I have troubles using ExtendedExecutionSession in Windows 10 UAP.
First, it seems that ExtendedExecutionSession.RequestExtensionAsync only returns Allowed if it is called from the app Suspending event handler. If it is called outside this event handler the method returns Denied.
Second, most critical problem. My app executes downloads. If any download is in progress I request ExtendedExecutionSession to allow downloads to complete. What I found at least on Windows 10 mobile though is ExtendedExecutionSession is allowed in app on suspend but downloads seem to freeze. Nothing is downloaded while app is in background and when app is resumed downloads appear frozen with no data transferred.
Here is the MSDN guidance for Extended Execution: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/launch-resume/run-minimized-with-extended-execution
SavingData is the only type of Extended Execution Reason that can be used in the Suspending state. Note that this is specifically for saving critical user data locally that will be lost once the process is removed from memory.
It sounds like you should use the Unspecified Extended Execution if you need to accomplish something when your app is running and in the foreground. It will be revoked if the user decides to close the app before the download operation completes. Like was previously suggested, a background transfer or use of the ApplicationTrigger or MaintenanceTrigger may be better options for these downloads if you want them to continue after your app has been closed.
Related
I'm writing a UAP C#/XAML application, for the time being I'm interested in case when user runs my app in desktop environment (case when keyobard and mouse are available, the machine is running some version of Windows 10 not Windows 10 Mobile).
I want to intercept ALT+F4 in order to ask user a few important questions before they quit, like in for example notepad - when you have unsaved file and the notepad notifies you about this fact and asks if you want to save your work, quit without saving or go back to working with your file.
Is such a behaviour possible in Windows 10 UAP? I tried to play with Application.Suspending event and ExtendedExecutionSession, but it seems like before this event is fired the GUI thread is dead, and all I can do in this event's handler are operations not requiring user interaction.
There is no way to intercept and stop events like this.
By the time your app is told it is suspending following a close event (alt+f4, cross clicked) you have 10 seconds (on desktop) to clear up and save state before you are completely terminated.
With universal apps, you shouldn't need a dialog asking them to save or not, just save state so next time they reopen you refresh the view to how it was before, or, think mail client, save their typings as a draft. The guidance on Microsoft is, however, that if the user closes your app, assume they want you gone so don't restore state.
The only thing you can do for some extra processing is ask the OS for extended execution, though this isn't guaranteed and even if granted can be revoked with 1s notice to termination. It's important to note that, even with extended execution granted, you app is not allowed any UI.
For more information on Windows 10 universal application lifecycle, I'd recommend watching the Application Lifecycle session on Microsoft Virtual Academy.
I'm in the process of designing an application that will run on a headless Windows CE 6.0 device. The idea is to make an application that will be started at startup and run until powered off. (Basically it will look like a service, but an application is easier to debug without the complete hassle to stop/deploy/start/attach to process procedure)
My concern is what will happen during development. If I debug/deploy the application I see no way of closing it in a friendly and easy way. (Feel free to suggest if this can be done in a better/user friendly way) I will just stop the debugger and the result will be WSACleanup is not called.
Now, the question. What is the consequence of not calling WSACleanup? Will I be able to start and run the winsock application again using the debugger? Or will there be a resource leak preventing me to do so?
Thanks in advance,
Jef
I think that Harry Johnston comment is correct.
Even if your application has no UI you can find a way to close it gracefully. I suppose that you have one or more threads in loops, you can add a named manual reset event that is checked (or can be used for waits instead of Sleep()) inside the loop condition and build a small application that opens the event using the same name, sets it and quits. This would force also your service app to close.
It may not be needed for debugging, but it may be useful also if you'll need to update your software and this requires that your main service is not running.
I am new to mobile website development, and facing this issue where I want to refresh data on the website in every 30 sec which is invoked from the client side and server provides the data in response. Problem is when I close the browser or when the browser goes in background it stops working. Is there any thing we can do to make this thing possible?
Have a look at the Android Developers - Processes and Threads guide. You'll get a deeper introduction to how process life-cycles work and what the difference is between the states for background- and foreground processes.
You could embed your web app in a WebView. This way you could deal with the closing browser case: you could provide a means to "exit" the app that involves closing only your container activity. That way the timers you have registered in javascript will still be running in the 'WebViewCoreThread'. This is an undesirable behavior and a source of problems, but you can take advantage of it if you want (just make sure you don't run UI-related code there). I've never tested this in Kit Kat (which uses a different WebView based on Chrome) but works for previous versions, as I described here.
Now the user can always close any app. Even without user interaction, the OS can kill your app on low memory. So just give up on long-running apps that never end, because the OS is designed in such a way this is simply not possible.
You could go native and schedule Alarms using the AlarmManager.
Just checked this out on the Android KitKat WebView and as per Mister Smith's comments the javascript will continue executing in the background until the Activity is killed off:
Just tested with this running in a WebView:
http://jsbin.com/EwEjIyaY/3/edit
My gut instinct is that if the user has moved your application into the background, there seems little value in performing updates every 30 seconds, it makes more sense to just start updating again once the user opens the device up and cache what information you currently have available to you.
As far as Chrome for Android goes the same is happening, as Chrome falls into the background the javascript is still running.
If you are experiencing different behaviour then what exactly are you seeing and can you give us an example?
