.
I am teached that /usr/bin/gcc/ should be linked to an executable but not index, so the link to 4.7.0 is wrong. But could anyone tell me which executable to link to, or which executable is /usr/bin/ linked to in a common computer? This may very likely lead to the solution to the problem.
I cannot run configure one more time because configure itself requires gcc but now it is not found. So I'm afraid the problem cannot be fixed by that.
Be aware of the PATH variable. You could have some $HOME/bin/ in it.
Restore your system's gcc (so undo all the mess you have done). Then run which gcc and gcc -v to understand what is it exactly.
If you compile GCC from its source code (as distributed by the FSF), choose a recent version, e.g. GCC 8 in fall 2018.
Read carefully about installing GCC. Compile it outside of its source code. Be aware of the many configure options. I suggest to consider configuring it with some --program-suffix option (such as --program-suffix=-8) and then adding symlinks (e.g. $HOME/bin/gcc -> /usr/local/bin/gcc-8) appropriately.
ln -s /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0 /usr/bin/gcc
it is wrong. Since /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/ is some internal directory, and /usr/bin/gcc has to be an executable.
You probably don't need to run update-alternatives, but you do need to add (cleverly) something in a directory mentioned in your PATH
See also this answer to a similar question.
after edits in the question
You need first to clean up the mess you did under /usr/ (in particular in /usr/bin/ which you should never change without your package system). Remove all the things you added under /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/. Then re-install forcibly and explicitly appropriate system gcc packages (using yum or some other package manager).
I have /usr/bin/ in my PATH, so this should be OK.
Probably not. My recommendation is to have $HOME/bin/ and /usr/local/bin/ early in your PATH (so before /usr/bin/; you might need to edit ~/.bashrc to change your PATH setting) and to add your new gcc, as something like gcc-8 (if you compile GCC 8 from its source code), there. If you want a system wide installation, have some /usr/local/bin/gcc-8 program. If you want a personal installation, have some $HOME/bin/gcc-8 program (both could be absolute symlinks to somewhere else).
I am new to Cuda, and I am trying to compile this simple test_1.cu file:
#include <stdio.h>
__global__ void kernel(void)
{
}
int main (void)
{
kernel<<<1,1>>>();
printf( "Hello, World!\n");
return 0;
}
using this: nvcc test_1.cu
The output I get is:
In file included from /usr/local/cuda/bin/../include/cuda_runtime.h:59:0,
from <command-line>:0:
/usr/local/cuda/bin/../include/host_config.h:82:2: error: #error -- unsupported GNU version! gcc 4.5 and up are not supported!
my gcc --version:
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) 4.6.1
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
How can I install a second version of gcc (4.4 -) along with 4.6 without messing everything up?
I found this old topic:
CUDA incompatible with my gcc version
the answer was:
gcc 4.5 and 4.6 are not supported with CUDA - code won't compile and
the rest of the toolchain, including cuda-gdb, won't work properly.
You cannot use them, and the restriction is non-negotiable.
Your only solution is to install a gcc 4.4 version as a second
compiler (most distributions will allow that). There is an option to
nvcc --compiler-bindir which can be used to point to an alternative
compiler. Create a local directory and the make symbolic links to the
supported gcc version executables. Pass that local directory to nvcc
via the --compiler-bindir option, and you should be able to compile
CUDA code without effecting the rest of your system.
But I have no idea how to do it
In my case I didn't have root rights, so I couldn't fully replace the current gcc (4.7) with the older version 4.4 (which I think would be a bad alternative). Although I did have rights where CUDA was installed. My solution was to create an extra folder (e.g. /somepath/gccfornvcc/), wherever I had rights, then to create a link to an nvcc accepted compiler. I already had gcc 4.4 available (but you can install it, without removing your current version).
ln -s [path to gcc 4.4]/gcc-4.4 /somepath/gccfornvcc/gcc
Then, in the same folder where the nvcc binary lives, you should find a file called nvcc.profile . There you just need to add the following line:
compiler-bindir = /somepath/gccfornvcc
And that will make nvcc use the proper compiler. This helps keeping the system in a proper state, keeping the newest compiler, but nvcc (only nvcc) will use the old compiler version.
