I'm having some troubles to find the right way to approach this problem:
I've got a situation like the following:
<ul>
<li class="section">
<a href="#">
<img src="path/to/img.png">
<span class="title">Section 1</span>
</a>
</li>
<li class="section">
<a href="#">
<img src="path/to/img-2.png">
<span class="title">Section 2</span>
</a>
</li>
</ul>
Now within a 12 cols grid, I've got that .section is defined as:
.section {
position: relative;
#include span(6);
}
and so far so good.
Now I've defined the .title to be hover the image like:
.title {
display: block;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
[edit] the configuration I'm using has got the following definition:
susy: (
gutter-position: inside;
);
but I can't use width: 100%; because it won't work, and I do need to manually give it a width, whereas a value computed out of span() won't work e.g. width: span(6 of 6); due to the gutter-position that sets the padding instead of the margin.
Is there any good or consistent way to go around this problem?
Should I just stick to the default after or before for gutter-position?
You need to set the left property in order to align your title with the container, and then you can either set right or width to get the full width:
.title {
display: block;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
or
.title {
display: block;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
}
Related
I cannot use text align to move the pages in the navbar to the right while using display: inline-block.
https://www.w3schools.com/w3css/tryw3css_templates_architect.htm
I want to only use display: inline-block to make a navbar like the one shown in this link (the logo to the left and the pages/links to the right)
You can wrap the page links in their own element and position that element absolute to the right.
In the snippet below I use a <ul> for the page links and position it to the right.
nav {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
}
ul, li, a {
display: inline-block;
}
ul {
position: absolute;
right: 0;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
a {
padding: 10px;
background-color: lightslategray;
color: #fff;
text-decoration: none;
}
<nav>
<b>BR</b> Architects
<ul>
<li>Projects</li>
<li>About</li>
<li>Contact</li>
</ul>
</nav>
TL;DR: Here's a CodePen.
I have a UI with an image and a grid of text with long lines which looks like this:
I'm using CSS Flexbox with two elements: the image and the text. And then to lay out the text, I'm using CSS Grid. Now, when I view this on a narrow screen for mobile, it correctly wraps everything and stacks the two elements:
But on desktop, with a slightly narrower div, the flex box wraps before the grid text like this:
How can I get the text to wrap while leaving the flex box alone in this case? I fear I may need to use some media queries, but I'm not even sure if I'm using the right CSS components for this.
Here's the code:
index.html:
<div class="media-callout">
<div class="media-thumb">
<img height="170" width="120">
</div>
<div class="media-callout-grid">
<div class="media-callout-key">Authors</div>
<div>Babalola, J & Ogunkola, Babalola</div>
<div class="media-callout-key">Year</div>
<div>2013</div>
<div class="media-callout-key">Title</div>
<div class="media-callout-value">Scientific Literacy: Conceptual Overview, Importance and Strategies for Improvement</div>
<div class="media-callout-key">Journal</div>
<div><em>Journal of Educational and Social Research</em></div>
<div class="media-callout-key">Location</div>
<div>vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 265–274</div>
<div class="media-callout-key">DOI</div>
<div>10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n1p265</div>
</div>
</div>
style.css:
.media-callout {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: center;
row-gap: 20px;
column-gap: 10px;
padding: 1em;
max-width: max-content;
}
.media-thumb img {
float: left;
height: 175px;
width: auto;
}
.media-callout-grid {
display: grid;
font-size: 12pt;
grid-template-columns: 6em 1fr;
align-content: center;
gap: 0 15px;
}
.media-callout-key {
text-align: right;
font-weight: bold;
}
.media-callout-value {
word-break: break-word;
word-wrap: break-all;
}
A media query does indeed resolve this:
#media screen and (min-width: 600px) {
.media-callout {
flex-wrap: nowrap;
}
}
The query must come AFTER the .media-callout block. I also had to use this approach to prevent the image from being squashed.
I finished my website but I didn't realize that safari doesn't support the flexbox gap. Is there a way around this without having the mess anything up? This is mostly for my media queries.
<div class="social-media">
<a href="https://github.com/">
<img class="social-media__icon" src="img/github.png" alt="Github">
</a>
<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/">
<img class="social-media__icon" src="img/linkedin.png" alt="LinkedIn">
</a>
</div>
.social-media {
display: -webkit-box;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: flex;
-webkit-box-pack: center;
-ms-flex-pack: center;
justify-content: center;
gap: 8rem;
margin-top: 10rem;
padding-bottom: 2rem;
}
.social-media img {
width: 90px;
height: 90px;
}
#media only screen and (max-width: 400px) {
.social-media {
gap: 3rem;
margin-top: 5rem;
}
.social-media img {
width: 62px;
height: 62px;
}
}
Use the Lobotomized owl selector: .parent > * + * {} to add a margin-left that gives you space between the elements that come after another element, this way you eliminate the undesired margin it creates when you put the margin directly to the child's first element (.social-media img{})
.social-media > * + * { margin-left: 8rem;}
Here you can read more about the Lobotomized Owl Selector
Edit: Gap is now supported in safari so you should be able to use it no problem.