I have a classic ASP application that has been stable for years and now we're having all kinds of problems with it. After moving the app between machines and wiping the original so we could have a fresh install of windows, we've come to the following "symptom". The app pools do not appear to allow for multiple simultaneous requests. Here's what we are seeing:
The app runs normally for most people, but when someone within one of the app pools accesses a long-running script (usually one with lots of DB access) all of the other users in the pool must wait for that script to complete. Once the script completes, everyone else's requests run. This initially made us suspect the DB connection string or something.
UNTIL... we noticed also that large file uploads into our system also cause the app pool to stop responding. What's interesting about this is that we're using the SAFileup COM+ object to do our uploads, which has a progress display in a pop-up window. When you go to upload the file, the progress display comes up, but then never refreshes to show upload progress. If you wait it out, however, the file will eventually upload and the other pending requests will process as normal.
Our app pools are in the default configuration, using the IWAM account to launch. I checked to ensure that the IWAM account has all the appropriate permissions. It does.
We've tried a variety of DB connection strings, none solved the problem (though I'm thinking it's not the DB connection string). Just in case someone thinks it is, here's our connection string: "Provider=SQLNCLI;Trusted_Connection=yes;Server=(local);Database=demo;". It couldn't be simpler. This string was previously not a problem.
I fussed with the web gardens thing and it does, indeed, make the system respond to multiple requests, but each worker thread in the garden has its own session state which causes our users to get booted when their request gets randomly assigned to a new worker thread. Only having a single worker process in the garden was never an issue before anyway.
I've used SQL Profiler and sp_who2 to see if during the long-running scripts there are any deadlocks or blocks on the SQL Server. There are not.
The issues initially started after we had installed some patches from Microsoft. We wiped a machine clean and installed Win2k3 server, then SP2, and then didn't patch anymore after that. The problem remained, so it doesn't appear to have been a patch.
I'm pretty much at a loss now... does anyone have any experience with similar issues? If so, how were they fixed?
Check that you don't have ASP debugging enabled on the server. This will force the ASP script engine to run on a single thread.
Sounds like an limit on the number of concurrent incoming requests to the IIS or the Windows Server..
Check out http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david.wang/archive/2006/04/12/howto-maximize-the-number-of-concurrent-connections-to-iis6.aspx and http://forums.iis.net/p/1152112/1880908.aspx#1880908 on how to tweak the settings.
We are having a web application build using asp.net 3.5 & SQL server as database which is quite big and used by around 300 super users for managing around 5000 staffs.
Now we are implementing SMS functionality into the application which means the users will be able to send and receive SMS. Every two minute the SMS server of the third party is pinged to check whether there are any new messages. Also SMS are hold in queue and send every time interval of 15 to 30 minutes.
I want this checking and sending process to run in the background of the application all the time, even if the user closes the browser window.
I need some advice on how do I do this?
Will using thread will achieve this or do I need to create a windows service for it or are there any other options?
More information:
I want to execute a task in a timer, what will happen if I close the browser window, the task wont be completed isn't it so.
For example I am saving 10 records to the database in a time interval of 5 minutes, which means every 5 minutes when the timer tick event fires, a record is inserted into the database.
How do I run this task if I close the browser window?
I tried looking at windows service but how do I pass a generic collection of data to it for processing.
There really is no thread or service choice, a service can (and usually is!) multi threaded, a thread can start a service.
There are three basic choices you can:-
Somehow start another thread running when a user logs in -- this is probably a very poor choice for what you want, as you cannot really keep it running once the user session is lost.
Write a fully fledged windows service which is starts on OS startup and continues running unitl the server is shutdown. You can make this dependant on the SQLserver service, so it starts after the DB is available. This is the "best" solution but may be overkill for your purposes. Aslo you need to know the services API to write it properly as you need to respond correctly to shutdown and status requests.
You can schedule your task periodically using either the Windows schedular, or, preferably the schedular which is built in to SQLServer, I think this would be the most suitable option for your needs.
Distinguish between what the browser is doing and what's happening server-side.
Your Web App is sitting server-side waiting for requests from whatever browsers may be running, and servicing those requests, in servicing those requests I guess it may well put messages on a queue and have a look in a database for any new messages.
You want the daemon processor, which talks to the third-party SMS, to be triggered by time rather than by browser function. Either of your suggestions would work:
A competely independent service could run and work against the queues and database.
Your web app, which I assume is already a service, could spawn a thread
In either case we have a few technical questions of avoiding any race conditions between the browser-request processing and the daemon - but databases and queueing systems can deal with that.
So I would decide between stand-alone daemon and background thread like this:
Which is easier to implement? I'm a Java EE developer, I know in my app server I have an API for specifying code to be run according to a timer, the API deals with the threading issues. So for me that's very easy. I don't know what you have available. Timers are not quite as trivial as they may appear - so having a reliable API is beneficial. If this was a more complex requirement, where the daemon code were gnarly and might possibly interfere with the WebApp code then I might prefer to keep it conspicuously separate.
Which is easier to deploy and administer? Deploy separate Web App and daemon, or deploy one thing. In the Java EE world we could have a single Enterprise Application with all the code, so that's a single thing to deploy, start and control.
One other thing to consider: Scaling and Resilience. You might choose to have more than one copy of your web app running, either to provide fail-over capabilities or just because you need the extra power. In which case how many daemons would you have? Would it be a problem to have two daemons running? You might need some extra code to mediate between two daemons, for example log in the database the time of last work, each daemon can say "Oh, my buddy balready did the 10:30 job, I'll go back to sleep"