Doing some research online shows several methods for accomplishing this task. I just tested the method found here: http://www.vectorfabrics.com/blog/item/cuda_4.0_on_ubuntu_11.04 and it worked like a charm for me. It steps you through installing gcc 4.4 and creating scripts to run that version with nvcc. If you prefer trying the method mentioned in your post I'd recommend following that first link to install gcc4.4 and then create symbolic links as mentioned in your post. Creating symbolic links in Linux is accomplished by using the 'ln' command.
For example:
ln -s [source file/folder path] [linkpath]
This link gives a few examples of creating symbolic links on both Ubuntu and Windows: http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/16226/complete-guide-to-symbolic-links-symlinks-on-windows-or-linux/. Hopefully that points you in the right direction.
I guess you may try the new, beta, version, that based on LLVM.
Another way to make nvcc work with non-default compiler (unlike #Sluml's answer, it allows more flexibility):
At first, just like #Slump proposed, you need to create directory ~/local/gcc-4.4/, and then create there symlinks for right versions of gcc: for i in gcc gxx; do ln -s /usr/bin/${i}-4.4 ~/local/cudagcc/${i}; done. Now when you run nvcc -ccbin ~/local/gcc-4.4/ ... nvcc will use correct versions of gcc.
Here is small CMake snippet of forcing nvcc use specific host compiler.
option (CUDA_ENFORCE_HOST_COMPILER "Force nvcc to use the same compiler used to compile .c(pp) files insted of gcc/g++" OFF)
if (${CUDA_ENFORCE_HOST_COMPILER})
set (CMAKE_GCC_TEMP_DIR "CMakeGCC")
file(MAKE_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_GCC_TEMP_DIR})
execute_process(COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E create_symlink ${CMAKE_C_COMPILER} ${CMAKE_GCC_TEMP_DIR}/gcc)
execute_process(COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E create_symlink ${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER} ${CMAKE_GCC_TEMP_DIR}/g++)
set(CUDA_NVCC_FLAGS -ccbin ${CMAKE_GCC_TEMP_DIR} ${CUDA_NVCC_FLAGS})
endif()
Reference：
I update my gcc from 4.4 to 4.6. Then I could not use nvcc to compile my code. Luckily, by using the method provided by the following link. I set my default gcc compiler back to gcc 4.4. Now, I could compile file using either gcc4.4 or gcc4.6. quit cool
http://ubuntuguide.net/how-to-install-and-setup-gcc-4-1g4-1-in-ubuntu-10-0410-10
Working with embedded C-projects. There are libraries, include files and so on - for micro controllers. No need for me to use GCC for a host machine and OS (Linux Mint 64 bit). As a rule...
But now I'm trying to compile mspdebug project from a Github - with a GCC of course. And I get an error at the very begin of make:
mspdebug$ make
cc -DUSE_READLINE -O1 -Wall -Wno-char-subscripts -ggdb -I. -Isimio -Iformats -Itransport -Idrivers -Iutil -Iui -DLIB_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/\" -o util/btree.o -c util/btree.c
util/btree.c:19:20: fatal error: assert.h: No such file or directory
#include <assert.h>
^
compilation terminated.
I search for the includes in all possible paths (I've got the list of them via gcc -v command) - there are no assert.h file, as well, as stdio.h and so on. Except virtual box directories there is only one place (where GCC does not search includes): /usr/lib/syslinux/com32/include
AFAIK, all standard libs and includes are installed with the GCC. So I try to reinstall GCC (4.8.4) - nothing changes.
What is the normal way to give GCC all standard environment it needs?
Thanks to the right direction set by Sam Varshavchik I found the info in the stackoverflow. So I did the following:
1) installed build-essential:
sudo apt-get install build-essential
2) installed libusb (since my try to build the package revealed the absence of usb.h):
sudo apt-get install libusb-dev
And it is OK! The mspdebug (v.023) is compiled and successfully tested!
So, Linux Mint 17.2 (at least) requires installing some libs to a GCC, the most basic is build-essential.
assert.h is not part of gcc, it's a part of glibc.
Most likely, your Linux distribution puts the system headers into a separate package that you need to install.
Fedora, for examples, puts the header files in the glibc-headers package. However, you can't be using Fedora, because Fedora's gcc package has a dependency on glibc-headers, to make sure that it gets pulled in.
Whatever Linux distribution you're using, you need to research which distribution package will install the system header files you need to build stuff with.