Property gap with display: flex is not supported by Safar version < 14 https://caniuse.com/flexbox-gap .
You might want to replace display flex with grid:
display: grid;
grid-gap: 8rem; /* Safari 10-11 */
gap: 8rem; /* Safari 12+ */
because grid's gap is supported in older Safari versions: https://caniuse.com/mdn-css_properties_gap_grid_context
The accepted answer has the problem, that you will have a wrong margin on the first element if when there is only one row. Also centered elements will always be 8rem too far the right.
Better solution that will always work with correct spacings:
.container {
display: flex;
// the trick is to set margins around boxes, but correct the margins around elements that are situated at the border of the container with negative margins
margin: 0 -10px -20px -10px;
}
.box {
min-width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: deeppink;
margin: 0 10px 20px 10px;
}
<div class='container'>
<div class='box'>1</div>
<div class='box'>2</div>
<div class='box'>3</div>
<div class='box'>4</div>
</div>
You can remove the gap class and add another one to child elements
<div class="d-flex"> // it was "d-flex gap" previously
<div class="mx-2">
//content
</div>
<div class="mx-2">
//content
</div>
</div>
I think you could make a div container and put justify-content: space-between; then i think it should work
If you look here... http://matiny.tk/Mixed%20Swim/Mixed.html
This is a simple site I'm making. It uses Bootstrap to switch the menu when the screen shrinks. Nicely enough, the Menu label/checkbox combo is not working, though it has worked on another site of mine. This is the relevant code...
<label for="menulogo" id="menulabel" class="visible-sm visible-xs"><img src="Menu.png"></label>
<input type="checkbox" id="menulogo">
</nav>
<nav id="menu">
SHOP
ABOUT
BLOG
GALLERY
CONTACT
</nav>
label {
font-size: 40px;
width: 100%;
color: white;
z-index: 2;
}
#menulogo {
opacity: 0;
}
#menu a {
background: rgba(0,0,0,.35);
font-size: 50px;
color: white;
height: 75px;
}
#menu {
margin-top: 100px;
text-align:center;
z-index: 3;
display: none;
position: fixed;
}
#menulogo:checked + #menu {
display: block;
}
As it turns out, my order of elements was incorrect. If one is going to use something like... #menulogo:checked + #menu, then the + or ~ selector means that the nav with #menu has to go right after the checkbox input, like so...
<label for="menulogo" id="menulabel" class="visible-sm visible-xs"><img src="Menu.png"> MENU</label>
<input type="checkbox" id="menulogo">
<!--These must be in sequence-->
<nav id="menu">
SHOP
ABOUT
BLOG
GALLERY
CONTACT
</nav>
I have a problem with safari. I have searched for 6 hours straight for a fix, so exscuse me if my explanation is bad. So the thing is: I have added a hover effect on my thumbnails, it works in all browsers, but the thumbs are not placed correctly in safari and IE.
I have tried to use:
#media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0){
img.a {
position: absolute;
top: -500;
z-index: 10;
}
img.b {
position: absolute;
top: -500;
}
}
But this works for webkit browser, meaning chrome as well.
The css I am currently using which works in chrome and firefox:
img.a {
position: absolute;
top: -500;
margin-left: -115px;
z-index: 10;
width: 230px;
height: 120px;
border: none;
}
img.b {
position: absolute;
top: -500;
margin-left: -115px;
width: 230px;
height: 120px;
border: none;
}
If anyone has a solution it would really save my day :)
Here is the site if you need to inspect: www.janthorb.com
Get rid of the CSS
div#thumbnails {
text-align:center;
}
and also get rid of your margin-left: -115px for your images and you will have something that works in both browswers.
You page code is a mess, no alignment. HTML structure is not reasonable, and cause CSS also is very not science. I rewrote your structure, you can reference.
.demo{ width:820px;margin:0 auto;}
.list{ margin-right:-20px; zoom:1;}
.list li{ float:left; width:230px; height:135px; margin:0 36px 25px 0; overflow:hidden; zoom:1;}
.link{ position:relative;width:228px; height:120px; display:block;border:thin dashed #1b1b1b; overflow:hidden;}
.link img{ position:absolute;top:0;left:0; }
.link .gray{ z-index:11;}
.link .hover{ z-index:10;}
<ul class="list">
<li>
<a class="link" href="#">
<img class="gray" src="http://www.janthorb.com/thumb1_bw.jpg" alt="">
<img class="hover" src="http://www.janthorb.com/thumb1.jpg" alt="">
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a class="link" href="#">
<img class="gray" src="http://www.janthorb.com/thumb1_bw.jpg" alt="">
<img class="hover" src="http://www.janthorb.com/thumb1.jpg" alt="">
</a>
</li>
</ul>
and demo is here