While building gcc, I get this error:
In file included from /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25,
from /usr/include/errno.h:36,
from ../.././gcc/tsystem.h:96,
from ../.././gcc/crtstuff.c:68:
/usr/include/linux/errno.h:4:23: error: asm/errno.h: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [crtbegin.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/gcc-4.1.2/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc'
I am building gcc 4.1 from source. I think I have to install build-essential. However installing that package in ubuntu 12.04 will automatically download and install gcc 4.6 and I don't want that.
Is there any other way?
I think the package you want is linux-libc-dev . I encountered this when building 32-on-64; so I needed linux-libc-dev:i386 .
This worked for me:
ln -s /usr/include/asm-generic /usr/include/asm
This worked for me:
sudo ln -s /usr/include/asm-generic /usr/include/asm
The reason being that what GCC expects to be called /usr/include/asm is renamed to /usr/include/asm-generic in some distros.
This fixed it for me.
sudo apt-get install linux-libc-dev:i386
This solved it for me on Debian 10, even though I was compiling with an LLVM-based compiler:
sudo apt install gcc-multilib
/usr/include/asm/errno.h is part of the linux headers. I can't speak directly to Ubuntu 12.04, but in general you can download the linux sources as a package for your distro and it shouldn't require you to download/install gcc. Failing that, you can manually download the linux headers for the version of your kernel (uname -a) and use an include directive to CFLAGS to specify the directory to look for those.
Edit: sudo apt-get install linux-headers-generic may work for you.
You are missing part of the development packages. I don't know Ubuntu, but you should be able to ask it's package management system to install the package containing /usr/include/asm/errno.h.
Do not copy some file with a similar name from somewhere on your system (or, even worse, from somewhere else). Missing files might mean that some package is damaged; again, ask your package manager to check everything and (re)install missing/broken pieces.
Unless you are running some LTS release, upgrade. Your Ubuntu is some 2 years old, i.e., ancient.
While we are at this, why on this beautiful planet are you building such an ancient compiler? Current GCC is just released 4.9.0, anything before 4.7 is ancient history, not longer supported.
On Ubuntu 16.04 x86_64 you could try this:
ln -s /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/asm /usr/include/asm
This works on my server.
If you want to use errno.h that is in the asm file, simply go to /usr/(ctrl + l, type /usr/) and then search for errno.h and errno-base.h. Once you did find them, copy the code in these two files, and place them in your include folder. And be careful, in "errno.h" the file includes "errno-base.h" as:
#include <asm-generic/errno-base.h>
Either create a directory with the same name above or change the code above to something different which is suitable for you to use.
If you can find:
usr/include/asm-generic/errno.h
by executing:
find /usr/include -name errno.h
then try to execute:
cp --archive /usr/include/asm-generic /usr/include/asm
It may fix that problem.
I had this issue while compiling Asterisk 1.8.24.0 and solved it with:
mkdir /usr/include/asm-generic
cp /usr/include/asm/errno-base.h /usr/include/asm-generic/
Don't know if it is the "right way" but i've read the comments above and that gave me the idea... and it worked :)
This is part of some instructions that I was given from a website helping me install CUDA on a hybrid system. I'm using ubuntu 12.04 LTS dual booted as well as having a hybrid graphics card system of Intel Integrated Graphics and NVIDIA GEForce GT 540M.
--external instructions--
The last thing that might cause issues is the version of gcc and g++. Long story short, make sure the pointers gcc and g++ in /usr/bin (and subsequently /usr/local/cuda/bin) are pointing to gcc-4.5 and g++-4.5 (can get these with apt-get) since they are the most recent versions supported by nvcc. Use the soft-link command to achieve this.
--back to me--
Assuming that downloading them with
apt-get install gcc-4.5 g++-4.5
will suffice for that part.
However, how do I make sure that the 'pointers' (how do I identify those?) are linked to the recently downloaded versions. I know the soft link command is
ln -s "target" "symbol" (one for gcc)
ln -s "target" "symbol" (one for g++)
I don't want to do this wrong and I'm quite new to linux so please help me with what 'target' should look like as well as 'symbol' and I'll be on my way.
Alex
It's better to use update alternatives for managing default gcc for your system. For example, you have two versions 4.4 and 4.5. For CUDA you need 4.4.x version of gcc/ Lets set it system default:
sudo update-alternatives \
--install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.5 40 \
--slave /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.5
sudo update-alternatives \
--install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.4 60 \
--slave /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.4
Soft links might be work, but I think, update alternatives is the easiest way.